Impressing friends is a very important thing.
Do it in a separate function to make it even more
explicit, and ease integration.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This is the way x86_64 does, and complement the already
present patch that does the bios cpu to apicid mapping here
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We fill the per-cpu (or array) that maps
bios cpu id to apicid in mpparse_32.c, the way x86_64 does
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We use the same routing as x86_64, moved now to setup.c.
Just with a few ifdefs inside.
Note that this routing uses prefill_possible_map().
It has the very nice side effect of allowing hotplugging of
cpus that are marked as present but disabled by acpi bios.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Instead of declaring them inside of X86_64 ifdef, do it
unconditionally
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
this will serve as a reference as to whether or not to
use the per_cpu variables in mpparse. Done the same way
as x86_64
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This mapping already exists in x86_64, just provide it for
i386
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We have already removed the only condition that could fail here.
so just don't test for any return value
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Do tests before do_boot_cpu in native_cpu_up for i386.
Tests are a little bit broader than originally, and are the
same as x86_64. Test for smp_callin is not applicable right now
and is deferred.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Isolate all sanity checking in a smp_sanity_check()
function as x86_64 does.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
goal is to have i386 and x86_64 closer, so we
add barriers to match
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch does not change the behaviour of x86_64, since APIC_INTEGRATED
is always defined as (1). But the code now matches exactly i386 version
(well, this part of the code, at least)
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This is done so we call setup_secondary_clock() in the same place x86_64
does. A separate patch for this is appearantly not needed. But clock
initialization is such a delicate thing, that it's safer to do this way
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This matches x86_64 behaviour, which is a superior one IMHO
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
now that it is the same between arches, put it into smpboot.c
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Call it conditionally for secondary cpus. This behaviour
matches i386
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
provide two specialized identify_secondary_cpu() and identify_boot_cpu()
routines for x86_64. Although not strictly needed, they are functionally
correct, and will ease integration with i386
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The split of smp_store_cpu_info in a quirks-only part
will ease integration with x86_64
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
It is used to match i386. The definition for the non-paravirt
case is moved to smp.h instead of smp_32.h
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch replaces apic_read() for apic_read_around()
and apic_write for apic_write_around() in smpboot_64.c
We do it to have a common usage between x86_64 and i386.
In the former, it will always simply expand to apic_write
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Add loglevel facilities to printks in __inquire_remote_apic.
the levels are the ones to match x86_64 ones.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
change some variables' types in __inquire_remote_apic to
match x86_64
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fix coding style in pci-dma_64.c and add stubs for documentation. I
hope someone fills the rest, I understand maybe off and soft...
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
When acpi=off or there is no SRAT defined, apicid_to_node is got from K8
Northbridge PCI configuration space in k8_scan_nodes() in
arch/x86_64/mm/k8toplogy.c.
The problem is that it assumes bsp apic id is 0 at that point.
For four socket system with Quad core cpus installed, all cpus apic id
is offset by 4, and bsp apic id is 4.
For eight socket system with dual core cpus installed, all cpus apic id
is offset by 2, and bsp apic id is 2.
We need get boot_cpu_id --- bsp apic id, before k8_scan_nodes by called.
So create early_acpi_boot_init and early_get_smp_config for get boot_cpu_id.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
<asm-x86/nops.h> describes certain multibyte instructions as
"generic" nops when in fact they aren't nops at all in 64-bit
mode (missing REX.W causing truncation of a register).
Update the comment to state that K8 or P6 style nops should be
used in 64-bit mode. This matches what the alternatives code does.
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Otherwise, enabling (or better, subsequent disabling) of single
stepping would cause a kernel oops on CPUs not having this MSR.
The patch could have been added a conditional to the MSR write in
user_disable_single_step(), but centralizing the updates seems safer
and (looking forward) better manageable.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
