The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-34-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-33-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-32-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-29-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-27-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Since Kionix accelerometers use various numbers of bits to report data, a
device-specific function is required.
Implement the function as a callback in the device-specific chip_info structure
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9c550fb28e34915d473e379f812c7753f7643bae.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add the chip_info structure to the driver's private data to hold all
the device specific infos.
Refactor the kx022a driver implementation to make it more generic and
extensible.
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7a31d0cdefba15d7c791252ec8bc5db553b3996b.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Avoid error returns on a failure to match and instead just warn with
assumption that we have a correct dt-binding telling us that
some new device with a different ID is backwards compatible.
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b587cfec2f3350623277005f62121864bee857c7.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The STX104 features an 8254 Counter/Timer chip providing three
counter/timers which can be used for frequency measurement, frequency
output, pulse width modulation, pulse width measurement, event count,
etc. The STX104 provides a register bank selection to bank select
between the 8254 Bank and the Indexed Register Array Bank; the Indexed
Register Array is not utilized by this driver, so the 8254 Bank is
selected unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916112031.3634-1-william.gray@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The devm_clk_register() is deprecated and devm_clk_hw_register() should be
used as a replacement.
Switching to the clk_hw interface also allows to use the built-in device
managed version of registering the clock provider. The non-clk_hw interface
does not have a device managed version.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230910140903.551081-1-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
According to the datasheet switching to a new channel function implies
multiple steps.
All functions must be selected for a minimum of 130 μs before changing
to another function.
The DAC_CODEx registers are not reset by changing channel functions.
Prior to changing channel functions, it is recommended to set the DAC
code to 0x0000 via the DAC_CODEx registers. Set the channel function
to high impedance via the CH_FUNC_SETUPx registers before transitioning
to the new channel function. After the new channel function is configured,
it is recommended to wait 150 μs before updating the DAC code.
Even though the channel switch is done at only at probe, where a device
reset is performed, that does not guarantee that the steps prior
changing to new channel function should be neglected.
Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911142950.216687-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Simplify probe() by replacing id lookup for retrieving match data and
device_get_match_data() by i2c_get_match_data().
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903145926.66855-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The MCP4725 has a register offset '3' for reading DAC value compared to
'4' for MCP4726. Add dac_reg_offset variable to struct mcp4725_chip_info
to handle this difference.
Drop chip_id from struct mcp4725_chip_info as it is unused.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903115548.59306-5-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The MCP4725 has external voltage reference compared MCP4725 which
has reference embeedded in eeprom. Add use_ext_ref_voltage variable
to struct mcp4725_chip_info to handle this difference.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903115548.59306-4-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add struct mcp4725_chip_info with chan_spec and chip_id variable.
After this simplify probe() by replacing device_get_match_data() and id
lookup for retrieving match data by i2c_get_match_data() by converting
enum->pointer for data in the match table.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903115548.59306-3-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Replace the variable 'id' from struct mcp4725_data with local variable
chip_id in probe() as the id variable is not used elsewhere in the
driver.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903115548.59306-2-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Simplify adxl345_read_raw() by adding uscale variable to
struct adxl345_chip_info. Also convert variables adxl3{4,7}5_uscale to
macros and use it in OF/ACPI/ID match table.
Drop enum adxl345_device_type as there is no user.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903090051.39274-3-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Convert enum->pointer for data in match data table, so that
device_get_match_data() can do match against OF/ACPI/I2C tables, once i2c
bus type match support added to it.
Add struct adxl345_chip_info and replace enum->adxl345_chip_info in the
match table and simplify adxl345_probe().
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230903090051.39274-2-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
