The gpiolib is unique in the way it uses intermediate fwspecs
when feeding an interrupt specifier to the parent domain, as it
relies on the populate_parent_alloc_arg() callback to perform
a dynamic allocation.
This is pretty inefficient (we free the structure almost immediately),
and the only reason this isn't a stack allocation is that our
ThunderX friend uses MSIs rather than a FW-constructed structure.
Let's solve it by providing a new type composed of the union
of a struct irq_fwspec and a msi_info_t, which satisfies both
requirements. This allows us to use a stack allocation, and we
can move the handful of users to this new scheme.
Also perform some additional cleanup, such as getting rid of the
stub versions of the irq_domain_translate_*cell helpers, which
are never used when CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY isn't selected.
Tested on a Tegra186.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
Cc: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220707182314.66610-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com
The fwnode of GPIO IRQ must be set to its own fwnode, not the fwnode of the
parent IRQ. Therefore, this sets own fwnode instead of the parent IRQ fwnode to
GPIO IRQ's.
Fixes: 2ad74f40da ("gpio: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti GPIO support")
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
the private information.
Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.
If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
there are other ways to log/see this during probe.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
