Even if this is not supposed to happen, there is no reason to fail the
probe if it was explicitly requested to use no ECC engine at all (for
instance, during development). This condition is met by just
commenting out the error on the OOB free bytes count after the
assignation of an ECC engine if none was provided (any other situation
would error out much earlier anyway).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Now that all the logic is available in the NAND core, let's use it
from the SPI-NAND core. Right now there is no functional change as the
default ECC engine for SPI-NANDs is set to 'on-die', but user can now
use software correction if they want to by just setting the right
properties in the DT.
Also note that the OOB layout handling is removed from the SPI-NAND
core as each ECC engine is supposed to handle it by it's own; users
should not be aware of that.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Add the logic in the NAND core to find the right ECC engine depending
on the NAND chip requirements and the user desires. Right now, the
choice may be made between (more will come):
* software Hamming
* software BCH
* on-die (SPI-NAND devices only)
Once the ECC engine has been found, the ECC engine must be
configured.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The SPI-NAND layer default is on-die ECC because until now it was the
only one supported. New SPI-NAND chip flavors might use something else
as ECC engine provider but this will always be the default if the user
does not choose explicitly something else.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Make use of the existing functions taken from the SPI-NAND core to
instantiate an on-die ECC engine specific to the SPI-NAND core. The
next step will be to tweak the core to use this object instead of
calling the helpers directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Prepare the creation of a SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine by gathering the
ECC-related code earlier enough in the core to avoid the need for
forward declarations.
The next step is to actually create that engine by implementing the
generic ECC interface.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This code is meant to be reused by the SPI-NAND core. Now that the
driver has been cleaned and reorganized, use a generic ECC engine
object to store the driver's data instead of accessing members of the
nand_chip structure. This means adding proper init/cleanup helpers.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Prefix by ecc_sw_hamming_ the functions which should be internal only
but are exported for "raw" operations.
Prefix by nand_ecc_sw_hamming_ the other functions which will be used
in the context of the declaration of an Hamming proper ECC engine
object.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Some functions should never have been exported (the ones prefixed by
__*), in this case simply drop the documentation, we never want
anybody to use this function from the outside.
For the other functions, enhance the style.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The include file pretends being the header for "ECC algorithm", while
it is just the header for the Hamming implementation. Make this clear
by rewording the sentence.
Do the same with the module description.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_ecc_ctrl embeds a private pointer which only has a meaning in the
sunxi driver. This structure will soon be deprecated, but as this
field is actually not needed, let's just drop it.
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Let's continue introducing the generic ECC engine abstraction in the
NAND subsystem by instantiating a first ECC engine: the software
BCH one.
While at it, make a very tidy ecc_sw_bch_init() function and move all
the sanity checks and user input management in
nand_ecc_sw_bch_init_ctx(). This second helper will be called from the
raw RAND core.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Traditionally, Linux unlocks the whole flash because there are legacy
devices which has the write protection bits set by default at startup.
If you actually want to use the flash protection bits, eg. because there
is a read-only part for a bootloader, this automatic unlocking is
harmful. If there is no hardware write protection in place (usually
called WP#), a startup of the kernel just discards this protection.
I've gone through the datasheets of all the flashes (except the Intel
ones where I could not find any datasheet nor reference) which supports
the unlocking feature and looked how the sector protection was
implemented. The currently supported flashes can be divided into the
following two categories:
(1) block protection bits are non-volatile. Thus they keep their values
at reset and power-cycle
(2) flashes where these bits are volatile. After reset or power-cycle,
the whole memory array is protected.
(a) some devices needs a special "Global Unprotect" command, eg.
the Atmel AT25DF041A.
(b) some devices require to clear the BPn bits in the status
register.
Due to the reasons above, we do not want to clear the bits for flashes
which belong to category (1). Fortunately for us, only Atmel flashes
fall into category (2a). Implement the "Global Protect" and "Global
Unprotect" commands for these. For (2b) we can use normal block
protection locking scheme.
This patch adds a new flag to indicate the case (2). Only if we have
such a flash we unlock the whole flash array. To be backwards compatible
it also introduces a kernel configuration option which restores the
complete legacy behavior ("Disable write protection on any flashes").
Hopefully, this will clean up "unlock the entire flash for legacy
devices" once and for all.
For reference here are the actually commits which introduced the legacy
behavior (and extended the behavior to other chip manufacturers):
commit f80e521c91 ("mtd: m25p80: add support for the Intel/Numonyx {16,32,64}0S33B SPI flash chips")
commit ea60658a08 ("mtd: m25p80: disable SST software protection bits by default")
commit 7228982442 ("[MTD] m25p80: fix bug - ATmel spi flash fails to be copied to")
Actually, this might also fix handling of the Atmel AT25DF flashes,
because the original commit 7228982442 ("[MTD] m25p80: fix bug -
ATmel spi flash fails to be copied to") was writing a 0 to the status
register, which is a "Global Unprotect". This might not be the case in
the current code which only handles the block protection bits BP2, BP1
and BP0. Thus, it depends on the current contents of the status register
if this unlock actually corresponds to a "Global Unprotect" command. In
the worst case, the current code might leave the AT25DF flashes in a
write protected state.
The commit 191f5c2ed4 ("mtd: spi-nor: use 16-bit WRR command when QE
is set on spansion flashes") changed that behavior by just clearing BP2
to BP0 instead of writing a 0 to the status register.
Further, the commit 3e0930f109 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling
of block write protection") expanded the unlock_all() feature to ANY
flash which supports locking.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-8-michael@walle.cc
These flashes have some weird BP bits mapping which aren't supported in
the current locking code. Just add a simple unlock op to unprotect the
entire flash array which is needed for legacy behavior.
Fixes: 3e0930f109 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection")
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-7-michael@walle.cc
For the Atmel and SST parts this flag was already moved to individual
flash parts because it is considered bad esp. because newer flash chips
will automatically inherit the "has locking" support. While this won't
likely be the case for the Intel parts, we do it for consistency
reasons.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-6-michael@walle.cc
This is considered bad for the following reasons:
(1) We only support the block protection with BPn bits for write
protection. Not all SST parts support this.
(2) Newly added flash chip will automatically inherit the "has
locking" support and thus needs to explicitly tested. Better
be opt-in instead of opt-out.
(3) There are already supported flashes which doesn't support
the locking scheme. So I assume this wasn't properly tested
before adding that chip; which enforces my previous argument
that locking support should be an opt-in.
Remove the global flag and add individual flags to all flashes
which supports BP locking. In particular the following flashes
don't support the BP scheme:
- SST26VF016B
- SST26WF016B
- SST26VF064B
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-5-michael@walle.cc
This is considered bad for the following reasons:
(1) We only support the block protection with BPn bits for write
protection. Not all Atmel parts support this.
(2) Newly added flash chip will automatically inherit the "has
locking" support and thus needs to explicitly tested. Better
be opt-in instead of opt-out.
(3) There are already supported flashes which doesn't support
the locking scheme. So I assume this wasn't properly tested
before adding that chip; which enforces my previous argument
that locking support should be an opt-in.
Remove the global flag and add individual flags to all flashes which
supports BP locking. In particular the following flashes don't support
the BP scheme:
- AT26F004
- AT25SL321
- AT45DB081D
Please note, that some flashes which are marked as SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK just
support Global Protection, i.e. not our supported block protection
locking scheme. This is to keep backwards compatibility with the
current "unlock all at boot" mechanism. In particular the following
flashes doesn't have BP bits:
- AT25DF041A
- AT25DF321
- AT25DF321A
- AT25DF641
- AT26DF081A
- AT26DF161A
- AT26DF321
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-4-michael@walle.cc
Just try to unlock the whole SPI-NOR flash array. Don't abort the
probing in case of an error. Justifications:
(1) For some boards, this just works because
spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() is broken and just checks the
second half of the 16bit. Once that will be fixed, SPI probe will
fail for boards which has hardware-write protected SPI-NOR flashes.
(2) Until now, hardware write-protection was the only viable solution
to use the block protection bits. This is because this very
function spi_nor_unlock_all() will be called unconditionally on
every linux boot. Therefore, this bits only makes sense in
combination with the hardware write-protection. If we would fail
the SPI probe on an error in spi_nor_unlock_all() we'd break
virtually all users of the block protection bits.
(3) We should try hard to keep the MTD working even if the flash might
not be writable/erasable.
Fixes: 3e0930f109 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection")
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-3-michael@walle.cc
This flash part actually has 4 block protection bits.
Please note, that this patch is just based on information of the
datasheet of the datasheet and wasn't tested.
Fixes: 3e0930f109 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection")
Reported-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-2-michael@walle.cc
The S28 flash family uses 2-bit ECC by default with each ECC block being
16 bytes. Under this scheme multi-pass programming to an ECC block is
not allowed. Set the writesize to make sure multi-pass programming is
not attempted on the flash.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201201102711.8727-4-p.yadav@ti.com
Some flashes like the Cypress S28 family use ECC. Under this ECC scheme,
multi-pass writes to an ECC block is not allowed. In other words, once
data is programmed to an ECC block, it can't be programmed again without
erasing it first.
Upper layers like file systems need to be given this information so they
do not cause error conditions on the flash by attempting multi-pass
programming. This can be done by setting 'writesize' in 'struct
mtd_info'.
Set the default to 1 but allow flashes to modify it in fixup hooks. If
more flashes show up with this constraint in the future it might be
worth it to add it to 'struct flash_info', but for now increasing its
size is not worth it.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201201102711.8727-3-p.yadav@ti.com
There are a few typos in comments in the SPI NOR framework; fix them.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130152416.1283972-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net
Permit the user to specify the erase page size as a parameter.
This solves two problems:
- phram can access images made by mkfs.jffs2. mkfs.jffs2 won't
create images with erase sizes less than 8KiB; many architectures
define PAGE_SIZE as 4KiB.
- Allows more effective use of small capacity devices. JFFS2
needs somewhere between 2 and 5 empty pages for garbage collection;
and for an NVRAM part with only 32KiB of space, a smaller erase page
allows much better utilization in applications where garbage collection
is important.
Signed-off-by: Patrick O'Grady <patrick@baymotion.com>
Reviewed-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJ7m5OqYv_=JB9NhHsqBsa8YU0DFRoP7C+W10PY22wonAGJK=A@mail.gmail.com/
[Guohua Zhong: fix token array index out of bounds and update patch for kernel master branch]
Signed-off-by: Guohua Zhong <zhongguohua1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201207095529.20896-1-zhongguohua1@huawei.com
sparse is unhappy with us casting the __iomem address space pointer to
a type with no address space attribute specified:
"sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)"
>> drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c:78:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
Indeed we perform the __iomem-less type casting but to an integer
variable. The integer variable isn't dereferenced then, so the casting is
safe and won't cause any problem. But in order to make sparse happy and
keep the code coherent let's fix the warning by converting the local
"shift" and "chunk" variables to the "unsigned int" type (since their
value won't ever exceed three) and cast the __iomem-pointers to uintptr_t.
Add the same fix to the bt1_rom_map_read() method for unification.
Fixes: b3e79e7682 ("mtd: physmap: Add Baikal-T1 physically mapped ROM support")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202011021254.XC70BaQT-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201125072640.23516-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Some devices (especially QCA ones) are already using hardcoded partition
names with colons in it. The OpenMesh A62 for example provides following
mtd relevant information via cmdline:
root=31:11 mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(0:SBL1),128k(0:MIBIB),384k(0:QSEE),64k(0:CDT),64k(0:DDRPARAMS),64k(0:APPSBLENV),512k(0:APPSBL),64k(0:ART),64k(custom),64k(0:KEYS),0x002b0000(kernel),0x00c80000(rootfs),15552k(inactive) rootfsname=rootfs rootwait
The change to split only on the last colon between mtd-id and partitions
will cause newpart to see following string for the first partition:
KEYS),0x002b0000(kernel),0x00c80000(rootfs),15552k(inactive)
Such a partition list cannot be parsed and thus the device fails to boot.
Avoid this behavior by making sure that the start of the first part-name
("(") will also be the last byte the mtd-id split algorithm is using for
its colon search.
Fixes: eb13fa0227 ("mtd: parser: cmdline: Support MTD names containing one or more colons")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201124062506.185392-1-sven@narfation.org
Switch the block device lookup interfaces to directly work with a dev_t
so that struct block_device references are only acquired by the
blkdev_get variants (and the blk-cgroup special case). This means that
we now don't need an extra reference in the inode and can generally
simplify handling of struct block_device to keep the lookups contained
in the core block layer code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This code is meant to be reused by the SPI-NAND core. Now that the
driver has been cleaned and reorganized, use a generic ECC engine
object to store the driver's data instead of accessing members of the
nand_chip structure.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
These functions must be usable by the main NAND core, so their names
must be technology-agnostic as well as the parameters. Hence, we pass
a generic nand_device instead of a raw nand_chip structure.
As it seems that changing the raw NAND functions to always pass a
generic NAND device is a lost of time, we prefer to create dedicated
raw NAND wrappers that will be useful in the near future to do the
translation.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The NAND BCH control structure has nothing to do outside of this
driver, all users of the nand_bch_init/free() functions just save it
to chip->ecc.priv so do it in this driver directly and return a
regular error code instead.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Currently, BCH and Hamming engine are sharing the same
tweaking/restoring I/O mechanism: they need the I/O request to fully
cover the main/OOB area. Let's make this code generic as sharing the
code between two drivers is already a win. Maybe other ECC engine
drivers will need it too.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:129: warning: Cannot understand * @mtd: the device
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:145: warning: Cannot understand * @mtd: the device
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:161: warning: Cannot understand * @mtd: the device
drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c:184: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'powernv_flash_set_driver_info'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-24-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'section' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'oobregion' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1436: warning: bad line:
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Function parameter or member 'ops' not described in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'len' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'retlen' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'mode' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2156: warning: Function parameter or member 'block_size' not described in 'onenand_multiblock_erase'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2156: warning: Excess function parameter 'region' description in 'onenand_multiblock_erase'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Function parameter or member 'ops' not described in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Excess function parameter 'len' description in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Excess function parameter 'retlen' description in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3387: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'flexonenand_get_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3387: warning: Excess function parameter 'onenand_info' description in 'flexonenand_get_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3509: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'flexonenand_check_blocks_erased'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3509: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd_info' description in 'flexonenand_check_blocks_erased'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3557: warning: Function parameter or member 'die' not described in 'flexonenand_set_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3557: warning: Function parameter or member 'boundary' not described in 'flexonenand_set_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3557: warning: Function parameter or member 'lock' not described in 'flexonenand_set_boundary'
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-23-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/arasan-nand-controller.c:133: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'anfc_op'
Cc: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@xilinx.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-22-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c:250: warning: Function parameter or member 'caps' not described in 'sunxi_nfc'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitriy B <rzk333@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-21-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:191: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'omap_prefetch_enable'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:221: warning: Function parameter or member 'cs' not described in 'omap_prefetch_reset'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:221: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'omap_prefetch_reset'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:946: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'omap_enable_hwecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:946: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'omap_enable_hwecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1017: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'omap_dev_ready'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1017: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'omap_dev_ready'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1036: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'omap_enable_hwecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1036: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'omap_enable_hwecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1142: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_calc' not described in '_omap_calculate_ecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1142: warning: Excess function parameter 'ecc_code' description in '_omap_calculate_ecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1270: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_calc' not described in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_sw'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1270: warning: Excess function parameter 'ecc_code' description in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_sw'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1284: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_calc' not described in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_multi'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1284: warning: Excess function parameter 'ecc_code' description in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_multi'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1681: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'is_elm_present'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1681: warning: Function parameter or member 'elm_node' not described in 'is_elm_present'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1681: warning: Excess function parameter 'omap_nand_info' description in 'is_elm_present'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Jian Zhang <jzhang@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-20-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:102: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_steps' not described in 'elm_config'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:102: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_step_size' not described in 'elm_config'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:102: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_syndrome_size' not described in 'elm_config'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:440: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'elm_context_save'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:488: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'elm_context_restore'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-19-lee.jones@linaro.org
Correct 'controller' typo while we're at it.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/s3c2410.c:172: warning: Function parameter or member 'controller' not described in 's3c2410_nand_info'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/s3c2410.c:172: warning: Function parameter or member 'freq_transition' not described in 's3c2410_nand_info'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-18-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cafe_nand.c:372: warning: Function parameter or member 'page' not described in 'cafe_nand_read_page'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cafe_nand.c:372: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'cafe_nand_read_page'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-17-lee.jones@linaro.org
'dummy' is never checked (as per the nomenclature) and the use of
'emtpymatch' is currently #if 0'ed out. We could also #if 0 the
declaration, but #ifery is pretty ugly, so I like to keep it to a
minimum.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c: In function ‘DoC_Delay’:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c:219:16: warning: variable ‘dummy’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c: In function ‘doc200x_calculate_ecc’:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c:706:6: warning: variable ‘emptymatch’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Dan Brown <dan_brown@ieee.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-16-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.c:446: warning: Function parameter or member 'ns_ptr' not described in 'gluebi_notify'
drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.c:446: warning: Excess function parameter 'ptr' description in 'gluebi_notify'
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-15-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'cmd' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'desc' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'dma_cmd' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'begin' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'end' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'next_desc' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1977: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'brcmnand_dma_run'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1977: warning: Function parameter or member 'desc' not described in 'brcmnand_dma_run'
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-14-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c:584: warning: Function parameter or member 'nested' not described in 'schedule_erase'
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c:1075: warning: Excess function parameter 'shutdown' description in '__erase_worker'
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-13-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c:1304: warning: Function parameter or member 'vidb' not described in 'ubi_eba_copy_leb'
drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c:1304: warning: Excess function parameter 'vid_hdr' description in 'ubi_eba_copy_leb'
drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c:1483: warning: Function parameter or member 'ai' not described in 'print_rsvd_warning'
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-12-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c:464: warning: Function parameter or member 'sgl' not described in 'ubi_leb_read_sg'
drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c:464: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'ubi_leb_read_sg'
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-11-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c:36: warning: Function parameter or member 'write_cache_variants' not described in 'SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS'
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c:36: warning: Function parameter or member '0' not described in 'SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Yoshio Furuyama <ytc-mb-yfuruyama7@kioxia.com>
Cc: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-10-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'ubi_num' not described in 'mtd_dev_param'
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-9-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/hisi-sfc.c:328: warning: Function parameter or member 'np' not described in 'hisi_spi_nor_register'
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/hisi-sfc.c:328: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'hisi_spi_nor_register'
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'check_short_pattern'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'check_short_pattern'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'paglen' not described in 'check_short_pattern'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'td' not described in 'check_short_pattern'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'create_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'create_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bd' not described in 'create_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'create_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:132: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_memory_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:132: warning: Function parameter or member 'bd' not described in 'onenand_memory_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_isbad_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'offs' not described in 'onenand_isbad_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'allowbbt' not described in 'onenand_isbad_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:182: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_scan_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:182: warning: Function parameter or member 'bd' not described in 'onenand_scan_bbt'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:230: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_default_bbt'
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-7-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c:1592: warning: Function parameter or member 'section' not described in 'mtd_ooblayout_find_eccregion'
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c:1592: warning: Excess function parameter 'sectionp' description in 'mtd_ooblayout_find_eccregion'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-6-lee.jones@linaro.org
This patch also places the descriptions in the correct order.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.c:819: warning: bad line:
drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.c:1799: warning: Excess function parameter 'base' description in 'doc_probe_device'
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-5-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'section' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'oobregion' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:200: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'onenand_readw'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:212: warning: Function parameter or member 'value' not described in 'onenand_writew'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:212: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'onenand_writew'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:225: warning: Function parameter or member 'this' not described in 'onenand_block_address'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:225: warning: Function parameter or member 'block' not described in 'onenand_block_address'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:242: warning: Function parameter or member 'this' not described in 'onenand_bufferram_address'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:242: warning: Function parameter or member 'block' not described in 'onenand_bufferram_address'
NB: Snipped 200 lines for brevity.
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-4-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c:19: warning: Function parameter or member 'fmt' not described in 'pr_fmt'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: "Jochen Schäuble" <psionic@psionic.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-3-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:300: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in '__mtd_del_partition'
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:300: warning: Excess function parameter 'priv' description in '__mtd_del_partition'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <gleixner@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-2-lee.jones@linaro.org
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-20-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-18-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-15-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip(), a NAND controller
hook.
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip(), a NAND controller
hook.
Fixes: d7157ff49a ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Reported-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
BLKFLSBUF is not supposed to actually send a flush command to the device,
but to tear down buffer cache structures. Remove the mtd_blkdevs
implementation and just use the default semantics instead.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Since this flash doesn't have a Profile 1.0 table, the Octal DTR
capabilities are enabled in the post SFDP fixup, along with the 8D-8D-8D
fast read settings.
Enable Octal DTR mode with 20 dummy cycles to allow running at the
maximum supported frequency of 200Mhz.
The flash supports the soft reset sequence. So, add the flag in the
flash's info.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-16-p.yadav@ti.com
The Cypress Semper flash is an xSPI compliant octal DTR flash. Add
support for using it in octal DTR mode.
The flash by default boots in a hybrid sector mode. But the sector map
table on the part I had was programmed incorrectly and the SMPT values
on the flash don't match the public datasheet. Specifically, in some
places erase type 3 was used instead of 4. In addition, the region sizes
were incorrect in some places. So, for testing I set CFR3N[3] to enable
uniform sector sizes. Since the uniform sector mode bit is a
non-volatile bit, this series does not change it to avoid making any
permanent changes to the flash configuration. The correct data to
implement a fixup is not available right now and will be done in a
follow-up patch if needed.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
[vigneshr@ti.com: Drop unnecessary sleep in Octal DTR switch sequence]
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-15-p.yadav@ti.com
On resume, the init procedure will be run that will re-enable it.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-14-p.yadav@ti.com
Perform a Soft Reset on shutdown on flashes that support it so that the
flash can be reset to its initial state and any configurations made by
spi-nor (given that they're only done in volatile registers) will be
reset. This will hand back the flash in pristine state for any further
operations on it.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-13-p.yadav@ti.com
A Soft Reset sequence will return the flash to Power-on-Reset (POR)
state. It consists of two commands: Soft Reset Enable and Soft Reset.
Find out if the sequence is supported from BFPT DWORD 16.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-12-p.yadav@ti.com
Allow flashes to specify a hook to enable octal DTR mode. Use this hook
whenever possible to get optimal transfer speeds.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-11-p.yadav@ti.com
Parse just the 22nd dword and look for the 'DTR Octal Mode Enable
Volatile bit'.
SPI_NOR_IO_MODE_EN_VOLATILE should be set just for the flashes
that don't define the optional SFDP SCCR Map. For the others,
let the SFDP do its job and fill the SNOR_F_IO_MODE_EN_VOLATILE
flag. We avoid this way polluting the flash flags when declaring
one.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-10-p.yadav@ti.com
We don't want to enter a stateful mode, where a X-X-X I/O mode
is entered by setting a non-volatile bit, because in case of a
reset or a crash, once in the non-volatile mode, we may not be able
to recover in bootloaders and we may break the SPI NOR boot.
Forbid by default the I/O modes that are set via a non-volatile bit.
SPI_NOR_IO_MODE_EN_VOLATILE should be set just for the flashes that
don't define the optional SFDP SCCR Map, so that we don't pollute the
flash info flags.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-9-p.yadav@ti.com
Some controllers, like the cadence qspi controller, have trouble reading
only 1 byte in DTR mode. So, do 2 byte reads for SR and FSR commands in
DTR mode, and then discard the second byte.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-8-p.yadav@ti.com
The xSPI Profile 1.0 table specifies how many dummy cycles and address
bytes are needed for the Read Status Register command in octal DTR mode.
Use that information to send the correct Read SR command.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-7-p.yadav@ti.com
This table is indication that the flash is xSPI compliant and hence
supports octal DTR mode. Extract information like the fast read opcode,
dummy cycles, the number of dummy cycles needed for a Read Status
Register command, and the number of address bytes needed for a Read
Status Register command.
We don't know what speed the controller is running at. Find the fast
read dummy cycles for the fastest frequency the flash can run at to be
sure we are never short of dummy cycles. If nothing is available,
default to 20. Flashes that use a different value should update it in
their fixup hooks.
Since we want to set read settings, expose spi_nor_set_read_settings()
in core.h.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-6-p.yadav@ti.com
Some devices in DTR mode expect an extra command byte called the
extension. The extension can either be same as the opcode, bitwise
inverse of the opcode, or another additional byte forming a 16-byte
opcode. Get the extension type from the BFPT. For now, only flashes with
"repeat" and "inverse" extensions are supported.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-5-p.yadav@ti.com
Double Transfer Rate (DTR) is SPI protocol in which data is transferred
on each clock edge as opposed to on each clock cycle. Make
framework-level changes to allow supporting flashes in DTR mode.
Right now, mixed DTR modes are not supported. So, for example a mode
like 4S-4D-4D will not work. All phases need to be either DTR or STR.
The xSPI spec says that "The program commands provide SPI backward
compatible commands for programming data...". So 8D-8D-8D page program
opcodes are populated with using 1S-1S-1S opcodes.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005153138.6437-4-p.yadav@ti.com
