Parsing entries in an ACPI table had assumed a generic header
structure. There is no standard ACPI header, though, so less common
layouts with different field sizes required custom parsers to go through
their subtable entry list.
Create the infrastructure for adding different table types so parsing
the entries array may be more reused for all ACPI system tables and
the common code doesn't need to be duplicated.
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Tested-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Allocating a minimum of 32 LPIs per PCI device, let's reduce it to
be just 1, as most devices do not need that many interrupts.
We still have to special-case DevID 0, as there is plenty of broken
HW around where the PCI RID is not presented as a DevID to the ITS,
and all the devices are presented as DevID 0. In this case, we keep
the 32 minimal allocation.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
At the moment, the core ITS driver imposes the allocation to be
in chunks of 32. As we want to relax this on a per bus basis, let's
move the the the allocation constraints to each bus.
No functionnal change.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On some platforms there's an ITS available but it's not enabled
because reading or writing the registers is denied by the
firmware. In fact, reading or writing them will cause the system
to reset. We could remove the node from DT in such a case, but
it's better to skip nodes that are marked as "disabled" in DT so
that we can describe the hardware that exists and use the status
property to indicate how the firmware has configured things.
Cc: Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
of the full path string for each node.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: "Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Acked-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
The call to pci_for_each_dma_alias() in the ITS PCI code has aroused
suspicion in the past, and upon closer inspection does turn out to be
completely backwards. Rather than iterating through each RID alias of
the given device, what we actually want to be doing here is iterating
through all the *other* devices which may also alias the same RID, in
order to size the table for the worst case.
Do the right thing by ignoring the initial DMA aliases themselves and
just using that walk to detect an aliasing bridge, then walking back
down the bus topology as necessary to actually count everything else.
Our alias handling still isn't perfect, since we don't account for the
cases of certain bridges only taking ownership of transactions under
particular circumstances, but without completely reworking the ITS code
to cope with the notion of multiple DevIDs per device, it'll have to do.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Let ACPI build ITS PCI MSI domain. ACPI code is responsible for retrieving
inner domain token and passing it on to its_pci_msi_init_one generic
init call.
IORT maintains list of registered domain tokens and allows to find
corresponding domain based on MADT ITS subtable ID info.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Firmware agnostic code lands in common functions which do necessary
domain initialization based on unique domain handler. DT specific
code goes to DT specific init call.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Replace open coded generation PCI/MSI requester id with call to the
new function pci_msi_domain_get_msi_rid() which applies the "msi-map"
to the id value.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
As we continue to push of_node towards the outskirts of irq domains,
let's start tackling the case of msi_create_irq_domain and its little
friends.
This has limited impact in both PCI/MSI, platform MSI, and a few
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>
Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-17-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
When configuring the interrupt mapping for a new device, we
iterate over all the possible aliases to account for their
maximum MSI allocation. This was introduced by e8137f4f50
("irqchip: gicv3-its: Iterate over PCI aliases to generate ITS configuration").
Turns out that the code doing that is a bit braindead, and repeatedly
accounts for the same device over and over.
Fix this by counting the actual alias that is passed to us by the
core code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443800646-8074-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We can now lookup the base ITS domain, making it possible to
initialize the PCI/MSI code independently from the main ITS
subsystem.
This allows us to remove all the previously add hooks.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438091186-10244-15-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
It is becoming obvious that having the PCI/MSI code in the same
file as the the core ITS code is giving people implementing non-PCI
MSI support the wrong kind of idea.
In order to make things a bit clearer, let's move the PCI/MSI code
out to its own file. Hopefully it will make it clear that whoever
thinks of hooking into the core ITS better have a very strong point.
We use a temporary entry point that will get removed in a subsequent
patch, once the proper infrastructure is added.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438091186-10244-12-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
