The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
direction misannotations and (hopefully) preventing
more of the same for the future.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHQEABYIAB0WIQQqUNBr3gm4hGXdBJlZ7Krx/gZQ6wUCY5ZzQAAKCRBZ7Krx/gZQ
65RZAP4nTkvOn0NZLVFkuGOx8pgJelXAvrteyAuecVL8V6CR4AD40qCVY51PJp8N
MzwiRTeqnGDxTTF7mgd//IB6hoatAA==
=bcvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'pull-iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
Pull iov_iter updates from Al Viro:
"iov_iter work; most of that is about getting rid of direction
misannotations and (hopefully) preventing more of the same for the
future"
* tag 'pull-iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers
iov_iter: saner checks for attempt to copy to/from iterator
[xen] fix "direction" argument of iov_iter_kvec()
[vhost] fix 'direction' argument of iov_iter_{init,bvec}()
[target] fix iov_iter_bvec() "direction" argument
[s390] memcpy_real(): WRITE is "data source", not destination...
[s390] zcore: WRITE is "data source", not destination...
[infiniband] READ is "data destination", not source...
[fsi] WRITE is "data source", not destination...
[s390] copy_oldmem_kernel() - WRITE is "data source", not destination
csum_and_copy_to_iter(): handle ITER_DISCARD
get rid of unlikely() on page_copy_sane() calls
READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are
"data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as
used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as
"we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly
the wrong way.
Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder
to misinterpret...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed()/acpi_evaluate_dsm() should be coupled with
ACPI_FREE() to free the ACPI memory, because we need to track the
allocation of acpi_object when ACPI_DBG_TRACK_ALLOCATIONS enabled,
so use ACPI_FREE() instead of kfree().
Fixes: 0db89fa243 ("ACPI: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver")
Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In case of error, memremap() returns NULL pointer not
ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
should be replaced with NULL test.
Fixes: 0db89fa243 ("ACPI: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Introduce the pfr_update driver which can be used for Platform Firmware
Runtime code injection and driver update [1].
The user is expected to provide the EFI capsule, and pass it to the
driver by writing the capsule to a device special file. The capsule
is transferred by the driver to the platform firmware with the help
of an ACPI _DSM method under the special ACPI Platform Firmware
Runtime Update device (INTC1080), and the actual firmware update is
carried out by the low-level Management Mode code in the platform
firmware.
This change allows certain pieces of the platform firmware to be
updated on the fly while the system is running (runtime) without the
need to restart it, which is key in the cases when the system needs to
be available 100% of the time and it cannot afford the downtime related
to restarting it, or when the work carried out by the system is
particularly important, so it cannot be interrupted, and it is not
practical to wait until it is complete.
Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_MM_OS_Interface_Spec_Rev100.pdf # [1]
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
