The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes
difficult to remember what each new magic number means.
Backward compatibility is preserved since it is possible to specify
numerical value for the hidepid parameter. This does not break the
fsconfig since it is not possible to specify a numerical value through
it. All numeric values are converted to a string. The type
FSCONFIG_SET_BINARY cannot be used to indicate a numerical value.
Selftest has been added to verify this behavior.
Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This patch allows to have multiple procfs instances inside the
same pid namespace. The aim here is lightweight sandboxes, and to allow
that we have to modernize procfs internals.
1) The main aim of this work is to have on embedded systems one
supervisor for apps. Right now we have some lightweight sandbox support,
however if we create pid namespacess we have to manages all the
processes inside too, where our goal is to be able to run a bunch of
apps each one inside its own mount namespace without being able to
notice each other. We only want to use mount namespaces, and we want
procfs to behave more like a real mount point.
2) Linux Security Modules have multiple ptrace paths inside some
subsystems, however inside procfs, the implementation does not guarantee
that the ptrace() check which triggers the security_ptrace_check() hook
will always run. We have the 'hidepid' mount option that can be used to
force the ptrace_may_access() check inside has_pid_permissions() to run.
The problem is that 'hidepid' is per pid namespace and not attached to
the mount point, any remount or modification of 'hidepid' will propagate
to all other procfs mounts.
This also does not allow to support Yama LSM easily in desktop and user
sessions. Yama ptrace scope which restricts ptrace and some other
syscalls to be allowed only on inferiors, can be updated to have a
per-task context, where the context will be inherited during fork(),
clone() and preserved across execve(). If we support multiple private
procfs instances, then we may force the ptrace_may_access() on
/proc/<pids>/ to always run inside that new procfs instances. This will
allow to specifiy on user sessions if we should populate procfs with
pids that the user can ptrace or not.
By using Yama ptrace scope, some restricted users will only be able to see
inferiors inside /proc, they won't even be able to see their other
processes. Some software like Chromium, Firefox's crash handler, Wine
and others are already using Yama to restrict which processes can be
ptracable. With this change this will give the possibility to restrict
/proc/<pids>/ but more importantly this will give desktop users a
generic and usuable way to specifiy which users should see all processes
and which users can not.
Side notes:
* This covers the lack of seccomp where it is not able to parse
arguments, it is easy to install a seccomp filter on direct syscalls
that operate on pids, however /proc/<pid>/ is a Linux ABI using
filesystem syscalls. With this change LSMs should be able to analyze
open/read/write/close...
In the new patch set version I removed the 'newinstance' option
as suggested by Eric W. Biederman.
Selftest has been added to verify new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
I thought that /proc/sysvipc has the same bug as /proc/net
commit 1fde6f21d9
proc: fix /proc/net/* after setns(2)
However, it doesn't! /proc/sysvipc files do
get_ipc_ns(current->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
in their open() hook and avoid the problem.
Keep the test, maybe /proc/sysvipc will become broken someday :-\
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190706180146.GA21015@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which:
- Have no license information of any form
These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:
GPL-2.0-only
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Start testing VM related fiels found in per-process files.
Do it by jiting small executable which brings its address space to
precisely known state, then comparing /proc/*/maps, smaps, smaps_rollup,
and statm files to expected values.
Currently only x86_64 is supported.
[adobriyan@gmail.com: exit correctly in /proc/*/maps test]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190206073659.GB15311@avx2
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190203165806.GA14568@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Same story: I have WIP patch to make it faster, so better have a test
as well.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180627195209.GC18113@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There are plans to change how /proc/self result is calculated,
for that a test is necessary.
Use direct system call because of this whole getpid caching story.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180627195103.GB18113@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* Test lookup in /proc/self/fd.
"map_files" lookup story showed that lookup is not that simple.
* Test that all those symlinks open the same file.
Check with (st_dev, st_info).
* Test that kernel threads do not have anything in their /proc/*/fd/
directory.
Now this is where things get interesting.
First, kernel threads aren't pinned by /proc/self or equivalent,
thus some "atomicity" is required.
Second, ->comm can contain whitespace and ')'.
No, they are not escaped.
Third, the only reliable way to check if process is kernel thread
appears to be field #9 in /proc/*/stat.
This field is struct task_struct::flags in decimal!
Check is done by testing PF_KTHREAD flags like we do in kernel.
PF_KTREAD value is a part of userspace ABI !!!
Other methods for determining kernel threadness are not reliable:
* RSS can be 0 if everything is swapped, even while reading
from /proc/self.
* ->total_vm CAN BE ZERO if process is finishing
munmap(NULL, whole address space);
* /proc/*/maps and similar files can be empty because unmapping
everything works. Read returning 0 can't distinguish between
kernel thread and such suicide process.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180505000414.GA15090@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The only tests I could come up with for /proc/uptime are:
- test that values increase monotonically for 1 second,
- bounce around CPUs and test the same thing.
Avoid glibc like plague for affinity given patches like this:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152130031912594&w=4
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180317165235.GB3445@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Perform reads with nearly everything in /proc, and some writing as well.
Hopefully memleak checkers and KASAN will find something.
[adobriyan@gmail.com: /proc/kmsg can and will block if read under root]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180316232147.GA20146@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
[adobriyan@gmail.com: /proc/sysrq-trigger lives on the ground floor]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180317164911.GA3445@avx2
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180315201251.GA12396@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Test fork counter formerly known as ->last_pid, the only part of
/proc/loadavg which can be tested.
Testing in init pid namespace is not reliable because of background
activity.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180311152241.GA26247@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I totally forgot that _parse_integer() accepts arbitrary amount of
leading zeroes leading to the following lookups:
OK
# readlink /proc/1/map_files/56427ecba000-56427eddc000
/lib/systemd/systemd
bogus
# readlink /proc/1/map_files/00000000000056427ecba000-56427eddc000
/lib/systemd/systemd
# readlink /proc/1/map_files/56427ecba000-00000000000056427eddc000
/lib/systemd/systemd
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180303215130.GA23480@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Read from /proc/self/syscall should yield read system call and correct
args in the output as current is reading /proc/self/syscall.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180226212145.GB742@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This patch starts testing /proc. Many more tests to come (I promise).
Read from /proc/self/wchan should always return "0" as current is in
TASK_RUNNING state while reading /proc/self/wchan.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180226212006.GA742@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
