Make use of the new struct_size() helper instead of the offsetof() idiom.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201008141828.GA20325@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Various driver updates for platforms. A bulk of this is smaller fixes or
cleanups, but some of the new material this time around is:
- Support for Nvidia Tegra234 SoC
- Ring accelerator support for TI AM65x
- PRUSS driver for TI platforms
- Renesas support for R-Car V3U SoC
- Reset support for Cortex-M4 processor on i.MX8MQ
There are also new socinfo entries for a handful of different SoCs
and platforms.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=tfPb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'armsoc-drivers' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc
Pull ARM SoC-related driver updates from Olof Johansson:
"Various driver updates for platforms. A bulk of this is smaller fixes
or cleanups, but some of the new material this time around is:
- Support for Nvidia Tegra234 SoC
- Ring accelerator support for TI AM65x
- PRUSS driver for TI platforms
- Renesas support for R-Car V3U SoC
- Reset support for Cortex-M4 processor on i.MX8MQ
There are also new socinfo entries for a handful of different SoCs and
platforms"
* tag 'armsoc-drivers' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc: (131 commits)
drm/mediatek: reduce clear event
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add clear option in cmdq_pkt_wfe api
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add jump function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s_mask value function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s value function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add read_s function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s_mask function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add address shift in jump
soc: mediatek: mtk-infracfg: Fix kerneldoc
soc: amlogic: pm-domains: use always-on flag
reset: sti: reset-syscfg: fix struct description warnings
reset: imx7: add the cm4 reset for i.MX8MQ
dt-bindings: reset: imx8mq: add m4 reset
reset: Fix and extend kerneldoc
reset: reset-zynqmp: Added support for Versal platform
dt-bindings: reset: Updated binding for Versal reset driver
reset: imx7: Support module build
soc: fsl: qe: Remove unnessesary check in ucc_set_tdm_rxtx_clk
soc: fsl: qman: convert to use be32_add_cpu()
...
Driver doesn't use keyword enum for enum owl_dmadesc_offsets resulting
in warning:
drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:139: warning: cannot understand function prototype:
'enum owl_dmadesc_offsets '
So add the keyword to fix it and also add documentation for missing
OWL_DMADESC_SIZE
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007083113.567559-6-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Commit f19a11d40a ("dmaengine: xilinx: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API") updated driver to use new tasklet_setup() API but
missed to update the documentation for the tasklet function.
Fixes: f19a11d40a ("dmaengine: xilinx: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007083113.567559-5-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Commit f19a11d40a ("dmaengine: xilinx: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API") updated driver to use new tasklet_setup() API but
missed to update the documentation for the tasklet function.
Fixes: f19a11d40a ("dmaengine: xilinx: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007083113.567559-4-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Commit 00c4747a2f ("dmaengine: qcom: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API") updated driver to use new tasklet_setup() API but
missed to update the documentation for the tasklet function.
Fixes: 00c4747a2f ("dmaengine: qcom: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007083113.567559-3-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Commit 6752e40d66 ("dmaengine: altera-msgdma: convert tasklets to use
new tasklet_setup() API") updated driver to use new tasklet_setup() API
but missed to update the documentation for the tasklet function.
Fixes: 6752e40d66 ("dmaengine: altera-msgdma: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007083113.567559-2-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201006050458.221329-2-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201006050458.221329-1-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
sg_init_table zeroes its first argument, so the allocation of that argument
doesn't have to.
the semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x,n,flags;
@@
x =
- kcalloc
+ kmalloc_array
(n,sizeof(*x),flags)
...
sg_init_table(x,n)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1600601186-7420-10-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
sg_init_table zeroes its first argument, so the allocation of that argument
doesn't have to.
the semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x,n,flags;
@@
x =
- kcalloc
+ kmalloc_array
(n,sizeof(*x),flags)
...
sg_init_table(x,n)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1600601186-7420-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
dma_alloc_coherent() is called with a fixed SZ_2M size, but frees happen
with IOAT_CHUNK_SIZE. Recently, IOAT_CHUNK_SIZE was reduced to 512M but
the allocation did not change. To fix, change to using the
IOAT_CHUNK_SIZE define.
This was caught with the upcoming patchset for converting Intel platforms to the
dma-iommu implementation. It has a warning when the unmapped size differs from
the mapped size.
Fixes: a02254f8a6 ("dmaengine: ioat: Decreasing allocation chunk size 2M->512K")
Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/776771a2-247a-d1be-d882-bee02d919ae0@deltatee.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922200844.2982-1-logang@deltatee.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Use the devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() helper instead of
calling platform_get_resource_byname() and devm_ioremap_resource()
separately.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200921093701.102208-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Commit 59cd818763 ("dmaengine: fsl: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API") broke this driver by not removing the old channel
update method.
Fix this by remove the offending call as channel is queried from
tasklet structure.
Fixes: 59cd818763 ("dmaengine: fsl: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201001164740.178977-1-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The jz4780_dma_tx_status() function would check if a channel's cookie
state was set to 'completed', and if not, it would enter the critical
section. However, in that time frame, the jz4780_dma_chan_irq() function
was able to set the cookie to 'completed', and clear the jzchan->vchan
pointer, which was deferenced in the critical section of the first
function.
Fix this race by checking the channel's cookie state after entering the
critical function and not before.
Fixes: d894fc6046 ("dmaengine: jz4780: add driver for the Ingenic JZ4780 DMA controller")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.0
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Reported-by: Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu>
Tested-by: Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201004140307.885556-1-paul@crapouillou.net
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Commit 59cd818763 ("dmaengine: fsl: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API") converted the pl330 driver to use new tasklet
functions but missed that driver calls the tasklet function directly as
well, so update it.
Fixes: 59cd818763 ("dmaengine: fsl: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200930121735.49699-1-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
There is no need to have a conditional for boolean expression when
function returns bool. Drop unnecessary code and return boolean
result directly.
While at it, drop unneeded casting from void *.
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922115847.30100-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Andy reported that commit 6b41030fdc ("dmaengine: dmatest:
Restore default for channel") broke his scripts for the case
where "busy" channel is used for configuration with expectation
that run command would do nothing. Instead, behavior was
(unintentionally) changed to treat such case as under-configuration
and progress with defaults, i.e. run command would start a test
with default setting for channel (which would use all channels).
Restore original behavior with tracking status of channel setter
so we can distinguish between misconfigured and under-configured
cases in run command and act accordingly.
Fixes: 6b41030fdc ("dmaengine: dmatest: Restore default for channel")
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922115847.30100-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Now the K3 UDMA glue layer enable functions perform RMW operation on UDMA
RX/TX RT_CTL registers to set EN bit and enable channel, which is
incorrect, because only EN bit has to be set in those registers to enable
channel (all other bits should be cleared 0).
More over, this causes issues when bootloader leaves UDMA channel RX/TX
RT_CTL registers in incorrect state - TDOWN bit set, for example. As
result, UDMA channel will just perform teardown right after it's enabled.
Hence, fix it by writing correct values (EN=1) directly in UDMA channel
RX/TX RT_CTL registers in k3_udma_glue_enable_tx/rx_chn() functions.
Fixes: d702419134 ("dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add glue layer for non DMAengine users")
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916120955.7963-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function ‘iop_adma_alloc_chan_resources’:
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:447:13: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
hw_desc = (char *) iop_chan->device->dma_desc_pool;
^
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:449:4: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
(dma_addr_t) &hw_desc[idx * IOP_ADMA_SLOT_SIZE];
^
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function ‘iop_adma_probe’:
drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:1301:3: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
(void *) adev->dma_desc_pool);
Use dma_addr_t for dma_desc_pool, and %pad to print dma_addr_t.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818115101.55700-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
This eliminates the following sparse warning:
drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c:29:5: warning: symbol 'completion_timeout' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c:33:5: warning: symbol 'idle_timeout' was not
declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200912072158.602585-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
'desc' variable is now defined but not used in sf_pdma_donebh_tasklet(),
causing this warning:
drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c: In function 'sf_pdma_donebh_tasklet':
drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c:287:23: warning: unused variable 'desc' [-Wunused-variable]
Remove this unused variable
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914055302.22962-1-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Running in hardIRQ context, disabling IRQ is redundant.
Cc: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200912094036.32112-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831134745.314945-1-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-36-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-34-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-33-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-32-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-31-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-30-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-29-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-28-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-27-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-26-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-25-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-24-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-23-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-22-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-21-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-20-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-19-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-18-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-17-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831103542.305571-16-allen.lkml@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
