mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
8ded916092
1083 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Vladimir Oltean
|
8ded916092 |
net: dsa: tag_sja1105: stop asking the sja1105 driver in sja1105_xmit_tpid
Introduced in commit
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
b0b8c67eaa |
net: dsa: sja1105: drop untagged packets on the CPU and DSA ports
The sja1105 driver is a bit special in its use of VLAN headers as DSA tags. This is because in VLAN-aware mode, the VLAN headers use an actual TPID of 0x8100, which is understood even by the DSA master as an actual VLAN header. Furthermore, control packets such as PTP and STP are transmitted with no VLAN header as a DSA tag, because, depending on switch generation, there are ways to steer these control packets towards a precise egress port other than VLAN tags. Transmitting control packets as untagged means leaving a door open for traffic in general to be transmitted as untagged from the DSA master, and for it to traverse the switch and exit a random switch port according to the FDB lookup. This behavior is a bit out of line with other DSA drivers which have native support for DSA tagging. There, it is to be expected that the switch only accepts DSA-tagged packets on its CPU port, dropping everything that does not match this pattern. We perhaps rely a bit too much on the switches' hardware dropping on the CPU port, and place no other restrictions in the kernel data path to avoid that. For example, sja1105 is also a bit special in that STP/PTP packets are transmitted using "management routes" (sja1105_port_deferred_xmit): when sending a link-local packet from the CPU, we must first write a SPI message to the switch to tell it to expect a packet towards multicast MAC DA 01-80-c2-00-00-0e, and to route it towards port 3 when it gets it. This entry expires as soon as it matches a packet received by the switch, and it needs to be reinstalled for the next packet etc. All in all quite a ghetto mechanism, but it is all that the sja1105 switches offer for injecting a control packet. The driver takes a mutex for serializing control packets and making the pairs of SPI writes of a management route and its associated skb atomic, but to be honest, a mutex is only relevant as long as all parties agree to take it. With the DSA design, it is possible to open an AF_PACKET socket on the DSA master net device, and blast packets towards 01-80-c2-00-00-0e, and whatever locking the DSA switch driver might use, it all goes kaput because management routes installed by the driver will match skbs sent by the DSA master, and not skbs generated by the driver itself. So they will end up being routed on the wrong port. So through the lens of that, maybe it would make sense to avoid that from happening by doing something in the network stack, like: introduce a new bit in struct sk_buff, like xmit_from_dsa. Then, somewhere around dev_hard_start_xmit(), introduce the following check: if (netdev_uses_dsa(dev) && !skb->xmit_from_dsa) kfree_skb(skb); Ok, maybe that is a bit drastic, but that would at least prevent a bunch of problems. For example, right now, even though the majority of DSA switches drop packets without DSA tags sent by the DSA master (and therefore the majority of garbage that user space daemons like avahi and udhcpcd and friends create), it is still conceivable that an aggressive user space program can open an AF_PACKET socket and inject a spoofed DSA tag directly on the DSA master. We have no protection against that; the packet will be understood by the switch and be routed wherever user space says. Furthermore: there are some DSA switches where we even have register access over Ethernet, using DSA tags. So even user space drivers are possible in this way. This is a huge hole. However, the biggest thing that bothers me is that udhcpcd attempts to ask for an IP address on all interfaces by default, and with sja1105, it will attempt to get a valid IP address on both the DSA master as well as on sja1105 switch ports themselves. So with IP addresses in the same subnet on multiple interfaces, the routing table will be messed up and the system will be unusable for traffic until it is configured manually to not ask for an IP address on the DSA master itself. It turns out that it is possible to avoid that in the sja1105 driver, at least very superficially, by requesting the switch to drop VLAN-untagged packets on the CPU port. With the exception of control packets, all traffic originated from tag_sja1105.c is already VLAN-tagged, so only STP and PTP packets need to be converted. For that, we need to uphold the equivalence between an untagged and a pvid-tagged packet, and to remember that the CPU port of sja1105 uses a pvid of 4095. Now that we drop untagged traffic on the CPU port, non-aggressive user space applications like udhcpcd stop bothering us, and sja1105 effectively becomes just as vulnerable to the aggressive kind of user space programs as other DSA switches are (ok, users can also create 8021q uppers on top of the DSA master in the case of sja1105, but in future patches we can easily deny that, but it still doesn't change the fact that VLAN-tagged packets can still be injected over raw sockets). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
58adf9dcb1 |
net: dsa: let drivers state that they need VLAN filtering while standalone
As explained in commit
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
06cfb2df7e |
net: dsa: don't advertise 'rx-vlan-filter' when not needed
There have been multiple independent reports about dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid being called (and consequently calling the drivers' .port_vlan_add) when it isn't needed, and sometimes (not always) causing problems in the process. Case 1: mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_prepare is stubborn and only accepts VLANs on bridged ports. That is understandably so, because standalone mv88e6xxx ports are VLAN-unaware, and VTU entries are said to be a scarce resource. Otherwise said, the following fails lamentably on mv88e6xxx: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set lan3 master br0 ip link add link lan10 name lan10.1 type vlan id 1 [485256.724147] mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: p10: hw VLAN 1 already used by port 3 in br0 RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported This has become a worse issue since commit |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
67b5fb5db7 |
net: dsa: properly fall back to software bridging
If the driver does not implement .port_bridge_{join,leave}, then we must
fall back to standalone operation on that port, and trigger the error
path of dsa_port_bridge_join. This sets dp->bridge_dev = NULL.
In turn, having a non-NULL dp->bridge_dev when there is no offloading
support makes the following things go wrong:
- dsa_default_offload_fwd_mark make the wrong decision in setting
skb->offload_fwd_mark. It should set skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0 for
ports that don't offload the bridge, which should instruct the bridge
to forward in software. But this does not happen, dp->bridge_dev is
incorrectly set to point to the bridge, so the bridge is told that
packets have been forwarded in hardware, which they haven't.
- switchdev objects (MDBs, VLANs) should not be offloaded by ports that
don't offload the bridge. Standalone ports should behave as packet-in,
packet-out and the bridge should not be able to manipulate the pvid of
the port, or tag stripping on egress, or ingress filtering. This
should already work fine because dsa_slave_port_obj_add has:
case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_port(dp, obj->orig_dev))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
err = dsa_slave_vlan_add(dev, obj, extack);
but since dsa_port_offloads_bridge_port works based on dp->bridge_dev,
this is again sabotaging us.
All the above work in case the port has an unoffloaded LAG interface, so
this is well exercised code, we should apply it for plain unoffloaded
bridge ports too.
Reported-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
09dba21b43 |
net: dsa: don't call switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload for unoffloaded bridge ports
For ports that have a NULL dp->bridge_dev, dsa_port_to_bridge_port()
also returns NULL as expected.
Issue #1 is that we are performing a NULL pointer dereference on brport_dev.
Issue #2 is that these are ports on which switchdev_bridge_port_offload
has not been called, so we should not call switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload
on them either.
Both issues are addressed by checking against a NULL brport_dev in
dsa_port_pre_bridge_leave and exiting early.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
f5e165e72b |
net: dsa: track unique bridge numbers across all DSA switch trees
Right now, cross-tree bridging setups work somewhat by mistake. In the case of cross-tree bridging with sja1105, all switch instances need to agree upon a common VLAN ID for forwarding a packet that belongs to a certain bridging domain. With TX forwarding offload, the VLAN ID is the bridge VLAN for VLAN-aware bridging, and the tag_8021q TX forwarding offload VID (a VLAN which has non-zero VBID bits) for VLAN-unaware bridging. The VBID for VLAN-unaware bridging is derived from the dp->bridge_num value calculated by DSA independently for each switch tree. If ports from one tree join one bridge, and ports from another tree join another bridge, DSA will assign them the same bridge_num, even though the bridges are different. If cross-tree bridging is supported, this is an issue. Modify DSA to calculate the bridge_num globally across all switch trees. This has the implication for a driver that the dp->bridge_num value that DSA will assign to its ports might not be contiguous, if there are boards with multiple DSA drivers instantiated. Additionally, all bridge_num values eat up towards each switch's ds->num_fwd_offloading_bridges maximum, which is potentially unfortunate, and can be seen as a limitation introduced by this patch. However, that is the lesser evil for now. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
994d2cbb08 |
net: dsa: tag_sja1105: be dsa_loop-safe
Add support for tag_sja1105 running on non-sja1105 DSA ports, by making sure that every time we dereference dp->priv, we check the switch's dsa_switch_ops (otherwise we access a struct sja1105_port structure that is in fact something else). This adds an unconditional build-time dependency between sja1105 being built as module => tag_sja1105 must also be built as module. This was there only for PTP before. Some sane defaults must also take place when not running on sja1105 hardware. These are: - sja1105_xmit_tpid: the sja1105 driver uses different VLAN protocols depending on VLAN awareness and switch revision (when an encapsulated VLAN must be sent). Default to 0x8100. - sja1105_rcv_meta_state_machine: this aggregates PTP frames with their metadata timestamp frames. When running on non-sja1105 hardware, don't do that and accept all frames unmodified. - sja1105_defer_xmit: calls sja1105_port_deferred_xmit in sja1105_main.c which writes a management route over SPI. When not running on sja1105 hardware, bypass the SPI write and send the frame as-is. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
b2b8913341 |
net: dsa: tag_8021q: fix notifiers broadcast when they shouldn't, and vice versa
During the development of the blamed patch, the "bool broadcast"
argument of dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} was originally called
"bool local", and the meaning was the exact opposite.
Due to a rookie mistake where the patch was modified at the last minute
without retesting, the instances of dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del}
are called with the wrong values. During setup and teardown, cross-chip
notifiers should not be broadcast to all DSA trees, while during
bridging, they should.
Fixes:
|
||
Jakub Kicinski
|
f4083a752a |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Conflicts: drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ptp.h |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
724395f4dc |
net: dsa: tag_8021q: don't broadcast during setup/teardown
Currently, on my board with multiple sja1105 switches in disjoint trees
described in commit
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
ab97462beb |
net: dsa: print more information when a cross-chip notifier fails
Currently this error message does not say a lot: [ 32.693498] DSA: failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN deletion: -ENOENT [ 32.699725] DSA: failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN deletion: -ENOENT [ 32.705931] DSA: failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN deletion: -ENOENT [ 32.712139] DSA: failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN deletion: -ENOENT [ 32.718347] DSA: failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN deletion: -ENOENT [ 32.724554] DSA: failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN deletion: -ENOENT but in this form, it is immediately obvious (at least to me) what the problem is, even without further looking at the code: [ 12.345566] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1088 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.353804] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2112 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.362019] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1089 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.370246] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2113 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.378466] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1090 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.386683] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2114 deletion: -ENOENT Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
a72808b658 |
net: dsa: create a helper for locating EtherType DSA headers on TX
Create a similar helper for locating the offset to the DSA header relative to skb->data, and make the existing EtherType header taggers to use it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
5d928ff486 |
net: dsa: create a helper for locating EtherType DSA headers on RX
It seems that protocol tagging driver writers are always surprised about the formula they use to reach their EtherType header on RX, which becomes apparent from the fact that there are comments in multiple drivers that mention the same information. Create a helper that returns a void pointer to skb->data - 2, as well as centralize the explanation why that is the case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
6bef794da6 |
net: dsa: create a helper which allocates space for EtherType DSA headers
Hide away the memmove used by DSA EtherType header taggers to shift the MAC SA and DA to the left to make room for the header, after they've called skb_push(). The call to skb_push() is still left explicit in drivers, to be symmetric with dsa_strip_etype_header, and because not all callers can be refactored to do it (for example, brcm_tag_xmit_ll has common code for a pre-Ethernet DSA tag and an EtherType DSA tag). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
f1dacd7aea |
net: dsa: create a helper that strips EtherType DSA headers on RX
All header taggers open-code a memmove that is fairly not all that obvious, and we can hide the details behind a helper function, since the only thing specific to the driver is the length of the header tag. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
c35b57ceff |
net: switchdev: zero-initialize struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info emitted by drivers towards the bridge
The blamed commit added a new field to struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info,
but did not make sure that all call paths set it to something valid.
For example, a switchdev driver may emit a SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE
notifier, and since the 'is_local' flag is not set, it contains junk
from the stack, so the bridge might interpret those notifications as
being for local FDB entries when that was not intended.
To avoid that now and in the future, zero-initialize all
switchdev_notifier_fdb_info structures created by drivers such that all
newly added fields to not need to touch drivers again.
Fixes:
|
||
Leon Romanovsky
|
919d13a7e4 |
devlink: Set device as early as possible
All kernel devlink implementations call to devlink_alloc() during initialization routine for specific device which is used later as a parent device for devlink_register(). Such late device assignment causes to the situation which requires us to call to device_register() before setting other parameters, but that call opens devlink to the world and makes accessible for the netlink users. Any attempt to move devlink_register() to be the last call generates the following error due to access to the devlink->dev pointer. [ 8.758862] devlink_nl_param_fill+0x2e8/0xe50 [ 8.760305] devlink_param_notify+0x6d/0x180 [ 8.760435] __devlink_params_register+0x2f1/0x670 [ 8.760558] devlink_params_register+0x1e/0x20 The simple change of API to set devlink device in the devlink_alloc() instead of devlink_register() fixes all this above and ensures that prior to call to devlink_register() everything already set. Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
bee7c577e6 |
net: dsa: avoid fast ageing twice when port leaves a bridge
Drivers that support both the toggling of address learning and dynamic FDB flushing (mv88e6xxx, b53, sja1105) currently need to fast-age a port twice when it leaves a bridge: - once, when del_nbp() calls br_stp_disable_port() which puts the port in the BLOCKING state - twice, when dsa_port_switchdev_unsync_attrs() calls dsa_port_clear_brport_flags() which disables address learning The knee-jerk reaction might be to say "dsa_port_clear_brport_flags does not need to fast-age the port at all", but the thing is, we still need both code paths to flush the dynamic FDB entries in different situations. When a DSA switch port leaves a bonding/team interface that is (still) a bridge port, no del_nbp() will be called, so we rely on dsa_port_clear_brport_flags() function to restore proper standalone port functionality with address learning disabled. So the solution is just to avoid double the work when both code paths are called in series. Luckily, DSA already caches the STP port state, so we can skip flushing the dynamic FDB when we disable address learning and the STP state is one where no address learning takes place at all. Under that condition, not flushing the FDB is safe because there is supposed to not be any dynamic FDB entry at all (they were flushed during the transition towards that state, and none were learned in the meanwhile). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
a4ffe09fc2 |
net: dsa: still fast-age ports joining a bridge if they can't configure learning
Commit
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
9264e4ad26 |
net: dsa: flush the dynamic FDB of the software bridge when fast ageing a port
Currently, when DSA performs fast ageing on a port, 'bridge fdb' shows us that the 'self' entries (corresponding to the hardware bridge, as printed by dsa_slave_fdb_dump) are deleted, but the 'master' entries (corresponding to the software bridge) aren't. Indeed, searching through the bridge driver, neither the brport_attr_learning handler nor the IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING handler call br_fdb_delete_by_port. However, br_stp_disable_port does, which is one of the paths which DSA uses to trigger a fast ageing process anyway. There is, however, one other very promising caller of br_fdb_delete_by_port, and that is the bridge driver's handler of the SWITCHDEV_FDB_FLUSH_TO_BRIDGE atomic notifier. Currently the s390/qeth HiperSockets card driver is the only user of this. I can't say I understand that driver's architecture or interaction with the bridge, but it appears to not be a switchdev driver in the traditional sense of the word. Nonetheless, the mechanism it provides is a useful way for DSA to express the fact that it performs fast ageing too, in a way that does not change the existing behavior for other drivers. Cc: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
4eab90d973 |
net: dsa: don't fast age bridge ports with learning turned off
On topology changes, stations that were dynamically learned on ports that are no longer part of the active topology must be flushed - this is described by clause "17.11 Updating learned station location information" of IEEE 802.1D-2004. However, when address learning on the bridge port is turned off in the first place, there is nothing to flush, so skip a potentially expensive operation. We can finally do this now since DSA is aware of the learning state of its bridged ports. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
045c45d1f5 |
net: dsa: centralize fast ageing when address learning is turned off
Currently DSA leaves it down to device drivers to fast age the FDB on a port when address learning is disabled on it. There are 2 reasons for doing that in the first place: - when address learning is disabled by user space, through IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING or the brport_attr_learning sysfs, what user space typically wants to achieve is to operate in a mode with no dynamic FDB entry on that port. But if the port is already up, some addresses might have been already learned on it, and it seems silly to wait for 5 minutes for them to expire until something useful can be done. - when a port leaves a bridge and becomes standalone, DSA turns off address learning on it. This also has the nice side effect of flushing the dynamically learned bridge FDB entries on it, which is a good idea because standalone ports should not have bridge FDB entries on them. We let drivers manage fast ageing under this condition because if DSA were to do it, it would need to track each port's learning state, and act upon the transition, which it currently doesn't. But there are 2 reasons why doing it is better after all: - drivers might get it wrong and not do it (see b53_port_set_learning) - we would like to flush the dynamic entries from the software bridge too, and letting drivers do that would be another pain point So track the port learning state and trigger a fast age process automatically within DSA. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
39f3210154 |
net: dsa: don't fast age standalone ports
DSA drives the procedure to flush dynamic FDB entries from a port based
on the change of STP state: whenever we go from a state where address
learning is enabled (LEARNING, FORWARDING) to a state where it isn't
(LISTENING, BLOCKING, DISABLED), we need to flush the existing dynamic
entries.
However, there are cases when this is not needed. Internally, when a
DSA switch interface is not under a bridge, DSA still keeps it in the
"FORWARDING" STP state. And when that interface joins a bridge, the
bridge will meticulously iterate that port through all STP states,
starting with BLOCKING and ending with FORWARDING. Because there is a
state transition from the standalone version of FORWARDING into the
temporary BLOCKING bridge port state, DSA calls the fast age procedure.
Since commit
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
c73c57081b |
net: dsa: don't disable multicast flooding to the CPU even without an IGMP querier
Commit |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
7df4e74494 |
net: dsa: stop syncing the bridge mcast_router attribute at join time
Qingfang points out that when a bridge with the default settings is
created and a port joins it:
ip link add br0 type bridge
ip link set swp0 master br0
DSA calls br_multicast_router() on the bridge to see if the br0 device
is a multicast router port, and if it is, it enables multicast flooding
to the CPU port, otherwise it disables it.
If we look through the multicast_router_show() sysfs or at the
IFLA_BR_MCAST_ROUTER netlink attribute, we see that the default mrouter
attribute for the bridge device is "1" (MDB_RTR_TYPE_TEMP_QUERY).
However, br_multicast_router() will return "0" (MDB_RTR_TYPE_DISABLED),
because an mrouter port in the MDB_RTR_TYPE_TEMP_QUERY state may not be
actually _active_ until it receives an actual IGMP query. So, the
br_multicast_router() function should really have been called
br_multicast_router_active() perhaps.
When/if an IGMP query is received, the bridge device will transition via
br_multicast_mark_router() into the active state until the
ip4_mc_router_timer expires after an multicast_querier_interval.
Of course, this does not happen if the bridge is created with an
mcast_router attribute of "2" (MDB_RTR_TYPE_PERM).
The point is that in lack of any IGMP query messages, and in the default
bridge configuration, unregistered multicast packets will not be able to
reach the CPU port through flooding, and this breaks many use cases
(most obviously, IPv6 ND, with its ICMP6 neighbor solicitation multicast
messages).
Leave the multicast flooding setting towards the CPU port down to a driver
level decision.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
f8b17a0bd9 |
net: dsa: tag_sja1105: optionally build as module when switch driver is module if PTP is enabled
TX timestamps are sent by SJA1110 as Ethernet packets containing
metadata, so they are received by the tagging driver but must be
processed by the switch driver - the one that is stateful since it
keeps the TX timestamp queue.
This means that there is an sja1110_process_meta_tstamp() symbol
exported by the switch driver which is called by the tagging driver.
There is a shim definition for that function when the switch driver is
not compiled, which does nothing, but that shim is not effective when
the tagging protocol driver is built-in and the switch driver is a
module, because built-in code cannot call symbols exported by modules.
So add an optional dependency between the tagger and the switch driver,
if PTP support is enabled in the switch driver. If PTP is not enabled,
sja1110_process_meta_tstamp() will translate into the shim "do nothing
with these meta frames" function.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
2c0b03258b |
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports
Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as
follows:
eth0 eth1
| |
CPU port CPU port
| DSA link |
sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0
| | | | | |
user user user user user user
port port port port port port
basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination,
but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in
hardware between one switch and another.
DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering
all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding
eth1 as a valid DSA master.
This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(),
DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no
dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used.
Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one
upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using
dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one.
For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks:
- sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the
dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu()
- sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one
that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns:
if (!cpu_dp)
return port;
which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a
characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then
@dp is its own upstream port.
So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports,
but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I
don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one.
Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in
terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this
case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to:
- Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in
order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain,
where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0.
This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination
throughput in switch 1.
- Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software
forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as
part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it
wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1.
- Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could
work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we
would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of
switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links
treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are
the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to
manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of
the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the
same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the
user on these gateway ports.
So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer
CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the
user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from
switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get
assigned to the CPU port from switch 1.
The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream
port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its
dedicated CPU port).
So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also
perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support
multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple
CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is
desirable, necessary, or possible.
Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch
hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting
assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good
enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch
1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in
order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the
dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the
smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the
moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops
between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible,
there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will
never have to support that use case.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
0e8eb9a16e |
net: dsa: rename teardown_default_cpu to teardown_cpu_ports
There is nothing specific to having a default CPU port to what dsa_tree_teardown_default_cpu() does. Even with multiple CPU ports, it would do the same thing: iterate through the ports of this switch tree and reset the ->cpu_dp pointer to NULL. So rename it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
421297efe6 |
net: dsa: tag_sja1105: consistently fail with arbitrary input
Dan Carpenter's smatch tests report that the "vid" variable, populated by sja1105_vlan_rcv when an skb is received by the tagger that has a VLAN ID which cannot be decoded by tag_8021q, may be uninitialized when used here: if (source_port == -1 || switch_id == -1) skb->dev = dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid(netdev, vid); The sja1105 driver, by construction, sets up the switch in a way that all data plane packets sent towards the CPU port are VLAN-tagged. So it is practically impossible, in a functional system, for a packet to be processed by sja1110_rcv() which is not a control packet and does not have a VLAN header either. However, it would be nice if the sja1105 tagging driver could consistently do something valid, for example fail, even if presented with packets that do not hold valid sja1105 tags. Currently it is a bit hard to argue that it does that, given the fact that a data plane packet with no VLAN tag will trigger a call to dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid with a vid argument that is an uninitialized stack variable. To fix this, we can initialize the u16 vid variable with 0, a value that can never be a bridge VLAN, so dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid will always return a NULL skb->dev. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210802195137.303625-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
29a097b774 |
net: dsa: remove the struct packet_type argument from dsa_device_ops::rcv()
No tagging driver uses this. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
bea7907837 |
net: dsa: don't set skb->offload_fwd_mark when not offloading the bridge
DSA has gained the recent ability to deal gracefully with upper interfaces it cannot offload, such as the bridge, bonding or team drivers. When such uppers exist, the ports are still in standalone mode as far as the hardware is concerned. But when we deliver packets to the software bridge in order for that to do the forwarding, there is an unpleasant surprise in that the bridge will refuse to forward them. This is because we unconditionally set skb->offload_fwd_mark = true, meaning that the bridge thinks the frames were already forwarded in hardware by us. Since dp->bridge_dev is populated only when there is hardware offload for it, but not in the software fallback case, let's introduce a new helper that can be called from the tagger data path which sets the skb->offload_fwd_mark accordingly to zero when there is no hardware offload for bridging. This lets the bridge forward packets back to other interfaces of our switch, if needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
04a1758348 |
net: dsa: tag_sja1105: fix control packets on SJA1110 being received on an imprecise port
On RX, a control packet with SJA1110 will have:
- an in-band control extension (DSA tag) composed of a header and an
optional trailer (if it is a timestamp frame). We can (and do) deduce
the source port and switch id from this.
- a VLAN header, which can either be the tag_8021q RX VLAN (pvid) or the
bridge VLAN. The sja1105_vlan_rcv() function attempts to deduce the
source port and switch id a second time from this.
The basic idea is that even though we don't need the source port
information from the tag_8021q header if it's a control packet, we do
need to strip that header before we pass it on to the network stack.
The problem is that we call sja1105_vlan_rcv for ports under VLAN-aware
bridges, and that function tells us it couldn't identify a tag_8021q
header, so we need to perform imprecise RX by VID. Well, we don't,
because we already know the source port and switch ID.
This patch drops the return value from sja1105_vlan_rcv and we just look
at the source_port and switch_id values from sja1105_rcv and sja1110_rcv
which were initialized to -1. If they are still -1 it means we need to
perform imprecise RX.
Fixes:
|
||
Arnd Bergmann
|
a76053707d |
dev_ioctl: split out ndo_eth_ioctl
Most users of ndo_do_ioctl are ethernet drivers that implement the MII commands SIOCGMIIPHY/SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG, or hardware timestamping with SIOCSHWTSTAMP/SIOCGHWTSTAMP. Separate these from the few drivers that use ndo_do_ioctl to implement SIOCBOND, SIOCBR and SIOCWANDEV commands. This is a purely cosmetic change intended to help readers find their way through the implementation. Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
edac6f6332 |
Revert "net: dsa: Allow drivers to filter packets they can decode source port from"
This reverts commit
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
b6ad86e6ad |
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q
The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
884be12f85 |
net: dsa: sja1105: add support for imprecise RX
This is already common knowledge by now, but the sja1105 does not have
hardware support for DSA tagging for data plane packets, and tag_8021q
sets up a unique pvid per port, transmitted as VLAN-tagged towards the
CPU, for the source port to be decoded nonetheless.
When the port is part of a VLAN-aware bridge, the pvid committed to
hardware is taken from the bridge and not from tag_8021q, so we need to
work with that the best we can.
Configure the switches to send all packets to the CPU as VLAN-tagged
(even ones that were originally untagged on the wire) and make use of
dsa_untag_bridge_pvid() to get rid of it before we send those packets up
the network stack.
With the classified VLAN used by hardware known to the tagger, we first
peek at the VID in an attempt to figure out if the packet was received
from a VLAN-unaware port (standalone or under a VLAN-unaware bridge),
case in which we can continue to call dsa_8021q_rcv(). If that is not
the case, the packet probably came from a VLAN-aware bridge. So we call
the DSA helper that finds for us a "designated bridge port" - one that
is a member of the VLAN ID from the packet, and is in the proper STP
state - basically these are all checks performed by br_handle_frame() in
the software RX data path.
The bridge will accept the packet as valid even if the source port was
maybe wrong. So it will maybe learn the MAC SA of the packet on the
wrong port, and its software FDB will be out of sync with the hardware
FDB. So replies towards this same MAC DA will not work, because the
bridge will send towards a different netdev.
This is where the bridge data plane offload ("imprecise TX") added by
the next patch comes in handy. The software FDB is wrong, true, but the
hardware FDB isn't, and by offloading the bridge forwarding plane we
have a chance to right a wrong, and have the hardware look up the FDB
for us for the reply packet. So it all cancels out.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
Tobias Waldekranz
|
d82f8ab0d8 |
net: dsa: tag_dsa: offload the bridge forwarding process
Allow the DSA tagger to generate FORWARD frames for offloaded skbs sent from a bridge that we offload, allowing the switch to handle any frame replication that may be required. This also means that source address learning takes place on packets sent from the CPU, meaning that return traffic no longer needs to be flooded as unknown unicast. Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
123abc06e7 |
net: dsa: add support for bridge TX forwarding offload
For a DSA switch, to offload the forwarding process of a bridge device
means to send the packets coming from the software bridge as data plane
packets. This is contrary to everything that DSA has done so far,
because the current taggers only know to send control packets (ones that
target a specific destination port), whereas data plane packets are
supposed to be forwarded according to the FDB lookup, much like packets
ingressing on any regular ingress port. If the FDB lookup process
returns multiple destination ports (flooding, multicast), then
replication is also handled by the switch hardware - the bridge only
sends a single packet and avoids the skb_clone().
DSA keeps for each bridge port a zero-based index (the number of the
bridge). Multiple ports performing TX forwarding offload to the same
bridge have the same dp->bridge_num value, and ports not offloading the
TX data plane of a bridge have dp->bridge_num = -1.
The tagger can check if the packet that is being transmitted on has
skb->offload_fwd_mark = true or not. If it does, it can be sure that the
packet belongs to the data plane of a bridge, further information about
which can be obtained based on dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num.
It can then compose a DSA tag for injecting a data plane packet into
that bridge number.
For the switch driver side, we offer two new dsa_switch_ops methods,
called .port_bridge_fwd_offload_{add,del}, which are modeled after
.port_bridge_{join,leave}.
These methods are provided in case the driver needs to configure the
hardware to treat packets coming from that bridge software interface as
data plane packets. The switchdev <-> bridge interaction happens during
the netdev_master_upper_dev_link() call, so to switch drivers, the
effect is that the .port_bridge_fwd_offload_add() method is called
immediately after .port_bridge_join().
If the bridge number exceeds the number of bridges for which the switch
driver can offload the TX data plane (and this includes the case where
the driver can offload none), DSA falls back to simply returning
tx_fwd_offload = false in the switchdev_bridge_port_offload() call.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
5b22d3669f |
net: dsa: track the number of switches in a tree
In preparation of supporting data plane forwarding on behalf of a software bridge, some drivers might need to view bridges as virtual switches behind the CPU port in a cross-chip topology. Give them some help and let them know how many physical switches there are in the tree, so that they can count the virtual switches starting from that number on. Note that the first dsa_switch_ops method where this information is reliably available is .setup(). This is because of how DSA works: in a tree with 3 switches, each calling dsa_register_switch(), the first 2 will advance until dsa_tree_setup() -> dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() and exit with error code 0 because the topology is not complete. Since probing is parallel at this point, one switch does not know about the existence of the other. Then the third switch comes, and for it, dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() returns complete = true. This switch goes ahead and calls dsa_tree_setup_switches() for everybody else, calling their .setup() methods too. This acts as the synchronization point. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Tobias Waldekranz
|
472111920f |
net: bridge: switchdev: allow the TX data plane forwarding to be offloaded
Allow switchdevs to forward frames from the CPU in accordance with the bridge configuration in the same way as is done between bridge ports. This means that the bridge will only send a single skb towards one of the ports under the switchdev's control, and expects the driver to deliver the packet to all eligible ports in its domain. Primarily this improves the performance of multicast flows with multiple subscribers, as it allows the hardware to perform the frame replication. The basic flow between the driver and the bridge is as follows: - When joining a bridge port, the switchdev driver calls switchdev_bridge_port_offload() with tx_fwd_offload = true. - The bridge sends offloadable skbs to one of the ports under the switchdev's control using skb->offload_fwd_mark = true. - The switchdev driver checks the skb->offload_fwd_mark field and lets its FDB lookup select the destination port mask for this packet. v1->v2: - convert br_input_skb_cb::fwd_hwdoms to a plain unsigned long - introduce a static key "br_switchdev_fwd_offload_used" to minimize the impact of the newly introduced feature on all the setups which don't have hardware that can make use of it - introduce a check for nbp->flags & BR_FWD_OFFLOAD to optimize cache line access - reorder nbp_switchdev_frame_mark_accel() and br_handle_vlan() in __br_forward() - do not strip VLAN on egress if forwarding offload on VLAN-aware bridge is being used - propagate errors from .ndo_dfwd_add_station() if not EOPNOTSUPP v2->v3: - replace the solution based on .ndo_dfwd_add_station with a solution based on switchdev_bridge_port_offload - rename BR_FWD_OFFLOAD to BR_TX_FWD_OFFLOAD v3->v4: rebase v4->v5: - make sure the static key is decremented on bridge port unoffload - more function and variable renaming and comments for them: br_switchdev_fwd_offload_used to br_switchdev_tx_fwd_offload br_switchdev_accels_skb to br_switchdev_frame_uses_tx_fwd_offload nbp_switchdev_frame_mark_tx_fwd to nbp_switchdev_frame_mark_tx_fwd_to_hwdom nbp_switchdev_frame_mark_accel to nbp_switchdev_frame_mark_tx_fwd_offload fwd_accel to tx_fwd_offload Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
David S. Miller
|
5af84df962 |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Conflicts are simple overlapping changes. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
4e51bf44a0 |
net: bridge: move the switchdev object replay helpers to "push" mode
Starting with commit |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
2f5dc00f7a |
net: bridge: switchdev: let drivers inform which bridge ports are offloaded
On reception of an skb, the bridge checks if it was marked as 'already
forwarded in hardware' (checks if skb->offload_fwd_mark == 1), and if it
is, it assigns the source hardware domain of that skb based on the
hardware domain of the ingress port. Then during forwarding, it enforces
that the egress port must have a different hardware domain than the
ingress one (this is done in nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress).
Non-switchdev drivers don't report any physical switch id (neither
through devlink nor .ndo_get_port_parent_id), therefore the bridge
assigns them a hardware domain of 0, and packets coming from them will
always have skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0. So there aren't any restrictions.
Problems appear due to the fact that DSA would like to perform software
fallback for bonding and team interfaces that the physical switch cannot
offload.
+-- br0 ---+
/ / | \
/ / | \
/ | | bond0
/ | | / \
swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3 swp4
There, it is desirable that the presence of swp3 and swp4 under a
non-offloaded LAG does not preclude us from doing hardware bridging
beteen swp0, swp1 and swp2. The bandwidth of the CPU is often times high
enough that software bridging between {swp0,swp1,swp2} and bond0 is not
impractical.
But this creates an impossible paradox given the current way in which
port hardware domains are assigned. When the driver receives a packet
from swp0 (say, due to flooding), it must set skb->offload_fwd_mark to
something.
- If we set it to 0, then the bridge will forward it towards swp1, swp2
and bond0. But the switch has already forwarded it towards swp1 and
swp2 (not to bond0, remember, that isn't offloaded, so as far as the
switch is concerned, ports swp3 and swp4 are not looking up the FDB,
and the entire bond0 is a destination that is strictly behind the
CPU). But we don't want duplicated traffic towards swp1 and swp2, so
it's not ok to set skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0.
- If we set it to 1, then the bridge will not forward the skb towards
the ports with the same switchdev mark, i.e. not to swp1, swp2 and
bond0. Towards swp1 and swp2 that's ok, but towards bond0? It should
have forwarded the skb there.
So the real issue is that bond0 will be assigned the same hardware
domain as {swp0,swp1,swp2}, because the function that assigns hardware
domains to bridge ports, nbp_switchdev_add(), recurses through bond0's
lower interfaces until it finds something that implements devlink (calls
dev_get_port_parent_id with bool recurse = true). This is a problem
because the fact that bond0 can be offloaded by swp3 and swp4 in our
example is merely an assumption.
A solution is to give the bridge explicit hints as to what hardware
domain it should use for each port.
Currently, the bridging offload is very 'silent': a driver registers a
netdevice notifier, which is put on the netns's notifier chain, and
which sniffs around for NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER events where the upper is a
bridge, and the lower is an interface it knows about (one registered by
this driver, normally). Then, from within that notifier, it does a bunch
of stuff behind the bridge's back, without the bridge necessarily
knowing that there's somebody offloading that port. It looks like this:
ip link set swp0 master br0
|
v
br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link()
|
v
call_netdevice_notifiers
|
v
dsa_slave_netdevice_event
|
v
oh, hey! it's for me!
|
v
.port_bridge_join
What we do to solve the conundrum is to be less silent, and change the
switchdev drivers to present themselves to the bridge. Something like this:
ip link set swp0 master br0
|
v
br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link()
|
v bridge: Aye! I'll use this
call_netdevice_notifiers ^ ppid as the
| | hardware domain for
v | this port, and zero
dsa_slave_netdevice_event | if I got nothing.
| |
v |
oh, hey! it's for me! |
| |
v |
.port_bridge_join |
| |
+------------------------+
switchdev_bridge_port_offload(swp0, swp0)
Then stacked interfaces (like bond0 on top of swp3/swp4) would be
treated differently in DSA, depending on whether we can or cannot
offload them.
The offload case:
ip link set bond0 master br0
|
v
br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link()
|
v bridge: Aye! I'll use this
call_netdevice_notifiers ^ ppid as the
| | switchdev mark for
v | bond0.
dsa_slave_netdevice_event | Coincidentally (or not),
| | bond0 and swp0, swp1, swp2
v | all have the same switchdev
hmm, it's not quite for me, | mark now, since the ASIC
but my driver has already | is able to forward towards
called .port_lag_join | all these ports in hw.
for it, because I have |
a port with dp->lag_dev == bond0. |
| |
v |
.port_bridge_join |
for swp3 and swp4 |
| |
+------------------------+
switchdev_bridge_port_offload(bond0, swp3)
switchdev_bridge_port_offload(bond0, swp4)
And the non-offload case:
ip link set bond0 master br0
|
v
br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link()
|
v bridge waiting:
call_netdevice_notifiers ^ huh, switchdev_bridge_port_offload
| | wasn't called, okay, I'll use a
v | hwdom of zero for this one.
dsa_slave_netdevice_event : Then packets received on swp0 will
| : not be software-forwarded towards
v : swp1, but they will towards bond0.
it's not for me, but
bond0 is an upper of swp3
and swp4, but their dp->lag_dev
is NULL because they couldn't
offload it.
Basically we can draw the conclusion that the lowers of a bridge port
can come and go, so depending on the configuration of lowers for a
bridge port, it can dynamically toggle between offloaded and unoffloaded.
Therefore, we need an equivalent switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload too.
This patch changes the way any switchdev driver interacts with the
bridge. From now on, everybody needs to call switchdev_bridge_port_offload
and switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload, otherwise the bridge will treat the
port as non-offloaded and allow software flooding to other ports from
the same ASIC.
Note that these functions lay the ground for a more complex handshake
between switchdev drivers and the bridge in the future.
For drivers that will request a replay of the switchdev objects when
they offload and unoffload a bridge port (DSA, dpaa2-switch, ocelot), we
place the call to switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload() strategically inside
the NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER notifier's code path, and not inside
NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER. This is because the switchdev object replay helpers
need the netdev adjacency lists to be valid, and that is only true in
NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER.
Cc: Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com>
Cc: Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com>
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
Cc: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
Cc: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> # dpaa2-switch: regression
Acked-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> # dpaa2-switch
Tested-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> # ocelot-switch
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
Lino Sanfilippo
|
37120f23ac |
net: dsa: tag_ksz: dont let the hardware process the layer 4 checksum
If the checksum calculation is offloaded to the network device (e.g due to NETIF_F_HW_CSUM inherited from the DSA master device), the calculated layer 4 checksum is incorrect. This is since the DSA tag which is placed after the layer 4 data is considered as being part of the daa and thus errorneously included into the checksum calculation. To avoid this, always calculate the layer 4 checksum in software. Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Lino Sanfilippo
|
21cf377a9c |
net: dsa: ensure linearized SKBs in case of tail taggers
The function skb_put() that is used by tail taggers to make room for the DSA tag must only be called for linearized SKBS. However in case that the slave device inherited features like NETIF_F_HW_SG or NETIF_F_FRAGLIST the SKB passed to the slaves transmit function may not be linearized. Avoid those SKBs by clearing the NETIF_F_HW_SG and NETIF_F_FRAGLIST flags for tail taggers. Furthermore since the tagging protocol can be changed at runtime move the code for setting up the slaves features into dsa_slave_setup_tagger(). Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
b94dc99c0d |
net: dsa: use switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device
Using the new fan-out helper for FDB entries installed on the software bridge, we can install host addresses with the proper refcount on the CPU port, such that this case: ip link set swp0 master br0 ip link set swp1 master br0 ip link set swp2 master br0 ip link set swp3 master br0 ip link set br0 address 00:01:02:03:04:05 ip link set swp3 nomaster works properly and the br0 address remains installed as a host entry with refcount 3 instead of getting deleted. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
c6451cda10 |
net: switchdev: introduce helper for checking dynamically learned FDB entries
It is a bit difficult to understand what DSA checks when it tries to avoid installing dynamically learned addresses on foreign interfaces as local host addresses, so create a generic switchdev helper that can be reused and is generally more readable. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
c64b9c0504 |
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support
The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is
this:
|
sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4
[ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ]
|
+---------+
|
sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4
[ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ]
|
+---------+
|
sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4
[ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ]
When the user runs:
ip link add br0 type bridge
ip link set sw0p0 master br0
ip link set sw2p0 master br0
It doesn't work.
This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and
"other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient
to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice
versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another
switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links
sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too.
Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a
bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we
notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire
tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs.
It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too
many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example,
when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the
RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there
isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet).
In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the
port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event.
But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties
are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to
list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire
routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have:
sw0p3: port@3 {
link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>;
};
This was done because:
/* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member,
* and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed,
* but this would require some more complex tree walking,
* so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all.
*/
but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is
actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we
cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid
the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we
can change.
And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones
aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between
switches B and C, in the general case.
So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and
probably why it will never change.
On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well
balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at
the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero
need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing.
In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join
notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do
anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the
.crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods.
Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation
of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is
because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we
have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between
switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used
to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do
that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code.
Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also
renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react
on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls:
- 1 for RX VLAN on user port
- 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port
- 1 for TX VLAN on user port
- 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port
now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via
dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add.
And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are
distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into
separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which
tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the
get go.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
|
Vladimir Oltean
|
e19cc13c9c |
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time
There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |