The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
A remove callback that just returns 0 is equivalent to no callback at
all as can be seen in platform_remove(). So simplify accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
As described in the added code comment, a reference to .exit.text is ok
for drivers registered via module_platform_driver_probe(). Make this
explicit to prevent a section mismatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
As described in the added code comment, a reference to .exit.text is ok
for drivers registered via module_platform_driver_probe(). Make this
explicit to prevent a section mismatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
As described in the added code comment, a reference to .exit.text is ok
for drivers registered via module_platform_driver_probe(). Make this
explicit to prevent a section mismatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
As described in the added code comment, a reference to .exit.text is ok
for drivers registered via module_platform_driver_probe(). Make this
explicit to prevent a section mismatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
As described in the added code comment, a reference to .exit.text is ok
for drivers registered via module_platform_driver_probe(). Make this
explicit to prevent a section mismatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002080529.2535610-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Some devices (e.g. BCM72112) use an alarm_irq interrupt that is
connected to a level interrupt controller rather than an edge
interrupt controller. In this case, the interrupt cannot be left
enabled by the irq handler while preserving the hardware wake-up
signal on wake capable devices or an interrupt storm will occur.
The alarm_expired flag is introduced to allow the disabling of
the interrupt when an alarm expires and to support balancing the
calls to disable_irq() and enable_irq() in accordance with the
existing design.
Fixes: 24304a8715 ("rtc: brcmstb-waketimer: allow use as non-wake alarm")
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230830224747.1663044-1-opendmb@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subsystem:
- Add a way for drivers to tell the core the supported alarm range is smaller
than the date range. This is not used yet but will be useful for the
alarmtimers in the next release.
- fix Wvoid-pointer-to-enum-cast warnings
- remove redundant of_match_ptr()
- stop warning for invalid alarms when the alarm is disabled
Drivers:
- isl12022: allow setting the trip level for battery level detection
- pcf2127: add support for PCF2131 and multiple timestamps
- stm32: time precision improvement, many fixes
- twl: NVRAM support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=4kkJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'rtc-6.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux
Pull RTC updates from Alexandre Belloni:
"Subsystem:
- Add a way for drivers to tell the core the supported alarm range is
smaller than the date range. This is not used yet but will be
useful for the alarmtimers in the next release.
- fix Wvoid-pointer-to-enum-cast warnings
- remove redundant of_match_ptr()
- stop warning for invalid alarms when the alarm is disabled
Drivers:
- isl12022: allow setting the trip level for battery level detection
- pcf2127: add support for PCF2131 and multiple timestamps
- stm32: time precision improvement, many fixes
- twl: NVRAM support"
* tag 'rtc-6.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux: (73 commits)
dt-bindings: rtc: ds3231: Remove text binding
rtc: wm8350: remove unnecessary messages
rtc: twl: remove unnecessary messages
rtc: sun6i: remove unnecessary message
rtc: stop warning for invalid alarms when the alarm is disabled
rtc: twl: add NVRAM support
rtc: pcf85363: Allow to wake up system without IRQ
rtc: m48t86: add DT support for m48t86
dt-bindings: rtc: Add ST M48T86
rtc: pcf2127: remove useless check
rtc: rzn1: Report maximum alarm limit to rtc core
rtc: ds1305: Report maximum alarm limit to rtc core
rtc: tps6586x: Report maximum alarm limit to rtc core
rtc: cmos: Report supported alarm limit to rtc infrastructure
rtc: cros-ec: Detect and report supported alarm window size
rtc: Add support for limited alarm timer offsets
rtc: isl1208: Fix incorrect logic in isl1208_set_xtoscb()
MAINTAINERS: remove obsolete pattern in RTC SUBSYSTEM section
rtc: tps65910: Remove redundant dev_warn() and do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq()
rtc: omap: Do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq()
...
The RTC core already prints a message when the RTC is registered and when
registering fails, it is not necessary to have more in the driver.
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827221643.544259-3-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The core already print a message once the rtc is successfully registered,
it is not necessary to print an other one.
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827221643.544259-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
When the alarm is not enabled, it may never have been set and so we can't
expect it to be valid. This will prevent the apparition of boot messages
like this one:
rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: 2023-7-8 45:85:85
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827221532.543353-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
When wakeup-source is set in the devicetree, set up the device for
using the output as interrupt instead of clock. This is similar to
how other RTC devices handle this.
This allows the clock chip to turn on the board when wired to do
so in hardware.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821072013.7072-1-mike.looijmans@topic.nl
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
RZN1 only supports alarms up to one week in the future.
Report the limit to the RTC core and use the reported limit
to validate the requested alarm time when setting it.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817225537.4053865-8-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
DS1305 only supports alarms up to 24 hours in the future.
Report the limit to the RTC core, and use the reported limit
to validate the requested alarm time when setting it.
If the alarm is too large when trying to set an alarm, return -ERANGE
instead of -EDOM to align with error codes returned by other rtc drivers.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817225537.4053865-7-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
tps6586x only supports alarms up to 16,383 seconds in the future.
Report the limit to the RTC core.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817225537.4053865-6-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The alarm window supported by the cmos RTC depends on the chip
and its configuration. Report the limit to the RTC core.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817225537.4053865-5-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC on some older Chromebooks can only handle alarms less than
24 hours in the future. The only way to find out is to try to set
an alarm further in the future. If that fails, assume that the RTC
connected to the EC can only handle less than 24 hours of alarm
window, and report that value to the RTC core.
After that change, it is no longer necessary to limit the alarm time
when setting it. Report any excessive alarms to the caller instead.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817225537.4053865-4-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The XTOSCB bit is not bit 0, but xtosb_val is either 0 or 1. If it is 1,
test will never succeed. Fix this issue by using double negation.
While at it, remove unnecessary blank line from probe().
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZN4BgzG2xmzOzdFZ@duo.ucw.cz/
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817161038.407960-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not possible for platform_get_irq() to return 0. Use the
return value from platform_get_irq().
And there is no need to call the dev_warn() function directly to print
a custom message when handling an error from platform_get_irq()
function as it is going to display an appropriate error message
in case of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803080713.4061782-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not possible for platform_get_irq() to return 0. Use the
return value from platform_get_irq().
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803080713.4061782-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This keeps the IRQ enabled during system suspend, if the RTC's wakeup
source is enabled. Since the IRQ is not required to wake from shutdown,
continue to add the wakeup source even if registering the wakeirq fails.
See commit 029d3a6f2f ("rtc: da9063: add as wakeup source").
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230717190937.1301509-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
If PCF2127 device is absent from the I2C bus, or if there is a
communication problem, disabling POR0 may fail silently and we
still continue with probing the device. In that case, abort probe
operation.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728171211.3016019-1-hugo@hugovil.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This converts the DS2404 to use GPIO descriptors instead of
hard-coded global GPIO numbers.
The platform data can be deleted because there are no in-tree
users and it only contained GPIO numbers which are now
passed using descriptor tables (or device tree or ACPI).
The driver was rewritten to use a state container for the
device driver state (struct ds2404 *chip) and pass that
around instead of using a global singleton storage for the
GPIO handles.
When declaring GPIO descriptor tables or other hardware
descriptions for the RTC driver, implementers should take care
to flag the RESET line as active low, such as by using the
GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW flag in the descriptor table.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807-descriptors-rtc-v1-1-ce0f9187576e@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
After the switch to SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and a subsequent
fix, stm32_rtc_{suspend,resume}() are unused when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not
set because SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() is a no-op in that
configuration:
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:904:12: error: 'stm32_rtc_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
904 | static int stm32_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:894:12: error: 'stm32_rtc_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
894 | static int stm32_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
The non-"SET_" version of this macro, NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(), is
designed to handle this situation by only assigning the callbacks when
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set while allowing the functions to appear used to
the compiler. Switch to that macro to resolve the warnings. There is no
functional change with this, as SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() is
defined using NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230815-rtc-stm32-unused-pm-funcs-v1-1-82eb8e02d903@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
'type' is an enum, thus cast of pointer on 64-bit compile test with W=1
causes:
rtc-rs5c372.c:829:19: error: cast to smaller integer type 'enum rtc_type' from 'const void *' [-Werror,-Wvoid-pointer-to-enum-cast]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810103902.151145-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
'type' is an enum, thus cast of pointer on 64-bit compile test with W=1
causes:
rtc-jz4740.c:352:14: error: cast to smaller integer type 'enum jz4740_rtc_type' from 'const void *' [-Werror,-Wvoid-pointer-to-enum-cast]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810103902.151145-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
'type' is an enum, thus cast of pointer on 64-bit compile test with W=1
causes:
rtc-rv8803.c:648:18: error: cast to smaller integer type 'enum rv8803_type' from 'const void *' [-Werror,-Wvoid-pointer-to-enum-cast]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810103902.151145-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
'type' is an enum, thus cast of pointer on 64-bit compile test with W=1
causes:
rtc-ds1307.c:1747:18: error: cast to smaller integer type 'enum ds_type' from 'const void *' [-Werror,-Wvoid-pointer-to-enum-cast]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810103902.151145-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
If device tree implies that the chip's IRQ/F_OUT pin is used as a
clock, expose that in the driver. For now, pretend it is a
fixed-rate (32kHz) clock; if other use cases appear the driver can be
updated to provide its own clk_ops etc.
When the clock output is not used on a given board, one can prolong
the battery life by ensuring that the FOx bits are 0. For the hardware
I'm currently working on, the RTC draws 1.2uA with the FOx bits at
their default 0001 value, dropping to 0.88uA when those bits are
cleared.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615105826.411953-9-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Since the meaning of the SR_LBAT85 and SR_LBAT75 bits are different in
battery backup mode, they may very well be set after power on, and
stay set for up to a minute (i.e. until the battery detection in VDD
mode happens when the seconds counter hits 59). This would mean that
userspace doing a ioctl(RTC_VL_READ) early on could get a false
positive.
The battery level detection can also be triggered by explicitly
writing a 1 to the TSE bit in the BETA register. Do that once during
boot. Empirically, this does not immediately update the bits in
the status register (i.e., an immediate read of SR after this write
can still show stale values), but the update is done after a few
milliseconds, so certainly before the RTC device gets registered and
userspace has a chance of doing the ioctl() on this device.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615105826.411953-7-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Hook up support for reading the values of the SR_LBAT85 and SR_LBAT75
bits. Translate the former to "battery low", and the latter to
"battery empty or not-present".
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615105826.411953-6-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Implement support for using the values given in the
isil,battery-trip-levels-microvolt property to set appropriate values
in the VB85TP/VB75TP bits in the PWR_VBAT register.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615105826.411953-5-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
There are multiple problems with this warning.
First of all, it triggers way too often, in fact nearly on every boot,
because the SR_LBAT85/SR_LBAT75 bits have another meaning when in
battery backup mode. Quoting from the data sheet:
LOW BATTERY INDICATOR 85% BIT (LBAT85)
In Normal Mode (VDD), this bit indicates when the battery level has
dropped below the pre-selected trip levels. [...] The LBAT85
detection happens automatically once every minute when seconds
register reaches 59.
In Battery Mode (VBAT), this bit indicates the device has entered
into battery mode by polling once every 10 minutes. The LBAT85
detection happens automatically once when the minute register
reaches x9h or x0h minutes.
Similar wording applies to the LBAT75 bit.
This means that if the device is powered off for more than 10 minutes,
the LBAT85 bit is guaranteed to be set. Upon power-on, unless we're
close enough to the end of a minute and/or the boot is slow enough
that the second register passes 59, the LBAT85 bit is still set when
the kernel (or early userspace) reads the RTC to set the system's
wallclock time.
Another minor problem is with the bit logic. If the 75% level is
reached, logically we're also below 85%, so both bits would most
likely be set. So even if the battery is below 75%, the warning would
still say "voltage dropped below 85%".
A third problem is that the driver and current DT binding offer no way
to indicate the nominal battery level and/or settings of the Battery
Level Monitor Trip Bits. Since the default value of the VB85TP[2:0] and
VB75TP[2:0] bits are 000, this means the actual setting of the
LBAT85/LBAT75 bits in VDD mode doesn't happen until the battery is below
2.125V/1.875V, which for a standard 3V battery is way too late.
A fourth problem is emitting this warning from ->read_time:
util-linux' hwclock will, in the absence of support for getting an
interrupt when the seconds counter is updated, issue
ioctl(RTC_RD_TIME) in a busy-loop until it sees a change in the
seconds field. In that case, if the battery low bits are set (either
genuinely, more than a minute after boot, due to the battery actually
being low, or as above, bogusly shortly after boot), the kernel log is
swamped with hundreds of identical warnings.
Subsequent patches will add such bindings and driver support, and also
proper support for RTC_VL_READ. For now, remove the broken warning.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615105826.411953-2-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Referring to platform_get_irq()'s definition, the return value has
already been checked if ret < 0, and printed via dev_err_probe().
Calling dev_err_probe() one more time outside platform_get_irq()
is obviously redundant.
Removing dev_err_probe() outside platform_get_irq() to clean up
above problem.
Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802093650.976352-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
After a previous commit changed the driver over to
SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(), the suspend/resume
functions must no longer be hidden behind an #ifdef:
In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,
from drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:8:
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:927:39: error: 'stm32_rtc_suspend' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'stm32_rtc_probe'?
927 | SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(stm32_rtc_suspend, stm32_rtc_resume)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:58:44: note: in definition of macro 'PTR_IF'
58 | #define PTR_IF(cond, ptr) ((cond) ? (ptr) : NULL)
| ^~~
include/linux/pm.h:329:26: note: in expansion of macro 'pm_sleep_ptr'
329 | .suspend_noirq = pm_sleep_ptr(suspend_fn), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes: fb9a7e5360 ("rtc: stm32: change PM callbacks to "_noirq()"")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801105932.3738430-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
ds1685_rtc_poweroff is only used externally via symbol_get, which was
only ever intended for very internal symbols like this one. Use
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for it so that symbol_get can enforce only being used
on EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL symbols.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
