btrfs_trim_fs iterates over the fs_devices->alloc_list while holding the
device_list_mutex. The problem is that ->alloc_list is protected by the
chunk mutex. We don't want to hold the chunk mutex over the trim of the
entire file system. Fortunately, the ->dev_list list is protected by
the dev_list mutex and while it will give us all devices, including
read-only devices, we already just skip the read-only devices. Then we
can continue to take and release the chunk mutex while scanning each
device.
Fixes: 499f377f49 ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
fstrim on some btrfs only trims the unallocated space, not trimming any
space in existing block groups.
[CAUSE]
Before fstrim_range passed to btrfs_trim_fs(), it gets truncated to
range [0, super->total_bytes). So later btrfs_trim_fs() will only be
able to trim block groups in range [0, super->total_bytes).
While for btrfs, any bytenr aligned to sectorsize is valid, since btrfs
uses its logical address space, there is nothing limiting the location
where we put block groups.
For filesystem with frequent balance, it's quite easy to relocate all
block groups and bytenr of block groups will start beyond
super->total_bytes.
In that case, btrfs will not trim existing block groups.
[FIX]
Just remove the truncation in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(), so btrfs_trim_fs()
can get the unmodified range, which is normally set to [0, U64_MAX].
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: f4c697e640 ("btrfs: return EINVAL if start > total_bytes in fitrim ioctl")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Function btrfs_trim_fs() doesn't handle errors in a consistent way. If
error happens when trimming existing block groups, it will skip the
remaining blocks and continue to trim unallocated space for each device.
The return value will only reflect the final error from device trimming.
This patch will fix such behavior by:
1) Recording the last error from block group or device trimming
The return value will also reflect the last error during trimming.
Make developer more aware of the problem.
2) Continuing trimming if possible
If we failed to trim one block group or device, we could still try
the next block group or device.
3) Report number of failures during block group and device trimming
It would be less noisy, but still gives user a brief summary of
what's going wrong.
Such behavior can avoid confusion for cases like failure to trim the
first block group and then only unallocated space is trimmed.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add bg_ret and dev_ret to the messages ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since commit d7df2c796d ("Btrfs attach delayed ref updates to delayed
ref heads"), check_delayed_ref() won't return -ENOENT.
In btrfs_cross_ref_exist(), two variables 'ret' and 'ret2' are
originally used to handle -ENOENT error case. Since the code is not
needed anymore, let's just remove 'ret2'.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Here we're not releasing any space, but transferring bytes from
->bytes_may_use to ->bytes_reserved. The last change to the code in
commit 18513091af ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's
bytes_may_use timely") removed a conditional tracepoint and the logic
changed too but the tracepiont remained.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
For certain crafted image, whose csum root leaf has missing backref, if
we try to trigger write with data csum, it could cause deadlock with the
following kernel WARN_ON():
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 41 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:230 btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400
CPU: 1 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1+ #8
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper
RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400
Call Trace:
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x39f/0x770
__btrfs_cow_block+0x285/0x9e0
btrfs_cow_block+0x191/0x2e0
btrfs_search_slot+0x492/0x1160
btrfs_lookup_csum+0xec/0x280
btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x2be/0xa60
add_pending_csums+0xaf/0xf0
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x74b/0xc90
finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20
normal_work_helper+0xf6/0x500
btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20
process_one_work+0x302/0x770
worker_thread+0x81/0x6d0
kthread+0x180/0x1d0
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[CAUSE]
That crafted image has missing backref for csum tree root leaf. And
when we try to allocate new tree block, since there is no
EXTENT/METADATA_ITEM for csum tree root, btrfs consider it's free slot
and use it.
The extent tree of the image looks like:
Normal image | This fuzzed image
----------------------------------+--------------------------------
BG 29360128 | BG 29360128
One empty slot | One empty slot
29364224: backref to UUID tree | 29364224: backref to UUID tree
Two empty slots | Two empty slots
29376512: backref to CSUM tree | One empty slot (bad type) <<<
29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree | 29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree
... | ...
Since bytenr 29376512 has no METADATA/EXTENT_ITEM, when btrfs try to
alloc tree block, it's an valid slot for btrfs.
And for finish_ordered_write, when we need to insert csum, we try to CoW
csum tree root.
By accident, empty slots at bytenr BG_OFFSET, BG_OFFSET + 8K,
BG_OFFSET + 12K is already used by tree block COW for other trees, the
next empty slot is BG_OFFSET + 16K, which should be the backref for CSUM
tree.
But due to the bad type, btrfs can recognize it and still consider it as
an empty slot, and will try to use it for csum tree CoW.
Then in the following call trace, we will try to lock the new tree
block, which turns out to be the old csum tree root which is already
locked:
btrfs_search_slot() called on csum tree root, which is at 29376512
|- btrfs_cow_block()
|- btrfs_set_lock_block()
| |- Now locks tree block 29376512 (old csum tree root)
|- __btrfs_cow_block()
|- btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
|- btrfs_reserve_extent()
| Now it returns tree block 29376512, which extent tree
| shows its empty slot, but it's already hold by csum tree
|- btrfs_init_new_buffer()
|- btrfs_tree_lock()
| Triggers WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid)
|- wait_event()
Wait lock owner to release the lock, but it's
locked by ourself, so it will deadlock
[FIX]
This patch will do the lock_owner and current->pid check at
btrfs_init_new_buffer().
So above deadlock can be avoided.
Since such problem can only happen in crafted image, we will still
trigger kernel warning for later aborted transaction, but with a little
more meaningful warning message.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200405
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON()
when trying to recover balance:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10
RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202
Call Trace:
walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs]
merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs]
mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs]
mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0
ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0
__x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[CAUSE]
Extent tree corruption. In this particular case, reloc tree root's
owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is
corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree().
[FIX]
It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at
least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully.
And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share
the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make
__del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid
possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes uses the variable "ret" for return value,
but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of
the callers do not handle the return value, so it is safe to drop the
unneeded "ret" and return void. There are no callees that would need the
function to handle or pass the value either.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's
objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid.
They are both set to the same value in __setup_root():
static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 objectid)
{
...
root->objectid = objectid;
...
root->root_key.objectid = objecitd;
...
}
and not changed to other value after initialization.
grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places:
$ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l
133
$ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l
55
(4.17, inc. some noise)
It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems
that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case.
Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove
'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since ret must be 0 here, don't have to return. No functional change
and code readability is not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Using true and false here is closer to the expected semantic than using
0 and 1. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
After btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc(), num_bytes will be assigned
again by btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(). Once block_rsv fails, we
can't properly free the num_bytes of the previous qgroup_reserve. Use a
separate variable to store the num_bytes of the qgroup_reserve.
Delete the comment for the qgroup_reserved that does not exist and add a
comment about use_global_rsv.
Fixes: c4c129db5d ("btrfs: drop unused parameter qgroup_reserved")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If a crafted image has missing block group items, it could cause
unexpected behavior and breaks the assumption of 1:1 chunk<->block group
mapping.
Although we have the block group -> chunk mapping check, we still need
chunk -> block group mapping check.
This patch will do extra check to ensure each chunk has its
corresponding block group.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
A crafted btrfs image with incorrect chunk<->block group mapping will
trigger a lot of unexpected things as the mapping is essential.
Although the problem can be caught by block group item checker
added in "btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item", it's still not
sufficient. A sufficiently valid block group item can pass the check
added by the mentioned patch but could fail to match the existing chunk.
This patch will add extra block group -> chunk mapping check, to ensure
we have a completely matching (start, len, flags) chunk for each block
group at mount time.
Here we reuse the original helper find_first_block_group(), which is
already doing the basic bg -> chunk checks, adding further checks of the
start/len and type flags.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199837
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There is no user of this function anymore.
This was forgotten to be removed in commit a575ceeb13
("Btrfs: get rid of unused orphan infrastructure").
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Leftover after fix e339a6b097 ("Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always
use no_quota"), that removed it from the function calls but not the
structure.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we're trying to make a data reservation and we have to allocate a
data chunk we could leak ret == 1, as do_chunk_alloc() will return 1 if
it allocated a chunk. Since the end of the function is the success path
just return 0.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In find_free_extent() under checks: label, we have the following code:
search_start = ALIGN(offset, fs_info->stripesize);
/* move on to the next group */
if (search_start + num_bytes >
block_group->key.objectid + block_group->key.offset) {
btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, offset, num_bytes);
goto loop;
}
if (offset < search_start)
btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, offset,
search_start - offset);
BUG_ON(offset > search_start);
However ALIGN() is rounding up, thus @search_start >= @offset and that
BUG_ON() will never be triggered.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are many places that open code the duplicity factor of the block
group profiles, create a common helper. This can be easily extended for
more copies.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fs_info can be fetched from the transaction handle directly.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a small helper, btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), to acquire locks and
add a block group to unused_bgs list.
No functional modification, and only 3 callers are involved.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
do_chunk_alloc implements logic to detect whether there is currently
pending chunk allocation (by means of space_info->chunk_alloc being
set) and if so it loops around to the 'again' label. Additionally,
based on the state of the space_info (e.g. whether it's full or not)
and the return value of should_alloc_chunk() it decides whether this
is a "hard" error (ENOSPC) or we can just return 0.
This patch refactors all of this:
1. Put order to the scattered ifs handling the various cases in an
easy-to-read if {} else if{} branches. This makes clear the various
cases we are interested in handling.
2. Call should_alloc_chunk only once and use the result in the
if/else if constructs. All of this is done under space_info->lock, so
even before multiple calls of should_alloc_chunk were unnecessary.
3. Rewrite the "do {} while()" loop currently implemented via label
into an explicit loop construct.
4. Move the mutex locking for the case where the caller is the one doing
the allocation. For the case where the caller needs to wait a concurrent
allocation, introduce a pair of mutex_lock/mutex_unlock to act as a
barrier and reword the comment.
5. Switch local vars to bool type where pertinent.
All in all this shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In commit b150a4f10d ("Btrfs: use a percpu to keep track of possibly
pinned bytes") we use total_bytes_pinned to track how many bytes we are
going to free in this transaction. When we are close to ENOSPC, we check it
and know if we can make the allocation by commit the current transaction.
For every data/metadata extent we are going to free, we add
total_bytes_pinned in btrfs_free_extent() and btrfs_free_tree_block(), and
release it in unpin_extent_range() when we finish the transaction. So this
is a variable we frequently update but rarely read - just the suitable
use of percpu_counter. But in previous commit we update total_bytes_pinned
by default 32 batch size, making every update essentially a spin lock
protected update. Since every spin lock/unlock operation involves syncing
a globally used variable and some kind of barrier in a SMP system, this is
more expensive than using total_bytes_pinned as a simple atomic64_t.
So fix this by using a customized batch size. Since we only read
total_bytes_pinned when we are close to ENOSPC and fail to allocate new
chunk, we can use a really large batch size and have nearly no penalty
in most cases.
[Test]
We tested the patch on a 4-cores x86 machine:
1. fallocate a 16GiB size test file
2. take snapshot (so all following writes will be COW)
3. run a 180 sec, 4 jobs, 4K random write fio on test file
We also added a temporary lockdep class on percpu_counter's spin lock
used by total_bytes_pinned to track it by lock_stat.
[Results]
unpatched:
lock_stat version 0.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
class name con-bounces contentions
waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces
acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg
total_bytes_pinned_percpu: 82 82
0.21 0.61 29.46 0.36 298340
635973 0.09 11.01 173476.25 0.27
patched:
lock_stat version 0.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
class name con-bounces contentions
waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces
acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg
total_bytes_pinned_percpu: 1 1
0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 13601
31542 0.14 9.61 11016.90 0.35
[Analysis]
Since the spin lock only protects a single in-memory variable, the
contentions (number of lock acquisitions that had to wait) in both
unpatched and patched version are low. But when we see acquisitions and
acq-bounces, we get much lower counts in patched version. Here the most
important metric is acq-bounces. It means how many times the lock gets
transferred between different cpus, so the patch can really reduce
cacheline bouncing of spin lock (also the global counter of percpu_counter)
in a SMP system.
Fixes: b150a4f10d ("Btrfs: use a percpu to keep track of possibly pinned bytes")
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Functions that get btrfs inode can simply reach the fs_info by
dereferencing the root and this looks a bit more straightforward
compared to the btrfs_sb(...) indirection.
If the transaction handle is available and not NULL it's used instead.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The v0 extent type checks are the right case for the unlikely
annotations as we don't expect to ever see them, so let's give the
compiler some hint.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Following the removal of the v0 handling code let's be courteous and
print an error message when such extents are handled. In the cases
where we have a transaction just abort it, otherwise just call
btrfs_handle_fs_error. Both cases result in the FS being re-mounted RO.
In case the error handling would be too intrusive, leave the BUG_ON in
place, like extent_data_ref_count, other proper handling would catch
that earlier.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The v0 compat code was introduced in commit 5d4f98a28c
("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)") 9
years ago, which was merged in 2.6.31. This means that the code is
there to support filesystems which are _VERY_ old and if you are using
btrfs on such an old kernel, you have much bigger problems. This coupled
with the fact that no one is likely testing/maintining this code likely
means it has bugs lurking. All things considered I think 43 kernel
releases later it's high time this remnant of the past got removed.
This patch removes all code wrapped in #ifdefs but leaves the BUG_ONs in case
we have a v0 with no support intact as a sort of safety-net.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If type of extent_inline_ref found is not expected, filesystem may have
been corrupted, should return EUCLEAN instead of EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
Under certain KVM load and LTP tests, it is possible to hit the
following calltrace if quota is enabled:
BTRFS critical (device vda2): unable to find logical 8820195328 length 4096
BTRFS critical (device vda2): unable to find logical 8820195328 length 4096
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 49 at ../block/blk-core.c:172 blk_status_to_errno+0x1a/0x30
CPU: 0 PID: 49 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 4.12.14-15-default #1 SLE15 (unreleased)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
task: ffff9f827b340bc0 task.stack: ffffb4f8c0304000
RIP: 0010:blk_status_to_errno+0x1a/0x30
Call Trace:
submit_extent_page+0x191/0x270 [btrfs]
? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0x130/0x130 [btrfs]
__do_readpage+0x2d2/0x810 [btrfs]
? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0x130/0x130 [btrfs]
? run_one_async_done+0xc0/0xc0 [btrfs]
__extent_read_full_page+0xe7/0x100 [btrfs]
? run_one_async_done+0xc0/0xc0 [btrfs]
read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ab/0x2d0 [btrfs]
? run_one_async_done+0xc0/0xc0 [btrfs]
btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x94/0xf0 [btrfs]
read_tree_block+0x31/0x60 [btrfs]
read_block_for_search.isra.35+0xf0/0x2e0 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0x46b/0xa00 [btrfs]
? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a8/0x510
? btrfs_get_token_32+0x5b/0x120 [btrfs]
find_parent_nodes+0x11d/0xeb0 [btrfs]
? leaf_space_used+0xb8/0xd0 [btrfs]
? btrfs_leaf_free_space+0x49/0x90 [btrfs]
? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x93/0x100 [btrfs]
btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x93/0x100 [btrfs]
btrfs_find_all_roots+0x45/0x60 [btrfs]
btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x20/0x40 [btrfs]
btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x1a3/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent+0x38/0x40 [btrfs]
insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.71+0x289/0x2e0 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x2f4/0x7f0 [btrfs]
? pick_next_task_fair+0x2cd/0x530
? __switch_to+0x92/0x4b0
btrfs_worker_helper+0x81/0x300 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x1da/0x3f0
worker_thread+0x2b/0x3f0
? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
kthread+0x11a/0x130
? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
BTRFS critical (device vda2): unable to find logical 8820195328 length 16384
BTRFS: error (device vda2) in btrfs_finish_ordered_io:3023: errno=-5 IO failure
BTRFS info (device vda2): forced readonly
BTRFS error (device vda2): pending csums is 2887680
[CAUSE]
It's caused by race with block group auto removal:
- There is a meta block group X, which has only one tree block
The tree block belongs to fs tree 257.
- In current transaction, some operation modified fs tree 257
The tree block gets COWed, so the block group X is empty, and marked
as unused, queued to be deleted.
- Some workload (like fsync) wakes up cleaner_kthread()
Which will call btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() to remove unused block
groups.
So block group X along its chunk map get removed.
- Some delalloc work finished for fs tree 257
Quota needs to get the original reference of the extent, which will
read tree blocks of commit root of 257.
Then since the chunk map gets removed, the above warning gets
triggered.
[FIX]
Just let btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() skip block group which still has
pinned bytes.
However there is a minor side effect: currently we only queue empty
blocks at update_block_group(), and such empty block group with pinned
bytes won't go through update_block_group() again, such block group
won't be removed, until it gets new extent allocated and removed.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When a new extent buffer is allocated there are a few mandatory fields
which need to be set in order for the buffer to be sane: level,
generation, bytenr, backref_rev, owner and FSID/UUID. Currently this
is open coded in the callers of btrfs_alloc_tree_block, meaning it's
fairly high in the abstraction hierarchy of operations. This patch
solves this by simply moving this init code in btrfs_init_new_buffer,
since this is the function which initializes a newly allocated
extent buffer. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed bg cache.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from trans since the function is always called
within a valid transaction.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced directly from the transaction handle since it's
always valid.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle, since it's
always valid.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle, since it's
always valid.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed block group.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed block group.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from trans since the function is always called
within a transaction.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from trans since the function is always called
within a transaction.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can always be referneced from the passed transaction handle since
it's always valid. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs_info can be refenreced from the transaction handle, since it's always
valid. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The argument is no longer used so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle so
fs_info can be referenced from there. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction from where
fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function already takes a transaction which holds a reference to
the fs_info struct. Use that reference and remove the extra arg. No
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
