test_lru_sanity5() fails when the number of online cpus
is fewer than the number of possible cpus. It can be
reproduced with qemu by using cmd args "--smp cpus=2,maxcpus=8".
The problem is the loop in test_lru_sanity5() is testing
'i' which is incorrect.
This patch:
1. Make sched_next_online() always return -1 if it cannot
find a next cpu to schedule the process.
2. In test_lru_sanity5(), the parent process does
sched_setaffinity() first (through sched_next_online())
and the forked process will inherit it according to
the 'man sched_setaffinity'.
Fixes: 5db58faf98 ("bpf: Add tests for the LRU bpf_htab")
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Nothing in this minimal script seems to require bash. We often run these
tests on embedded devices where the only shell available is the busybox
ash. Use sh instead.
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eb@emlix.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Running ./test_verifier as unprivileged lets 1 out of 98 tests fail:
[...]
#71 unpriv: check that printk is disallowed FAIL
Unexpected error message!
0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
1: (bf) r1 = r10
2: (07) r1 += -8
3: (b7) r2 = 8
4: (bf) r3 = r1
5: (85) call bpf_trace_printk#6
unknown func bpf_trace_printk#6
[...]
The test case is correct, just that the error outcome changed with
ebb676daa1 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id").
Same as with e00c7b216f ("bpf: fix multiple issues in selftest suite
and samples") issue 2), so just fix up the function name.
Fixes: ebb676daa1 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Commit 57a09bf0a4 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
registers") introduced a regression where existing programs stopped
loading due to reaching the verifier's maximum complexity limit,
whereas prior to this commit they were loading just fine; the affected
program has roughly 2k instructions.
What was found is that state pruning couldn't be performed effectively
anymore due to mismatches of the verifier's register state, in particular
in the id tracking. It doesn't mean that 57a09bf0a4 is incorrect per
se, but rather that verifier needs to perform a lot more work for the
same program with regards to involved map lookups.
Since commit 57a09bf0a4 is only about tracking registers with type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL, the id is only needed to follow registers
until they are promoted through pattern matching with a NULL check to
either PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE or UNKNOWN_VALUE type. After that point, the
id becomes irrelevant for the transitioned types.
For UNKNOWN_VALUE, id is already reset to 0 via mark_reg_unknown_value(),
but not so for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE where id is becoming stale. It's even
transferred further into other types that don't make use of it. Among
others, one example is where UNKNOWN_VALUE is set on function call
return with RET_INTEGER return type.
states_equal() will then fall through the memcmp() on register state;
note that the second memcmp() uses offsetofend(), so the id is part of
that since d2a4dd37f6 ("bpf: fix state equivalence"). But the bisect
pointed already to 57a09bf0a4, where we really reach beyond complexity
limit. What I found was that states_equal() often failed in this
case due to id mismatches in spilled regs with registers in type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE. Unlike non-spilled regs, spilled regs just perform
a memcmp() on their reg state and don't have any other optimizations
in place, therefore also id was relevant in this case for making a
pruning decision.
We can safely reset id to 0 as well when converting to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE.
For the affected program, it resulted in a ~17 fold reduction of
complexity and let the program load fine again. Selftest suite also
runs fine. The only other place where env->id_gen is used currently is
through direct packet access, but for these cases id is long living, thus
a different scenario.
Also, the current logic in mark_map_regs() is not fully correct when
marking NULL branch with UNKNOWN_VALUE. We need to cache the destination
reg's id in any case. Otherwise, once we marked that reg as UNKNOWN_VALUE,
it's id is reset and any subsequent registers that hold the original id
and are of type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL won't be marked UNKNOWN_VALUE
anymore, since mark_map_reg() reuses the uncached regs[regno].id that
was just overridden. Note, we don't need to cache it outside of
mark_map_regs(), since it's called once on this_branch and the other
time on other_branch, which are both two independent verifier states.
A test case for this is added here, too.
Fixes: 57a09bf0a4 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- direct packet read is allowed for LWT_*
- direct packet write for LWT_IN/LWT_OUT is prohibited
- direct packet write for LWT_XMIT is allowed
- access to skb->tc_classid is prohibited for LWT_*
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Occasionally, clang (e.g. version 3.8.1) translates a sum between two
constant operands using a BPF_OR instead of a BPF_ADD. The verifier is
currently not handling this scenario, and the destination register type
becomes UNKNOWN_VALUE even if it's still storing a constant. As a result,
the destination register cannot be used as argument to a helper function
expecting a ARG_CONST_STACK_*, limiting some use cases.
Modify the verifier to handle this case, and add a few tests to make sure
all combinations are supported, and stack boundaries are still verified
even with BPF_OR.
Signed-off-by: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is a test to verify that
bpf: fix states equal logic for varlen access
actually fixed the problem. The problem was if the register we added to our map
register was UNKNOWN in both the false and true branches and the only thing that
changed was the range then we'd incorrectly assume that the true branch was
valid, which it really wasnt. This tests this case and properly fails without
my fix in place and passes with it in place.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
1) The test_lru_map and test_lru_dist fails building on my machine since
the sys/resource.h header is not included.
2) test_verifier fails in one test case where we try to call an invalid
function, since the verifier log output changed wrt printing function
names.
3) Current selftest suite code relies on sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) for
retrieving the number of possible CPUs. This is broken at least in our
scenario and really just doesn't work.
glibc tries a number of things for retrieving _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF.
First it tries equivalent of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]* | wc -l,
if that fails, depending on the config, it either tries to count CPUs
in /proc/cpuinfo, or returns the _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN value instead.
If /proc/cpuinfo has some issue, it returns just 1 worst case. This
oddity is nothing new [1], but semantics/behaviour seems to be settled.
_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN will parse /sys/devices/system/cpu/online, if
that fails it looks into /proc/stat for cpuX entries, and if also that
fails for some reason, /proc/cpuinfo is consulted (and returning 1 if
unlikely all breaks down).
While that might match num_possible_cpus() from the kernel in some
cases, it's really not guaranteed with CPU hotplugging, and can result
in a buffer overflow since the array in user space could have too few
number of slots, and on perpcu map lookup, the kernel will write beyond
that memory of the value buffer.
William Tu reported such mismatches:
[...] The fact that sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) != num_possible_cpu()
happens when CPU hotadd is enabled. For example, in Fusion when
setting vcpu.hotadd = "TRUE" or in KVM, setting ./qemu-system-x86_64
-smp 2, maxcpus=4 ... the num_possible_cpu() will be 4 and sysconf()
will be 2 [2]. [...]
Documentation/cputopology.txt says /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible
outputs cpu_possible_mask. That is the same as in num_possible_cpus(),
so first step would be to fix the _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF calls with our
own implementation. Later, we could add support to bpf(2) for passing
a mask via CPU_SET(3), for example, to just select a subset of CPUs.
BPF samples code needs this fix as well (at least so that people stop
copying this). Thus, define bpf_num_possible_cpus() once in selftests
and import it from there for the sample code to avoid duplicating it.
The remaining sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) in samples are unrelated.
After all three issues are fixed, the test suite runs fine again:
# make run_tests | grep self
selftests: test_verifier [PASS]
selftests: test_maps [PASS]
selftests: test_lru_map [PASS]
selftests: test_kmod.sh [PASS]
[1] https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-06/msg00079.html
[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg121183.html
Fixes: 3059303f59 ("samples/bpf: update tracex[23] examples to use per-cpu maps")
Fixes: 86af8b4191 ("Add sample for adding simple drop program to link")
Fixes: df570f5772 ("samples/bpf: unit test for BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY")
Fixes: e155967179 ("samples/bpf: unit test for BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH")
Fixes: ebb676daa1 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id")
Fixes: 5db58faf98 ("bpf: Add tests for the LRU bpf_htab")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch has some unit tests and a test_lru_dist.
The test_lru_dist reads in the numeric keys from a file.
The files used here are generated by a modified fio-genzipf tool
originated from the fio test suit. The sample data file can be
found here: https://github.com/iamkafai/bpf-lru
The zipf.* data files have 100k numeric keys and the key is also
ranged from 1 to 100k.
The test_lru_dist outputs the number of unique keys (nr_unique).
F.e. The following means, 61239 of them is unique out of 100k keys.
nr_misses means it cannot be found in the LRU map, so nr_misses
must be >= nr_unique. test_lru_dist also simulates a perfect LRU
map as a comparison:
[root@arch-fb-vm1 ~]# ~/devshare/fb-kernel/linux/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist \
/root/zipf.100k.a1_01.out 4000 1
...
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x0):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000) nr_misses:31603(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000 nr_misses:34328(/100000)
....
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x2):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000) nr_misses:31710(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000 nr_misses:34328(/100000)
[root@arch-fb-vm1 ~]# ~/devshare/fb-kernel/linux/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist \
/root/zipf.100k.a0_01.out 40000 1
...
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x0):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000) nr_misses:67054(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000 nr_misses:66993(/100000)
...
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x2):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000) nr_misses:67068(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000 nr_misses:66993(/100000)
LRU map has also been added to map_perf_test:
/* Global LRU */
[root@kerneltest003.31.prn1 ~]# for i in 1 4 8; do echo -n "$i cpus: "; \
./map_perf_test 16 $i | awk '{r += $3}END{print r " updates"}'; done
1 cpus: 2934082 updates
4 cpus: 7391434 updates
8 cpus: 6500576 updates
/* Percpu LRU */
[root@kerneltest003.31.prn1 ~]# for i in 1 4 8; do echo -n "$i cpus: "; \
./map_perf_test 32 $i | awk '{r += $3}END{print r " updates"}'; done
1 cpus: 2896553 updates
4 cpus: 9766395 updates
8 cpus: 17460553 updates
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
A BPF program is required to check the return register of a
map_elem_lookup() call before accessing memory. The verifier keeps
track of this by converting the type of the result register from
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE after a conditional
jump ensures safety. This check is currently exclusively performed
for the result register 0.
In the event the compiler reorders instructions, BPF_MOV64_REG
instructions may be moved before the conditional jump which causes
them to keep their type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL to which the
verifier objects when the register is accessed:
0: (b7) r1 = 10
1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1
2: (bf) r2 = r10
3: (07) r2 += -8
4: (18) r1 = 0x59c00000
6: (85) call 1
7: (bf) r4 = r0
8: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8) R4=map_value_or_null(ks=8,vs=8) R10=fp
9: (7a) *(u64 *)(r4 +0) = 0
R4 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'
This commit extends the verifier to keep track of all identical
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers after a map_elem_lookup() by
assigning them an ID and then marking them all when the conditional
jump is observed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add a start of a test suite for kernel selftests. This moves test_verifier
and test_maps over to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ along with various
code improvements and also adds a script for invoking test_bpf module.
The test suite can simply be run via selftest framework, f.e.:
# cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
# make
# make run_tests
Both test_verifier and test_maps were kind of misplaced in samples/bpf/
directory and we were looking into adding them to selftests for a while
now, so it can be picked up by kbuild bot et al and hopefully also get
more exposure and thus new test case additions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
