Commit Graph

150 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tvrtko Ursulin
ac657f6461 drm/i915: Introduce IS_GEN macro
To be used for more efficient Gen range checking.

v2: Remove spurious chunk. (Chris Wilson)
v3: Rebase.
v4: Renamed from INTEL_GEN_RANGE and added GEN_FOREVER.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v3)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1462874228-6601-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2016-05-11 12:27:28 +01:00
Chris Wilson
c033666a94 drm/i915: Store a i915 backpointer from engine, and use it
text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
6309351	3578714	 696320	10584385	 a18141	vmlinux
6308391	3578714	 696320	10583425	 a17d81	vmlinux

Almost 1KiB of code reduction.

v2: More s/INTEL_INFO()->gen/INTEL_GEN()/ and IS_GENx() conversions

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
6304579	3578778	 696320	10579677	 a16edd	vmlinux
6303427	3578778	 696320	10578525	 a16a5d	vmlinux

Now over 1KiB!

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1462545621-30125-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-05-09 13:41:24 +01:00
Joonas Lahtinen
72e96d6450 drm/i915: Refer to GGTT {,VM} consistently
Refer to the GGTT VM consistently as "ggtt->base" instead of just "ggtt",
"vm" or indirectly through other variables like "dev_priv->ggtt.base"
to avoid confusion with the i915_ggtt object itself and PPGTT VMs.

Refer to the GGTT as "ggtt" instead of indirectly through chaining.

As a bonus gets rid of the long-standing i915_obj_to_ggtt vs.
i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt conflict, due to removal of i915_obj_to_ggtt!

v2:
- Added some more after grepping sources with Chris

v3:
- Refer to GGTT VM through ggtt->base consistently instead of ggtt_vm
  (Chris)

v4:
- Convert all dev_priv->ggtt->foo accesses to ggtt->foo.

v5:
- Make patch checker happy

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2016-03-31 17:55:43 +03:00
Joonas Lahtinen
62106b4f6b drm/i915: Rename dev_priv->gtt to dev_priv->ggtt
Refer to Global GTT consistently as GGTT, thus rename dev_priv->gtt
to dev_priv->ggtt and struct i915_gtt to struct i915_ggtt.

Fix a couple of whitespace problems while at it.

v2:
- Fix a typo in commit message.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2016-03-18 15:18:15 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
a98ee79317 drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW
These platforms should be fine now.

FBC can allow very significant power savings for screen-on idle
systems, but it is worth mentioning that a lot of people won't get
significant power savings by enabling this feature because they may
have something else preventing the system from getting into the
deepest sleep states. Examples may include a hungry wifi device or a
max_performance SATA link power management policy. You can check your
PC state residencies on the powertop "Idle stats" tab. I recommend
trying to run "sudo powertop --auto-tune" and then seeing if the
residencies improve.

Oh, and in case you - the person reading this commit message - found
this commit through git bisect, please do the following:
 - Check your dmesg and see if there are error messages mentioning
   underruns around the time your problem started happening.
 - Download intel-gpu-tools, compile it, and run:
   $ sudo ./tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking --run-subtest '*fbc-*' 2>&1 | tee fbc.txt
   Then send us the fbc.txt file, especially if you get a failure.
   This will really maximize your chances of getting the bug fixed
   quickly.
 - Try to find a reliable way to reproduce the problem, and tell us.
 - Boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the problem, then send us the
   dmesg file.

v2: Don't enable by default on SKL.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455655643-2535-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-02-19 18:06:16 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
5375ce9f38 drm/i915/fbc: set fbc->active from the new activation functions
Now that we have top-level gen-independent hw_activate and
hw_deactivate functions, set fbc->active directly from them, removing
the duplicated code.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454101060-23198-3-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-02-04 14:18:22 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
8c40074cb2 drm/i915/fbc: unexport the HW level activation functions
The recent introduction of a new caller of dev_priv->fbc.deactivate()
is a good example of why we need unexport those functions. Anything
outside intel_fbc.c should only call the functions exported by
intel_fbc.c, so in order to enforce that, kill the function pointers
stored inside dev_priv->fbc and replace them with functions that can't
be called from outside intel_fbc.c.

This should make it much harder for new code to call these functions
from outside intel_fbc.c.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454101060-23198-2-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-02-04 14:17:45 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
e35be23f31 drm/i915/fbc: refactor some small functions called only once
The FBC fixes we've been doing in the last months required a lot of
refactor, so functions that were once big and called from different
spots are now small and called only once. IMHO now it's better to just
move the contents of these functions to their only callers since this
reduces the number of indirections while reading the code.

While at it, also improve the related comments a little bit.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-26-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:21:10 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
9b42281f9d drm/i915/fbc: don't store/check a pointer to the FB
We already make sure we run intel_fbc_update_update during modesets
and page flips, and this function takes care of deactivating FBC, so
it shouldn't be possible for us to reach the condition we check at
intel_fbc_work_fn. So instead of grabbing framebuffer references and
adding a lot of code to track when we need to free them, just don't
track anything at all since we shouldn't need to.

v2: Rebase.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-25-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:20:39 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
b20d27526c drm/i915/fbc: don't store the fb_id on reg_params
We don't actually use fb_id anywhere. We already compare all
parameters that matter to the hardware: pixel format, stride,
fence_reg and ggtt_offset. The ID shouldn't make a difference.

Besides, we already update the FBC data at every modeset/flip, so this
can't change behind our backs.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-23-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:18:28 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
913a3a6aca drm/i915/fbc: don't print no_fbc_reason to dmesg
Our dmesg messages started being misleading after we converted to the
enable+activate model: we always print "Disabling FBC", even when
we're just deactivating it. So, for example, when I boot my machine
and do "dmesg | grep -i fbc", I see:
  [drm:intel_fbc_enable] Enabling FBC on pipe A
  [drm:set_no_fbc_reason] Disabling FBC: framebuffer not tiled or fenced
but then, if I read the debugfs file, I will see:
  $ sudo cat i915_fbc_status
  FBC enabled
  Compressing: yes
so we can conclude that dmesg is misleading, since FBC is actually
enabled. What happened is that we deactivated FBC due to fbcon not
being tiled, but when we silently reactivated it when the display
manager started. We don't print activation messages since there may be
way too many of these operations per second during normal desktop
usage.

One possible solution would be to change set_no_fbc_reason to
correctly differentiate between disable and deactivation, but we
removed support from printing activation/deactivation messages in the
past because they were too frequent. So instead of doing this, let's
just not print anything on dmesg, and leave the debugfs file if the
user needs to investigate something. We already print when we enable
and disable FBC anyway on a given pipe, so this should already help
triaging bugs.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-22-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:18:16 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
5bc40472de drm/i915/fbc: don't try to deactivate FBC if it's not enabled
During FBC invalidation, don't call intel_fbc_deactivate if it's not
enabled. This doesn't fix any bug, but helps making the interface
saner.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-21-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:17:56 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
49227c4ae3 drm/i915/fbc: make FBC work with fastboot
Move intel_fbc_enable to a place where it is called regardless of the
"modeset" variable, and make sure intel_fbc_enable can be called
multiple times without intel_fbc_disable being called.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-20-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:17:36 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
58f9c0bc55 drm/i915/fbc: move intel_fbc_{enable, disable} call one level up
Instead of duplicating the calls for every platform, let's just put
them in the correct places inside intel_atomic_commit. This will also
make it easier for us to move the enable call in order to support
fasbtoot.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-19-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:17:19 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
f51be2e0e3 drm/i915/fbc: choose the new FBC CRTC during atomic check
This opens the possibility of implementing nicer schemes to choose the
CRTC, such as checking the amount of stolen memory available, or
choosing the best pipe on platforms that don't die FBC to pipe or
plane A.

This code was written for another refactor that I ended up discarding,
so I don't actually need it, but I figured this patch would be an
improvement on its own so I kept it on the series.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-18-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:16:45 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
010cf73d46 drm/i915/fbc: rewrite the multiple_pipes_ok() code for locking
Older FBC platforms have this restriction where FBC can't be enabled
if multiple pipes are enabled. In the current code, we disable FBC
before the second pipe becomes visible.

One of the problems with this code is that the current
multiple_pipes_ok() implementation just iterates through all CRTCs
looking at their states, but it doesn't make sure that the state
locks are grabbed. It also can't just grab the locks for every CRTC
since this would kill one of the biggest advantages of atomic
modesetting.

After the recent FBC changes, we now have the appropriate locks for
the given CRTC, so we can just try to maintain the state of each CRTC
and update it once intel_fbc_pre_update is called.

As a last note, I don't have gen 2/3 machines to test this code. My
current plan is to enable FBC on just the newer platforms, so this
patch is just an attempt to get the gen 2/3 code at least looking
sane, so if one day someone decide to fix FBC on these platforms, they
may have less work to do.

Not-tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> (only on HSW+)
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-16-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:15:56 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
65c7600f07 drm/i915/fbc: make sure we cancel the work function at fbc_disable
Just to be sure nothing will survive a module unload. We need to do
this after the unlock in order to make sure the function won't get
stuck trying to grab the lock we already own while we wait for it to
finish.

Reported-by: Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-15-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:15:43 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
c937ab3e58 drm/i915/fbc: rename the FBC disable functions
Instead of:
 - intel_fbc_disable_crtc(crtc)
 - intel_fbc_disable(dev_priv)
we now have:
 - intel_fbc_disable(crtc)
 - intel_fbc_global_disable(dev_priv)

This is because all the other functions that take a CRTC are called
 - intel_fbc_something(crtc)
Instead of:
 - intel_fbc_something_crtc(crtc)

And I also hope that the word "global" is going to help make it more
explicit that "global" is the unusual case, not the opposite.

Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-14-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:13:33 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
60eb2cc71c drm/i915/fbc: unexport intel_fbc_deactivate
With the addition and usage of intel_fbc_pre_update,
intel_fbc_deactivate is not used anymore outside intel_fbc.c, so kill
the exported function and rename __intel_fbc_deactivate.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-13-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:12:49 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
1eb52238a5 drm/i915/fbc: fix the FBC state checking code
We'll now call intel_fbc_pre_update instead of intel_fbc_deactivate
during atomic commits. This will continue to guarantee that we
deactivate FBC and it will also update the state checking structures
at the correct time. Then, later, at the point where we were calling
intel_fbc_update, we'll only need to call intel_fbc_post_update.

Also add the proper warnings in case we don't have the appropriate
locks. Daniel mentioned the warnings will have to be removed for async
commits, but let's keep them here while we can.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-12-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:12:07 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
212890cfcd drm/i915/fbc: split intel_fbc_update into pre and post update
So now pre_update will be responsible for unconditionally deactivating
FBC and updating the state cache, while post_update will be
responsible for checking if it can be enabled, then enabling it.

This is one more step into proper locking.

Notice that intel_fbc_flush now calls post_update directly. The FBC
flush can only happen for drawing operations - since we explicitly
ignore the flips -, so the FBC state is not expected to have changed
at this point. With this we can just run post_update, which will make
sure we won't deactivate+reactivate FBC as would be the case now if we
called pre_update + post_update.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-11-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:11:48 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
aaf78d276b drm/i915/fbc: introduce struct intel_fbc_state_cache
Per the new atomic locking rules, we need to cache the CRTC, plane and
FB state structures we use so we can access them later without needing
more locks. So do this.

Notice that there are some pieces of the FBC code that look at things
that are only computed during the modeset, so we can't just can't
precompute whether FBC can be activated during the update_state_cache
stage. We may be able to do this later.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-10-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:11:09 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
261fe99ac2 drm/i915/fbc: don't flush for operations on the wrong frontbuffer
If frontbuffer_bits doesn't match the current frontbuffer, there's no
reason to recompress or update FBC.

There was a plan to make the FBC test suite catch this type of
problem, but it never got implemented due to being low priority.

While at it, also implement Ville's suggestion and use
plane->frontbuffer_bit instead of INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-8-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:10:38 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
0dd81544c9 drm/i915/fbc: don't use the frontbuffer tracking subsystem for flips
Before this patch, page flips would call intel_frontbuffer_flip() and
intel_frontbuffer_flip_complete(), which would call intel_fbc_flush(),
which would call intel_fbc_update(). The problem is that drawing
operations also trigger intel_fbc_flush() calls, so it's not
guaranteed that we have the CRTC and FB locks grabbed when
intel_fbc_flush() happens, since the call trace may come from the
rendering path.

We're trying to make the FBC code grab the appropriate CRTC/FB locks,
so split the drawing and the flipping logic in order to achieve that
in later patches. So now the frontbuffer tracking code is just going
to be used for frontbuffer drawing, and intel_fbc_update() is going to
be used directly for actual page flips.

As a note, we don't need to call intel_fbc_flip() during the two
places where we call intel_frontbuffer_flip() since in one of them we
already have an intel_fbc_update() call, and in the other we have the
planes disabled.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-7-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:10:20 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
ab34a7e8b5 drm/i915/fbc: replace frequent dev_priv->fbc.x with fbc->x
We say "dev_priv->fbc.something" way too many times in our code while
we could be saying just "fbc->something" with a previous declaration
of fbc. This has been bothering me for a while but I didn't want to
patch it since I wanted to fix the real problems first. But as I add
more code I keep thinking about it, especially since it makes the code
easier to read and it can make us fit 80 columns easier, so let's just
do the change now.

While at it, also rename from i915_fbc to intel_fbc because the whole
FBC code uses intel_fbc.

v2: Rebase after the work_fn changes.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453406763-10400-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:09:37 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
b183b3f143 drm/i915/fbc: introduce struct intel_fbc_reg_params
The early return inside __intel_fbc_update does not completely check
all the parameters that affect the FBC register values. For example,
we currently lack looking at crtc->adjusted_y (for the fence Y offset)
and all the parameters that affect the CFB size (for i8xx).

Instead of just adding the missing parameters to the check and hoping
that any changes to the fbc_activate functions also come with a
matching change to the __intel_fbc_update check, introduce a new
structure where we store these parameters and use the structure at the
fbc_activate function. Of course, it's still possible to access
everything from dev_priv in those functions, but IMHO the new code
will be harder to break.

v2: Rebase.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-5-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:08:38 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
44a8a25708 drm/i915/fbc: extract intel_fbc_can_enable()
Make our enable/activate checking model more explicit, especially
since we now have intel_fbc_can_activate().

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:08:25 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
615b40d7e4 drm/i915/fbc: extract intel_fbc_can_activate()
Extract all the code that checks if the FBC configuration is valid to
its own function, making __intel_fbc_update() much simpler.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-3-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:07:38 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
ca18d51d77 drm/i915/fbc: wait for a vblank instead of 50ms when enabling
Instead of waiting for 50ms, just wait until the next vblank, since
it's the minimum requirement. The whole infrastructure of FBC is based
on vblanks, so waiting for X vblanks instead of X milliseconds sounds
like the correct way to go. Besides, 50ms may be less than a vblank on
super slow modes that may or may not exist.

There are some small improvements in PC state residency (due to the
fact that we're now using 16ms for the common modes instead of 50ms),
but the biggest advantage is still the correctness of being
vblank-based instead of time-based.

v2:
  - Rebase after changing the patch order.
  - Update the commit message.
v3:
  - Fix bogus vblank_get() instead of vblank_count() (Ville).
  - Don't forget to call drm_crtc_vblank_{get,put} (Chris, Ville)
  - Adjust the performance details on the commit message.
v4:
  - Don't grab the FBC mutex just to grab the vblank (Maarten)

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453406585-10233-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
2016-01-29 18:07:08 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
ee7d6cfa4b drm/i915: only recompress FBC after flushing a drawing operation
There's no need to stop and restart FBC, which is quite expensive as
we have to revalidate the CRTC state. After flushing a drawing
operation we know the CRTC state hasn't changed, so a nuke
(recompress) should be fine.

v2: Make it simpler (Chris).
v3: Rewrite the patch again due to patch order changes.
v4: Rewrite commit message (Chris).

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:38:11 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
820bcabbf0 drm/i915: get rid of FBC {,de}activation messages
When running Cinnamon I see way too many pairs of these messages: many
per second. Get rid of them as they're just telling us FBC is working
as expected. We already have the messages for enable/disable, so we
don't really need messages for activation/deactivation.

v2: Rebase after changing the patch order.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:37:28 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
559d913583 drm/i915: kill fbc.uncompressed_size
Directly call intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size() in the only place that
actually needs it, and use the proper check before removing the stolen
node. IMHO, this change makes our code easier to understand.

v2: Use drm_mm_node_allocated() (Chris).

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:36:42 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
128d735606 drm/i915: use a single intel_fbc_work struct
This was already on my TODO list, and was requested both by Chris and
Ville, for different reasons. The advantages are avoiding a frequent
malloc/free pair, and the locality of having the work structure
embedded in dev_priv. The maximum used memory is also smaller since
previously we could have multiple allocated intel_fbc_work structs at
the same time, and now we'll always have a single one - the one
embedded on dev_priv. Of course, we're now using a little more memory
on the cases where there's nothing scheduled.

The biggest challenge here is to keep everything synchronized the way
it was before.

Currently, when we try to activate FBC, we allocate a new
intel_fbc_work structure. Then later when we conclude we must delay
the FBC activation a little more, we allocate a new intel_fbc_work
struct, and then adjust dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work to point to the new
struct. So when the old work runs - at intel_fbc_work_fn() - it will
check that dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work points to something else, so it does
nothing. Everything is also protected by fbc.lock.

Just cancelling the old delayed work doesn't work because we might
just cancel it after the work function already started to run, but
while it is still waiting to grab fbc.lock. That's why we use the
"dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work == work" check described in the paragraph
above.

So now that we have a single work struct we have to introduce a new
way to synchronize everything. So we're making the work function a
normal work instead of a delayed work, and it will be responsible for
sleeping the appropriate amount of time itself. This way, after it
wakes up it can grab the lock, ask "were we delayed or cancelled?" and
then go back to sleep, enable FBC or give up.

v2:
  - Spelling fixes.
  - Rebase after changing the patch order.
  - Fix ms/jiffies confusion.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:35:58 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
e6cd6dc104 drm/i915: check for FBC planes in the same place as the pipes
This moves the pre-gen4 check from update() to enable(). The HAS_DDI
in the original code is not needed since only gen 2/3 have the plane
swapping code.

v2: Rebase.
v3: Extract fbc_on_plane_a_only() (Chris).

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:35:34 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
c5ecd4691c drm/i915: alloc/free the FBC CFB during enable/disable
One of the problems with the current code is that it frees the CFB and
releases its drm_mm node as soon as we flip FBC's enable bit. This is
bad because after we disable FBC the hardware may still use the CFB
for the rest of the frame, so in theory we should only release the
drm_mm node one frame after we disable FBC. Otherwise, a stolen memory
allocation done right after an FBC disable may result in either
corrupted memory for the new owner of that memory region or corrupted
screen/underruns in case the new owner changes it while the hardware
is still reading it. This case is not exactly easy to reproduce since
we currently don't do a lot of stolen memory allocations, but I see
patches on the mailing list trying to expose stolen memory to user
space, so races will be possible.

I thought about three different approaches to solve this, and they all
have downsides.

The first approach would be to simply use multiple drm_mm nodes and
freeing the unused ones only after a frame has passed. The problem
with this approach is that since stolen memory is rather small,
there's a risk we just won't be able to allocate a new CFB from stolen
if the previous one was not freed yet. This could happen in case we
quickly disable FBC from pipe A and decide to enable it on pipe B, or
just if we change pipe A's fb stride while FBC is enabled.

The second approach would be similar to the first one, but maintaining
a single drm_mm node and keeping track of when it can be reused. This
would remove the disadvantage of not having enough space for two
nodes, but would create the new problem where we may not be able to
enable FBC at the point intel_fbc_update() is called, so we would have
to add more code to retry updating FBC after the time has passed. And
that can quickly get too complex since we can get invalidate, flush,
disable and other calls in the middle of the wait.

Both solutions above - and also the current code - have the problem
that we unnecessarily free+realloc FBC during invalidate+flush
operations even if the CFB size doesn't change.

The third option would be to move the allocation/deallocation to
enable/disable. This makes sure that the pipe is always disabled when
we allocate/deallocate the CFB, so there's no risk that the FBC
hardware may read or write to the memory right after it is freed from
drm_mm. The downside is that it is possible for user space to change
the buffer stride without triggering a disable/enable - only
deactivate/activate -, so we'll have to handle this case somehow - see
igt's kms_frontbuffer_tracking test, fbc-stridechange subtest. It
could be possible to implement a way to free+alloc the CFB during said
stride change, but it would involve a lot of book-keeping - exactly as
mentioned above - just for on case, so for now I'll keep it simple and
just deactivate FBC. Besides, we may not even need to disable FBC
since we do CFB over-allocation.

Note from Chris: "Starting a fullscreen client that covers a single
monitor in a multi-monitor setup will trigger a change in stride on
one of the CRTCs (the monitors will be flipped independently).". It
shouldn't be a huge problem if we lose FBC on multi-monitor setups
since these setups already have problems reaching deep PC states
anyway.

v2: Rebase after changing the patch order.
v3:
  - Remove references to the stride change case being "uncommon" and
    paste Chris' example.
  - Rebase after a change in a previous patch.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:35:04 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
d029bcad6e drm/i915: introduce intel_fbc_{enable,disable}
The goal is to call FBC enable/disable only once per modeset, while
activate/deactivate/update will be called multiple times.

The enable() function will be responsible for deciding if a CRTC will
have FBC on it and then it will "lock" FBC on this CRTC: it won't be
possible to change FBC's CRTC until disable(). With this, all checks
and resource acquisition that only need to be done once per modeset
can be moved from update() to enable(). And then the update(),
activate() and deactivate() code will also get simpler since they
won't need to worry about the CRTC being changed.

The disable() function will do the reverse operation of enable(). One
of its features is that it should only be called while the pipe is
already off. This guarantees that FBC is stopped and nothing is
using the CFB.

With this, the activate() and deactivate() functions just start and
temporarily stop FBC. They are the ones touching the hardware enable
bit, so HW state reflects dev_priv->crtc.active.

The last function remaining is update(). A lot of times I thought
about renaming update() to activate() or try_to_activate() since it's
called when we want to activate FBC. The thing is that update() may
not only decide to activate FBC, but also deactivate or keep it on the
same state, so I'll leave this name for now.

Moving code to enable() and disable() will also help in case we decide
to move FBC to pipe_config or something else later.

The current patch only puts the very basic code on enable() and
disable(). The next commits will take care of moving more stuff from
update() to the new functions.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
v4: Rebase again after upstream changes.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:34:01 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
0e631adc1a drm/i915: introduce is_active/activate/deactivate to the FBC terminology
The long term goal is to have enable/disable as the higher level
functions and activate/deactivate as the lower level functions, just
like we do for PSR and for the CRTC. This way, we'll run enable and
disable once per modeset, while update, activate and deactivate will
be run many times. With this, we can move the checks and code that
need to run only once per modeset to enable(), making the code simpler
and possibly a little faster.

This patch is just the first step on the conversion: it starts by
converting the current low level functions from enable/disable to
activate/deactivate. This patch by itself has no benefits other than
making review and rebase easier. Please see the next patches for more
details on the conversion.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:33:01 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
754d113304 drm/i915: pass the crtc as an argument to intel_fbc_update()
There's no need to reevaluate the status of every single crtc when a
single crtc changes its state.

With this, we're cutting the case where due to a change in pipe B,
intel_fbc_update() is called, then intel_fbc_find_crtc() concludes FBC
should be enabled on pipe A, then it completely rechecks the state of
pipe A only to conclude FBC should remain enabled on pipe A. If any
change on pipe A triggers a need to recompute whether FBC is valid on
pipe A, then at some point someone is going to call
intel_fbc_update(PIPE_A).

The addition of intel_fbc_deactivate() is necessary so we keep track
of the previously selected CRTC when we do invalidate/flush. We're
also going to continue the enable/disable/activate/deactivate concept
in the next patches.

v2: Rebase.
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:32:13 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
e9c5fd26ac drm/i915: set dev_priv->fbc.crtc before scheduling the enable work
This thing where we need to get the crtc either from the work
structure or the fbc structure itself is confusing and unnecessary.
Set fbc.crtc right when scheduling the enable work so we can always
use it.

The problem is not what gets passed and how to retrieve it. The
problem is that when we're in the other parts of the code we always
have to keep in mind that if FBC is already enabled we have to get the
CRTC from place A, if FBC is scheduled we have to get the CRTC from
place B, and if it's disabled there's no CRTC. Having a single place
to retrieve the CRTC from allows us to treat the "is enabled" and "is
scheduled" cases as the same case, reducing the mistake surface. I
guess I should add this to the commit message.

Besides the immediate advantages, this is also going to make one of
the next commits much simpler. And even later, when we introduce
enable/disable + activate/deactivate, this will be even simpler as
we'll set the CRTC at enable time. So all the
activate/deactivate/update code can just look at the single CRTC
variable regardless of the current state.

v2: Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:14:05 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
90d5234fdb drm/i915: fix the CFB size check
In function find_compression_threshold() we try to over-allocate CFB
space in order to reduce reallocations and fragmentation, and we're
not considering that at the CFB size check. Consider it.

There is also a longer-term plan to kill
dev_priv->fbc.uncompressed_size, but this will come later.

v2: Use drm_mm_node_allocated() (Chris).

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
2015-12-03 11:13:45 -02:00
Paulo Zanoni
5205bbe62b drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c
From our maintainer Daniel Vetter a few days ago:
  "Oh dear this is dead code. kdbg uses the fbcon, which always uses
  untiled, which means fbc will never be enabled. Also we have 0 users
  and 0 test coverage for kdbg on top of i915 (Jesse implemented it
  for fun years back). Imo just remove all this code."

Adding to what Daniel said: for kgdboc's KMS support,
intel_pipe_set_base_atomic() already manually disables FBC, so we
won't do the in_dbg_master() check there. This is essentially a revert
of:

commit c924b934d0
Author: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 5 09:22:32 2010 -0500
    i915: when kgdb is active display compression should be off

Besides, it is not clear what is the exact problem caused by FBC, and
why other features such as PSR, DRRS, IPS and RPM are not also
checking for in_dbg_master(). IMHO we should either remove the code as
suggested by Daniel or we add some nice comments explaining why is FBC
so special.

v2: Rebase due to new patch order.

Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-13-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 11:00:58 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
850bfaab71 drm/i915: clarify that checking the FB stride for CFB is intentional
Daniel was looking at this code and asked about whether fb->pitches[0]
is correct, then he suggested we should a comment to make sure it is
actually intentional.

For more information on the CFB size calculation, please see the
commit message of:

commit c4ffd40908
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 1 19:55:57 2015 -0300
    drm/i915: fix CFB size calculation

Requested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-12-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 11:00:34 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
e585feb064 drm/i915: remove too-frequent FBC debug message
If we run igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking, this message will appear
thousands of times, eating a significant part of our dmesg buffer.
It's part of the expected FBC behavior, so let's just silence it.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-10-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 11:00:21 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
b07ea0fae5 drm/i915: refactor FBC deactivation at init
Make sure we deactivate FBC at intel_fbc_init(), so we can remove the
call from intel_display.c. Currently we only have the "enabled"
software state, but later we'll have both "enabled" and "active", and
we'll add assertions to them, so just calling intel_fbc_disable() from
intel_modeset_init() won't work. It's better to make sure
intel_fbc_init() already puts the hardware in the expected state, so
we can put nice assertions in the other functions.

v2: Keep/improve the comment (Chris).
v3: Improve the commit message a little bit.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-9-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 11:00:06 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
c68ae339e7 drm/i915: don't disable_fbc() if FBC is already disabled
If FBC is disabled we will still call intel_fbc_invalidate(), and as a
result we may call intel_fbc_deactivate(), which will try to touch
registers.

I'm pretty sure I saw this happen on a runtime suspended device, and
I'm almost sure I was running igt/pm_rpm. It produced the "you touched
registers while the device is suspended" WARNs. But this was some time
ago and I can't remember exactly which conditions were necessary to
reproduce the problem.

v2: Rebase to new series order.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-8-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:59:45 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
548043abae drm/i915: fix the __intel_fbc_update() comments
Don't try to list in comments the cases where we should enable or
disable FBC: it varies a lot with the hardware generations and the
code should be the documentation. Also notice that there's already a
huge gap between the comments and what's in the code.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-7-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:59:30 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
45b32a2919 drm/i915: use struct intel_crtc *crtc at __intel_fbc_update()
This change was part of the commit that makes intel_fbc_update()
receive an intel_crtc as argument instead of dev_priv, but since it
was polluting the diff with too many chunks I decided to move it to
its own commit.

It seems that our developers are favoring having this instead of the
old combination drm_crtc *crtc + intel_crtc *intel_crtc, and on the
mentioned commit we'll get rid of the drm_crtc variable, so let's do
an intermediate commit with the rename, so on the next commit we'll
have just struct intel_crtc *crtc.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-6-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:59:13 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
30c58d5896 drm/i915: extract crtc_is_valid() on the FBC code
We're going to kill intel_fbc_find_crtc(), that's why a big part of
the logic moved from intel_fbc_find_crtc() to crtc_is_valid().

v2:
  - Rebase due to pipe_a_only change.
  - Split the multiline conditional (Chris).

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-5-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:59:01 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
a4dedd5a14 drm/i915: remove unnecessary check for crtc->primary->fb
We already check if the CRTC is visible, and it shouldn't be possible
to have a visible CRTC without an FB.

This was noticed by both Chris and Ville on different ocasions.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:58:49 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
571050226c drm/i915: extract fbc_on_pipe_a_only()
Make the code easier to read.

Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-3-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:58:34 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
d5ce416489 drm/i915: rename intel_fbc_nuke to intel_fbc_recompress
Although the term "nuke" is part of the FBC spec, it's not very
intuitive, so let's rename it to make it easier for people that are
not familiar with the spec.

Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-2-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:58:14 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
793af070a7 drm/i915: remove newline from a no_fbc_reason message
Newlines are not needed and they're not used by the other messages. I
added the newline by mistake.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446664257-32012-14-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-10 10:51:30 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
bf6189c6f0 drm/i915: change no_fbc_reason from enum to string
I wanted to add yet another check to intel_fbc_update() and realized
I would need to create yet another enum no_fbc_reason case. So I
remembered this patch series that Damien wrote a long time ago and
nobody ever reviewed, so I decided to reimplement it since the code
changed a lot since then.

Credits-to: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1445964628-30226-2-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-04 15:02:51 +01:00
Rodrigo Vivi
ef11bdb3e0 drm/i915/kbl: Introduce Kabylake platform defition.
Kabylake is a Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
following Skylake.

It is Gen9p5, so it inherits everything from Skylake.

Let's start by adding the platform separated from Skylake
but reusing most of all features, functions etc. Later we
rebase the PCI-ID patch without is_skylake=1
so we don't replace what original Author did there.

Few IS_SKYLAKEs if statements are not being covered by this patch
on purpose:
   - Workarounds: Kabylake is derivated from Skylake H0 so no
     		  W/As apply here.
   - GuC: A following patch removes Kabylake support with an
     	  explanation: No firmware available yet.
   - DMC/CSR: Done in a separated patch since we need to be carefull
     	      and load the version for revision 7 since
	      Kabylake is Skylake H0.

v2: relative cleaner commit message and added the missed
    IS_KABYLAKE to intel_i2c.c as pointed out by Jani.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2015-10-28 21:35:38 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
856312aeb1 drm/i915: fix FBC buffer size checks
According to my experiments (and later confirmation from the hardware
developers), the maximum sizes mentioned in the specification delimit
how far in the buffer the hardware tracking can go. And the hardware
calculates the size based on the plane address we provide - and the
provided plane address might not be the real x:0,y:0 point due to the
compute_page_offset() function.

On platforms that do the x/y offset adjustment trick it will be really
hard to reproduce a bug, but on the current SKL we can reproduce the
bug with igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-farfromfence. With this
patch, we'll go from "CRC assertion failure" to "FBC unexpectedly
disabled", which is still a failure on the test suite but is not a
perceived user bug - you will just not save as much power as you could
if FBC is disabled.

v2, rewrite patch after clarification from the Hadware guys:
  - Rename function so it's clear what the check is for.
  - Use the new intel_fbc_get_plane_source_sizes() function in order
    to get the proper sizes as seen by FBC.
v3:
  - Rebase after the s/sizes/size/ on the previous patch.
  - Adjust comment wording (Ville).
  - s/used_/effective_/ (Ville).

Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-farfromfence (SKL)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-10-09 09:35:50 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
c4ffd40908 drm/i915: fix CFB size calculation
We were considering the whole framebuffer height, but the spec says we
should only consider the active display height size. There were still
some unclear questions based on the spec, but the hardware guys
clarified them for us. According to them:

- CFB size = CFB stride * Number of lines FBC writes to CFB
- CFB stride = plane stride / compression limit
- Number of lines FBC writes to CFB = MIN(plane source height, maximum
  number of lines FBC writes to CFB)
- Plane source height =
  - pipe source height (PIPE_SRCSZ register) (before SKL)
  - plane size register height (PLANE_SIZE register) (SKL+)
- Maximum number of lines FBC writes to CFB =
  - plane source height (before HSW)
  - 2048 (HSW+)

For the plane source height, I could just have made our code do
I915_READ() in order to be more future proof, but since it's not cool
to do register reads I decided to just recalculate the values we use
when we actually write to those registers.

With this patch, depending on your machine configuration, a lot of the
kms_frontbuffer_tracking subtests that used to result in a SKIP due to
not enough stolen memory still start resulting in a PASS.

v2: Use the clipped src size instead of pipe_src_h (Ville).
v3: Use the appropriate information provided by the hardware guys.
v4: Bikesheds: s/sizes/size/, s/fb_cpp/cpp/ (Ville).
v5: - Don't use crtc->config->pipe_src_x for BDW- (Ville).
    - Fix the register name written in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-10-09 09:35:32 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
3c5f174e38 drm/i915: export size_is_valid() from __intel_fbc_update()
Make the giant function a little less giant.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Add pipe_ prefix as suggested by Chris.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-30 10:20:07 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
9f218336bd drm/i915: extract fbc_supported()
Make it clear that we're checking whether FBC is supported or not. The
fact that the vfunc is not NULL is just a consequence.

Another name option would have been fbc_initialized().

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-30 10:20:06 +02:00
Ville Syrjälä
4d110c71fb drm/i915: Parametrize FBC_TAG registers
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 17:14:53 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
2db3366b18 drm/i915: fix FBC for cases where crtc->base.y is non-zero
I only tested this on BDW and SKL, but since the register description
is the same ever since gen4, let's assume that all gens take the same
register format. If that's not true, then hopefully someone will
bisect a bug to this patch and we'll fix it.

Notice that the wrong fence offset register just means that the
hardware tracking will be wrong.

Testcases:
 - igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt
 - igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt

v2:
  - Add intel_crtc->adjusted_{x,y} so this code can work independently
    of intel_gen4_compute_page_offset(). (Ville).
  - This version also works on SKL.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:20 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
b9e831dc39 drm/i915: reject invalid formats for FBC
This commit is essentially a rewrite of "drm/i915: Check pixel format
for fbc" from Ville Syrjälä. The idea is the same, but the code is
different due to all the changes that happened since his original
patch. So any bugs are due to my bad rewrite.

v2:
  - Drop the alpha formats (Ville).
v3:
  - Drop the stale comment (Ville).

Testcases: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/*fbc*-${format_name}-draw-*
Credits-to: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:19 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
40f4022ef6 drm/i915: don't apply WaFbcAsynchFlipDisableFbcQueue on SKL
This WA is only for HSW/BDW.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:19 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
57012be928 drm/i915: apply WaFbcAsynchFlipDisableFbcQueue earlier
The spec says the register should have that value for the entire time
that FBC is enabled, so apply the WA before we enable FBC.

Notice that we also have this WA for ILK/SNB, but it is implemented at
init_clock_gating(). I could move the IVB/HSW/BDW WA code to
init_clock_gating() too, but since we recently had some complaints
about WAs not staying after being set, I'm going to play safe and keep
this here for now.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:18 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
7b24c9a696 drm/i915: don't enable FBC when pixel rate exceeds 95% on HSW/BDW
BSpec says we shouldn't enable FBC on HSW/BDW when the pipe pixel rate
exceeds 95% of the core display clock.

v2:
  - HSW also needs the WA (Ville).
  - Add the WA name (Ville).
  - Use the current cdclk (Ville).

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:18 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
b8bf5d7fe0 drm/i915: print the correct amount of bytes allocated for the CFB
And also print the threshold. I was surprised to see a log message
claiming the CFB size was 32mb when there was less than 24mb available
for it.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:18 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
a9da512b3e drm/i915: avoid the last 8mb of stolen on BDW/SKL
The FBC hardware for these platforms doesn't have access to the
bios_reserved range, so it always assumes the maximum (8mb) is used.
So avoid this range while allocating.

This solves a bunch of FIFO underruns that happen if you end up
putting the CFB in that memory range. On my machine, with 32mb of
stolen, I need a 2560x1440 mode for that.

Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-* (given the right setup)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:17 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
adf70c65cf drm/i915: check for the supported strides on HSW+ FBC
Don't allow FBC for cases where the spec says we can't FBC.

v2:
  - Just WARN_ON() the strides that should have been caught earlier
    (Daniel)
  - Make it a new function since I expect this to grow more.
v3:
  - Document which IGT test is exercised by this.
v4:
  - Implement the restrictions for gens 2-6 too (Ville).
  - Fix off-by-one mistake (Ville).

Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-badstride
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:17 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
e8cb8d69d1 drm/i915: fix the FBC work allocation failure path
Always update the currrent crtc, fb and vertical offset after calling
enable_fbc. We were forgetting to do so along the failure paths when
enabling fbc synchronously. Fix this with a new helper to enable_fbc()
and update the state simultaneously.

v2: Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Constify struct drm_framebuffer (Ville).

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-09-23 14:39:16 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
6f4551fe8e drm/i915: fix FBC frontbuffer tracking flushing code
Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if
we didn't previously get an invalidate. Since it's possible to get
flushes without an invalidate first, remove the busy_bits early
return.

So now that we don't have the busy_bits guard anymore we'll need the
origin check for the GTT tracking (we were not doing anything on GTT
flushes due to the GTT check at invalidate()).

As a last detail, since we can get multiple consecutive flushes,
disable FBC before updating it, otherwise intel_fbc_update() will just
keep FBC enabled instead of restarting it.

Notice that this does not fix any of the current IGT tests due to the
fact that we still have a few intel_fbc() calls at points where we
also have the frontbuffer tracking calls: we didn't fully convert to
frontbuffer tracking yet. Once we remove those calls and start relying
only on the frontbuffer tracking infrastructure we'll need this patch.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-08-05 09:59:44 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
8df5dd57fd drm/i915: move set_no_fbc_reason() call out of intel_fbc_find_crtc()
So now all the calls are inside __intel_fbc_update(). Consistency!

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-08 11:40:33 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
232fd934a4 drm/i915: extract FBC_MULTIPLE_PIPES check
I have two separate refactor ideas that require extracting this to a
separate function. I'm not sure which idea I'll end choosing, but
since both will require extracting this function, let's do this now.

Notice that this is just code moving. Any possible problems with the
current multiple pipes check should be fixed in later commits.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-08 11:40:25 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
8935108528 drm/i915: add FBC_IN_DBG_MASTER no_fbc_reason
The poor in_dbg_master() check was the only one without a reason
string. Give it a reason string so it won't feel excluded.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-08 11:40:17 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
220285f228 drm/i915: use intel_crtc for the FBC functions
This is all internal i915.ko work, let's start using intel_crtc for
everything.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-08 11:40:10 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
7733b49bb0 drm/i915: use dev_priv for the FBC functions
Because the cool kids use dev_priv and FBC wants to be cool too.

We've been historically using struct drm_device on the FBC function
arguments, but we only really need it for intel_vgpu_active(): we can
use dev_priv everywhere else. So let's fully switch to dev_priv since
I'm getting tired of adding "struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev"
everywhere.

If I get a NACK here I'll propose the opposite: convert all the
functions that currently take dev_priv to take dev.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-08 11:39:45 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
ff2a311710 drm/i915: move FBC vfuncs to struct i915_fbc
Because it makes more sense there, IMHO.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-08 11:39:37 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
0bf73c361f drm/i915: protect FBC functions with FBC checks
Now all the functions called by other files check whether FBC has been
initialized. This allows us to drop the checks on the static
functions.

v2:
 - s/HAS_FBC/dev_priv->display.enable_fbc/ everywhere but the init
   function (Chris).

Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-06 14:34:27 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
c80ac8548d drm/i915: FBC doesn't need struct_mutex anymore
Everything is covered either by fbc.lock or mm.stolen_lock, and
intel_fbc.c is already responsible for grabbing the appropriate locks
when it needs them.

Reviewed-by: Chris wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-06 14:34:20 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
25ad93fd9f drm/i915: add the FBC mutex
Make sure we're not going to have weird races in really weird cases
where a lot of different CRTCs are doing rendering and modesets at the
same time.

With this change and the stolen_lock from the previous patch, we can
start removing the struct_mutex locking we have around FBC in the next
patches.

v2:
 - Rebase (6 months later)
 - Also lock debugfs and stolen.
v3:
 - Don't lock a single value read (Chris).
 - Replace lockdep assertions with WARNs (Daniel).
 - Improve commit message.
 - Don't forget intel_pre_plane_update() locking.
v4:
 - Don't remove struct_mutex at intel_pre_plane_update() (Chris).
 - Add comment regarding locking dependencies (Chris).
 - Rebase after the stolen code rework.
 - Rebase again after drm-intel-nightly changes.
v5:
 - Rebase after the new stolen_lock patch.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v4)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-06 14:33:46 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
fc786728ee drm/i915: move FBC code out of i915_gem_stolen.c
With the abstractions created by the last patch, we can move this code
and the only thing inside intel_fbc.c that knows about dev_priv->mm is
the code that reads stolen_base.

We also had to move a call to i915_gem_stolen_cleanup_compression()
- now called intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb() - outside i915_gem_stolen.c.

v2:
  - Rebase after the remove_node() changes on the previous patch.

Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-06 14:33:32 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
ce65e47b78 drm/i915: don't increment the FBC threshold at fbc_enable
We first set the threshold value when we're allocating the CFB, and
then later at {ilk,gen7}_fbc_enable() we increment it in case we're
using 16bpp. While that is correct, it is dangerous: if we rework the
code a little bit in a way that allows us to call intel_fbc_enable()
without necessarily calling i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression() first,
we might end up incrementing threshold more than once. To prevent
that, increment a temporary variable instead.

v2: Rebase.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-07-03 07:39:00 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
d8514d6306 drm/i915: don't set the FBC plane select bits on HSW+
This commit is just to make the intentions explicit: on HSW+ these
bits are MBZ, but since we only support plane A and the macro
evaluates to zero when plane A is the parameter, we're not fixing any
bug.

v2:
 - Remove useless extra blank like (Chris).
 - Init dpfc_ctl in another place (Chris).

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-06-15 18:36:42 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
2e8144a53d drm/i915: unify no_fbc_reason message printing
This commit has two main advantages: simplify intel_fbc_update()
and deduplicate the strings.

v2:
 - Rebase due to changes on P1.
 - set_no_fbc_reason() can now return void (Chris).

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-06-15 18:36:36 +02:00
Paulo Zanoni
87f5ff0115 drm/i915: add FBC_ROTATION to enum no_fbc_reason
Because we're currently using FBC_UNSUPPORTED_MODE for two different
cases.

This commit will also allow us to write the next one without hiding
information from the user.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-06-15 18:36:31 +02:00
Maarten Lankhorst
b70709a6f0 drm/i915: get rid of primary_enabled and use atomic state
This was an optimization from way back before we had primary plane
support to be able to disable the primary plane. But with primary
plane support userspace can tell the kernel this directly, so there's
no big need for this any more. And it's getting in the way of the
atomic conversion.

If need be we can resurrect this later on properly again.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
[danvet: Explain why removing this is ok.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-05-08 13:03:53 +02:00
Rodrigo Vivi
ab585dea12 drm/i915: kill i915.powersave
This flag was being mostly used as a meta flag in some
cases and not covering other cases.

One of the risks is that it was masking some frontbuffer
trackings without disabling PSR.

So, better to kill this at once and avoid umbrella parameters.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Drop unused out: label to appease gcc.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-03-26 13:04:23 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
dbef0f15b5 drm/i915: add frontbuffer tracking to FBC
Kill the blt/render tracking we currently have and use the frontbuffer
tracking infrastructure.

Don't enable things by default yet.

v2: (Rodrigo) Fix small conflict on rebase and typo at subject.
v3: (Paulo) Rebase on RENDER_CS change.
v4: (Paulo) Rebase.
v5: (Paulo) Simplify: flushes don't have origin (Daniel).
            Also rebase due to patch order changes.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-03-17 22:29:56 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
e489e38e3f drm/i915: gen5+ can have FBC with multiple pipes
So allow it.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-23 23:59:57 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
68b92147d5 drm/i915: HSW+ FBC is tied to pipe A
So add code to consider this case.

v2: Reorder the series, so drop the possible_framebuffer_bits chunk.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-23 23:59:39 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
9510675387 drm/i915: extract intel_fbc_find_crtc()
I want to make this code a little more complicated, so let's extract
the function first.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-23 23:59:28 +01:00
Yu Zhang
bd49234b6a drm/i915: Disable framebuffer compression for i915 driver in VM
Framebuffer compression is disabled when driver detects it's
running in a Intel GVT-g enlightened VM, because FBC is not
emulated and there is no stolen memory for a vGPU.

v2:
take Chris' comments:
        - move the code into intel_update_fbc()

v4:
take Tvrtko's comments:
        - rebase the code into intel_fbc_update()

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiyuan Lv <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-13 23:28:24 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
e35fef211b drm/i915: change dev_priv->fbc.plane to dev_priv->fbc.crtc
Since the mapping from CRTCs to planes is fixed, looking at the CRTC
is essentially the same as looking at the plane. Also, the next
patches wil start using the frontbuffer_bits macros, and they take the
pipe as the parameter instead of the plane, and this could differ on
gens 2 and 3.

Another nice thing is that we don't risk accidentally initializing
things to PLANE_A if we don't set the value before it is used for the
first time. But this shouldn't be a problem with the current code.

V2: Rebase.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-13 23:28:15 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
104618b336 drm/i915: don't keep reassigning FBC_UNSUPPORTED
This may save a few picoseconds on !HAS_FBC platforms. And it also
satisfies my OCD.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-13 23:28:14 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni
7cc6574600 drm/i915: don't try to find crtcs for FBC if it's disabled
.. because it would be a waste of time, so move the place where the
check is done. Also, with this we won't risk printing "more than one
pipe active, disabling compression" or "no output, disabling" when FBC
is actually disabled.

This patch also represents a small behavior difference when using
i915.powersave=0: it is now exactly the same as i915.enable_fbc=0 on
this part of the code.

V2: Rebase.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-13 23:28:14 +01:00
Jani Nikula
60ee5cd24c drm/i915/fbc: fix the check for already reserved fbc size
The check for previously reserved stolen space size for FBC in
i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression() did not take the compression
threshold into account. Fix this by storing and comparing to
uncompressed size instead.

The bug has been introduced in

commit 5e59f7175f
Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Jun 30 10:41:24 2014 -0700

    drm/i915: Try harder to get FBC

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88975
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-02-13 23:28:03 +01:00
Matt Roper
8e7d688b7a drm/i915: Move rotation from intel_plane to drm_plane_state
Runtime state that can be manipulated via properties should now go in
intel_plane_state/drm_plane_state so that it can be tracked as part of
an atomic transaction.

We add a new 'intel_create_plane_state' function so that the proper
initial value for this property (and future properties) doesn't have to
be repeated at each plane initialization site.

v2:
 - Stick rotation in common drm_plane_state rather than
   intel_plane_state. (Daniel)
 - Add intel_create_plane_state() to consolidate the places where we
   have to set initial state values.  (Ander)

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-01-27 09:51:18 +01:00
Mika Kuoppala
59bad94718 drm/i915: Rename the forcewake get/put functions
We have multiple forcewake domains now on recent gens. Change the
function naming to reflect this.

v2: More verbose names (Chris)
v3: Rebase
v4: Rebase
v5: Add documentation for forcewake_get/put

Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-01-27 09:50:57 +01:00
Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
6e3c9717e0 drm/i915: Make intel_crtc->config a pointer
To match the semantics of drm_crtc->state, which this will eventually
become. The allocation of the memory for config will be fixed in a
followup patch. By adding the extra _config field to intel_crtc it was
possible to generate this entire patch with the cocci script below.

@@ @@
struct intel_crtc {
...
-struct intel_crtc_state config;
+struct intel_crtc_state _config;
+struct intel_crtc_state *config;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; @@
-memset(&crtc->config, 0, sizeof(crtc->config));
+memset(crtc->config, 0, sizeof(*crtc->config));
@@ @@
__intel_set_mode(...) {
<...
-to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config = *pipe_config;
+(*(to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config)) = *pipe_config;
...>
}
@@ @@
intel_crtc_init(...) {
...
WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&intel_crtc->base) != intel_crtc->pipe);
+intel_crtc->config = &intel_crtc->_config;
return;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; @@
-&crtc->config
+crtc->config
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; identifier member; @@
-crtc->config.member
+crtc->config->member
@@ expression E; @@
-&(to_intel_crtc(E)->config)
+to_intel_crtc(E)->config
@@ expression E; identifier member; @@
-to_intel_crtc(E)->config.member
+to_intel_crtc(E)->config->member

v2: Clarify manual changes by splitting them into another patch. (Matt)
    Improve cocci script to generate even more of the changes. (Ander)

Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-01-27 09:50:50 +01:00
Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2d112de7db drm/i915: Embedded struct drm_crtc_state in intel_crtc_state
And get rid of the duplicate mode structures. This patch was generated
with the following semantic patch:

@@ @@
struct intel_crtc_state {
+struct drm_crtc_state base;
+
...
-struct drm_display_mode requested_mode;
-struct drm_display_mode adjusted_mode;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc_state *state; @@
-state->adjusted_mode
+state->base.adjusted_mode
@@ struct intel_crtc_state *state; @@
-state->requested_mode
+state->base.mode
@@ struct intel_crtc_state state; @@
-state.adjusted_mode
+state.base.adjusted_mode
@@ struct intel_crtc_state state; @@
-state.requested_mode
+state.base.mode
@@ struct drm_crtc *crtc; @@
-to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config.adjusted_mode
+to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config.base.adjusted_mode
@@ identifier member; expression E; @@
-PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(adjusted_mode.member, E);
+PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.member, E);
@@ identifier member; @@
-PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(adjusted_mode.member);
+PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.member);
@@ identifier member; @@
-PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(adjusted_mode.member);
+PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(base.adjusted_mode.member);

v2: Completely generate the patch with cocci. (Ander)

Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-01-27 09:50:48 +01:00
Rodrigo Vivi
94b8395755 drm/i915: Introduce FBC DocBook.
No functional changes.

v2 (Paulo): Rebase.
v3: Accept Daniel's suggestions:
    * remove unclear and duplicated explanation.
    * remove marketing like doc and replace by a simple one.
    * remove bdw_fbc_sw_flush documentation.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-10 17:47:23 +01:00
Rodrigo Vivi
7ff0ebcc1e drm/i915: Move FBC stuff to intel_fbc.c
No functional changes. This is just the begin of a FBC rework.

v2 (Paulo):
  - Revert intel_fbc_init() changed parameter.
  - Revert set_no_fbc_reason() rename.
  - Rebase.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-10 17:47:20 +01:00