When testing space_cache v2 on a large set of machines, we encountered a
few symptoms:
1. "unable to add free space :-17" (EEXIST) errors.
2. Missing free space info items, sometimes caught with a "missing free
space info for X" error.
3. Double-accounted space: ranges that were allocated in the extent tree
and also marked as free in the free space tree, ranges that were
marked as allocated twice in the extent tree, or ranges that were
marked as free twice in the free space tree. If the latter made it
onto disk, the next reboot would hit the BUG_ON() in
add_new_free_space().
4. On some hosts with no on-disk corruption or error messages, the
in-memory space cache (dumped with drgn) disagreed with the free
space tree.
All of these symptoms have the same underlying cause: a race between
caching the free space for a block group and returning free space to the
in-memory space cache for pinned extents causes us to double-add a free
range to the space cache. This race exists when free space is cached
from the free space tree (space_cache=v2) or the extent tree
(nospace_cache, or space_cache=v1 if the cache needs to be regenerated).
struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin and struct
btrfs_block_group::progress are supposed to protect against this race,
but commit d0c2f4fa55 ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when
waiting for a transaction commit") subtly broke this by allowing
multiple transactions to be unpinning extents at the same time.
Specifically, the race is as follows:
1. An extent is deleted from an uncached block group in transaction A.
2. btrfs_commit_transaction() is called for transaction A.
3. btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> __btrfs_free_extent() runs the delayed
ref for the deleted extent.
4. __btrfs_free_extent() -> do_free_extent_accounting() ->
add_to_free_space_tree() adds the deleted extent back to the free
space tree.
5. do_free_extent_accounting() -> btrfs_update_block_group() ->
btrfs_cache_block_group() queues up the block group to get cached.
block_group->progress is set to block_group->start.
6. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction A calls
switch_commit_roots(). It sets block_group->last_byte_to_unpin to
block_group->progress, which is block_group->start because the block
group hasn't been cached yet.
7. The caching thread gets to our block group. Since the commit roots
were already switched, load_free_space_tree() sees the deleted extent
as free and adds it to the space cache. It finishes caching and sets
block_group->progress to U64_MAX.
8. btrfs_commit_transaction() advances transaction A to
TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED.
9. fsync calls btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction B. Since
transaction A is already in TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED and the
commit is for fsync, it advances.
10. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction B calls
switch_commit_roots(). This time, the block group has already been
cached, so it sets block_group->last_byte_to_unpin to U64_MAX.
11. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction A calls
btrfs_finish_extent_commit(), which calls unpin_extent_range() for
the deleted extent. It sees last_byte_to_unpin set to U64_MAX (by
transaction B!), so it adds the deleted extent to the space cache
again!
This explains all of our symptoms above:
* If the sequence of events is exactly as described above, when the free
space is re-added in step 11, it will fail with EEXIST.
* If another thread reallocates the deleted extent in between steps 7
and 11, then step 11 will silently re-add that space to the space
cache as free even though it is actually allocated. Then, if that
space is allocated *again*, the free space tree will be corrupted
(namely, the wrong item will be deleted).
* If we don't catch this free space tree corruption, it will continue
to get worse as extents are deleted and reallocated.
The v1 space_cache is synchronously loaded when an extent is deleted
(btrfs_update_block_group() with alloc=0 calls btrfs_cache_block_group()
with load_cache_only=1), so it is not normally affected by this bug.
However, as noted above, if we fail to load the space cache, we will
fall back to caching from the extent tree and may hit this bug.
The easiest fix for this race is to also make caching from the free
space tree or extent tree synchronous. Josef tested this and found no
performance regressions.
A few extra changes fall out of this change. Namely, this fix does the
following, with step 2 being the crucial fix:
1. Factor btrfs_caching_ctl_wait_done() out of
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() to allow waiting on a caching_ctl
that we already hold a reference to.
2. Change the call in btrfs_cache_block_group() of
btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished() to
btrfs_caching_ctl_wait_done(), which makes us wait regardless of the
space_cache option.
3. Delete the now unused btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished() and
space_cache_v1_done().
4. Change btrfs_cache_block_group()'s `int load_cache_only` parameter to
`bool wait` to more accurately describe its new meaning.
5. Change a few callers which had a separate call to
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() to use wait = true instead.
6. Make btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() static now that it's not
used outside of block-group.c anymore.
Fixes: d0c2f4fa55 ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
but task is already holding lock:
ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0
__btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600
btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230
btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290
btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x271/0x590
worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
kthread+0xf0/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70
do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0
relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0
relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-treloc-02#2 --> btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-tree-01);
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
7 locks held by btrfs/752500:
#0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90
#1: ffff97e284c02050 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40
#2: ffff97e284c00878 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400
#3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610
#4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73
check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice. There
are two competing things going on here. With relocation we create a
snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree. Any extent buffers that
get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key.
However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache
that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree
lockdep key set. This creates the lock dependency of
reloc tree -> normal tree
for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation
as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks.
However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is
merging the reloc root into the original fs root. This involves
searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then
swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block. We have to
search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for
the block we need to replace. This creates the dependency of
normal tree -> reloc tree
which is why lockdep complains.
Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a
different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block
that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that
block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a
lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root.
Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the
lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any
blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged.
This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with
normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we
maintain the lock order of
normal tree -> reloc tree
We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search
for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW
at that point gets set to the reloc tree key. This works correctly
because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting
the key for the block we're linking into the fs root.
With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
cow_file_range() works in an all-or-nothing way: if it fails to allocate an
extent for a part of the given region, it gives up all the region including
the successfully allocated parts. On cow_file_range(), run_delalloc_zoned()
writes data for the region only when it successfully allocate all the
region.
This all-or-nothing allocation and write-out are problematic when available
space in all the block groups are get tight with the active zone
restriction. btrfs_reserve_extent() try hard to utilize the left space in
the active block groups and gives up finally and fails with
-ENOSPC. However, if we send IOs for the successfully allocated region, we
can finish a zone and can continue on the rest of the allocation on a newly
allocated block group.
This patch implements the partial write-out for run_delalloc_zoned(). With
this patch applied, cow_file_range() returns -EAGAIN to tell the caller to
do something to progress the further allocation, and tells the successfully
allocated region with done_offset. Furthermore, the zoned extent allocator
returns -EAGAIN to tell cow_file_range() going back to the caller side.
Actually, we still need to wait for an IO to complete to continue the
allocation. The next patch implements that part.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Fixes: afba2bc036 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking")
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we run out of active zones and no sufficient space is left in any
block groups, we need to finish one block group to make room to activate a
new block group.
However, we cannot do this for metadata block groups because we can cause a
deadlock by waiting for a running transaction commit. So, do that only for
a data block group.
Furthermore, the block group to be finished has two requirements. First,
the block group must not have reserved bytes left. Having reserved bytes
means we have an allocated region but did not yet send bios for it. If that
region is allocated by the thread calling btrfs_zone_finish(), it results
in a deadlock.
Second, the block group to be finished must not be a SYSTEM block
group. Finishing a SYSTEM block group easily breaks further chunk
allocation by nullifying the SYSTEM free space.
In a certain case, we cannot find any zone finish candidate or
btrfs_zone_finish() may fail. In that case, we fall back to split the
allocation bytes and fill the last spaces left in the block groups.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Fixes: afba2bc036 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For the later patch, convert the return type from bool to int and return
errors. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's a reserved space on each device of size 1MiB that can be used by
bootloaders or to avoid accidental overwrite. Use a symbolic constant
with the explaining comment instead of hard coding the value and
multiple comments.
Note: since btrfs-progs v4.1, mkfs.btrfs will reserve the first 1MiB for
the primary super block (at offset 64KiB), until then the range could
have been used by mistake. Kernel has been always respecting the 1MiB
range for writes.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Mapping block for discard doesn't really share any code with the regular
block mapping case. Split it out into an entirely separate helper
that just returns an array of btrfs_discard_stripe structures and the
number of stripes.
This removes the need for the length field in the btrfs_io_context
structure, so remove tht.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=/47A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-5.19-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs reverts from David Sterba:
"Due to a recent report [1] we need to revert the radix tree to xarray
conversion patches.
There's a problem with sleeping under spinlock, when xa_insert could
allocate memory under pressure. We use GFP_NOFS so this is a real
problem that we unfortunately did not discover during review.
I'm sorry to do such change at rc6 time but the revert is IMO the
safer option, there are patches to use mutex instead of the spin locks
but that would need more testing. The revert branch has been tested on
a few setups, all seem ok.
The conversion to xarray will be revisited in the future"
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ [1]
* tag 'for-5.19-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
Revert "btrfs: turn delayed_nodes_tree into an XArray"
Revert "btrfs: turn name_cache radix tree into XArray in send_ctx"
Revert "btrfs: turn fs_info member buffer_radix into XArray"
Revert "btrfs: turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray"
This reverts commit 48b36a602a.
Revert the xarray conversion, there's a problem with potential
sleep-inside-spinlock [1] when calling xa_insert that triggers GFP_NOFS
allocation. The radix tree used the preloading mechanism to avoid
sleeping but this is not available in xarray.
Conversion from spin lock to mutex is possible but at time of rc6 is
riskier than a clean revert.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rUrf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-5.19-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- zoned relocation fixes:
- fix critical section end for extent writeback, this could lead
to out of order write
- prevent writing to previous data relocation block group if space
gets low
- reflink fixes:
- fix race between reflinking and ordered extent completion
- proper error handling when block reserve migration fails
- add missing inode iversion/mtime/ctime updates on each iteration
when replacing extents
- fix deadlock when running fsync/fiemap/commit at the same time
- fix false-positive KCSAN report regarding pid tracking for read locks
and data race
- minor documentation update and link to new site
* tag 'for-5.19-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
Documentation: update btrfs list of features and link to readthedocs.io
btrfs: fix deadlock with fsync+fiemap+transaction commit
btrfs: don't set lock_owner when locking extent buffer for reading
btrfs: zoned: fix critical section of relocation inode writeback
btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BG
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to migrate space when replacing extents
btrfs: add missing inode updates on each iteration when replacing extents
btrfs: fix race between reflinking and ordered extent completion
After commit 5f0addf7b8 ("btrfs: zoned: use dedicated lock for data
relocation"), we observe IO errors on e.g, btrfs/232 like below.
[09.0][T4038707] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4038707 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2381 btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs]
<snip>
[09.9][T4038707] Call Trace:
[09.5][T4038707] <TASK>
[09.3][T4038707] run_delalloc_nocow+0x7f1/0x11a0 [btrfs]
[09.6][T4038707] ? test_range_bit+0x174/0x320 [btrfs]
[09.2][T4038707] ? fallback_to_cow+0x980/0x980 [btrfs]
[09.3][T4038707] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x33e/0x3e0 [btrfs]
[09.5][T4038707] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x445/0x1320 [btrfs]
[09.2][T4038707] ? test_range_bit+0x320/0x320 [btrfs]
[09.4][T4038707] ? lock_downgrade+0x6a0/0x6a0
[09.2][T4038707] ? orc_find.part.0+0x1ed/0x300
[09.5][T4038707] ? __module_address.part.0+0x25/0x300
[09.0][T4038707] writepage_delalloc+0x159/0x310 [btrfs]
<snip>
[09.4][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
[09.5][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
[09.9][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 Add. Sense: Unaligned write command
[09.5][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 CDB: Write(16) 8a 00 00 00 00 00 02 f3 63 87 00 00 00 2c 00 00
[09.4][ C3] critical target error, dev sde, sector 396041272 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 3 prio class 0
[09.9][ C3] BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/dml_102_2 errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
The IO errors occur when we allocate a regular extent in previous data
relocation block group.
On zoned btrfs, we use a dedicated block group to relocate a data
extent. Thus, we allocate relocating data extents (pre-alloc) only from
the dedicated block group and vice versa. Once the free space in the
dedicated block group gets tight, a relocating extent may not fit into
the block group. In that case, we need to switch the dedicated block
group to the next one. Then, the previous one is now freed up for
allocating a regular extent. The BG is already not enough to allocate
the relocating extent, but there is still room to allocate a smaller
extent. Now the problem happens. By allocating a regular extent while
nocow IOs for the relocation is still on-going, we will issue WRITE IOs
(for relocation) and ZONE APPEND IOs (for the regular writes) at the
same time. That mixed IOs confuses the write pointer and arises the
unaligned write errors.
This commit introduces a new bit 'zoned_data_reloc_ongoing' to the
btrfs_block_group. We set this bit before releasing the dedicated block
group, and no extent are allocated from a block group having this bit
set. This bit is similar to setting block_group->ro, but is different from
it by allowing nocow writes to start.
Once all the nocow IO for relocation is done (hooked from
btrfs_finish_ordered_io), we reset the bit to release the block group for
further allocation.
Fixes: c2707a2556 ("btrfs: zoned: add a dedicated data relocation block group")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=lv6P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-5.19-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"Features:
- subpage:
- support for PAGE_SIZE > 4K (previously only 64K)
- make it work with raid56
- repair super block num_devices automatically if it does not match
the number of device items
- defrag can convert inline extents to regular extents, up to now
inline files were skipped but the setting of mount option
max_inline could affect the decision logic
- zoned:
- minimal accepted zone size is explicitly set to 4MiB
- make zone reclaim less aggressive and don't reclaim if there are
enough free zones
- add per-profile sysfs tunable of the reclaim threshold
- allow automatic block group reclaim for non-zoned filesystems, with
sysfs tunables
- tree-checker: new check, compare extent buffer owner against owner
rootid
Performance:
- avoid blocking on space reservation when doing nowait direct io
writes (+7% throughput for reads and writes)
- NOCOW write throughput improvement due to refined locking (+3%)
- send: reduce pressure to page cache by dropping extent pages right
after they're processed
Core:
- convert all radix trees to xarray
- add iterators for b-tree node items
- support printk message index
- user bulk page allocation for extent buffers
- switch to bio_alloc API, use on-stack bios where convenient, other
bio cleanups
- use rw lock for block groups to favor concurrent reads
- simplify workques, don't allocate high priority threads for all
normal queues as we need only one
- refactor scrub, process chunks based on their constraints and
similarity
- allocate direct io structures on stack and pass around only
pointers, avoids allocation and reduces potential error handling
Fixes:
- fix count of reserved transaction items for various inode
operations
- fix deadlock between concurrent dio writes when low on free data
space
- fix a few cases when zones need to be finished
VFS, iomap:
- add helper to check if sb write has started (usable for assertions)
- new helper iomap_dio_alloc_bio, export iomap_dio_bio_end_io"
* tag 'for-5.19-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (173 commits)
btrfs: zoned: introduce a minimal zone size 4M and reject mount
btrfs: allow defrag to convert inline extents to regular extents
btrfs: add "0x" prefix for unsupported optional features
btrfs: do not account twice for inode ref when reserving metadata units
btrfs: zoned: fix comparison of alloc_offset vs meta_write_pointer
btrfs: send: avoid trashing the page cache
btrfs: send: keep the current inode open while processing it
btrfs: allocate the btrfs_dio_private as part of the iomap dio bio
btrfs: move struct btrfs_dio_private to inode.c
btrfs: remove the disk_bytenr in struct btrfs_dio_private
btrfs: allocate dio_data on stack
iomap: add per-iomap_iter private data
iomap: allow the file system to provide a bio_set for direct I/O
btrfs: add a btrfs_dio_rw wrapper
btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group
btrfs: zoned: properly finish block group on metadata write
btrfs: zoned: finish block group when there are no more allocatable bytes left
btrfs: zoned: consolidate zone finish functions
btrfs: zoned: introduce btrfs_zoned_bg_is_full
btrfs: improve error reporting in lookup_inline_extent_backref
...
Introduce a wrapper to check if all the space in a block group is
allocated or not.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When iterating the backrefs in an extent item if the ptr to the
'current' backref record goes beyond the extent item a warning is
generated and -ENOENT is returned. However what's more appropriate to
debug such cases would be to return EUCLEAN and also print identifying
information about the performed search as well as the current content of
the leaf containing the possibly corrupted extent item.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The value of btrfs_delayed_extent_op::is_data is always false, we can
cascade the change and simplify code that depends on it, removing the
structure member eventually.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The parameter has been added in 2009 in the infamous monster commit
5d4f98a28c ("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT
CHANGE)") but not used ever since. We can sink it and allow further
simplifications.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
… rename it to simply fs_roots and adjust all usages of this object to use
the XArray API, because it is notionally easier to use and understand, as
it provides array semantics, and also takes care of locking for us,
further simplifying the code.
Also do some refactoring, esp. where the API change requires largely
rewriting some functions, anyway.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently we use a spin lock to protect the red black tree that we use to
track block groups. Most accesses to that tree are actually read only and
for large filesystems, with thousands of block groups, it actually has
a bad impact on performance, as concurrent read only searches on the tree
are serialized.
Read only searches on the tree are very frequent and done when:
1) Pinning and unpinning extents, as we need to lookup the respective
block group from the tree;
2) Freeing the last reference of a tree block, regardless if we pin the
underlying extent or add it back to free space cache/tree;
3) During NOCOW writes, both buffered IO and direct IO, we need to check
if the block group that contains an extent is read only or not and to
increment the number of NOCOW writers in the block group. For those
operations we need to search for the block group in the tree.
Similarly, after creating the ordered extent for the NOCOW write, we
need to decrement the number of NOCOW writers from the same block
group, which requires searching for it in the tree;
4) Decreasing the number of extent reservations in a block group;
5) When allocating extents and freeing reserved extents;
6) Adding and removing free space to the free space tree;
7) When releasing delalloc bytes during ordered extent completion;
8) When relocating a block group;
9) During fitrim, to iterate over the block groups;
10) etc;
Write accesses to the tree, to add or remove block groups, are much less
frequent as they happen only when allocating a new block group or when
deleting a block group.
We also use the same spin lock to protect the list of currently caching
block groups. Additions to this list are made when we need to cache a
block group, because we don't have a free space cache for it (or we have
but it's invalid), and removals from this list are done when caching of
the block group's free space finishes. These cases are also not very
common, but when they happen, they happen only once when the filesystem
is mounted.
So switch the lock that protects the tree of block groups from a spinning
lock to a read/write lock.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We keep track of the start offset of the block group with the lowest start
offset at fs_info->first_logical_byte. This requires explicitly updating
that field every time we add, delete or lookup a block group to/from the
red black tree at fs_info->block_group_cache_tree.
Since the block group with the lowest start address happens to always be
the one that is the leftmost node of the tree, we can use a red black tree
that caches the left most node. Then when we need the start address of
that block group, we can just quickly get the leftmost node in the tree
and extract the start offset of that node's block group. This avoids the
need to explicitly keep track of that address in the dedicated member
fs_info->first_logical_byte, and it also allows the next patch in the
series to switch the lock that protects the red black tree from a spin
lock to a read/write lock - without this change it would be tricky
because block group searches also update fs_info->first_logical_byte.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The search start argument passed to first_logical_byte() is always 0, as
we always want to get the logical start address of the block group with
the lowest logical start address. So remove it, as not only it is not
necessary, it also makes the following patches that change the lock that
protects the red black tree of block groups from a spin lock to a
read/write lock.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At btrfs_cross_ref_exist() we always allocate a path, but we really don't
need to because all its callers (only 2) already have an allocated path
that is not being used when they call btrfs_cross_ref_exist(). So change
btrfs_cross_ref_exist() to take a path as an argument and update both
its callers to pass in the unused path they have when they call
btrfs_cross_ref_exist().
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Secure erase is a very different operation from discard in that it is
a data integrity operation vs hint. Fully split the limits and helper
infrastructure to make the separation more clear.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> [drbd]
Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> [nifs2]
Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> [f2fs]
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache]
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs]
Acked-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-27-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Just use a non-zero max_discard_sectors as an indicator for discard
support, similar to what is done for write zeroes.
The only places where needs special attention is the RAID5 driver,
which must clear discard support for security reasons by default,
even if the default stacking rules would allow for it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> [drbd]
Acked-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com> [s390]
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache]
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs]
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-25-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In btrfs_make_block_group(), we activate the allocated block group,
expecting that the block group is soon used for allocation. However, the
chunk allocation from flush_space() context broke the assumption. There
can be a large time gap between the chunk allocation time and the extent
allocation time from the chunk.
Activating the empty block groups pre-allocated from flush_space()
context can exhaust the active zone counter of a device. Once we use all
the active zone counts for empty pre-allocated block groups, we cannot
activate new block group for the other things: metadata, tree-log, or
data relocation block group. That failure results in a fake -ENOSPC.
This patch introduces CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT to distinguish the
chunk allocation from find_free_extent(). Now, the new block group is
activated only in that context.
Fixes: eb66a010d5 ("btrfs: zoned: activate new block group")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
__btrfs_free_extent() does all of the hard work of updating the extent
ref items, and then at the end if we dropped the extent completely it
does the cleanup accounting work. We're going to only want to do that
work for metadata with extent tree v2, so extract this bit into its own
helper.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is a remnant of the work I did for qgroups a long time ago to only
run for a block when we had dropped the last ref. We haven't done that
for years, but the code remains. Drop this remnant.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We duplicate this logic for both data and metadata, at this point we've
already done our type specific extent root operations, this is just
doing the accounting and removing the space from the free space tree.
Extract this common logic out into a helper.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Switch this to an ASSERT() and return the error in the normal case.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
to_add is being initialized to len but this is never read as to_add is
overwritten later on. Remove the redundant initialization.
Cleans up the following clang-analyzer warning:
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2769:8: warning: Value stored to 'to_add' during
its initialization is never read [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores].
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file
systems in production. I reproduced this locally by injecting errors
into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time. This
presented as an error while looking up an extent item
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8
RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000
R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0
__btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200
? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0
? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30
? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0
? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50
? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220
prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320
relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0
btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60
balance_kthread+0x35/0x50
? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60
kthread+0x16b/0x190
? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at
the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex. However if we had a
pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot
deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a
state where we have a half deleted snapshot.
Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before
relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start
before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the
dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up
the snapshot.
Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that
had a pending drop_progress key. If they do then we know we were in the
middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info. Then
balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again.
If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're
safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the
cleaner_mutex.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The ZNS specification defines a limit on the number of "active"
zones. That limit impose us to limit the number of block groups which
can be used for an allocation at the same time. Not to exceed the
limit, we reuse the existing active block groups as much as possible
when we can't activate any other zones without sacrificing an already
activated block group in commit a85f05e59b ("btrfs: zoned: avoid
chunk allocation if active block group has enough space").
However, the check is wrong in two ways. First, it checks the
condition for every raid index (ffe_ctl->index). Even if it reaches
the condition and "ffe_ctl->max_extent_size >=
ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size" is met, there can be other block groups
having enough space to hold ffe_ctl->num_bytes. (Actually, this won't
happen in the current zoned code as it only supports SINGLE
profile. But, it can happen once it enables other RAID types.)
Second, it checks the active zone availability depending on the
raid index. The raid index is just an index for
space_info->block_groups, so it has nothing to do with chunk allocation.
These mistakes are causing a faulty allocation in a certain
situation. Consider we are running zoned btrfs on a device whose
max_active_zone == 0 (no limit). And, suppose no block group have a
room to fit ffe_ctl->num_bytes but some room to meet
ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size (i.e. max_extent_size > num_bytes >=
min_alloc_size).
In this situation, the following occur:
- With SINGLE raid_index, it reaches the chunk allocation checking
code
- The check returns true because we can activate a new zone (no limit)
- But, before allocating the chunk, it iterates to the next raid index
(RAID5)
- Since there are no RAID5 block groups on zoned mode, it again
reaches the check code
- The check returns false because of btrfs_can_activate_zone()'s "if
(raid_index != BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE)" part
- That results in returning -ENOSPC without allocating a new chunk
As a result, we end up hitting -ENOSPC too early.
Move the check to the right place in the can_allocate_chunk() hook,
and do the active zone check depending on the allocation flag, not on
the raid index.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a new hook for an extent allocator policy. With the new
hook, a policy can decide to allocate a new block group or not. If
not, it will return -ENOSPC, so btrfs_reserve_extent() will cut the
allocation size in half and retry the allocation if min_alloc_size is
large enough.
The hook has a place holder and will be replaced with the real
implementation in the next patch.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Allocating an extent from a block group can fail for various reasons.
When an allocation from a dedicated block group (for tree-log or
relocation data) fails, we need to unregister it as a dedicated one so
that we can allocate a new block group for the dedicated one.
However, we are returning early when the block group in case it is
read-only, fully used, or not be able to activate the zone. As a result,
we keep the non-usable block group as a dedicated one, leading to
further allocation failure. With many block groups, the allocator will
iterate hopeless loop to find a free extent, results in a hung task.
Fix the issue by delaying the return and doing the proper cleanups.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In the future we are going to have multiple copies of these trees. To
facilitate this we need a way to lookup the different roots we are
looking for. Handle this by adding a global root rb tree that is
indexed on the root->root_key. Then instead of loading the roots at
mount time with individually targeted keys, simply search the tree_root
for anything with the specific objectid we want. This will make it
straightforward to support both old style and new style file systems.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We are going to have multiple csum roots in the future, so convert all
users of ->csum_root to btrfs_csum_root() and rename ->csum_root to
->_csum_root so we can easily find remaining users in the future.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using
the btrfs_extent_root() helper. This will allow us to easily clean up
the remaining direct accesses in the future.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're only using this to start the transaction with to possibly allocate
a chunk. It doesn't really matter which root to use, but with extent
tree v2 we'll need a bytenr to look up a extent root which makes the
usage of the extent_root awkward here. Simply change it to the
chunk_root.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With extent tree v2 we'll have a different extent root based on where
the bytenr is located, so adjust the remove_extent_backref() helper and
it's helpers to pass the extent_root around.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that all call sites are using the slot number to modify item values,
rename the SETGET helpers to raw_item_*(), and then rework the _nr()
helpers to be the btrfs_item_*() btrfs_set_item_*() helpers, and then
rename all of the callers to the new helpers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to
insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the
metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata
extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since
there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are
creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the
ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the
root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to
btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate
a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root,
and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to
a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs]
[3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...)
[3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246
[3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002
[3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88
[3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88
[3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000
[3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88
[3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[3868.757803] Call Trace:
[3868.758281] <TASK>
[3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs]
[3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs]
[3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420
[3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs]
[3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs]
[3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs]
[3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
[3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs]
[3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0
[3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs]
[3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs]
[3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360
[3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
[3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0
[3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420
[3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
[3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0
[3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60
[3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0
[3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957
[3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...)
[3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957
[3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003
[3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36
[3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
[3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc
[3868.793765] </TASK>
[3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0
[3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]---
[3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2
[3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627
[3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33
[3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2
[3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610
(...)
[3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33
[3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2
[3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689
(...)
[3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0
[3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry
[3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block().
This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from
struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume
creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new
subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing
else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf2900 ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We've always been failing generic/260 because it's testing things we
actually don't care about and thus won't fail for. However we probably
should fail for fstrim_range->start == U64_MAX since we clearly can't
trim anything past that. This in combination with an update to
generic/260 will allow us to pass this test properly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_update_block_group() accounts for the number of bytes allocated or
freed. Argument @alloc specifies whether the call is for alloc or free.
Convert the argument @alloc type from int to bool.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of checking whether qgroup processing for a dealyed ref has to
happen in the core of delayed ref, simply pull the check at init time of
respective delayed ref structures. This eliminates the final use of
real_root in delayed-ref core paving the way to making this member
optional.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Both data and metadata delayed ref structures have fields named
root/ref_root respectively. Those are somewhat cryptic and don't really
convey the real meaning. In fact those roots are really the original
owners of the respective block (i.e in case of a snapshot a data delayed
ref will contain the original root that owns the given block). Rename
those fields accordingly and adjust comments.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We currently use lockdep_assert_held() at btrfs_assert_tree_locked(), and
that checks that we hold a lock either in read mode or write mode.
However in all contexts we use btrfs_assert_tree_locked(), we actually
want to check if we are holding a write lock on the extent buffer's rw
semaphore - it would be a bug if in any of those contexts we were holding
a read lock instead.
So change btrfs_assert_tree_locked() to use lockdep_assert_held_write()
instead and, to make it more explicit, rename btrfs_assert_tree_locked()
to btrfs_assert_tree_write_locked(), so that it's clear we want to check
we are holding a write lock.
For now there are no contexts where we want to assert that we must have
a read lock, but in case that is needed in the future, we can add a new
helper function that just calls out lockdep_assert_held_read().
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The structure btrfs_bio is used by two different sites:
- bio->bi_private for mirror based profiles
For those profiles (SINGLE/DUP/RAID1*/RAID10), this structures records
how many mirrors are still pending, and save the original endio
function of the bio.
- RAID56 code
In that case, RAID56 only utilize the stripes info, and no long uses
that to trace the pending mirrors.
So btrfs_bio is not always bind to a bio, and contains more info for IO
context, thus renaming it will make the naming less confusing.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The statement which decides if an extent allocation on a zoned device is
for the dedicated tree-log block group or not and if we can use the block
group we picked for this allocation is not easy to read but an important
part of the allocator.
Rewrite into an if condition instead of a plain boolean test to make it
stand out more, like the version which tests for the dedicated
data-relocation block group.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Relocation in a zoned filesystem can fail with a transaction abort with
error -22 (EINVAL). This happens because the relocation code assumes that
the extents we relocated the data to have the same size the source extents
had and ensures this by preallocating the extents.
But in a zoned filesystem we currently can't preallocate the extents as
this would break the sequential write required rule. Therefore it can
happen that the writeback process kicks in while we're still adding pages
to a delalloc range and starts writing out dirty pages.
This then creates destination extents that are smaller than the source
extents, triggering the following safety check in get_new_location():
1034 if (num_bytes != btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(leaf, fi)) {
1035 ret = -EINVAL;
1036 goto out;
1037 }
Temporarily create a dedicated block group for the relocation process, so
no non-relocation data writes can interfere with the relocation writes.
This is needed that we can switch the relocation process on a zoned
filesystem from the REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND writing we use for data to a scheme
like in a non-zoned filesystem using REQ_OP_WRITE and preallocation.
Fixes: 32430c6148 ("btrfs: zoned: enable relocation on a zoned filesystem")
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are several places in our codebase where we check if a root is the
root of the data reloc tree and subsequent patches will introduce more.
Factor out the check into a small helper function instead of open coding
it multiple times.
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
