Lots of the functions in relocation.c don't change pointer parameters
but lack the annotations. Add them and reformat according to current
coding style if needed.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() is a predicate so it should return
bool.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Both callers of btrfs_reloc_clone_csums allocate the ordered_extent that
btrfs_reloc_clone_csums operates on. Switch them to use
btrfs_alloc_ordered_extent instead of btrfs_add_ordered_extent and
pass the ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums instead of doing an
extra lookup.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[PROBLEM]
When relocation fails (mostly due to checksum mismatch), we only got
very cryptic error messages like:
BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group 13631488 flags data
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): csum failed root -9 ino 257 off 0 csum 0x373e1ae3 expected csum 0x98757625 mirror 1
BTRFS error (device dm-4): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0
BTRFS info (device dm-4): balance: ended with status: -5
The end user has to decipher the above messages and use various tools to
locate the affected files and find a way to fix the problem (mostly
deleting the file). This is not an easy work even for experienced
developer, not to mention the end users.
[SCRUB IS DOING BETTER]
By contrast, scrub is providing much better error messages:
BTRFS error (device dm-4): unable to fixup (regular) error at logical 13631488 on dev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 physical 13631488
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): checksum error at logical 13631488 on dev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1, physical 13631488, root 5, inode 257, offset 0, length 4096, links 1 (path: file)
BTRFS info (device dm-4): scrub: finished on devid 1 with status: 0
Which provides the affected files directly to the end user.
[IMPROVEMENT]
Instead of the generic data checksum error messages, which is not doing
a good job for data reloc inodes, this patch introduce a scrub like
backref walking based solution.
When a sector fails its checksum for data reloc inode, we go the
following workflow:
- Get the real logical bytenr
For data reloc inode, the file offset is the offset inside the block
group.
Thus the real logical bytenr is @file_off + @block_group->start.
- Do an extent type check
If it's tree blocks it's much easier to handle, just go through
all the tree block backref.
- Do a backref walk and inode path resolution for data extents
This is mostly the same as scrub.
But unfortunately we can not reuse the same function as the output
format is different.
Now the new output would be more user friendly:
BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group 13631488 flags data
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): csum failed root -9 ino 257 off 0 logical 13631488 csum 0x373e1ae3 expected csum 0x98757625 mirror 1
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): checksum error at logical 13631488 mirror 1 root 5 inode 257 offset 0 length 4096 links 1 (path: file)
BTRFS error (device dm-4): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 2, gen 0
BTRFS info (device dm-4): balance: ended with status: -5
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Move these out of ctree.h into relocation.h to cut down on code in
ctree.h
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
