korg/linux
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git synced 2024-11-15 08:14:15 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
599,135 Commits 112 Branches 5,274 Tags 4.8 GiB
95e4daa820
Commit Graph

1129 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Naoya Horiguchi
e570f56ccc mm: check_new_page_bad() directly returns in __PG_HWPOISON case 
Currently we check page->flags twice for "HWPoisoned" case of
check_new_page_bad(), which can cause a race with unpoisoning.

This race unnecessarily taints kernel with "BUG: Bad page state".
check_new_page_bad() is the only caller of bad_page() which is
interested in __PG_HWPOISON, so let's move the hwpoison related code in
bad_page() to it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160518100949.GA17299@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
seokhoon.yoon
29b52de182 mm, kasan: fix to call kasan_free_pages() after poisoning page 
When CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING and CONFIG_KASAN is enabled,
free_pages_prepare()'s codeflow is below.

  1)kmemcheck_free_shadow()
  2)kasan_free_pages()
    - set shadow byte of page is freed
  3)kernel_poison_pages()
  3.1) check access to page is valid or not using kasan
    ---> error occur, kasan think it is invalid access
  3.2) poison page
  4)kernel_map_pages()

So kasan_free_pages() should be called after poisoning the page.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463220405-7455-1-git-send-email-iamyooon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: seokhoon.yoon <iamyooon@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Stefan Bader
4b50bcc7ed mm: use phys_addr_t for reserve_bootmem_region() arguments 
Since commit 92923ca3aa ("mm: meminit: only set page reserved in the
memblock region") the reserved bit is set on reserved memblock regions.
However start and end address are passed as unsigned long.  This is only
32bit on i386, so it can end up marking the wrong pages reserved for
ranges at 4GB and above.

This was observed on a 32bit Xen dom0 which was booted with initial
memory set to a value below 4G but allowing to balloon in memory
(dom0_mem=1024M for example).  This would define a reserved bootmem
region for the additional memory (for example on a 8GB system there was
a reverved region covering the 4GB-8GB range).  But since the addresses
were passed on as unsigned long, this was actually marking all pages
from 0 to 4GB as reserved.

Fixes: 92923ca3aa ("mm: meminit: only set page reserved in the memblock region")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463491221-10573-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[4.2+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Minfei Huang
2a138dc7e5 mm: use existing helper to convert "on"/"off" to boolean 
It's more convenient to use existing function helper to convert string
"on/off" to boolean.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461908824-16129-1-git-send-email-mnghuan@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
31e49bfda1 mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for !CONFIG_COMPACTION 
Joonsoo has reported that he is able to trigger OOM for !costly high
order requests (heavy fork() workload close the OOM) with the new oom
detection rework.  This is because we rely only on should_reclaim_retry
when the compaction is disabled and it only checks watermarks for the
requested order and so we might trigger OOM when there is a lot of free
memory.

It is not very clear what are the usual workloads when the compaction is
disabled.  Relying on high order allocations heavily without any
mechanism to create those orders except for unbound amount of reclaim is
certainly not a good idea.

To prevent from potential regressions let's help this configuration
some.  We have to sacrifice the determinsm though because there simply
is none here possible.  should_compact_retry implementation for
!CONFIG_COMPACTION, which was empty so far, will do watermark check for
order-0 on all eligible zones.  This will cause retrying until either
the reclaim cannot make any further progress or all the zones are
depleted even for order-0 pages.  This means that the number of retries
is basically unbounded for !costly orders but that was the case before
the rework as well so this shouldn't regress.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
86a294a81f mm, oom, compaction: prevent from should_compact_retry looping for ever for costly orders 
"mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation" has
removed the upper bound for the reclaim/compaction retries based on the
number of reclaimed pages for costly orders.  While this is desirable
the patch did miss a mis interaction between reclaim, compaction and the
retry logic.  The direct reclaim tries to get zones over min watermark
while compaction backs off and returns COMPACT_SKIPPED when all zones
are below low watermark + 1<<order gap.  If we are getting really close
to OOM then __compaction_suitable can keep returning COMPACT_SKIPPED a
high order request (e.g.  hugetlb order-9) while the reclaim is not able
to release enough pages to get us over low watermark.  The reclaim is
still able to make some progress (usually trashing over few remaining
pages) so we are not able to break out from the loop.

I have seen this happening with the same test described in "mm: consider
compaction feedback also for costly allocation" on a swapless system.
The original problem got resolved by "vmscan: consider classzone_idx in
compaction_ready" but it shows how things might go wrong when we
approach the oom event horizont.

The reason why compaction requires being over low rather than min
watermark is not clear to me.  This check was there essentially since
56de7263fc ("mm: compaction: direct compact when a high-order
allocation fails").  It is clearly an implementation detail though and
we shouldn't pull it into the generic retry logic while we should be
able to cope with such eventuality.  The only place in
should_compact_retry where we retry without any upper bound is for
compaction_withdrawn() case.

Introduce compaction_zonelist_suitable function which checks the given
zonelist and returns true only if there is at least one zone which would
would unblock __compaction_suitable if more memory got reclaimed.  In
this implementation it checks __compaction_suitable with NR_FREE_PAGES
plus part of the reclaimable memory as the target for the watermark
check.  The reclaimable memory is reduced linearly by the allocation
order.  The idea is that we do not want to reclaim all the remaining
memory for a single allocation request just unblock
__compaction_suitable which doesn't guarantee we will make a further
progress.

The new helper is then used if compaction_withdrawn() feedback was
provided so we do not retry if there is no outlook for a further
progress.  !costly requests shouldn't be affected much - e.g.  order-2
pages would require to have at least 64kB on the reclaimable LRUs while
order-9 would need at least 32M which should be enough to not lock up.

[vbabka@suse.cz: fix classzone_idx vs. high_zoneidx usage in compaction_zonelist_suitable]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix it for Mel's mm-page_alloc-remove-field-from-alloc_context.patch]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
7854ea6c28 mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation 
PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER retry logic is mostly handled inside
should_reclaim_retry currently where we decide to not retry after at
least order worth of pages were reclaimed or the watermark check for at
least one zone would succeed after reclaiming all pages if the reclaim
hasn't made any progress.  Compaction feedback is mostly ignored and we
just try to make sure that the compaction did at least something before
giving up.

The first condition was added by a41f24ea9f ("page allocator: smarter
retry of costly-order allocations) and it assumed that lumpy reclaim
could have created a page of the sufficient order.  Lumpy reclaim, has
been removed quite some time ago so the assumption doesn't hold anymore.
Remove the check for the number of reclaimed pages and rely on the
compaction feedback solely.  should_reclaim_retry now only makes sure
that we keep retrying reclaim for high order pages only if they are
hidden by watermaks so order-0 reclaim makes really sense.

should_compact_retry now keeps retrying even for the costly allocations.
The number of retries is reduced wrt.  !costly requests because they are
less important and harder to grant and so their pressure shouldn't cause
contention for other requests or cause an over reclaim.  We also do not
reset no_progress_loops for costly request to make sure we do not keep
reclaiming too agressively.

This has been tested by running a process which fragments memory:
	- compact memory
	- mmap large portion of the memory (1920M on 2GRAM machine with 2G
	  of swapspace)
	- MADV_DONTNEED single page in PAGE_SIZE*((1UL<<MAX_ORDER)-1)
	  steps until certain amount of memory is freed (250M in my test)
	  and reduce the step to (step / 2) + 1 after reaching the end of
	  the mapping
	- then run a script which populates the page cache 2G (MemTotal)
	  from /dev/zero to a new file
And then tries to allocate
nr_hugepages=$(awk '/MemAvailable/{printf "%d\n", $2/(2*1024)}' /proc/meminfo)
huge pages.

root@test1:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory;echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory; ./fragment-mem-and-run /root/alloc_hugepages.sh 1920M 250M
Node 0, zone      DMA     31     28     31     10      2      0      2      1      2      3      1
Node 0, zone    DMA32    437    319    171     50     28     25     20     16     16     14    437

* This is the /proc/buddyinfo after the compaction

Done fragmenting. size=2013265920 freed=262144000
Node 0, zone      DMA    165     48      3      1      2      0      2      2      2      2      0
Node 0, zone    DMA32  35109  14575    185     51     41     12      6      0      0      0      0

* /proc/buddyinfo after memory got fragmented

Executing "/root/alloc_hugepages.sh"
Eating some pagecache
508623+0 records in
508623+0 records out
2083319808 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 11.7292 s, 178 MB/s
Node 0, zone      DMA      3      5      3      1      2      0      2      2      2      2      0
Node 0, zone    DMA32    111    344    153     20     24     10      3      0      0      0      0

* /proc/buddyinfo after page cache got eaten

Trying to allocate 129
129

* 129 hugepages requested and all of them granted.

Node 0, zone      DMA      3      5      3      1      2      0      2      2      2      2      0
Node 0, zone    DMA32    127     97     30     99     11      6      2      1      4      0      0

* /proc/buddyinfo after hugetlb allocation.

10 runs will behave as follows:
Trying to allocate 130
130
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 128
128
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 128
128
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 132
132
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 128
128
--
Trying to allocate 129
129

So basically 100% success for all 10 attempts.
Without the patch numbers looked much worse:
Trying to allocate 128
12
--
Trying to allocate 129
14
--
Trying to allocate 129
7
--
Trying to allocate 129
16
--
Trying to allocate 129
30
--
Trying to allocate 129
38
--
Trying to allocate 129
19
--
Trying to allocate 129
37
--
Trying to allocate 129
28
--
Trying to allocate 129
37

Just for completness the base kernel without oom detection rework looks
as follows:
Trying to allocate 127
30
--
Trying to allocate 129
12
--
Trying to allocate 129
52
--
Trying to allocate 128
32
--
Trying to allocate 129
12
--
Trying to allocate 129
10
--
Trying to allocate 129
32
--
Trying to allocate 128
14
--
Trying to allocate 128
16
--
Trying to allocate 129
8

As we can see the success rate is much more volatile and smaller without
this patch. So the patch not only makes the retry logic for costly
requests more sensible the success rate is even higher.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
33c2d21438 mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more 
should_reclaim_retry will give up retries for higher order allocations
if none of the eligible zones has any requested or higher order pages
available even if we pass the watermak check for order-0.  This is done
because there is no guarantee that the reclaimable and currently free
pages will form the required order.

This can, however, lead to situations where the high-order request (e.g.
order-2 required for the stack allocation during fork) will trigger OOM
too early - e.g.  after the first reclaim/compaction round.  Such a
system would have to be highly fragmented and there is no guarantee
further reclaim/compaction attempts would help but at least make sure
that the compaction was active before we go OOM and keep retrying even
if should_reclaim_retry tells us to oom if

	- the last compaction round backed off or
	- we haven't completed at least MAX_COMPACT_RETRIES active
	  compaction rounds.

The first rule ensures that the very last attempt for compaction was not
ignored while the second guarantees that the compaction has done some
work.  Multiple retries might be needed to prevent occasional pigggy
backing of other contexts to steal the compacted pages before the
current context manages to retry to allocate them.

compaction_failed() is taken as a final word from the compaction that
the retry doesn't make much sense.  We have to be careful though because
the first compaction round is MIGRATE_ASYNC which is rather weak as it
ignores pages under writeback and gives up too easily in other
situations.  We therefore have to make sure that MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT mode
has been used before we give up.  With this logic in place we do not
have to increase the migration mode unconditionally and rather do it
only if the compaction failed for the weaker mode.  A nice side effect
is that the stronger migration mode is used only when really needed so
this has a potential of smaller latencies in some cases.

Please note that the compaction doesn't tell us much about how
successful it was when returning compaction_made_progress so we just
have to blindly trust that another retry is worthwhile and cap the
number to something reasonable to guarantee a convergence.

If the given number of successful retries is not sufficient for a
reasonable workloads we should focus on the collected compaction
tracepoints data and try to address the issue in the compaction code.
If this is not feasible we can increase the retries limit.

[mhocko@suse.com: fix warning]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160512061636.GA4200@dhcp22.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
ede3771373 mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages 
wait_iff_congested has been used to throttle allocator before it retried
another round of direct reclaim to allow the writeback to make some
progress and prevent reclaim from looping over dirty/writeback pages
without making any progress.

We used to do congestion_wait before commit 0e093d9976 ("writeback: do
not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if
significant congestion is not being encountered in the current zone")
but that led to undesirable stalls and sleeping for the full timeout
even when the BDI wasn't congested.  Hence wait_iff_congested was used
instead.

But it seems that even wait_iff_congested doesn't work as expected.  We
might have a small file LRU list with all pages dirty/writeback and yet
the bdi is not congested so this is just a cond_resched in the end and
can end up triggering pre mature OOM.

This patch replaces the unconditional wait_iff_congested by
congestion_wait which is executed only if we _know_ that the last round
of direct reclaim didn't make any progress and dirty+writeback pages are
more than a half of the reclaimable pages on the zone which might be
usable for our target allocation.  This shouldn't reintroduce stalls
fixed by 0e093d9976 because congestion_wait is called only when we are
getting hopeless when sleeping is a better choice than OOM with many
pages under IO.

We have to preserve logic introduced by commit 373ccbe592 ("mm,
vmstat: allow WQ concurrency to discover memory reclaim doesn't make any
progress") into the __alloc_pages_slowpath now that wait_iff_congested
is not used anymore.  As the only remaining user of wait_iff_congested
is shrink_inactive_list we can remove the WQ specific short sleep from
wait_iff_congested because the sleep is needed to be done only once in
the allocation retry cycle.

[mhocko@suse.com: high_zoneidx->ac_classzone_idx to evaluate memory reserves properly]
 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
0a0337e0d1 mm, oom: rework oom detection 
__alloc_pages_slowpath has traditionally relied on the direct reclaim
and did_some_progress as an indicator that it makes sense to retry
allocation rather than declaring OOM.  shrink_zones had to rely on
zone_reclaimable if shrink_zone didn't make any progress to prevent from
a premature OOM killer invocation - the LRU might be full of dirty or
writeback pages and direct reclaim cannot clean those up.

zone_reclaimable allows to rescan the reclaimable lists several times
and restart if a page is freed.  This is really subtle behavior and it
might lead to a livelock when a single freed page keeps allocator
looping but the current task will not be able to allocate that single
page.  OOM killer would be more appropriate than looping without any
progress for unbounded amount of time.

This patch changes OOM detection logic and pulls it out from shrink_zone
which is too low to be appropriate for any high level decisions such as
OOM which is per zonelist property.  It is __alloc_pages_slowpath which
knows how many attempts have been done and what was the progress so far
therefore it is more appropriate to implement this logic.

The new heuristic is implemented in should_reclaim_retry helper called
from __alloc_pages_slowpath.  It tries to be more deterministic and
easier to follow.  It builds on an assumption that retrying makes sense
only if the currently reclaimable memory + free pages would allow the
current allocation request to succeed (as per __zone_watermark_ok) at
least for one zone in the usable zonelist.

This alone wouldn't be sufficient, though, because the writeback might
get stuck and reclaimable pages might be pinned for a really long time
or even depend on the current allocation context.  Therefore there is a
backoff mechanism implemented which reduces the reclaim target after
each reclaim round without any progress.  This means that we should
eventually converge to only NR_FREE_PAGES as the target and fail on the
wmark check and proceed to OOM.  The backoff is simple and linear with
1/16 of the reclaimable pages for each round without any progress.  We
are optimistic and reset counter for successful reclaim rounds.

Costly high order pages mostly preserve their semantic and those without
__GFP_REPEAT fail right away while those which have the flag set will
back off after the amount of reclaimable pages reaches equivalent of the
requested order.  The only difference is that if there was no progress
during the reclaim we rely on zone watermark check.  This is more
logical thing to do than previous 1<<order attempts which were a result
of zone_reclaimable faking the progress.

[vdavydov@virtuozzo.com: check classzone_idx for shrink_zone]
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: separate the heuristic into should_reclaim_retry]
[rientjes@google.com: use zone_page_state_snapshot for NR_FREE_PAGES]
[rientjes@google.com: shrink_zones doesn't need to return anything]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
c5d01d0d18 mm, compaction: simplify __alloc_pages_direct_compact feedback interface 
__alloc_pages_direct_compact communicates potential back off by two
variables:
	- deferred_compaction tells that the compaction returned
	  COMPACT_DEFERRED
	- contended_compaction is set when there is a contention on
	  zone->lock resp. zone->lru_lock locks

__alloc_pages_slowpath then backs of for THP allocation requests to
prevent from long stalls. This is rather messy and it would be much
cleaner to return a single compact result value and hide all the nasty
details into __alloc_pages_direct_compact.

This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
ea7ab982b6 mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum 
Compaction code is doing weird dances between COMPACT_FOO -> int ->
unsigned long

But there doesn't seem to be any reason for that.  All functions which
return/use one of those constants are not expecting any other value so it
really makes sense to define an enum for them and make it clear that no
other values are expected.

This is a pure cleanup and shouldn't introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Rik van Riel
59dc76b0d4 mm: vmscan: reduce size of inactive file list 
The inactive file list should still be large enough to contain readahead
windows and freshly written file data, but it no longer is the only
source for detecting multiple accesses to file pages.  The workingset
refault measurement code causes recently evicted file pages that get
accessed again after a shorter interval to be promoted directly to the
active list.

With that mechanism in place, we can afford to (on a larger system)
dedicate more memory to the active file list, so we can actually cache
more of the frequently used file pages in memory, and not have them
pushed out by streaming writes, once-used streaming file reads, etc.

This can help things like database workloads, where only half the page
cache can currently be used to cache the database working set.  This
patch automatically increases that fraction on larger systems, using the
same ratio that has already been used for anonymous memory.

[hannes@cmpxchg.org: cgroup-awareness]
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4741526b83 mm, page_alloc: restore the original nodemask if the fast path allocation failed 
The page allocator fast path uses either the requested nodemask or
cpuset_current_mems_allowed if cpusets are enabled.  If the allocation
context allows watermarks to be ignored then it can also ignore memory
policies.  However, on entering the allocator slowpath the nodemask may
still be cpuset_current_mems_allowed and the policies are enforced.
This patch resets the nodemask appropriately before entering the
slowpath.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160504143628.GU2858@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Vlastimil Babka
4e6118016e mm, page_alloc: uninline the bad page part of check_new_page() 
Bad pages should be rare so the code handling them doesn't need to be
inline for performance reasons.  Put it to separate function which
returns void.  This also assumes that the initial page_expected_state()
result will match the result of the thorough check, i.e.  the page
doesn't become "good" in the meanwhile.  This matches the same
expectations already in place in free_pages_check().

!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 134/-274 (-140)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  check_new_page_bad                             -     134    +134
  get_page_from_freelist                      3468    3194    -274

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
e2769dbdc5 mm, page_alloc: don't duplicate code in free_pcp_prepare 
The new free_pcp_prepare() function shares a lot of code with
free_pages_prepare(), which makes this a maintenance risk when some
future patch modifies only one of them.  We should be able to achieve
the same effect (skipping free_pages_check() from !DEBUG_VM configs) by
adding a parameter to free_pages_prepare() and making it inline, so the
checks (and the order != 0 parts) are eliminated from the call from
free_pcp_prepare().

!DEBUG_VM: bloat-o-meter reports no difference, as my gcc was already
inlining free_pages_prepare() and the elimination seems to work as
expected

DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 1035/-778 (257)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __free_pages_ok                              297    1060    +763
  free_hot_cold_page                           480     752    +272
  free_pages_prepare                           778       -    -778

Here inlining didn't occur before, and added some code, but it's ok for
a debug option.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
479f854a20 mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of pages allocated from the PCP 
Every page allocated checks a number of page fields for validity.  This
catches corruption bugs of pages that are already freed but it is
expensive.  This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages
only when the PCP lists are being refilled.  All compound pages are
checked.  This potentially avoids debugging checks entirely if the PCP
lists are never emptied and refilled so some corruption issues may be
missed.  Full checking requires DEBUG_VM.

With the two deferred debugging patches applied, the impact to a page
allocator microbenchmark is

                                             4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                           inline-v3r6            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               344.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 (  7.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               248.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 (  6.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               209.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 (  8.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               181.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 (  8.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              168.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              161.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 (  8.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              158.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 (  8.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             156.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             168.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             178.00 (  0.00%)           167.00 (  6.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            186.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  6.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            192.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  6.25%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            198.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  7.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            200.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  6.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           201.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  6.47%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                189.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  4.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                132.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  4.55%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                104.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 (  4.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                 90.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 (  5.56%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                84.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  4.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                80.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                78.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 (  5.13%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               77.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 (  5.19%)
  Min      free-odr0-256               94.00 (  0.00%)            91.00 (  3.19%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              108.00 (  0.00%)           112.00 ( -3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             115.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 ( -2.61%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             120.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( -4.17%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             123.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( -4.88%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             126.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( -3.17%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            126.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 ( -3.97%)

Note that the free paths for large numbers of pages is impacted as the
debugging cost gets shifted into that path when the page data is no
longer necessarily cache-hot.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4db7548ccb mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of freed pages until a PCP drain 
Every page free checks a number of page fields for validity.  This
catches premature frees and corruptions but it is also expensive.  This
patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages at the time they
are drained from the PCP list.  This will trigger the bug but the site
that freed the corrupt page will be lost.  To get the full context, a
kernel rebuild with DEBUG_VM is necessary.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Vlastimil Babka
002f290627 cpuset: use static key better and convert to new API 
An important function for cpusets is cpuset_node_allowed(), which
optimizes on the fact if there's a single root CPU set, it must be
trivially allowed.  But the check "nr_cpusets() <= 1" doesn't use the
cpusets_enabled_key static key the right way where static keys eliminate
branching overhead with jump labels.

This patch converts it so that static key is used properly.  It's also
switched to the new static key API and the checking functions are
converted to return bool instead of int.  We also provide a new variant
__cpuset_zone_allowed() which expects that the static key check was
already done and they key was enabled.  This is needed for
get_page_from_freelist() where we want to also avoid the relatively
slower check when ALLOC_CPUSET is not set in alloc_flags.

The impact on the page allocator microbenchmark is less than expected
but the cleanup in itself is worthwhile.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                       multcheck-v1r20               cpuset-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               348.00 (  0.00%)           348.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               254.00 (  0.00%)           254.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  1.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           171.00 (  1.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              166.00 (  0.00%)           163.00 (  1.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              162.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 (  1.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             160.00 (  0.00%)           157.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             169.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 (  1.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             180.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            188.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  0.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            194.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            202.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           203.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  0.49%)

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
0b423ca22f mm, page_alloc: inline pageblock lookup in page free fast paths 
The function call overhead of get_pfnblock_flags_mask() is measurable in
the page free paths.  This patch uses an inlined version that is faster.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
e5b31ac2ca mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary variable from free_pcppages_bulk 
The original count is never reused so it can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
da838d4fcb mm, page_alloc: pull out side effects from free_pages_check 
Check without side-effects should be easier to maintain.  It also
removes the duplicated cpupid and flags reset done in !DEBUG_VM variant
of both free_pcp_prepare() and then bulkfree_pcp_prepare().  Finally, it
enables the next patch.

It shouldn't result in new branches, thanks to inlining of the check.

!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-27 (-27)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __free_pages_ok                              748     739      -9
  free_pcppages_bulk                          1403    1385     -18

DEBUG_VM:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-28 (-28)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_prepare                           806     778     -28

This is also slightly faster because cpupid information is not set on
tail pages so we can avoid resets there.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
bb552ac6c6 mm, page_alloc: un-inline the bad part of free_pages_check 
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

!DEBUG_VM size and bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 124/-370 (-246)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
  free_pcppages_bulk                          1288    1171    -117
  __free_pages_ok                              948     695    -253

DEBUG_VM:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 124/-214 (-90)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
  free_pages_prepare                          1112     898    -214

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
7bfec6f47b mm, page_alloc: check multiple page fields with a single branch 
Every page allocated or freed is checked for sanity to avoid corruptions
that are difficult to detect later.  A bad page could be due to a number
of fields.  Instead of using multiple branches, this patch combines
multiple fields into a single branch.  A detailed check is only
necessary if that check fails.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                        initonce-v1r20            multcheck-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               359.00 (  0.00%)           348.00 (  3.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               260.00 (  0.00%)           254.00 (  2.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               214.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              165.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( -0.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              162.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             161.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 (  0.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             181.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  0.55%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            190.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            196.00 (  0.00%)           194.00 (  1.02%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            202.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.49%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            205.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  1.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           205.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  0.98%)

Again, the benefit is marginal but avoiding excessive branches is
important.  Ideally the paths would not have to check these conditions
at all but regrettably abandoning the tests would make use-after-free
bugs much harder to detect.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
93ea9964d1 mm, page_alloc: remove field from alloc_context 
The classzone_idx can be inferred from preferred_zoneref so remove the
unnecessary field and save stack space.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
c33d6c06f6 mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice 
The allocator fast path looks up the first usable zone in a zonelist and
then get_page_from_freelist does the same job in the zonelist iterator.
This patch preserves the necessary information.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                        fastmark-v1r20             initonce-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               364.00 (  0.00%)           359.00 (  1.37%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               262.00 (  0.00%)           260.00 (  0.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              165.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              161.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( -0.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             159.00 (  0.00%)           161.00 ( -1.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             168.00 (  0.00%)           170.00 ( -1.19%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             180.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 ( -0.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            190.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            202.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            206.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  0.49%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           206.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  0.49%)

The benefit is negligible and the results are within the noise but each
cycle counts.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
48ee5f3696 mm, page_alloc: shortcut watermark checks for order-0 pages 
Watermarks have to be checked on every allocation including the number
of pages being allocated and whether reserves can be accessed.  The
reserves only matter if memory is limited and the free_pages adjustment
only applies to high-order pages.  This patch adds a shortcut for
order-0 pages that avoids numerous calculations if there is plenty of
free memory yielding the following performance difference in a page
allocator microbenchmark;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optfair-v1r20             fastmark-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               380.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 (  4.21%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           262.00 (  4.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               227.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  5.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  5.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              173.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  4.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              169.00 (  0.00%)           161.00 (  4.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             169.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 (  5.92%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             180.00 (  0.00%)           168.00 (  6.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             190.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            198.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  4.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  3.92%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            209.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  3.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  3.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  3.74%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
305347550b mm, page_alloc: reduce cost of fair zone allocation policy retry 
The fair zone allocation policy is not without cost but it can be
reduced slightly.  This patch removes an unnecessary local variable,
checks the likely conditions of the fair zone policy first, uses a bool
instead of a flags check and falls through when a remote node is
encountered instead of doing a full restart.  The benefit is marginal
but it's there

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         decstat-v1r20              optfair-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               377.00 (  0.00%)           380.00 ( -0.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               226.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( -0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              175.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  1.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              172.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  1.74%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             183.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  1.64%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             191.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            210.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  0.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)

The benefit is marginal at best but one of the most important benefits,
avoiding a second search when falling back to another node is not
triggered by this particular test so the benefit for some corner cases
is understated.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4fcb097117 mm, page_alloc: shorten the page allocator fast path 
The page allocator fast path checks page multiple times unnecessarily.
This patch avoids all the slowpath checks if the first allocation
attempt succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
3777999dd4 mm, page_alloc: check once if a zone has isolated pageblocks 
When bulk freeing pages from the per-cpu lists the zone is checked for
isolated pageblocks on every release.  This patch checks it once per
drain.

[mgorman@techsingularity.net: fix locking radce, per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
83d4ca8148 mm, page_alloc: move __GFP_HARDWALL modifications out of the fastpath 
__GFP_HARDWALL only has meaning in the context of cpusets but the fast
path always applies the flag on the first attempt.  Move the
manipulations into the cpuset paths where they will be masked by a
static branch in the common case.

With the other micro-optimisations in this series combined, the impact
on a page allocator microbenchmark is

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         decstat-v1r20                micro-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               381.00 (  0.00%)           377.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               275.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               229.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               199.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  1.51%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              186.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  1.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              179.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  2.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              174.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             172.00 (  0.00%)           170.00 (  1.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             181.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 ( -1.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             193.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  1.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            201.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            206.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            212.00 (  0.00%)           210.00 (  0.94%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            215.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           216.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.93%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
5bb1b16975 mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary initialisation from __alloc_pages_nodemask() 
page is guaranteed to be set before it is read with or without the
initialisation.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
be06af002f mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary initialisation in get_page_from_freelist 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4dfa6cd8fd mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary local variable in get_page_from_freelist 
zonelist here is a copy of a struct field that is used once.  Ditch it.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
fa379b9586 mm, page_alloc: convert nr_fair_skipped to bool 
The number of zones skipped to a zone expiring its fair zone allocation
quota is irrelevant.  Convert to bool.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
c603844bdc mm, page_alloc: convert alloc_flags to unsigned 
alloc_flags is a bitmask of flags but it is signed which does not
necessarily generate the best code depending on the compiler.  Even
without an impact, it makes more sense that this be unsigned.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
f75fb889d1 mm, page_alloc: avoid unnecessary zone lookups during pageblock operations 
Pageblocks have an associated bitmap to store migrate types and whether
the pageblock should be skipped during compaction.  The bitmap may be
associated with a memory section or a zone but the zone is looked up
unconditionally.  The compiler should optimise this away automatically
so this is a cosmetic patch only in many cases.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
754078eb45 mm, page_alloc: use __dec_zone_state for order-0 page allocation 
__dec_zone_state is cheaper to use for removing an order-0 page as it
has fewer conditions to check.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optiter-v1r20              decstat-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               382.00 (  0.00%)           381.00 (  0.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               282.00 (  0.00%)           275.00 (  2.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               233.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.72%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              188.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  1.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              182.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 (  1.65%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              177.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  1.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             175.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             184.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 (  1.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             197.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            203.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            209.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            214.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            218.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           219.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 (  1.37%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
682a3385e7 mm, page_alloc: inline the fast path of the zonelist iterator 
The page allocator iterates through a zonelist for zones that match the
addressing limitations and nodemask of the caller but many allocations
will not be restricted.  Despite this, there is always functional call
overhead which builds up.

This patch inlines the optimistic basic case and only calls the iterator
function for the complex case.  A hindrance was the fact that
cpuset_current_mems_allowed is used in the fastpath as the allowed
nodemask even though all nodes are allowed on most systems.  The patch
handles this by only considering cpuset_current_mems_allowed if a cpuset
exists.  As well as being faster in the fast-path, this removes some
junk in the slowpath.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statinline-v1r20              optiter-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               412.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               301.00 (  0.00%)           282.00 (  6.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               247.00 (  0.00%)           233.00 (  5.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               215.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  5.58%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              199.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  5.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              191.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 (  4.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              187.00 (  0.00%)           177.00 (  5.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             185.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  5.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             193.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  4.66%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             207.00 (  0.00%)           197.00 (  4.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            213.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  4.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            220.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            226.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            229.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 (  4.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           229.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  4.37%)

perf indicated that next_zones_zonelist disappeared in the profile and
__next_zones_zonelist did not appear.  This is expected as the
micro-benchmark would hit the inlined fast-path every time.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
060e74173f mm, page_alloc: inline zone_statistics 
zone_statistics has one call-site but it's a public function.  Make it
static and inline.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statbranch-v1r20           statinline-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               419.00 (  0.00%)           412.00 (  1.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               305.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               250.00 (  0.00%)           247.00 (  1.20%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               219.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              195.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  2.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              191.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  2.09%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             189.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 (  2.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             198.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             210.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  1.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            216.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  1.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            221.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 (  0.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            227.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
175145748d mm, page_alloc: use new PageAnonHead helper in the free page fast path 
The PageAnon check always checks for compound_head but this is a
relatively expensive check if the caller already knows the page is a
head page.  This patch creates a helper and uses it in the page free
path which only operates on head pages.

With this patch and "Only check PageCompound for high-order pages", the
performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                               vanilla           nocompound-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               425.00 (  0.00%)           417.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               313.00 (  0.00%)           308.00 (  1.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               257.00 (  0.00%)           253.00 (  1.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               224.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 (  1.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              208.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              199.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              195.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  1.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             192.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             204.00 (  0.00%)           200.00 (  1.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             213.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            219.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           225.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            230.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( -0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                215.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 ( 11.16%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           136.00 ( 10.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                119.00 (  0.00%)           107.00 ( 10.08%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            96.00 (  9.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            87.00 ( 10.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                91.00 (  0.00%)            83.00 (  8.79%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            81.00 (  8.99%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               88.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  9.09%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              106.00 (  0.00%)            95.00 ( 10.38%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              116.00 (  0.00%)           111.00 (  4.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             133.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             136.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  4.41%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             138.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.80%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)

There is a sizable boost to the free allocator performance.  While there
is an apparent boost on the allocation side, it's likely a co-incidence
or due to the patches slightly reducing cache footprint.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
d61f859039 mm, page_alloc: only check PageCompound for high-order pages 
Another year, another round of page allocator optimisations focusing
this time on the alloc and free fast paths.  This should be of help to
workloads that are allocator-intensive from kernel space where the cost
of zeroing is not nceessraily incurred.

The series is motivated by the observation that page alloc
microbenchmarks on multiple machines regressed between 3.12.44 and 4.4.
Second, there is discussions before LSF/MM considering the possibility
of adding another page allocator which is potentially hazardous but a
patch series improving performance is better than whining.

After the series is applied, there are still hazards.  In the free
paths, the debugging checking and page zone/pageblock lookups dominate
but there was not an obvious solution to that.  In the alloc path, the
major contributers are dealing with zonelists, new page preperation, the
fair zone allocation and numerous statistic updates.  The fair zone
allocator is removed by the per-node LRU series if that gets merged so
it's nor a major concern at the moment.

On normal userspace benchmarks, there is little impact as the zeroing
cost is significant but it's visible

  aim9
                                 4.6.0-rc3             4.6.0-rc3
                                   vanilla         deferalloc-v3
  Min      page_test   828693.33 (  0.00%)   887060.00 (  7.04%)
  Min      brk_test   4847266.67 (  0.00%)  4966266.67 (  2.45%)
  Min      exec_test     1271.00 (  0.00%)     1275.67 (  0.37%)
  Min      fork_test    12371.75 (  0.00%)    12380.00 (  0.07%)

The overall impact on a page allocator microbenchmark for a range of orders
and number of pages allocated in a batch is

                                            4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                               vanilla            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               428.00 (  0.00%)           316.00 ( 26.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               314.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( 26.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               256.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 ( 25.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               222.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( 25.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              207.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 ( 25.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              197.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 24.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              193.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 ( 25.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             191.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 ( 25.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             203.00 (  0.00%)           153.00 ( 24.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             212.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            221.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 ( 20.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            232.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 ( 20.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 ( 20.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           236.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 ( 20.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1               519.00 (  0.00%)           450.00 ( 13.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2               391.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 14.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4               313.00 (  0.00%)           268.00 ( 14.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8               277.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-16              256.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 14.84%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-32              252.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 ( 15.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-64              244.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 ( 15.57%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-128             244.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-256             243.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 14.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-512             245.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 ( 14.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1024            248.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 ( 13.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2048            253.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 ( 13.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4096            258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8192            261.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 ( 12.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1               560.00 (  0.00%)           753.00 (-34.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2               424.00 (  0.00%)           351.00 ( 17.22%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4               339.00 (  0.00%)           393.00 (-15.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-8               298.00 (  0.00%)           246.00 ( 17.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-16              276.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( 17.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-32              271.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 ( 18.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-64              264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-128             264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-256             264.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 17.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-512             269.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( 17.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1024            279.00 (  0.00%)           230.00 ( 17.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2048            283.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4096            285.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 16.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1               629.00 (  0.00%)           505.00 ( 19.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2               472.00 (  0.00%)           374.00 ( 20.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-4               383.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 ( 21.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-8               341.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 21.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-16              316.00 (  0.00%)           248.00 ( 21.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-32              308.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-64              305.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-128             308.00 (  0.00%)           244.00 ( 20.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-256             317.00 (  0.00%)           249.00 ( 21.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-512             327.00 (  0.00%)           256.00 ( 21.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1024            331.00 (  0.00%)           261.00 ( 21.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2048            333.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 20.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1               767.00 (  0.00%)           572.00 ( 25.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-2               578.00 (  0.00%)           429.00 ( 25.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-4               474.00 (  0.00%)           346.00 ( 27.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-8               422.00 (  0.00%)           310.00 ( 26.54%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-16              399.00 (  0.00%)           295.00 ( 26.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-32              392.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-64              394.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-128             405.00 (  0.00%)           305.00 ( 24.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-256             417.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 23.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-512             425.00 (  0.00%)           326.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1024            426.00 (  0.00%)           329.00 ( 22.77%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                216.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 17.59%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( 17.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                120.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 ( 17.50%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 ( 19.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 ( 17.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                92.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 ( 17.39%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 ( 16.85%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               89.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 ( 17.98%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              107.00 (  0.00%)            90.00 ( 15.89%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              117.00 (  0.00%)           108.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             132.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 (  5.30%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             135.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 (  4.38%)
  Min      free-odr1-1                318.00 (  0.00%)           289.00 (  9.12%)
  Min      free-odr1-2                228.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  9.21%)
  Min      free-odr1-4                182.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  9.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-8                163.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 10.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-16               151.00 (  0.00%)           135.00 ( 10.60%)
  Min      free-odr1-32               146.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( 11.64%)
  Min      free-odr1-64               145.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( 10.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-128              148.00 (  0.00%)           134.00 (  9.46%)
  Min      free-odr1-256              148.00 (  0.00%)           137.00 (  7.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-512              151.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      free-odr1-1024             154.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  7.14%)
  Min      free-odr1-2048             156.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr1-4096             156.00 (  0.00%)           142.00 (  8.97%)
  Min      free-odr1-8192             156.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 ( 10.26%)
  Min      free-odr2-1                361.00 (  0.00%)           457.00 (-26.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-2                258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      free-odr2-4                208.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( -7.21%)
  Min      free-odr2-8                185.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 13.51%)
  Min      free-odr2-16               173.00 (  0.00%)           149.00 ( 13.87%)
  Min      free-odr2-32               166.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 ( 12.65%)
  Min      free-odr2-64               166.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 12.05%)
  Min      free-odr2-128              169.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 12.43%)
  Min      free-odr2-256              170.00 (  0.00%)           152.00 ( 10.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-512              177.00 (  0.00%)           156.00 ( 11.86%)
  Min      free-odr2-1024             182.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( 10.99%)
  Min      free-odr2-2048             181.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 11.60%)
  Min      free-odr2-4096             180.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 ( 11.67%)
  Min      free-odr3-1                431.00 (  0.00%)           367.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      free-odr3-2                306.00 (  0.00%)           259.00 ( 15.36%)
  Min      free-odr3-4                249.00 (  0.00%)           208.00 ( 16.47%)
  Min      free-odr3-8                224.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      free-odr3-16               208.00 (  0.00%)           176.00 ( 15.38%)
  Min      free-odr3-32               206.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 ( 15.53%)
  Min      free-odr3-64               210.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 15.24%)
  Min      free-odr3-128              215.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 ( 15.35%)
  Min      free-odr3-256              224.00 (  0.00%)           189.00 ( 15.62%)
  Min      free-odr3-512              232.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.95%)
  Min      free-odr3-1024             230.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.22%)
  Min      free-odr3-2048             229.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 ( 15.72%)
  Min      free-odr4-1                561.00 (  0.00%)           439.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      free-odr4-2                418.00 (  0.00%)           318.00 ( 23.92%)
  Min      free-odr4-4                339.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 20.65%)
  Min      free-odr4-8                299.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 20.07%)
  Min      free-odr4-16               289.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 19.03%)
  Min      free-odr4-32               291.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 19.24%)
  Min      free-odr4-64               298.00 (  0.00%)           238.00 ( 20.13%)
  Min      free-odr4-128              308.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 18.51%)
  Min      free-odr4-256              321.00 (  0.00%)           267.00 ( 16.82%)
  Min      free-odr4-512              327.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      free-odr4-1024             326.00 (  0.00%)           271.00 ( 16.87%)
  Min      total-odr0-1               644.00 (  0.00%)           494.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      total-odr0-2               466.00 (  0.00%)           356.00 ( 23.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-4               376.00 (  0.00%)           291.00 ( 22.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-8               328.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 23.48%)
  Min      total-odr0-16              304.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 23.03%)
  Min      total-odr0-32              289.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 22.49%)
  Min      total-odr0-64              282.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 22.70%)
  Min      total-odr0-128             280.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 ( 22.86%)
  Min      total-odr0-256             310.00 (  0.00%)           243.00 ( 21.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-512             329.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 ( 17.02%)
  Min      total-odr0-1024            346.00 (  0.00%)           290.00 ( 16.18%)
  Min      total-odr0-2048            357.00 (  0.00%)           304.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      total-odr0-4096            367.00 (  0.00%)           315.00 ( 14.17%)
  Min      total-odr0-8192            372.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 ( 14.78%)
  Min      total-odr0-16384           373.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 14.48%)
  Min      total-odr1-1               838.00 (  0.00%)           739.00 ( 11.81%)
  Min      total-odr1-2               619.00 (  0.00%)           543.00 ( 12.28%)
  Min      total-odr1-4               495.00 (  0.00%)           433.00 ( 12.53%)
  Min      total-odr1-8               440.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      total-odr1-16              407.00 (  0.00%)           353.00 ( 13.27%)
  Min      total-odr1-32              398.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 14.32%)
  Min      total-odr1-64              389.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 13.62%)
  Min      total-odr1-128             392.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 13.01%)
  Min      total-odr1-256             391.00 (  0.00%)           344.00 ( 12.02%)
  Min      total-odr1-512             396.00 (  0.00%)           349.00 ( 11.87%)
  Min      total-odr1-1024            402.00 (  0.00%)           357.00 ( 11.19%)
  Min      total-odr1-2048            409.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 ( 11.00%)
  Min      total-odr1-4096            414.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 11.59%)
  Min      total-odr1-8192            417.00 (  0.00%)           369.00 ( 11.51%)
  Min      total-odr2-1               921.00 (  0.00%)          1210.00 (-31.38%)
  Min      total-odr2-2               682.00 (  0.00%)           576.00 ( 15.54%)
  Min      total-odr2-4               547.00 (  0.00%)           616.00 (-12.61%)
  Min      total-odr2-8               483.00 (  0.00%)           406.00 ( 15.94%)
  Min      total-odr2-16              449.00 (  0.00%)           376.00 ( 16.26%)
  Min      total-odr2-32              437.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 16.25%)
  Min      total-odr2-64              431.00 (  0.00%)           363.00 ( 15.78%)
  Min      total-odr2-128             433.00 (  0.00%)           365.00 ( 15.70%)
  Min      total-odr2-256             434.00 (  0.00%)           371.00 ( 14.52%)
  Min      total-odr2-512             446.00 (  0.00%)           379.00 ( 15.02%)
  Min      total-odr2-1024            461.00 (  0.00%)           392.00 ( 14.97%)
  Min      total-odr2-2048            464.00 (  0.00%)           395.00 ( 14.87%)
  Min      total-odr2-4096            465.00 (  0.00%)           398.00 ( 14.41%)
  Min      total-odr3-1              1060.00 (  0.00%)           872.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      total-odr3-2               778.00 (  0.00%)           633.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-4               632.00 (  0.00%)           510.00 ( 19.30%)
  Min      total-odr3-8               565.00 (  0.00%)           452.00 ( 20.00%)
  Min      total-odr3-16              524.00 (  0.00%)           424.00 ( 19.08%)
  Min      total-odr3-32              514.00 (  0.00%)           415.00 ( 19.26%)
  Min      total-odr3-64              515.00 (  0.00%)           419.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-128             523.00 (  0.00%)           426.00 ( 18.55%)
  Min      total-odr3-256             541.00 (  0.00%)           438.00 ( 19.04%)
  Min      total-odr3-512             559.00 (  0.00%)           451.00 ( 19.32%)
  Min      total-odr3-1024            561.00 (  0.00%)           456.00 ( 18.72%)
  Min      total-odr3-2048            562.00 (  0.00%)           459.00 ( 18.33%)
  Min      total-odr4-1              1328.00 (  0.00%)          1011.00 ( 23.87%)
  Min      total-odr4-2               997.00 (  0.00%)           747.00 ( 25.08%)
  Min      total-odr4-4               813.00 (  0.00%)           615.00 ( 24.35%)
  Min      total-odr4-8               721.00 (  0.00%)           550.00 ( 23.72%)
  Min      total-odr4-16              689.00 (  0.00%)           529.00 ( 23.22%)
  Min      total-odr4-32              683.00 (  0.00%)           528.00 ( 22.69%)
  Min      total-odr4-64              692.00 (  0.00%)           531.00 ( 23.27%)
  Min      total-odr4-128             713.00 (  0.00%)           556.00 ( 22.02%)
  Min      total-odr4-256             738.00 (  0.00%)           586.00 ( 20.60%)
  Min      total-odr4-512             753.00 (  0.00%)           595.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      total-odr4-1024            752.00 (  0.00%)           600.00 ( 20.21%)

This patch (of 27):

order-0 pages by definition cannot be compound so avoid the check in the
fast path for those pages.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use unlikely(order) in free_pages_prepare(), per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Michal Hocko
3da88fb3ba mm, oom: move GFP_NOFS check to out_of_memory 
__alloc_pages_may_oom is the central place to decide when the
out_of_memory should be invoked.  This is a good approach for most
checks there because they are page allocator specific and the allocation
fails right after for all of them.

The notable exception is GFP_NOFS context which is faking
did_some_progress and keep the page allocator looping even though there
couldn't have been any progress from the OOM killer.  This patch doesn't
change this behavior because we are not ready to allow those allocation
requests to fail yet (and maybe we will face the reality that we will
never manage to safely fail these request).  Instead __GFP_FS check is
moved down to out_of_memory and prevent from OOM victim selection there.
There are two reasons for that

	- OOM notifiers might release some memory even from this context
	  as none of the registered notifier seems to be FS related
	- this might help a dying thread to get an access to memory
          reserves and move on which will make the behavior more
          consistent with the case when the task gets killed from a
          different context.

Keep a comment in __alloc_pages_may_oom to make sure we do not forget
how GFP_NOFS is special and that we really want to do something about
it.

Note to the current oom_notifier users:

The observable difference for you is that oom notifiers cannot depend on
any fs locks because we could deadlock.  Not that this would be allowed
today because that would just lockup machine in most of the cases and
ruling out the OOM killer along the way.  Another difference is that
callbacks might be invoked sooner now because GFP_NOFS is a weaker
reclaim context and so there could be reclaimable memory which is just
not reachable now.  That would require GFP_NOFS only loads which are
really rare and more importantly the observable result would be dropping
of reconstructible object and potential performance drop which is not
such a big deal when we are struggling to fulfill other important
allocation requests.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Raushaniya Maksudova <rmaksudova@parallels.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Joonsoo Kim
fc2bd799c7 mm/page_alloc: correct highmem memory statistics 
ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for
accurate statistics.  And, in following patches, ZONE_CMA will be
introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too.  So, instead of
manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and check
whether the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which can be
treated as highmem.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Joonsoo Kim
ba6b0979e3 power: add zone range overlapping check 
There is a system thats node's pfns are overlapped as follows:

  -----pfn-------->
  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2

Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.

mark_free_pages() iterates requested zone's pfn range and unset all
range's bitmap first.  And then it marks freepages in a zone to the
bitmap.  If there is an overlapping zone, above unset could clear
previous marked bit and reference to this bitmap in the future will
cause the problem.  To prevent it, this patch adds a zone check in
mark_free_pages().

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Joonsoo Kim
b9eb63191a mm/memory_hotplug: add comment to some functions related to memory hotplug 
__offline_isolated_pages() and test_pages_isolated() are used by memory
hotplug.  These functions require that range is in a single zone but
there is no code to do this because memory hotplug checks it before
calling these functions.  To avoid confusing future user of these
functions, this patch adds comments to them.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Li Zhang
949698a31a mm/page_alloc: Remove useless parameter of __free_pages_boot_core 
__free_pages_boot_core has parameter pfn which is not used at all.
Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhlcindy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Joonsoo Kim
0139aa7b7f mm: rename _count, field of the struct page, to _refcount 
Many developers already know that field for reference count of the
struct page is _count and atomic type.  They would try to handle it
directly and this could break the purpose of page reference count
tracepoint.  To prevent direct _count modification, this patch rename it
to _refcount and add warning message on the code.  After that, developer
who need to handle reference count will find that field should not be
accessed directly.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comments, per Vlastimil]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: Documentation/vm/transhuge.txt too]
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: sync ethernet driver changes]
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Cc: Yuval Mintz <yuval.mintz@qlogic.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Jason Baron
bc22af74f2 mm: update min_free_kbytes from khugepaged after core initialization 
Khugepaged attempts to raise min_free_kbytes if its set too low.
However, on boot khugepaged sets min_free_kbytes first from
subsys_initcall(), and then the mm 'core' over-rides min_free_kbytes
after from init_per_zone_wmark_min(), via a module_init() call.

Khugepaged used to use a late_initcall() to set min_free_kbytes (such
that it occurred after the core initialization), however this was
removed when the initialization of min_free_kbytes was integrated into
the starting of the khugepaged thread.

The fix here is simply to invoke the core initialization using a
core_initcall() instead of module_init(), such that the previous
initialization ordering is restored.  I didn't restore the
late_initcall() since start_stop_khugepaged() already sets
min_free_kbytes via set_recommended_min_free_kbytes().

This was noticed when we had a number of page allocation failures when
moving a workload to a kernel with this new initialization ordering.  On
an 8GB system this restores min_free_kbytes back to 67584 from 11365
when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y is set and either
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_ALWAYS=y or
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_MADVISE=y.

Fixes: 79553da293 ("thp: cleanup khugepaged startup")
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-05 17:38:53 -07:00
Vlastimil Babka
d9dddbf556 mm/page_alloc: prevent merging between isolated and other pageblocks 
Hanjun Guo has reported that a CMA stress test causes broken accounting of
CMA and free pages:

> Before the test, I got:
> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
> CmaTotal:         204800 kB
> CmaFree:          195044 kB
>
>
> After running the test:
> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
> CmaTotal:         204800 kB
> CmaFree:         6602584 kB
>
> So the freed CMA memory is more than total..
>
> Also the the MemFree is more than mem total:
>
> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:       16342016 kB
> MemFree:        22367268 kB
> MemAvailable:   22370528 kB

Laura Abbott has confirmed the issue and suspected the freepage accounting
rewrite around 3.18/4.0 by Joonsoo Kim.  Joonsoo had a theory that this is
caused by unexpected merging between MIGRATE_ISOLATE and MIGRATE_CMA
pageblocks:

> CMA isolates MAX_ORDER aligned blocks, but, during the process,
> partialy isolated block exists. If MAX_ORDER is 11 and
> pageblock_order is 9, two pageblocks make up MAX_ORDER
> aligned block and I can think following scenario because pageblock
> (un)isolation would be done one by one.
>
> (each character means one pageblock. 'C', 'I' means MIGRATE_CMA,
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE, respectively.
>
> CC -> IC -> II (Isolation)
> II -> CI -> CC (Un-isolation)
>
> If some pages are freed at this intermediate state such as IC or CI,
> that page could be merged to the other page that is resident on
> different type of pageblock and it will cause wrong freepage count.

This was supposed to be prevented by CMA operating on MAX_ORDER blocks,
but since it doesn't hold the zone->lock between pageblocks, a race
window does exist.

It's also likely that unexpected merging can occur between
MIGRATE_ISOLATE and non-CMA pageblocks.  This should be prevented in
__free_one_page() since commit 3c605096d3 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict
max order of merging on isolated pageblock").  However, we only check
the migratetype of the pageblock where buddy merging has been initiated,
not the migratetype of the buddy pageblock (or group of pageblocks)
which can be MIGRATE_ISOLATE.

Joonsoo has suggested checking for buddy migratetype as part of
page_is_buddy(), but that would add extra checks in allocator hotpath
and bloat-o-meter has shown significant code bloat (the function is
inline).

This patch reduces the bloat at some expense of more complicated code.
The buddy-merging while-loop in __free_one_page() is initially bounded
to pageblock_border and without any migratetype checks.  The checks are
placed outside, bumping the max_order if merging is allowed, and
returning to the while-loop with a statement which can't be possibly
considered harmful.

This fixes the accounting bug and also removes the arguably weird state
in the original commit 3c605096d3 where buddies could be left
unmerged.

Fixes: 3c605096d3 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/280
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Debugged-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.18+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-03-25 16:37:42 -07:00