R-Car M3-W needs a delay of 1 µs before powering off the A3IR and A3VC
power domains. Add support for this using a new flag, which indicates
that a power area is subject to this quirk.
Inspired by a patch in the BSP by Dien Pham.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ecbc3465c598084c904dd3714e2894463094ed9a.1713348705.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Until commit 7e8a50df26 ("soc: renesas: rcar-sysc: Drop legacy
handling") in v4.19, the rcar_sysc_ch structure was part of the API for
legacy board code not yet using DT. Since then, there is no longer a
reason to keep it as a separate structure.
Moreover, a future quirk handling will need access to the rcar_sysc_pd
structure's flags member in rcar_sysc_pwr_on_off(). Hence absorb the
rcar_sysc_ch structure into the rcar_sysc_pd structure, and pass around
the latter instead of the former.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/672805a8c52ce63200e342212bbe6f84a445397b.1713348705.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Description in HWM rev0.51E, 9.4 Usage notes, page 455 tells
"It takes several hundreds of microseconds to shutting off and
resuming power domain. Because actual time required for
shutting off and resuming depends on the status of on-board
power line, shutoff/resume time is not guaranteed by
electrical specification"
Let's assume the safe value of waiting is about 1000us.
Signed-off-by: Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Tho Vu <tho.vu.wh@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8734tx8b18.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
It has been pointed out that naming a subsystem "genpd" isn't very
self-explanatory and the acronym itself that means Generic PM Domain, is
known only by a limited group of people.
In a way to improve the situation, let's rename the subsystem to pmdomain,
which ideally should indicate that this is about so called Power Domains or
"PM domains" as we often also use within the Linux Kernel terminology.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912221127.487327-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
