3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Miguel Ojeda	f85bea18f7	rust: allow dead_code for never constructed bindings ... Starting with the upcoming Rust 1.80.0 (since upstream commit 35130d7233e9 ("Detect pub structs never constructed and unused associated constants in traits")), the `dead_code` pass detects more cases, which triggers in the `bindings` crate: warning: struct `boot_params` is never constructed --> rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs:10684:12 | 10684 | pub struct boot_params { | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default As well as in the `uapi` one: warning: struct `boot_params` is never constructed --> rust/uapi/uapi_generated.rs:10392:12 | 10392 | pub struct boot_params { | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default These are all expected, since we do not use all the structs in the bindings that `bindgen` generates from the C headers. Therefore, allow them. Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Reviewed-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev> Tested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709160615.998336-4-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>	2024-07-10 10:28:51 +02:00
Miguel Ojeda	3ed03f4da0	rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2 ... This is the first upgrade to the Rust toolchain since the initial Rust merge, from 1.62.0 to 1.68.2 (i.e. the latest). # Context The kernel currently supports only a single Rust version [1] (rather than a minimum) given our usage of some "unstable" Rust features [2] which do not promise backwards compatibility. The goal is to reach a point where we can declare a minimum version for the toolchain. For instance, by waiting for some of the features to be stabilized. Therefore, the first minimum Rust version that the kernel will support is "in the future". # Upgrade policy Given we will eventually need to reach that minimum version, it would be ideal to upgrade the compiler from time to time to be as close as possible to that goal and find any issues sooner. In the extreme, we could upgrade as soon as a new Rust release is out. Of course, upgrading so often is in stark contrast to what one normally would need for GCC and LLVM, especially given the release schedule: 6 weeks for Rust vs. half a year for LLVM and a year for GCC. Having said that, there is no particular advantage to updating slowly either: kernel developers in "stable" distributions are unlikely to be able to use their distribution-provided Rust toolchain for the kernel anyway [3]. Instead, by routinely upgrading to the latest instead, kernel developers using Linux distributions that track the latest Rust release may be able to use those rather than Rust-provided ones, especially if their package manager allows to pin / hold back / downgrade the version for some days during windows where the version may not match. For instance, Arch, Fedora, Gentoo and openSUSE all provide and track the latest version of Rust as they get released every 6 weeks. Then, when the minimum version is reached, we will stop upgrading and decide how wide the window of support will be. For instance, a year of Rust versions. We will probably want to start small, and then widen it over time, just like the kernel did originally for LLVM, see commit 3519c4d6e0 ("Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version"). # Unstable features stabilized This upgrade allows us to remove the following unstable features since they were stabilized: - `feature(explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait)` (1.63). - `feature(core_ffi_c)` (1.64). - `feature(generic_associated_types)` (1.65). - `feature(const_ptr_offset_from)` (1.65, *). - `feature(bench_black_box)` (1.66, *). - `feature(pin_macro)` (1.68). The ones marked with `*` apply only to our old `rust` branch, not mainline yet, i.e. only for code that we may potentially upstream. With this patch applied, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [2] for details. # Other required changes Since 1.63, `rustdoc` triggers the `broken_intra_doc_links` lint for links pointing to exported (`#[macro_export]`) `macro_rules`. An issue was opened upstream [4], but it turns out it is intended behavior. For the moment, just add an explicit reference for each link. Later we can revisit this if `rustdoc` removes the compatibility measure. Nevertheless, this was helpful to discover a link that was pointing to the wrong place unintentionally. Since that one was actually wrong, it is fixed in a previous commit independently. Another change was the addition of `cfg(no_rc)` and `cfg(no_sync)` in upstream [5], thus remove our original changes for that. Similarly, upstream now tests that it compiles successfully with `#[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]` [6], which allow us to get rid of some changes, such as an `#[allow(dead_code)]`. In addition, remove another `#[allow(dead_code)]` due to new uses within the standard library. Finally, add `try_extend_trusted` and move the code in `spec_extend.rs` since upstream moved it for the infallible version. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing There are a large amount of changes, but the vast majority of them are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [1] Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/2 [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72mT3bVDKdHgaea-6WiZazd8Mvurqmqegbe5JZxVyLR8Yg@mail.gmail.com/ [3] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106142 [4] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89891 [5] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98652 [6] Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-By: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Ariel Miculas <amiculas@cisco.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418214347.324156-4-ojeda@kernel.org [ Removed `feature(core_ffi_c)` from `uapi` ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>	2023-05-31 17:35:03 +02:00
Asahi Lina	4e17466568	rust: uapi: Add UAPI crate ... This crate mirrors the `bindings` crate, but will contain only UAPI bindings. Unlike the bindings crate, drivers may directly use this crate if they have to interface with userspace. Initially, just bind the generic ioctl stuff. In the future, we would also like to add additional checks to ensure that all types exposed by this crate satisfy UAPI-safety guarantees (that is, they are safely castable to/from a "bag of bits"). [ Miguel: added support for the `rustdoc` and `rusttest` targets, since otherwise they fail, and we want to keep them working. ] Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329-rust-uapi-v2-1-bca5fb4d4a12@asahilina.net Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>	2023-04-22 01:46:45 +02:00