The hyp_adr/ldr_this_cpu helpers were introduced for use in hyp code
because they always needed to use TPIDR_EL2 for base, while
adr/ldr_this_cpu from kernel proper would select between TPIDR_EL2 and
_EL1 based on VHE/nVHE.
Simplify this now that the hyp mode case can be handled using the
__KVM_VHE/NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ macros.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922204910.7265-6-dbrazdil@google.com
this_cpu_ptr is meant for use in kernel proper because it selects between
TPIDR_EL1/2 based on nVHE/VHE. __hyp_this_cpu_ptr was used in hyp to always
select TPIDR_EL2. Unify all users behind this_cpu_ptr and friends by
selecting _EL2 register under __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__. VHE continues
selecting the register using alternatives.
Under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, the kernel helpers perform a preemption check
which is omitted by the hyp helpers. Preserve the behavior for nVHE by
overriding the corresponding macros under __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__. Extend
the checks into VHE hyp code.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922204910.7265-5-dbrazdil@google.com
Minor cleanup that only creates __kvm_ex_table ELF section and
related symbols if CONFIG_KVM is enabled. Also useful as more
hyp-specific sections will be added.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922204910.7265-4-dbrazdil@google.com
Minor cleanup to move all macros related to prefixing nVHE hyp section
and symbol names into one place: hyp_image.h.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922204910.7265-3-dbrazdil@google.com
Relying on objcopy to prefix the ELF section names of the nVHE hyp code
is brittle and prevents us from using wildcards to match specific
section names.
Improve the build rules by partially linking all '.nvhe.o' files and
prefixing their ELF section names using a linker script. Continue using
objcopy for prefixing ELF symbol names.
One immediate advantage of this approach is that all subsections
matching a pattern can be merged into a single prefixed section, eg.
.text and .text.* can be linked into a single '.hyp.text'. This removes
the need for -fno-reorder-functions on GCC and will be useful in the
future too: LTO builds use .text subsections, compilers routinely
generate .rodata subsections, etc.
Partially linking all hyp code into a single object file also makes it
easier to analyze.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922204910.7265-2-dbrazdil@google.com
The PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC option to the PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS prctl()
allows the SSB mitigation to be enabled only until the next execve(),
at which point the state will revert back to PR_SPEC_ENABLE and the
mitigation will be disabled.
Add support for PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC on arm64.
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The kbuild robot reports that we're relying on an implicit inclusion to
get a definition of task_stack_page() in the Spectre-v4 mitigation code,
which is not always in place for some configurations:
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_stack_page' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
| task_pt_regs(task)->pstate |= val;
| ^
| arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:268:36: note: expanded from macro 'task_pt_regs'
| ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(p)) - 1)
| ^
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: note: did you mean 'task_spread_page'?
Add the missing include to fix the build error.
Fixes: a44acf477220 ("arm64: Move SSBD prctl() handler alongside other spectre mitigation code")
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009260013.Ul7AD29w%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Patching the EL2 exception vectors is integral to the Spectre-v2
workaround, where it can be necessary to execute CPU-specific sequences
to nobble the branch predictor before running the hypervisor text proper.
Remove the dependency on CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and allow the EL2 vectors
to be patched even when KASLR is not enabled.
Fixes: 7a132017e7a5 ("KVM: arm64: Replace CONFIG_KVM_INDIRECT_VECTORS with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009221053.Jv1XsQUZ%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Convert the KVM WA2 code to using the Spectre infrastructure,
making the code much more readable. It also allows us to
take SSBS into account for the mitigation.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Owing to the fact that the host kernel is always mitigated, we can
drastically simplify the WA2 handling by keeping the mitigation
state ON when entering the guest. This means the guest is either
unaffected or not mitigated.
This results in a nice simplification of the mitigation space,
and the removal of a lot of code that was never really used anyway.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Rewrite the Spectre-v4 mitigation handling code to follow the same
approach as that taken by Spectre-v2.
For now, report to KVM that the system is vulnerable (by forcing
'ssbd_state' to ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN), as this will be cleared up in
subsequent steps.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As part of the spectre consolidation effort to shift all of the ghosts
into their own proton pack, move all of the horrible SSBD prctl() code
out of its own 'ssbd.c' file.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In a similar manner to the renaming of ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR
to ARM64_SPECTRE_V2, rename ARM64_SSBD to ARM64_SPECTRE_V4. This isn't
_entirely_ accurate, as we also need to take into account the interaction
with SSBS, but that will be taken care of in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
If all CPUs discovered during boot have SSBS, then spectre-v4 will be
considered to be "mitigated". However, we still allow late CPUs without
SSBS to be onlined, albeit with a "SANITY CHECK" warning. This is
problematic for userspace because it means that the system can quietly
transition to "Vulnerable" at runtime.
Avoid this by treating SSBS as a non-strict system feature: if all of
the CPUs discovered during boot have SSBS, then late arriving secondaries
better have it as well.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The is_ttbrX_addr() functions have somehow ended up in the middle of
the start_thread() functions, so move them out of the way to keep the
code readable.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
If the system is not affected by Spectre-v2, then advertise to the KVM
guest that it is not affected, without the need for a safelist in the
guest.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The Spectre-v2 mitigation code is pretty unwieldy and hard to maintain.
This is largely due to it being written hastily, without much clue as to
how things would pan out, and also because it ends up mixing policy and
state in such a way that it is very difficult to figure out what's going
on.
Rewrite the Spectre-v2 mitigation so that it clearly separates state from
policy and follows a more structured approach to handling the mitigation.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The spectre mitigation code is spread over a few different files, which
makes it both hard to follow, but also hard to remove it should we want
to do that in future.
Introduce a new file for housing the spectre mitigations, and populate
it with the spectre-v1 reporting code to start with.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
For better or worse, the world knows about "Spectre" and not about
"Branch predictor hardening". Rename ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR to
ARM64_SPECTRE_V2 as part of moving all of the Spectre mitigations into
their own little corner.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Use is_hyp_mode_available() to detect whether or not we need to patch
the KVM vectors for branch hardening, which avoids the need to take the
vector pointers as parameters.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The removal of CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR means that
CONFIG_KVM_INDIRECT_VECTORS is synonymous with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE,
so replace it.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The spectre mitigations are too configurable for their own good, leading
to confusing logic trying to figure out when we should mitigate and when
we shouldn't. Although the plethora of command-line options need to stick
around for backwards compatibility, the default-on CONFIG options that
depend on EXPERT can be dropped, as the mitigations only do anything if
the system is vulnerable, a mitigation is available and the command-line
hasn't disabled it.
Remove CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR and CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD in favour of
enabling this code unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Commit 606f8e7b27 ("arm64: capabilities: Use linear array for
detection and verification") changed the way we deal with per-CPU errata
by only calling the .matches() callback until one CPU is found to be
affected. At this point, .matches() stop being called, and .cpu_enable()
will be called on all CPUs.
This breaks the ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 handling, as only a single CPU will be
mitigated.
In order to address this, forcefully call the .matches() callback from a
.cpu_enable() callback, which brings us back to the original behaviour.
Fixes: 606f8e7b27 ("arm64: capabilities: Use linear array for detection and verification")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Update the description of the PMU KVM_{GET, SET}_DEVICE_ATTR error codes
to be a better match for the code that returns them.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924123731.268177-3-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ returns -EFAULT if get_user() fails when reading
the interrupt number from kvm_device_attr.addr.
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT returns the error value from kvm_vgic_set_owner().
kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init() checks that the vgic has been initialized and the
interrupt number is valid, but kvm_vgic_set_owner() can still return the
error code -EEXIST if another device has already claimed the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924123731.268177-2-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Add a small blurb describing how the event filtering API gets used.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
As we can now hide events from the guest, let's also adjust its view of
PCMEID{0,1}_EL1 so that it can figure out why some common events are not
counting as they should.
The astute user can still look into the TRM for their CPU and find out
they've been cheated, though. Nobody's perfect.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
It can be desirable to expose a PMU to a guest, and yet not want the
guest to be able to count some of the implemented events (because this
would give information on shared resources, for example.
For this, let's extend the PMUv3 device API, and offer a way to setup a
bitmap of the allowed events (the default being no bitmap, and thus no
filtering).
Userspace can thus allow/deny ranges of event. The default policy
depends on the "polarity" of the first filter setup (default deny if the
filter allows events, and default allow if the filter denies events).
This allows to setup exactly what is allowed for a given guest.
Note that although the ioctl is per-vcpu, the map of allowed events is
global to the VM (it can be setup from any vcpu until the vcpu PMU is
initialized).
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
The PMU code suffers from a small defect where we assume that the event
number provided by the guest is always 16 bit wide, even if the CPU only
implements the ARMv8.0 architecture. This isn't really problematic in
the sense that the event number ends up in a system register, cropping
it to the right width, but still this needs fixing.
In order to make it work, let's probe the version of the PMU that the
guest is going to use. This is done by temporarily creating a kernel
event and looking at the PMUVer field that has been saved at probe time
in the associated arm_pmu structure. This in turn gets saved in the kvm
structure, and subsequently used to compute the event mask that gets
used throughout the PMU code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
The PMU emulation error handling is pretty messy when dealing with
attributes. Let's refactor it so that we have less duplication,
and that it is easy to extend later on.
A functional change is that kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init() used to return
-ENXIO when the PMU feature wasn't set. The error is now reported
as -ENODEV, matching the documentation. -ENXIO is still returned
when the interrupt isn't properly configured.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
KVM special-cases writes to MSR_IA32_TSC so that all CPUs have
the same base for the TSC. This logic is complicated, and we
do not want it to have any effect once the VM is started.
In particular, if any guest started to synchronize its TSCs
with writes to MSR_IA32_TSC rather than MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
the additional effect of kvm_write_tsc code would be uncharted
territory.
Therefore, this patch makes writes to MSR_IA32_TSC behave
essentially the same as writes to MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST when
they come from the guest. A new selftest (which passes
both before and after the patch) checks the current semantics
of writes to MSR_IA32_TSC and MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST originating
from both the host and the guest.
Upcoming work to remove the special side effects
of host-initiated writes to MSR_IA32_TSC and MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST
will be able to build onto this test, adjusting the host side
to use the new APIs and achieve the same effect.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Allow userspace to set up the memory map after KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE;
to do so, move the call to nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm inside the
KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES handler (which is currently
not used by nSVM). This is similar to what VMX does already.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Now that we have the ability to handle MSRs from user space and also to
select which ones we do want to prevent in-kernel KVM code from handling,
let's add a selftest to show case and verify the API.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-9-graf@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
It's not desireable to have all MSRs always handled by KVM kernel space. Some
MSRs would be useful to handle in user space to either emulate behavior (like
uCode updates) or differentiate whether they are valid based on the CPU model.
To allow user space to specify which MSRs it wants to see handled by KVM,
this patch introduces a new ioctl to push filter rules with bitmaps into
KVM. Based on these bitmaps, KVM can then decide whether to reject MSR access.
With the addition of KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR it can also deflect the
denied MSR events to user space to operate on.
If no filter is populated, MSR handling stays identical to before.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-8-graf@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We will introduce the concept of MSRs that may not be handled in kernel
space soon. Some MSRs are directly passed through to the guest, effectively
making them handled by KVM from user space's point of view.
This patch introduces all logic required to ensure that MSRs that
user space wants trapped are not marked as direct access for guests.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-7-graf@amazon.com>
[Replace "_idx" with "_slot". - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We will introduce the concept of MSRs that may not be handled in kernel
space soon. Some MSRs are directly passed through to the guest, effectively
making them handled by KVM from user space's point of view.
This patch introduces all logic required to ensure that MSRs that
user space wants trapped are not marked as direct access for guests.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-6-graf@amazon.com>
[Make terminology a bit more similar to VMX. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Prepare vmx and svm for a subsequent change that ensures the MSR permission
bitmap is set to allow an MSR that userspace is tracking to force a vmx_vmexit
in the guest.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
[agraf: rebase, adapt SVM scheme to nested changes that came in between]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-5-graf@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In the following commits we will add pieces of MSR filtering.
To ensure that code compiles even with the feature half-merged, let's add
a few stubs and struct definitions before the real patches start.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-4-graf@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MSRs are weird. Some of them are normal control registers, such as EFER.
Some however are registers that really are model specific, not very
interesting to virtualization workloads, and not performance critical.
Others again are really just windows into package configuration.
Out of these MSRs, only the first category is necessary to implement in
kernel space. Rarely accessed MSRs, MSRs that should be fine tunes against
certain CPU models and MSRs that contain information on the package level
are much better suited for user space to process. However, over time we have
accumulated a lot of MSRs that are not the first category, but still handled
by in-kernel KVM code.
This patch adds a generic interface to handle WRMSR and RDMSR from user
space. With this, any future MSR that is part of the latter categories can
be handled in user space.
Furthermore, it allows us to replace the existing "ignore_msrs" logic with
something that applies per-VM rather than on the full system. That way you
can run productive VMs in parallel to experimental ones where you don't care
about proper MSR handling.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-3-graf@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
When we find an MSR that we can not handle, bubble up that error code as
MSR error return code. Follow up patches will use that to expose the fact
that an MSR is not handled by KVM to user space.
Suggested-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20200925143422.21718-2-graf@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Rename "index" to "slot" in struct vmx_uret_msr to align with the
terminology used by common x86's kvm_user_return_msrs, and to avoid
conflating "MSR's ECX index" with "MSR's index into an array".
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200923180409.32255-16-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Rename "vmx_msr_index" to "vmx_uret_msrs_list" to associate it with the
uret MSRs array, and to avoid conflating "MSR's ECX index" with "MSR's
index into an array". Similarly, don't use "slot" in the name as that
terminology is claimed by the common x86 "user_return_msrs" mechanism.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200923180409.32255-15-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Add "uret" to vmx_set_guest_msr() to explicitly associate it with the
guest_uret_msrs array, and to differentiate it from vmx_set_msr() as
well as VMX's load/store MSRs.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200923180409.32255-14-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Rename "find_msr_entry" to scope it to VMX and to associate it with
guest_uret_msrs. Drop the "entry" so that the function name pairs with
the existing __vmx_find_uret_msr(), which intentionally uses a double
underscore prefix instead of appending "index" or "slot" as those names
are already claimed by other pieces of the user return MSR stack.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200923180409.32255-13-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Add vmx_setup_uret_msr() to wrap the lookup and manipulation of the uret
MSRs array during setup_msrs(). In addition to consolidating code, this
eliminates move_msr_up(), which while being a very literally description
of the function, isn't exacly helpful in understanding the net effect of
the code.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200923180409.32255-12-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
