NOCOW writes do not generate stripe_extent entries in the RAID stripe
tree, as the RAID stripe-tree feature initially was designed with a
zoned filesystem in mind and on a zoned filesystem, we do not allow NOCOW
writes. But the RAID stripe-tree feature is independent from the zoned
feature, so we must also do NOCOW writes for RAID stripe-tree filesystems.
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When cleaning up defrag inodes at btrfs_cleanup_defrag_inodes(), called
during remount and unmount, we are freeing every node from the rbtree
that tracks inodes for auto defrag using
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(), which doesn't modify the tree
itself. So once we unlock the lock that protects the rbtree, we have a
tree pointing to a root that was freed (and a root pointing to freed
nodes, and their children pointing to other freed nodes, and so on).
This makes further access to the tree result in a use-after-free with
unpredictable results.
Fix this by initializing the rbtree to an empty root after the call to
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() and before unlocking.
Fixes: 276940915f ("btrfs: clear defragmented inodes using postorder in btrfs_cleanup_defrag_inodes()")
Reported-by: syzbot+ad7966ca1f5dd8b001b3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f9aad406223eabff@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
There are some reports about invalid data backref objectids, the report
looks like this:
BTRFS critical (device sda): corrupt leaf: block=333654787489792 slot=110 extent bytenr=333413935558656 len=65536 invalid data ref objectid value 2543
The data ref objectid is the inode number inside the subvolume.
But in above case, the value is completely sane, not really showing the
problem.
[CAUSE]
The root cause of the problem is the deprecated feature, inode cache.
This feature results a special inode number, -12ULL, and it's no longer
recognized by tree-checker, triggering the error.
The direct problem here is the output of data ref objectid. The value
shown is in fact the dref_root (subvolume id), not the dref_objectid
(inode number).
[FIX]
Fix the output to use dref_objectid instead.
Reported-by: Neil Parton <njparton@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Archange <archange@archlinux.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAYHqBbrrgmh6UmW3ANbysJX9qG9Pbg3ZwnKsV=5mOpv_qix_Q@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/9541deea-9056-406e-be16-a996b549614d@archlinux.org/
Fixes: f333a3c7e8 ("btrfs: tree-checker: validate dref root and objectid")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file
descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have
a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak.
The race happens like this:
1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two
threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them
task A and task B;
2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at
file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode;
3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's
private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has
a value of NULL;
4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode
in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also
extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which
has a NULL value;
5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private
structure and assigns to the file structure;
6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file
private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both
tasks are using the same file descriptor.
At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A.
Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up
using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct
btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a
use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is
still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing
the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect
results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it
end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do
range validation before using the cached state.
Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while
holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated
the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent
user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially
using it incorrectly in the future.
Fixes: 3c32c7212f ("btrfs: use cached state when looking for delalloc ranges with lseek")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[SUBPAGE COMPRESSION LIMITS]
Currently inside writepage_delalloc(), if a delalloc range is going to
be submitted asynchronously (inline or compression, the page
dirty/writeback/unlock are all handled in at different time, not at the
submission time), then we return 1 and extent_writepage() will skip the
submission.
This is fine if every sector matches page size, but if a sector is
smaller than page size (aka, subpage case), then it can be very
problematic, for example for the following 64K page:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|/| |///////| |/|
| |
4K 52K
Where |/| is the dirty range we need to submit.
In the above case, we need the following different handling for the 3
ranges:
- [0, 4K) needs to be submitted for regular write
A single sector cannot be compressed.
- [16K, 32K) needs to be submitted for compressed write
- [48K, 52K) needs to be submitted for regular write.
Above, if we try to submit [16K, 32K) for compressed write, we will
return 1 and immediately, and without submitting the remaining
[48K, 52K) range.
Furthermore, since extent_writepage() will exit without unlocking any
sectors, the submitted range [0, 4K) will not have sector unlocked.
That's the reason why for now subpage is only allowed for full page
range.
[ENHANCEMENT]
- Introduce a submission bitmap at btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap
This records which sectors will be submitted by extent_writepage_io().
This allows us to track which sectors needs to be submitted thus later
to be properly unlocked.
For asynchronously submitted range (inline/compression), the
corresponding bits will be cleared from that bitmap.
- Only return 1 if no sector needs to be submitted in
writepage_delalloc()
- Only submit sectors marked by submission bitmap inside
extent_writepage_io()
So we won't touch the asynchronously submitted part.
- Introduce btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() helper
This will only unlock the involved sectors specified by @bitmap
parameter, to avoid touching the range asynchronously submitted.
Please note that, since subpage compression is still limited to page
aligned range, this change is only a preparation for future sector
perfect compression support for subpage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_unlock_writer() is already calling
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to do the heavy lifting work, the only
missing 0 writer check.
Thus there is no need to keep two different functions, move the 0 writer
check into btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock(), and remove
btrfs_folio_unlock_writer().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All cleanup paths lead to btrfs_path_free so path can be defined with
the automatic freeing callback in the following functions:
- btrfs_insert_orphan_item()
- btrfs_del_orphan_item()
Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All cleanup paths lead to btrfs_path_free so path can be defined with
the automatic freeing callback in the following functions:
- calculate_emulated_zone_size()
- calculate_alloc_pointer()
Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a DEFINE_FREE for struct btrfs_path. This defines a function that
can be called using the __free attribute. Define a macro
BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_FREE to make the declaration of an auto freeing path
very clear.
The intended use is to define the auto free of path in cases where the
path is allocated somewhere at the beginning and freed either on all
error paths or at the end of the function.
int func() {
BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_FREE(path);
if (...)
return -ERROR;
path = alloc_path();
...
if (...)
return -ERROR;
...
return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
[ update changelog ]
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() is only utilized in
extent_writepage() as a way to unlock all subpage range (for both
successful submission and error handling).
Meanwhile we have a similar function, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock().
The difference is, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() expects a range that is
a subset of the already locked range.
This limit on btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() is a little overkilled,
preventing it from being utilized for error paths.
So here we enhance btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to accept a superset of
the locked range, and only end the locked subset.
This means we can replace btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() with
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() instead.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Continue adding const to parameters. This is for clarity and minor
addition to safety. There are some minor effects, in the assembly code
and .ko measured on release config.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently BTRFS_I is a static inline function that takes a const inode
and returns btrfs inode, dropping the 'const' qualifier. This can break
assumptions of compiler though it seems there's no real case.
To make the parameter and return type consistent regardint const we can
use the container_of_const() that preserves it. However this would not
check the parameter type. To fix that use the same _Generic construct
but implement only the two expected types.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have a few places that check if we have the inode locked by doing:
ASSERT(inode_is_locked(vfs_inode));
This actually proved to be useful several times as if assertions are
enabled (and by default they are in many distros) it immediately triggers
a crash which is impossible for users to miss.
However that doesn't check if the lock is held by the calling task, so
the check passes if some other task locked the inode.
Using one of the lockdep functions to check the lock is held, like
lockdep_assert_held() for example, does check that the calling task
holds the lock, and if that's not the case it produces a warning and
stack trace in dmesg. However, despite the misleading "assert" in the
name of the lockdep helpers, it does not trigger a crash/BUG_ON(), just
a warning and splat in dmesg, which is easy to get unnoticed by users
who may have lockdep enabled.
So add a helper that does the ASSERT() and calls lockdep_assert_held()
immediately after and use it every where we check the inode is locked.
Like this if the lock is held by some other task we get the warning
in dmesg which is caught by fstests, very helpful during development,
and may also be occassionaly noticed by users with lockdep enabled.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Even in case of failure we could've discarded some data and userspace
should be made aware of it, so copy fstrim_range to userspace
regardless.
Also make sure to update the trimmed bytes amount even if
btrfs_trim_free_extents fails.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Stefani <luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover find_or_create_page() is compatible API, and it can
replaced with __filemap_get_folio(). Some interfaces have been converted
to use folio before, so the conversion operation from page can be
eliminated here.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Based on the previous patch, the compression path can be
directly used in folio without converting to page.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And memcpy_to_page() can be replaced with memcpy_to_folio().
But there is no memzero_folio(), but it can be replaced equivalently by
folio_zero_range().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And memcpy_to_page() can be replaced with memcpy_to_folio().
But there is no memzero_folio(), but it can be replaced equivalently by
folio_zero_range().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And memcpy_to_page() can be replaced with memcpy_to_folio().
But there is no memzero_folio(), but it can be replaced equivalently by
folio_zero_range().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And page_to_inode() can be replaced with folio_to_inode() now.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use folio_pos() instead of page_offset(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use folio_pos() instead of page_offset(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use kmap_local_folio() instead of kmap_local_page(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And use folio_pos instead of page_offset, which is more
consistent with folio usage. At the same time, folio_test_private() can
handle folio directly without converting from page to folio first.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Use folio_pos instead of page_offset, which is more
consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Now clear_page_extent_mapped() can deal with a folio
directly, so change its name to clear_folio_extent_mapped().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently btrfs compression path is not really subpage compatible, every
thing is still done in page unit.
That's fine for regular sector size and subpage routine. As even for
subpage routine compression is only enabled if the whole range is page
aligned, so reading the page cache in page unit is totally fine.
However in preparation for the future subpage perfect compression
support, we need to change the compression routine to properly handle a
subpage range.
This patch would prepare both zlib and zstd to only read the subpage
range for compression.
Lzo is already doing subpage aware read, as lzo's on-disk format is
already sectorsize dependent.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are only two differences between the two functions:
- btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io() does extra error propagation
This is mostly to allow tolerance for write errors.
- btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io() does extra pending_ios check
This check can handle both the original bio, or the cloned one.
(All accounting happens in the original one).
This makes btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io() a much safer call.
In fact we already had a double freeing error due to usage of
btrfs_bio_end_io() in the error path of btrfs_submit_chunk().
So just move the whole content of btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io() into
btrfs_bio_end_io().
For normal paths this brings no change, because they are already calling
btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io() in the first place.
For error paths (not only inside bio.c but also external callers), this
change will introduce extra checks, especially for external callers, as
they will error out without submitting the btrfs bio.
But considering it's already in the error path, such slower but much
safer checks are still an overall win.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Historically we've held the extent lock throughout the entire read.
There's been a few reasons for this, but it's mostly just caused us
problems. For example, this prevents us from allowing page faults
during direct io reads, because we could deadlock. This has forced us
to only allow 4k reads at a time for io_uring NOWAIT requests because we
have no idea if we'll be forced to page fault and thus have to do a
whole lot of work.
On the buffered side we are protected by the page lock, as long as we're
reading things like buffered writes, punch hole, and even direct IO to a
certain degree will get hung up on the page lock while the page is in
flight.
On the direct side we have the dio extent lock, which acts much like the
way the extent lock worked previously to this patch, however just for
direct reads. This protects direct reads from concurrent direct writes,
while we're protected from buffered writes via the inode lock.
Now that we're protected in all cases, narrow the extent lock to the
part where we're getting the extent map to submit the reads, no longer
holding the extent lock for the entire read operation. Push the extent
lock down into do_readpage() so that we're only grabbing it when looking
up the extent map. This portion was contributed by Goldwyn.
Co-developed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently we hold the extent lock for the entire duration of a read.
This isn't really necessary in the buffered case, we're protected by the
page lock, however it's necessary for O_DIRECT.
For O_DIRECT reads, if we only locked the extent for the part where we
get the extent, we could potentially race with an O_DIRECT write in the
same region. This isn't really a problem, unless the read is delayed so
much that the write does the COW, unpins the old extent, and some other
application re-allocates the extent before the read is actually able to
be submitted. At that point at best we'd have a checksum mismatch, but
at worse we could read data that doesn't belong to us.
To address this potential race we need to make sure we don't have
overlapping, concurrent direct io reads and writes.
To accomplish this use the new EXTENT_DIO_LOCKED bit in the direct IO
case in the same spot as the current extent lock. The writes will take
this while they're creating the ordered extent, which is also used to
make sure concurrent buffered reads or concurrent direct reads are not
allowed to occur, and drop it after the ordered extent is taken. For
reads it will act as the current read behavior for the EXTENT_LOCKED
bit, we set it when we're starting the read, we clear it in the end_io
to allow other direct writes to continue.
This still has the drawback of disallowing concurrent overlapping direct
reads from occurring, but that exists with the current extent locking.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In order to support dropping the extent lock during a read we need a way
to make sure that direct reads and direct writes for overlapping ranges
are protected from each other. To accomplish this introduce another
lock bit specifically for direct io. Subsequent patches will utilize
this to protect direct IO operations.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Defrag ioctl passes readahead from the file, but autodefrag does not
have a file so the readahead state is allocated when needed.
The autodefrag loop in cleaner thread iterates over inodes so we can
simply provide an on-stack readahead state and will not need to allocate
it in btrfs_defrag_file(). The size is 32 bytes which is acceptable.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's only one caller inode_should_defrag() that passes NULL to
btrfs_add_inode_defrag() so we can drop it an simplify the code.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The potential memory allocation failure is not a fatal error, skipping
autodefrag is fine and the caller inode_should_defrag() does not care
about the errors. Further writes can attempt to add the inode back to
the defragmentation list again.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_cleanup_defrag_inodes() is not called frequently, only in remount
or unmount, but the way it frees the inodes in fs_info->defrag_inodes
is inefficient. Each time it needs to locate first node, remove it,
potentially rebalance tree until it's done. This allows to do a
conditional reschedule.
For cleanups the rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() iterator is
convenient but we can't reschedule and restart iteration because some of
the tree nodes would be already freed.
The cleanup operation is kmem_cache_free() which will likely take the
fast path for most objects so rescheduling should not be necessary.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Also update the misleading comment, the passed item is not freed, that's
what the caller does.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
A comparator function does not change its parameters, make them const.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Previous patch freed the function name btrfs_submit_bio() so we can use
it for a helper that submits struct bio.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function name is a bit misleading as it submits the btrfs_bio
(bbio), rename it so we can use btrfs_submit_bio() when an actual bio is
submitted.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The member btrfs_fs_info::subpage_info stores the cached bitmap start
position inside the merged bitmap.
However in reality there is only one thing depending on the sectorsize,
bitmap_nr_bits, which records the number of sectors that fit inside a
page.
The sequence of sub-bitmaps have fixed order, thus it's just a quick
multiplication to calculate the start position of each sub-bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The parameter @nr_ret is used to tell the caller how many sectors have
been submitted for IO.
Then callers check @nr_ret value to determine if we need to manually
clear the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY, as if we submitted no sector (e.g. all
sectors are beyond i_size) there is no folio_start_writeback() called thus
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag will not be cleared.
Remove this parameter by:
- Moving the btrfs_folio_clear_writeback() call into
__extent_writepage_io()
So that if we didn't submit any IO, then manually call
btrfs_folio_set_writeback() to clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY when
the page is no longer dirty.
- Use a bool to record if we have submitted any sector
Instead of an int.
- Use subpage compatible helpers to end folio writeback.
This brings no change to the behavior, just for the sake of consistency.
As for the call site inside __extent_writepage(), we're always called
for the whole page, so the existing full page helper
folio_(start|end)_writeback() is totally fine.
For the call site inside extent_write_locked_range(), although we can
have subpage range, folio_start_writeback() will only clear
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY if the page is no longer dirty, and the full folio
will still be dirty if there is any subpage dirty range.
Only when the last dirty subpage sector is cleared, the
folio_start_writeback() will clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY.
So no matter if we call the full page or subpage helper, the result
is still the same, then just use the subpage helpers for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fix a few obvious grammar mistakes: a -> an, then -> than.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use xarray to track dirty extents to reduce the size of the struct
btrfs_qgroup_extent_record from 64 bytes to 40 bytes. The xarray is
more cache line friendly, it also reduces the complexity of insertion
and search code compared to rb tree.
Another change introduced is about error handling. Before this patch,
the result of btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_nolock() is always a success. In
this patch, because of this function calls the function xa_store() which
has the possibility to fail, so mark qgroup as inconsistent if error
happened and then free preallocated memory. Also we preallocate memory
before spin_lock(), if memory preallcation failed, error handling is the
same the existing code.
Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Junchao Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
