This fixes a regression where coma lead to concatenating board names
and broke module loading for C8H.
Fixes: 5b4285c57b ("hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) fix Formula VIII definition")
Signed-off-by: Michael Carns <mike@carns.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615122544.140340-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Adds support for the ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING WIFI II board and
simplifies formatting for the list of supported models.
Signed-off-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220505073351.123753-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
DSDT code for AMD 400-series chipset shows that sensor addresses differ
for this generation from those for the AMD 500-series boards.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427143001.1443605-4-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
We need to keep some more information about the current board than just
the sensors set, and with more boards to add the dmi id array grows
quickly. Our probe code is always the same so let's switch to a custom
test code and a custom board info array. That allows us to omit board
vendor string (ASUS uses two strings that differ in case) in the board
info and use case-insensitive comparison, and also do not duplicate
sensor definitions for such board variants as " (WI-FI)" when sensors
are identical to the base variant.
Also saves a quarter of the module size by replacing big dmi_system_id
structs with smaller ones.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427143001.1443605-2-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Remove the call to dev_info() from the board detection function, which
is called from probe(), not only to be in line with hwmon driver rules, but
also because the message duplicates the error code returned from probe()
for that case (ENODEV).
Changes in:
- v2: add missing newline (style).
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220217194318.2960472-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reading DSDT code for ASUS X470-based boards (the ones served by the
asus_wmi_Sensors driver), where ASUS put hardware monitoring functions
into the WMI code, reveals that fan and current sensors data is
unsigned. For the current sensor that was confirmed by a user who showed
high enough current value for overflow.
Thus let's assume that the signedness of the sensors is determined by its
type and that only temperature ones provide signed numbers.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220211164855.265698-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
A user discovered [1] the CPU Core voltage sensor, which spans 2
registers and provides output in mV. Althroug the discovery was made
with a X470 chipset, the sensor is present in X570 (tested with C8H).
For now simply add it to each board with the CPU current sensor present.
[1] https://github.com/zeule/asus-ec-sensors/issues/12
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Tested-by: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208094244.1106312-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Temperature sensor readings are signed, which is hinted by their blank
value (oxd8, 216 as unsigned and -40 as signed). T_Sensor, Crosshair
VIII Hero, and a freezer were used to confirm that.
Here we read fan sensors as signed too, because with their typical
values and 2-byte width, I can't tell a difference between signed and
unsigned, as I don't have a high speed chipset fan.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220204163045.576903-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
There is no such struct as "asus_ec_sensors", it was supposed to be
"ec_sensors_data". This typo does not affect either build or runtime.
Fixes: c4b1687d6897 ("hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) add driver for ASUS EC")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220205092015.GA612@kili
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
This driver provides the same data as the asus_wmi_ec_sensors driver
(and gets it from the same source) but does not use WMI, polling
the ACPI EC directly.
That provides two enhancements: sensor reading became quicker (on some
systems or kernel configuration it took almost a full second to read
all the sensors, that transfers less than 15 bytes of data), the driver
became more flexible. The driver now relies on ACPI mutex to lock access
to the EC in the same way as the WMI code does.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124015658.687309-2-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Tested-by: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
