Currently we only hold one ctx->lock at a time, which results in us
flipping back and forth between cpuctx->ctx.lock and task_ctx->lock.
Avoid this and gain large atomic regions by holding both locks. We
nest the task lock inside the cpu lock, since with task scheduling we
might have to change task ctx while holding the cpu ctx lock.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110409192141.769881865@chello.nl
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Small cleanup to how we refcount in find_get_context(), this also
allows us to use put_ctx() to free things instead of using kfree().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110409192141.719340481@chello.nl
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Oleg noted that ctx_sched_out() disables the PMU even though it might
not actually do something, avoid needless PMU-disabling.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110409192141.665385503@chello.nl
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
As part of the events sybsystem unification, relocate hw_breakpoint.c
into its new destination.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
mv kernel/perf_event.c -> kernel/events/core.c. From there, all further
sensible splitting can happen. The idea is that due to perf_event.c
becoming pretty sizable and with the advent of the marriage with ftrace,
splitting functionality into its logical parts should help speeding up
the unification and to manage the complexity of the subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
