Commit Graph

10104 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Torvalds
f0fddcec6b for-5.14-rc2-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmD7GZUACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDs+BA/+OHDY2ROYEnysAqF1qaDENVVnUavnDYYa+Uk61KVvx0pm/mHY9SllsuH4
 WCIwCwH7LZs11cRYp3vD80t4OdVGBKaDvEfX+znMCQYuoBm6G5eT3n5jhsVFr1jJ
 EqUVzUY+S44IWAEhzkVnSAD4xnMsan8b+YnngIFSMEqJlH+on6w8FhyP0QXwInxk
 1kfjl8tDMiryKFaekfGX5WaeflEeWGoHNf2xYokzPD/Oq6TCaoLycar1YXH+80FM
 05Jl0+jfEWbaHouMNd8bW9nHnSxh30i7gorY17Q6KLOFDCThNiKZuypZsQcCi/df
 TbjQDNTZjSsReFvrFeFlEdGv3dFHBGxz1Ns7RFPfVeNgmN0WnOLmzS+4rmfGyi8L
 +3TQ6MGqgG0DppPwfB9caDvxYsbN23uA1v5J1B+Dsbo47lFWWIoBQBtDvErAiHEy
 KF7B4jIOWrx3ZYwv3pkE3D+D19sKkB9+wLnlwVSF77npKO1up8W0h4mPdMLZaznW
 TGBXxwqI4105MSX5UatBpX+HYATpEWG5tmeZz5ERGFNC/piILmY4iVz/c5Vguh9/
 iUQwjSudIDWgGxcL7VClqrdF7sucsml6Svb+ZrxckmK7pa97TG2bIlzJDg0eFcle
 NBcw8RBcBMUay/Y04cKHLJAj6OOjBiXnxKjjHrhvtaBmOV2SHpc=
 =kj2e
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.14-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "A few fixes and one patch to help some block layer API cleanups:

   - skip missing device when running fstrim

   - fix unpersisted i_size on fsync after expanding truncate

   - fix lock inversion problem when doing qgroup extent tracing

   - replace bdgrab/bdput usage, replace gendisk by block_device"

* tag 'for-5.14-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: store a block_device in struct btrfs_ordered_extent
  btrfs: fix lock inversion problem when doing qgroup extent tracing
  btrfs: check for missing device in btrfs_trim_fs
  btrfs: fix unpersisted i_size on fsync after expanding truncate
2021-07-23 12:49:07 -07:00
Christoph Hellwig
c7c3a6dcb1 btrfs: store a block_device in struct btrfs_ordered_extent
Store the block device instead of the gendisk in the btrfs_ordered_extent
structure instead of acquiring a reference to it later.

Note: this is from series removing bdgrab/bdput, btrfs is one of the
last users.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-22 15:50:15 +02:00
Filipe Manana
8949b9a114 btrfs: fix lock inversion problem when doing qgroup extent tracing
At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a
NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function
take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold
a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction
commit from wiping out commit roots.

However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where
we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree,
namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate
or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem
because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be
acquired before locking any extent buffer.

Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent
buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158
from fstests, it reported the following trace:

[ 9057.626435] ======================================================
[ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted
[ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.632542]
               but task is already holding lock:
[ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.635255]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 9057.636292]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 9057.637240]
               -> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.638138]        down_read+0x46/0x140
[ 9057.638648]        btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 9057.639398]        btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.640283]        btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641114]        btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641819]        btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.642643]        btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.643418]        evict+0xcf/0x1d0
[ 9057.643895]        do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300
[ 9057.644525]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 9057.645110]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 9057.645835]
               -> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.646600]        __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.647248]        lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.647773]        down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.648350]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.649175]        btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650010]        btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650849]        scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.651733]        iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.652501]        scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.653264]        scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.654295]        scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655111]        btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655831]        process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.656425]        worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.656993]        kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.657494]        ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 9057.658030]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 9057.659064]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 9057.659824]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 9057.660402]        ----                    ----
[ 9057.660988]   lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.661581]                                lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.662348]                                lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.663254]   lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.663690]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781:
[ 9057.665023]  #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.666260]  #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.667639]  #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.669017]  #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.670408]
               stack backtrace:
[ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1
[ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[ 9057.674258] Call Trace:
[ 9057.674588]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 9057.675083]  check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 9057.675611]  __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.676132]  lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.676605]  ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.677313]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.677849]  down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.678349]  ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679068]  __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679760]  btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.680458]  btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.681083]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 9057.681594]  ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.682336]  scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683058]  ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683834]  ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.684632]  iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685316]  scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685977]  ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110
[ 9057.686460]  scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.687316]  scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688021]  btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688649]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.689180]  process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.689696]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.690175]  ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 9057.690731]  kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.691158]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 9057.691697]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the
commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post().

We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots()
from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref
lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and
therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called
from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write
lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-22 15:50:07 +02:00
Anand Jain
16a200f66e btrfs: check for missing device in btrfs_trim_fs
A fstrim on a degraded raid1 can trigger the following null pointer
dereference:

  BTRFS info (device loop0): allowing degraded mounts
  BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
  BTRFS info (device loop0): has skinny extents
  BTRFS warning (device loop0): devid 2 uuid 97ac16f7-e14d-4db1-95bc-3d489b424adb is missing
  BTRFS warning (device loop0): devid 2 uuid 97ac16f7-e14d-4db1-95bc-3d489b424adb is missing
  BTRFS info (device loop0): enabling ssd optimizations
  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000620
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 4574 Comm: fstrim Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7+ #31
  Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_trim_fs+0x199/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffff959541797d28 EFLAGS: 00010293
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff946f84eca508 RCX: a7a67937adff8608
  RDX: ffff946e8122d000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffc02fdbf0
  RBP: ffff946ea4615000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff946e8122d960 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: ffff959541797db8 R14: ffff946e8122d000 R15: ffff959541797db8
  FS:  00007f55917a5080(0000) GS:ffff946f9bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 0000000000000620 CR3: 000000002d2c8001 CR4: 00000000000706f0
  Call Trace:
  btrfs_ioctl_fitrim+0x167/0x260 [btrfs]
  btrfs_ioctl+0x1c00/0x2fe0 [btrfs]
  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x140/0x240
  ? syscall_trace_enter.constprop.0+0x188/0x240
  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0

Reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -fq -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
  $ mount /dev/loop0 /btrfs
  $ umount /btrfs
  $ btrfs dev scan --forget
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop0 /btrfs

  $ fstrim /btrfs

The reason is we call btrfs_trim_free_extents() for the missing device,
which uses device->bdev (NULL for missing device) to find if the device
supports discard.

Fix is to check if the device is missing before calling
btrfs_trim_free_extents().

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-22 15:49:49 +02:00
Filipe Manana
9acc8103ab btrfs: fix unpersisted i_size on fsync after expanding truncate
If we have an inode that does not have the full sync flag set, was changed
in the current transaction, then it is logged while logging some other
inode (like its parent directory for example), its i_size is increased by
a truncate operation, the log is synced through an fsync of some other
inode and then finally we explicitly call fsync on our inode, the new
i_size is not persisted.

The following example shows how to trigger it, with comments explaining
how and why the issue happens:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

  $ touch /mnt/foo
  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 1M" /mnt/bar

  $ sync

  # Fsync bar, this will be a noop since the file has not yet been
  # modified in the current transaction. The goal here is to clear
  # BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC from the inode's runtime flags.
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar

  # Now rename both files, without changing their parent directory.
  $ mv /mnt/bar /mnt/bar2
  $ mv /mnt/foo /mnt/foo2

  # Increase the size of bar2 with a truncate operation.
  $ xfs_io -c "truncate 2M" /mnt/bar2

  # Now fsync foo2, this results in logging its parent inode (the root
  # directory), and logging the parent results in logging the inode of
  # file bar2 (its inode item and the new name). The inode of file bar2
  # is logged with an i_size of 0 bytes since it's logged in
  # LOG_INODE_EXISTS mode, meaning we are only logging its names (and
  # xattrs if it had any) and the i_size of the inode will not be changed
  # when the log is replayed.
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foo2

  # Now explicitly fsync bar2. This resulted in doing nothing, not
  # logging the inode with the new i_size of 2M and the hole from file
  # offset 1M to 2M. Because the inode did not have the flag
  # BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC set, when it was logged through the
  # fsync of file foo2, its last_log_commit field was updated,
  # resulting in this explicit of file bar2 not doing anything.
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar2

  # File bar2 content and size before a power failure.
  $ od -A d -t x1 /mnt/bar2
  0000000 ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab
  *
  1048576 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  *
  2097152

  <power failure>

  # Mount the filesystem to replay the log.
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

  # Read the file again, should have the same content and size as before
  # the power failure happened, but it doesn't, i_size is still at 1M.
  $ od -A d -t x1 /mnt/bar2
  0000000 ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab
  *
  1048576

This started to happen after commit 209ecbb858 ("btrfs: remove stale
comment and logic from btrfs_inode_in_log()"), since btrfs_inode_in_log()
no longer checks if the inode's list of modified extents is not empty.
However, checking that list is not the right way to address this case
and the check was added long time ago in commit 125c4cf9f3
("Btrfs: set inode's logged_trans/last_log_commit after ranged fsync")
for a different purpose, to address consecutive ranged fsyncs.

The reason that checking for the list emptiness makes this test pass is
because during an expanding truncate we create an extent map to represent
a hole from the old i_size to the new i_size, and add that extent map to
the list of modified extents in the inode. However if we are low on
available memory and we can not allocate a new extent map, then we don't
treat it as an error and just set the full sync flag on the inode, so that
the next fsync does not rely on the list of modified extents - so checking
for the emptiness of the list to decide if the inode needs to be logged is
not reliable, and results in not logging the inode if it was not possible
to allocate the extent map for the hole.

Fix this by ensuring that if we are only logging that an inode exists
(inode item, names/references and xattrs), we don't update the inode's
last_log_commit even if it does not have the full sync runtime flag set.

A test case for fstests follows soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-22 15:49:42 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
f02bf8578b for-5.14-rc1-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmDsjSEACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDtnZRAAieSXta8GaJYNF4cKs7xHttIkNl0ljJHsJsKoN5kCxW22RWsf8gAyToT3
 XERkJfRksgMH0Th3StJqTxg0fQTSiSi1bcz+wJjMVvQev2gX8dw7O05GLZT5GTzx
 zquI57+OGDEpQdEM6YzrUl+tYnO0roibI2LQeMWUXYXJTy6F75zWjBqKcTGcnfGc
 d8bOi6ijN4F148zIxvr6ahHrQN9WGwD5OWA1I5RqHBadgwCDWsQIdE6/N1Kdavf5
 uW785lJ8a4VqOWyM7Y0kp4madnF9rwZ/CFyoQFJ51oG/NrUf469+bCBFM8VOEwSa
 c3ZaqvF8CF3sndSAYiI4MEBFbM2O4hIVl/B9NkjDXDu3VlkRwwHDxZfadvc4BzsG
 kfisaw/GbOvOv8ojxBq4ux2nbRIVul096HpZH4UWHs/MCQ5Ct40OP5sG77YZKQgf
 o+D65V3NMn1gnp+B8wqyNnraY4hAoBePoK9f3IH+WXF5hlk6gWkbWxmXxCIPvJM4
 XTJUcNCXDZtKA9KRgOmcP9fZSu4gyD3hbDRgU5nKkLLSGE+mE4BRmtnq91VnT7FA
 5Nxlrjw9Na9LoyXYaoHcCksj207KU6WVgIjK4OFJarLMWlSDYBwAQCX0+voG+ZBq
 qa6BuLpq2aJhB6Q4M3MdAQSbhfR6tcI+HENCQlFHa6Je7oY9NVQ=
 =v00S
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.14-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs zoned mode fixes from David Sterba:

 - fix deadlock when allocating system chunk

 - fix wrong mutex unlock on an error path

 - fix extent map splitting for append operation

 - update and fix message reporting unusable chunk space

 - don't block when background zone reclaim runs with balance in
   parallel

* tag 'for-5.14-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: zoned: fix wrong mutex unlock on failure to allocate log root tree
  btrfs: don't block if we can't acquire the reclaim lock
  btrfs: properly split extent_map for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND
  btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array
  btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks
  btrfs: zoned: print unusable percentage when reclaiming block groups
  btrfs: zoned: fix types for u64 division in btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work
2021-07-13 12:02:07 -07:00
Filipe Manana
ea32af47f0 btrfs: zoned: fix wrong mutex unlock on failure to allocate log root tree
When syncing the log, if we fail to allocate the root node for the log
root tree:

1) We are unlocking fs_info->tree_log_mutex, but at this point we have
   not yet locked this mutex;

2) We have locked fs_info->tree_root->log_mutex, but we end up not
   unlocking it;

So fix this by unlocking fs_info->tree_root->log_mutex instead of
fs_info->tree_log_mutex.

Fixes: e75f9fd194 ("btrfs: zoned: move log tree node allocation out of log_root_tree->log_mutex")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 18:27:44 +02:00
Johannes Thumshirn
9cc0b837e1 btrfs: don't block if we can't acquire the reclaim lock
If we can't acquire the reclaim_bgs_lock on block group reclaim, we
block until it is free. This can potentially stall for a long time.

While reclaim of block groups is necessary for a good user experience on
a zoned file system, there still is no need to block as it is best
effort only, just like when we're deleting unused block groups.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:57 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
abb99cfdaf btrfs: properly split extent_map for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND
Damien reported a test failure with btrfs/209. The test itself ran fine,
but the fsck ran afterwards reported a corrupted filesystem.

The filesystem corruption happens because we're splitting an extent and
then writing the extent twice. We have to split the extent though, because
we're creating too large extents for a REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND operation.

When dumping the extent tree, we can see two EXTENT_ITEMs at the same
start address but different lengths.

$ btrfs inspect dump-tree /dev/nullb1 -t extent
...
   item 19 key (269484032 EXTENT_ITEM 126976) itemoff 15470 itemsize 53
           refs 1 gen 7 flags DATA
           extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 257 offset 786432 count 1
   item 20 key (269484032 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15417 itemsize 53
           refs 1 gen 7 flags DATA
           extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 257 offset 786432 count 1

The duplicated EXTENT_ITEMs originally come from wrongly split extent_map in
extract_ordered_extent(). Since extract_ordered_extent() uses
create_io_em() to split an existing extent_map, we will have
split->orig_start != split->start. Then, it will be logged with non-zero
"extent data offset". Finally, the logged entries are replayed into
a duplicated EXTENT_ITEM.

Introduce and use proper splitting function for extent_map. The function is
intended to be simple and specific usage for extract_ordered_extent() e.g.
not supporting compression case (we do not allow splitting compressed
extent_map anyway).

There was a question raised by Qu, in summary why we want to split the
extent map (and not the bio):

The problem is not the limit on the zone end, which as you mention is
the same as the block group end. The problem is that data write use zone
append (ZA) operations. ZA BIOs cannot be split so a large extent may
need to be processed with multiple ZA BIOs, While that is also true for
regular writes, the major difference is that ZA are "nameless" write
operation giving back the written sectors on completion. And ZA
operations may be reordered by the block layer (not intentionally
though). Combine both of these characteristics and you can see that the
data for a large extent may end up being shuffled when written resulting
in data corruption and the impossibility to map the extent to some start
sector.

To avoid this problem, zoned btrfs uses the principle "one data extent
== one ZA BIO". So large extents need to be split. This is unfortunate,
but we can revisit this later and optimize, e.g. merge back together the
fragments of an extent once written if they actually were written
sequentially in the zone.

Reported-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Fixes: d22002fd37 ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered extent when bio is sent")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
CC: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:45 +02:00
Filipe Manana
79bd37120b btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array
Commit eafa4fd0ad ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in
exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many
tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the
first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished
their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks
being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate
tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K.

However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of
the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system
chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent
buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not
making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the
subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving
system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it
and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while
the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common.

This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array
exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk
allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the
insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while
under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the
same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates
a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way
we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes.

The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps
reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree.

For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains,
because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree.
Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk
removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes
to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond
to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these
other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree
right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk
allocation and chunk removal do.

The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition
of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and
removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior
that did not change.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:41 +02:00
Filipe Manana
1cb3db1cf3 btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks
When a task attempting to allocate a new chunk verifies that there is not
currently enough free space in the system space_info and there is another
task that allocated a new system chunk but it did not finish yet the
creation of the respective block group, it waits for that other task to
finish creating the block group. This is to avoid exhaustion of the system
chunk array in the superblock, which is limited, when we have a thundering
herd of tasks allocating new chunks. This problem was described and fixed
by commit eafa4fd0ad ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations").

However there are two very similar scenarios where this can lead to a
deadlock:

1) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B
   to finish creation of the respective system block group. However before
   task B ends its transaction handle and finishes the creation of the
   system block group, it attempts to allocate another chunk (like a data
   chunk for an fallocate operation for a very large range). Task B will
   be unable to progress and allocate the new chunk, because task A set
   space_info->chunk_alloc to 1 and therefore it loops at
   btrfs_chunk_alloc() waiting for task A to finish its chunk allocation
   and set space_info->chunk_alloc to 0, but task A is waiting on task B
   to finish creation of the new system block group, therefore resulting
   in a deadlock;

2) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to
   finish creation of the respective system block group. By the time that
   task B enter the final phase of block group allocation, which happens
   at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it modifies the extent
   tree, the device tree or the chunk tree to insert the items for some
   new block group, it needs to allocate a new chunk, so it ends up at
   btrfs_chunk_alloc() and keeps looping there because task A has set
   space_info->chunk_alloc to 1, but task A is waiting for task B to
   finish creation of the new system block group and release the reserved
   system space, therefore resulting in a deadlock.

In short, the problem is if a task B needs to allocate a new chunk after
it previously allocated a new system chunk and if another task A is
currently waiting for task B to complete the allocation of the new system
chunk.

Unfortunately this deadlock scenario introduced by the previous fix for
the system chunk array exhaustion problem does not have a simple and short
fix, and requires a big change to rework the chunk allocation code so that
chunk btree updates are all made in the first phase of chunk allocation.
And since this deadlock regression is being frequently hit on zoned
filesystems and the system chunk array exhaustion problem is triggered
in more extreme cases (originally observed on PowerPC with a node size
of 64K when running the fallocate tests from stress-ng), revert the
changes from that commit. The next patch in the series, with a subject
of "btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system
chunk array" does the necessary changes to fix the system chunk array
exhaustion problem.

Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210621015922.ewgbffxuawia7liz@naota-xeon/
Fixes: eafa4fd0ad ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:40 +02:00
Johannes Thumshirn
5f93e776c6 btrfs: zoned: print unusable percentage when reclaiming block groups
When we're automatically reclaiming a zone, because its zone_unusable
value is above the reclaim threshold, we're only logging how much
percent of the zone's capacity are used, but not how much of the
capacity is unusable.

Also print the percentage of the unusable space in the block group
before we're reclaiming it.

Example:

  BTRFS info (device sdg): reclaiming chunk 230686720 with 13% used 86% unusable

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:37 +02:00
David Sterba
54afaae34e btrfs: zoned: fix types for u64 division in btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work
The types in calculation of the used percentage in the reclaiming
messages are both u64, though bg->length is either 1GiB (non-zoned) or
the zone size in the zoned mode. The upper limit on zone size is 8GiB so
this could theoretically overflow in the future, right now the values
fit.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:34 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
d3acb15a3a Merge branch 'work.iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
Pull iov_iter updates from Al Viro:
 "iov_iter cleanups and fixes.

  There are followups, but this is what had sat in -next this cycle. IMO
  the macro forest in there became much thinner and easier to follow..."

* 'work.iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (37 commits)
  csum_and_copy_to_pipe_iter(): leave handling of csum_state to caller
  clean up copy_mc_pipe_to_iter()
  pipe_zero(): we don't need no stinkin' kmap_atomic()...
  iov_iter: clean csum_and_copy_...() primitives up a bit
  copy_page_from_iter(): don't need kmap_atomic() for kvec/bvec cases
  copy_page_to_iter(): don't bother with kmap_atomic() for bvec/kvec cases
  iterate_xarray(): only of the first iteration we might get offset != 0
  pull handling of ->iov_offset into iterate_{iovec,bvec,xarray}
  iov_iter: make iterator callbacks use base and len instead of iovec
  iov_iter: make the amount already copied available to iterator callbacks
  iov_iter: get rid of separate bvec and xarray callbacks
  iov_iter: teach iterate_{bvec,xarray}() about possible short copies
  iterate_bvec(): expand bvec.h macro forest, massage a bit
  iov_iter: unify iterate_iovec and iterate_kvec
  iov_iter: massage iterate_iovec and iterate_kvec to logics similar to iterate_bvec
  iterate_and_advance(): get rid of magic in case when n is 0
  csum_and_copy_to_iter(): massage into form closer to csum_and_copy_from_iter()
  iov_iter: replace iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic() with iterator-advancing variant
  [xarray] iov_iter_npages(): just use DIV_ROUND_UP()
  iov_iter_npages(): don't bother with iterate_all_kinds()
  ...
2021-07-03 11:30:04 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
df668a5fe4 for-5.14/block-2021-06-29
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJEBAABCAAuFiEEwPw5LcreJtl1+l5K99NY+ylx4KYFAmDbXAwQHGF4Ym9lQGtl
 cm5lbC5kawAKCRD301j7KXHgpr0HEADDJaSgjpnWQwH1RVLNagJa9KnktxZYsEs+
 as3QmDdpKRG3rEC9bdE7FLe/xq3WBaO5j1hTQ9P6IguqLyS1Df72DtTlKyaCrZoe
 zv9eIlY4lZUfksE2nzWmlN9uG0FBVXeEQpHCLSNbUZeK1zvV6+NNhQqw2kc0sEqu
 hReUFeMUbsMcu/w5T3XMVJNsTMCql9wta2H0q5hONQyJQSrIwa1D+sUdE5I8fO4j
 bnoYX9yxHX26EztX1UJiGRgoq5Trz7LY7hAfljKSkewpFwiHE2vBdq2L0C2RKsIV
 tTs2DjMCMQyPNeA7WAG8HlR4aPG+7+/fuBP1KJHkykjWXglWN7OqISuBv6rrBgQs
 gNRnZ4qmb1CzD6aLEBk59nHt6po6eMxXIW856YktKy8rKcrgK29qP44Z+oomkPKo
 ZjQ0wqN5CvpObM/dIKxl9bAJ4zQDHBt49d5nTTQLfWl/mgevu6ZNWD/hONyCQmFy
 zKKqQ/wkxWHutOsjC5/MKNb3ZRNH9tt9X+HfULO2DU6IqqifYw/ex4z4MVsBopJC
 7pPfd81kgC73TgXe1AaCwHqNWsrqYCuTK0ew1CtGudlS3lucMwtap4GBiCgg5gbu
 M8pEgwO4OcCLHyRUc8zdfqI7HumbprbFmojPkwGSEe0ofVD74lMhzbUj5jvTYY2B
 t8D2XcgyOA==
 =lhon
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.14/block-2021-06-29' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block

Pull core block updates from Jens Axboe:

 - disk events cleanup (Christoph)

 - gendisk and request queue allocation simplifications (Christoph)

 - bdev_disk_changed cleanups (Christoph)

 - IO priority improvements (Bart)

 - Chained bio completion trace fix (Edward)

 - blk-wbt fixes (Jan)

 - blk-wbt enable/disable fix (Zhang)

 - Scheduler dispatch improvements (Jan, Ming)

 - Shared tagset scheduler improvements (John)

 - BFQ updates (Paolo, Luca, Pietro)

 - BFQ lock inversion fix (Jan)

 - Documentation improvements (Kir)

 - CLONE_IO block cgroup fix (Tejun)

 - Remove of ancient and deprecated block dump feature (zhangyi)

 - Discard merge fix (Ming)

 - Misc fixes or followup fixes (Colin, Damien, Dan, Long, Max, Thomas,
   Yang)

* tag 'for-5.14/block-2021-06-29' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (129 commits)
  block: fix discard request merge
  block/mq-deadline: Remove a WARN_ON_ONCE() call
  blk-mq: update hctx->dispatch_busy in case of real scheduler
  blk: Fix lock inversion between ioc lock and bfqd lock
  bfq: Remove merged request already in bfq_requests_merged()
  block: pass a gendisk to bdev_disk_changed
  block: move bdev_disk_changed
  block: add the events* attributes to disk_attrs
  block: move the disk events code to a separate file
  block: fix trace completion for chained bio
  block/partitions/msdos: Fix typo inidicator -> indicator
  block, bfq: reset waker pointer with shared queues
  block, bfq: check waker only for queues with no in-flight I/O
  block, bfq: avoid delayed merge of async queues
  block, bfq: boost throughput by extending queue-merging times
  block, bfq: consider also creation time in delayed stable merge
  block, bfq: fix delayed stable merge check
  block, bfq: let also stably merged queues enjoy weight raising
  blk-wbt: make sure throttle is enabled properly
  blk-wbt: introduce a new disable state to prevent false positive by rwb_enabled()
  ...
2021-06-30 12:12:56 -07:00
Nikolay Borisov
629e33a168 btrfs: remove unused btrfs_fs_info::total_pinned
This got added 14 years ago in 324ae4df00 ("Btrfs: Add block group
pinned accounting back") but it was not ever used. Subsequently its
usage got gradually removed in 8790d502e4 ("Btrfs: Add support for
mirroring across drives") and 11833d66be ("Btrfs: improve async block
group caching"). Let's remove it for good!

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 19:58:26 +02:00
Josef Bacik
138a12d865 btrfs: rip out btrfs_space_info::total_bytes_pinned
We used this in may_commit_transaction() in order to determine if we
needed to commit the transaction.  However we no longer have that logic
and thus have no use of this counter anymore, so delete it.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:55:25 +02:00
Josef Bacik
3ffad6961d btrfs: rip the first_ticket_bytes logic from fail_all_tickets
This was a trick implemented to handle the case where we had a giant
reservation in front of a bunch of little reservations in the ticket
queue.  If the giant reservation was too large for the transaction
commit to make a difference we'd ENOSPC everybody out instead of
committing the transaction.  This logic was put in to force us to go
back and re-try the transaction commit logic to see if we could make
progress.

Instead now we know we've committed the transaction, so any space that
would have been recovered is now available, and would be caught by the
btrfs_try_granting_tickets() in this loop, so we no longer need this
code and can simply delete it.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:51:48 +02:00
Josef Bacik
0480855392 btrfs: remove FLUSH_DELAYED_REFS from data ENOSPC flushing
Since we unconditionally commit the transaction now we no longer need to
run the delayed refs to make sure our total_bytes_pinned value is
uptodate, we can simply commit the transaction.  Remove this stage from
the data flushing list.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:51:10 +02:00
Josef Bacik
c416a30cdd btrfs: rip out may_commit_transaction
may_commit_transaction was introduced before the ticketing
infrastructure existed.  There was a problem where we'd legitimately be
out of space, but every reservation would trigger a transaction commit
and then fail.  Thus if you had 1000 things trying to make a
reservation, they'd all do the flushing loop and thus commit the
transaction 1000 times before they'd get their ENOSPC.

This helper was introduced to short circuit this, if there wasn't space
that could be reclaimed by committing the transaction then simply ENOSPC
out.  This made true ENOSPC tests much faster as we didn't waste a bunch
of time.

However many of our bugs over the years have been from cases where we
didn't account for some space that would be reclaimed by committing a
transaction.  The delayed refs rsv space, delayed rsv, many pinned bytes
miscalculations, etc.  And in the meantime the original problem has been
solved with ticketing.  We no longer will commit the transaction 1000
times.  Instead we'll get 1000 waiters, we will go through the flushing
mechanisms, and if there's no progress after 2 loops we ENOSPC everybody
out.  The ticketing infrastructure gives us a deterministic way to see
if we're making progress or not, thus we avoid a lot of extra work.

So simplify this step by simply unconditionally committing the
transaction.  This removes what is arguably our most common source of
early ENOSPC bugs and will allow us to drastically simplify many of the
things we track because we simply won't need them with this stuff gone.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:50:45 +02:00
Filipe Manana
35b22c19af btrfs: send: fix crash when memory allocations trigger reclaim
When doing a send we don't expect the task to ever start a transaction
after the initial check that verifies if commit roots match the regular
roots. This is because after that we set current->journal_info with a
stub (special value) that signals we are in send context, so that we take
a read lock on an extent buffer when reading it from disk and verifying
it is valid (its generation matches the generation stored in the parent).
This stub was introduced in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75 ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") in order to fix a concurrency issue
between send and balance.

However there is one particular exception where we end up needing to start
a transaction and when this happens it results in a crash with a stack
trace like the following:

[60015.902283] kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 at arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h:44 kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902292] kernel: Modules linked in: uinput rfcomm snd_seq_dummy (...)
[60015.902384] kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 #1
[60015.902387] kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./F2A88XN-WIFI, BIOS F6 12/24/2015
[60015.902389] kernel: RIP: 0010:kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902393] kernel: Code: ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd (...)
[60015.902396] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb583453220 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902399] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9fb583453224
[60015.902401] kernel: RDX: ffff9fb583453224 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[60015.902402] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902404] kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002
[60015.902406] kernel: R13: ffff9fb583453348 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
[60015.902408] kernel: FS:  00007f158e62d8c0(0000) GS:ffff93bd37580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[60015.902410] kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[60015.902412] kernel: CR2: 0000000000000039 CR3: 00000001256d2000 CR4: 00000000000506e0
[60015.902414] kernel: Call Trace:
[60015.902419] kernel:  kfence_unprotect+0x13/0x30
[60015.902423] kernel:  page_fault_oops+0x89/0x270
[60015.902427] kernel:  ? search_module_extables+0xf/0x40
[60015.902431] kernel:  ? search_bpf_extables+0x57/0x70
[60015.902435] kernel:  kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xd6/0xf0
[60015.902437] kernel:  __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x142/0x180
[60015.902440] kernel:  exc_page_fault+0x67/0x150
[60015.902445] kernel:  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
[60015.902450] kernel: RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x71/0x580
[60015.902454] kernel: Code: d3 0f 84 92 00 00 00 80 e7 06 0f 85 63 (...)
[60015.902456] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb5834533f8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902458] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
[60015.902460] kernel: RDX: 0000000000000801 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000039
[60015.902462] kernel: RBP: ffff93bc0a7eb800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902463] kernel: R10: 0000000000098a00 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001
[60015.902464] kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff93bc0c92b000 R15: ffff93bc0c92b000
[60015.902468] kernel:  btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5d/0x120
[60015.902473] kernel:  btrfs_evict_inode+0x2c5/0x3f0
[60015.902476] kernel:  evict+0xd1/0x180
[60015.902480] kernel:  inode_lru_isolate+0xe7/0x180
[60015.902483] kernel:  __list_lru_walk_one+0x77/0x150
[60015.902487] kernel:  ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902489] kernel:  ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902491] kernel:  list_lru_walk_one+0x47/0x70
[60015.902495] kernel:  prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x50
[60015.902497] kernel:  super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
[60015.902501] kernel:  do_shrink_slab+0x142/0x240
[60015.902505] kernel:  shrink_slab+0x164/0x280
[60015.902509] kernel:  shrink_node+0x2c8/0x6e0
[60015.902512] kernel:  do_try_to_free_pages+0xcb/0x4b0
[60015.902514] kernel:  try_to_free_pages+0xda/0x190
[60015.902516] kernel:  __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x373/0xcc0
[60015.902521] kernel:  ? __memcg_kmem_charge_page+0xc2/0x1e0
[60015.902525] kernel:  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x30a/0x340
[60015.902528] kernel:  pipe_write+0x30b/0x5c0
[60015.902531] kernel:  ? set_next_entity+0xad/0x1e0
[60015.902534] kernel:  ? switch_mm_irqs_off+0x58/0x440
[60015.902538] kernel:  __kernel_write+0x13a/0x2b0
[60015.902541] kernel:  kernel_write+0x73/0x150
[60015.902543] kernel:  send_cmd+0x7b/0xd0
[60015.902545] kernel:  send_extent_data+0x5a3/0x6b0
[60015.902549] kernel:  process_extent+0x19b/0xed0
[60015.902551] kernel:  btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1434/0x17e0
[60015.902554] kernel:  ? _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe1/0x100
[60015.902557] kernel:  _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xbf/0x100
[60015.902559] kernel:  ? enqueue_entity+0x18c/0x7b0
[60015.902562] kernel:  btrfs_ioctl+0x185f/0x2f80
[60015.902564] kernel:  ? psi_task_change+0x84/0xc0
[60015.902569] kernel:  ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40
[60015.902572] kernel:  ? check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x70
[60015.902576] kernel:  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x137/0x1e0
[60015.902579] kernel:  ? expand_files+0x1cb/0x1d0
[60015.902582] kernel:  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902585] kernel:  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902588] kernel:  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[60015.902591] kernel:  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[60015.902595] kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f158e38f0ab
[60015.902599] kernel: Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b (...)
[60015.902602] kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffcb2519bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[60015.902605] kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcb251ae00 RCX: 00007f158e38f0ab
[60015.902607] kernel: RDX: 00007ffcb2519cf0 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004
[60015.902608] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00007f158e297640 R09: 00007f158e297640
[60015.902610] kernel: R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[60015.902612] kernel: R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007ffcb251aee0 R15: 0000558c1a83e2a0
[60015.902615] kernel: ---[ end trace 7bbc33e23bb887ae ]---

This happens because when writing to the pipe, by calling kernel_write(),
we end up doing page allocations using GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ACCOUNT as the
gfp flags, which allow reclaim to happen if there is memory pressure. This
allocation happens at fs/pipe.c:pipe_write().

If the reclaim is triggered, inode eviction can be triggered and that in
turn can result in starting a transaction if the inode has a link count
of 0. The transaction start happens early on during eviction, when we call
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() at btrfs_evict_inode(). This happens if
there is currently an open file descriptor for an inode with a link count
of 0 and the reclaim task gets a reference on the inode before that
descriptor is closed, in which case the reclaim task ends up doing the
final iput that triggers the inode eviction.

When we have assertions enabled (CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y), this triggers
the following assertion at transaction.c:start_transaction():

    /* Send isn't supposed to start transactions. */
    ASSERT(current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB);

And when assertions are not enabled, it triggers a crash since after that
assertion we cast current->journal_info into a transaction handle pointer
and then dereference it:

   if (current->journal_info) {
       WARN_ON(type & TRANS_EXTWRITERS);
       h = current->journal_info;
       refcount_inc(&h->use_count);
       (...)

Which obviously results in a crash due to an invalid memory access.

The same type of issue can happen during other memory allocations we
do directly in the send code with kmalloc (and friends) as they use
GFP_KERNEL and therefore may trigger reclaim too, which started to
happen since 2016 after commit e780b0d1c1 ("btrfs: send: use
GFP_KERNEL everywhere").

The issue could be solved by setting up a NOFS context for the entire
send operation so that reclaim could not be triggered when allocating
memory or pages through kernel_write(). However that is not very friendly
and we can in fact get rid of the send stub because:

1) The stub was introduced way back in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75
   ("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") to solve an
   issue exclusive to when send and balance are running in parallel,
   however there were other problems between balance and send and we do
   not allow anymore to have balance and send run concurrently since
   commit 9e967495e0 ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due
   to concurrent relocation"). More generically the issues are between
   send and relocation, and that last commit eliminated only the
   possibility of having send and balance run concurrently, but shrinking
   a device also can trigger relocation, and on zoned filesystems we have
   relocation of partially used block groups triggered automatically as
   well. The previous patch that has a subject of:

   "btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running"

   Addresses all the remaining cases that can trigger relocation.

2) We can actually allow starting and even committing transactions while
   in a send context if needed because send is not holding any locks that
   would block the start or the commit of a transaction.

So get rid of all the logic added by commit a26e8c9f75 ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO"). We can now always call
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate() at verify_parent_transid() since send is
the only case that uses commit roots without having a transaction open or
without holding the commit_root_sem.

Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJCQCtRQ57=qXo3kygwpwEBOU_CA_eKvdmjP52sU=eFvuVOEGw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:58 +02:00
Filipe Manana
1cea5cf0e6 btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running
Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is
running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and
the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded
while send is about to do something with the extents.

This was explained in commit 9e967495e0 ("Btrfs: prevent send failures
and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and
send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case
where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion
which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device).

We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned
filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background
thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf13 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically
reclaim zones").

So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there
are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening.
This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the
subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support".

Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between
send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which
would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to
finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:58 +02:00
David Sterba
cbeaae4f6f btrfs: shorten integrity checker extent data mount option
Subjectively, CHECK_INTEGRITY_INCLUDING_EXTENT_DATA is quite long and
calling it CHECK_INTEGRITY_DATA still keeps the meaning and matches the
mount option name.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:58 +02:00
David Sterba
ccd9395b52 btrfs: switch mount option bits to enums and use wider type
Switch defines of BTRFS_MOUNT_* to an enum (the symbolic names are
recorded in the debugging information for convenience).

There are two more things done but separating them would not make much
sense as it's touching the same lines:

- Renumber shifts 18..31 to 17..30 to get rid of the hole in the
  sequence.

- Use 1UL as the value that gets shifted because we're approaching the
  32bit limit and due to integer promotions the value of (1 << 31)
  becomes 0xffffffff80000000 when cast to unsigned long (eg. the option
  manipulating helpers).

  This is not causing any problems yet as the operations are in-memory
  and masking the 31st bit works, we don't have more than 31 bits so the
  ill effects of not masking higher bits don't happen. But once we have
  more, the problems will emerge.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:58 +02:00
David Sterba
5548c8c6f5 btrfs: props: change how empty value is interpreted
Based on user feedback and actual problems with compression property,
there's no support to unset any compression options, or to force no
compression flag.

Note: This has changed recently in e2fsprogs 1.46.2, 'chattr +m'
(setting NOCOMPRESS).

In btrfs properties, the empty value should really mean reset to
defaults, for all properties in general. Right now there's only the
compression one, so this change should not cause too many problems.

Old behaviour:

  $ lsattr file
  ---------------------- file
  # the NOCOMPRESS bit is set
  $ btrfs prop set file compression ''
  $ lsattr file
  ---------------------m file

This is equivalent to 'btrfs prop set file compression no' in current
btrfs-progs as the 'no' or 'none' values are translated to an empty
string.

This is where the new behaviour is different: empty string drops the
compression flag (-c) and nocompress (-m):

  $ lsattr file
  ---------------------- file
  # No change
  $ btrfs prop set file compression ''
  $ lsattr file
  ---------------------- file
  $ btrfs prop set file compression lzo
  $ lsattr file
  --------c------------- file
  $ btrfs prop get file compression
  compression=lzo
  $ btrfs prop set file compression ''
  # Reset to the initial state
  $ lsattr file
  ---------------------- file
  # Set NOCOMPRESS bit
  $ btrfs prop set file compression no
  $ lsattr file
  ---------------------m file

This obviously brings problems with backward compatibility, so this
patch should not be backported without making sure the updated
btrfs-progs are also used and that scripts have been updated to use the
new semantics.

Summary:

- old kernel:
  no, none, "" - set NOCOMPRESS bit
- new kernel:
  no, none - set NOCOMPRESS bit
  "" - drop all compression flags, ie. COMPRESS and NOCOMPRESS

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:58 +02:00
David Sterba
f216562731 btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages
The early check if we should attempt compression does not take into
account the number of input pages. It can happen that there's only one
page, eg. a tail page after some ranges of the BTRFS_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED
have been processed, or an isolated page that won't be converted to an
inline extent.

The single page would be compressed but a later check would drop it
again because the result size must be at least one block shorter than
the input. That can never work with just one page.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
44365827cc btrfs: fix unbalanced unlock in qgroup_account_snapshot()
qgroup_account_snapshot() is trying to unlock the not taken
tree_log_mutex in a error path. Since ret != 0 in this case, we can
just return from here.

Fixes: 2a4d84c11a ("btrfs: move delayed ref flushing for qgroup into qgroup helper")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
David Sterba
da658b5708 btrfs: sysfs: export dev stats in devinfo directory
The device stats can be read by ioctl, wrapped by command 'btrfs device
stats'. Provide another source where to read the information in
/sys/fs/btrfs/FSID/devinfo/DEVID/error_stats . The format is a list of
'key value' pairs one per line, which is common in other stat files.
The names are the same as used in other device stat outputs.

The stats are all in one file as it's the snapshot of all available
stats. The 'one value per file' format is not very suitable here. The
stats should be valid right after the stats item is read from disk,
shortly after initializing the device.

In case the stats are not yet valid, print just 'invalid' as the file
contents.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
David Sterba
1a9fd4172d btrfs: fix typos in comments
Fix typos that have snuck in since the last round. Found by codespell.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
c86bdc9b7c btrfs: remove a stale comment for btrfs_decompress_bio()
Since commit 8140dc30a4 ("btrfs: btrfs_decompress_bio() could accept
compressed_bio instead"), btrfs_decompress_bio() accepts
"struct compressed_bio" other than open-coded parameter list.

Thus the comments for the parameter list is no longer needed.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
Baokun Li
bb930007c0 btrfs: send: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail
Use list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail() as it's
doing the same thing and allows further cleanups.  Open code
name_cache_used() as there is only one user.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
Christophe Leroy
b05fbcc36b btrfs: disable build on platforms having page size 256K
With a config having PAGE_SIZE set to 256K, BTRFS build fails
with the following message

  include/linux/compiler_types.h:326:38: error: call to
  '__compiletime_assert_791' declared with attribute error:
  BUILD_BUG_ON failed: (BTRFS_MAX_COMPRESSED % PAGE_SIZE) != 0

BTRFS_MAX_COMPRESSED being 128K, BTRFS cannot support platforms with
256K pages at the time being.

There are two platforms that can select 256K pages:
 - hexagon
 - powerpc

Disable BTRFS when 256K page size is selected. Supporting this would
require changes to the subpage mode that's currently being developed.
Given that 256K is many times larger than page sizes commonly used and
for what the algorithms and structures have been tuned, it's out of
scope and disabling build is a reasonable option.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
Filipe Manana
d8ac76cdd1 btrfs: send: fix invalid path for unlink operations after parent orphanization
During an incremental send operation, when processing the new references
for the current inode, we might send an unlink operation for another inode
that has a conflicting path and has more than one hard link. However this
path was computed and cached before we processed previous new references
for the current inode. We may have orphanized a directory of that path
while processing a previous new reference, in which case the path will
be invalid and cause the receiver process to fail.

The following reproducer triggers the problem and explains how/why it
happens in its comments:

  $ cat test-send-unlink.sh
  #!/bin/bash

  DEV=/dev/sdi
  MNT=/mnt/sdi

  mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
  mount $DEV $MNT

  # Create our test files and directory. Inode 259 (file3) has two hard
  # links.
  touch $MNT/file1
  touch $MNT/file2
  touch $MNT/file3

  mkdir $MNT/A
  ln $MNT/file3 $MNT/A/hard_link

  # Filesystem looks like:
  #
  # .                                     (ino 256)
  # |----- file1                          (ino 257)
  # |----- file2                          (ino 258)
  # |----- file3                          (ino 259)
  # |----- A/                             (ino 260)
  #        |---- hard_link                (ino 259)
  #

  # Now create the base snapshot, which is going to be the parent snapshot
  # for a later incremental send.
  btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1
  btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1

  # Move inode 257 into directory inode 260. This results in computing the
  # path for inode 260 as "/A" and caching it.
  mv $MNT/file1 $MNT/A/file1

  # Move inode 258 (file2) into directory inode 260, with a name of
  # "hard_link", moving first inode 259 away since it currently has that
  # location and name.
  mv $MNT/A/hard_link $MNT/tmp
  mv $MNT/file2 $MNT/A/hard_link

  # Now rename inode 260 to something else (B for example) and then create
  # a hard link for inode 258 that has the old name and location of inode
  # 260 ("/A").
  mv $MNT/A $MNT/B
  ln $MNT/B/hard_link $MNT/A

  # Filesystem now looks like:
  #
  # .                                     (ino 256)
  # |----- tmp                            (ino 259)
  # |----- file3                          (ino 259)
  # |----- B/                             (ino 260)
  # |      |---- file1                    (ino 257)
  # |      |---- hard_link                (ino 258)
  # |
  # |----- A                              (ino 258)

  # Create another snapshot of our subvolume and use it for an incremental
  # send.
  btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2
  btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2

  # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to
  # apply both send streams to recreate both snapshots.
  umount $DEV

  mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null

  mount $DEV $MNT

  # First add the first snapshot to the new filesystem by applying the
  # first send stream.
  btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT

  # The incremental receive operation below used to fail with the
  # following error:
  #
  #    ERROR: unlink A/hard_link failed: No such file or directory
  #
  # This is because when send is processing inode 257, it generates the
  # path for inode 260 as "/A", since that inode is its parent in the send
  # snapshot, and caches that path.
  #
  # Later when processing inode 258, it first processes its new reference
  # that has the path of "/A", which results in orphanizing inode 260
  # because there is a a path collision. This results in issuing a rename
  # operation from "/A" to "/o260-6-0".
  #
  # Finally when processing the new reference "B/hard_link" for inode 258,
  # it notices that it collides with inode 259 (not yet processed, because
  # it has a higher inode number), since that inode has the name
  # "hard_link" under the directory inode 260. It also checks that inode
  # 259 has two hardlinks, so it decides to issue a unlink operation for
  # the name "hard_link" for inode 259. However the path passed to the
  # unlink operation is "/A/hard_link", which is incorrect since currently
  # "/A" does not exists, due to the orphanization of inode 260 mentioned
  # before. The path is incorrect because it was computed and cached
  # before the orphanization. This results in the receiver to fail with
  # the above error.
  btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT

  umount $MNT

When running the test, it fails like this:

  $ ./test-send-unlink.sh
  Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1'
  At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1
  Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2'
  At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2
  At subvol snap1
  At snapshot snap2
  ERROR: unlink A/hard_link failed: No such file or directory

Fix this by recomputing a path before issuing an unlink operation when
processing the new references for the current inode if we previously
have orphanized a directory.

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
David Sterba
ae5d29d4e7 btrfs: inline wait_current_trans_commit_start in its caller
Function wait_current_trans_commit_start is now fairly trivial so it can
be inlined in its only caller.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:11 +02:00
David Sterba
32cc4f8759 btrfs: sink wait_for_unblock parameter to async commit
There's only one caller left btrfs_ioctl_start_sync that passes 0, so we
can remove the switch in btrfs_commit_transaction_async.

A cleanup 9babda9f33 ("btrfs: Remove async_transid from
btrfs_mksubvol/create_subvol/create_snapshot") removed calls that passed
1, so this is a followup.

As this removes last call of wait_current_trans_commit_start_and_unblock,
remove the function as well.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:11 +02:00
Nathan Chancellor
bfaa324e9a btrfs: remove total_data_size variable in btrfs_batch_insert_items()
clang warns:

  fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:684:6: warning: variable 'total_data_size' set
  but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
	  int total_data_size = 0, total_size = 0;
	      ^
  1 warning generated.

This variable's value has been unused since commit fc0d82e103 ("btrfs:
sink total_data parameter in setup_items_for_insert"). Eliminate it.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1391
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:11 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
77d255348b btrfs: eliminate insert label in add_falloc_range
By way of inverting the list_empty conditional the insert label can be
eliminated, making the function's flow entirely linear.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
3d078efae6 btrfs: subpage: fix a rare race between metadata endio and eb freeing
[BUG]
There is a very rare ASSERT() triggering during full fstests run for
subpage rw support.

No other reproducer so far.

The ASSERT() gets triggered for metadata read in
btrfs_page_set_uptodate() inside end_page_read().

[CAUSE]
There is still a small race window for metadata only, the race could
happen like this:

                T1                  |              T2
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
end_bio_extent_readpage()           |
|- btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer() |
|  |- free_extent_buffer()          |
|     Still have 2 refs             |
|- end_page_read()                  |
   |- if (unlikely(PagePrivate())   |
   |  The page still has Private    |
   |                                | free_extent_buffer()
   |                                | |  Only one ref 1, will be
   |                                | |  released
   |                                | |- detach_extent_buffer_page()
   |                                |    |- btrfs_detach_subpage()
   |- btrfs_set_page_uptodate()     |
      The page no longer has Private|
      >>> ASSERT() triggered <<<    |

This race window is super small, thus pretty hard to hit, even with so
many runs of fstests.

But the race window is still there, we have to go another way to solve
it other than relying on random PagePrivate() check.

Data path is not affected, as it will lock the page before reading,
while unlocking the page after the last read has finished, thus no race
window.

[FIX]
This patch will fix the bug by repurposing btrfs_subpage::readers.

Now btrfs_subpage::readers will be a member shared by both metadata and
data.

For metadata path, we don't do the page unlock as metadata only relies
on extent locking.

At the same time, teach page_range_has_eb() to take
btrfs_subpage::readers into consideration.

So that even if the last eb of a page gets freed, page::private won't be
detached as long as there still are pending end_page_read() calls.

By this we eliminate the race window, this will slight increase the
metadata memory usage, as the page may not be released as frequently as
usual.  But it should not be a big deal.

The code got introduced in ("btrfs: submit read time repair only for
each corrupted sector"), but the fix is in a separate patch to keep the
problem description and the crash is rare so it should not hurt
bisectability.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wegruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
bcd77455d5 btrfs: don't clear page extent mapped if we're not invalidating the full page
[BUG]
With current btrfs subpage rw support, the following script can lead to
fs hang:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev
  $ mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt
  $ fsstress -w -n 100 -p 1 -s 1608140256 -v -d $mnt

The fs will hang at btrfs_start_ordered_extent().

[CAUSE]
In above test case, btrfs_invalidate() will be called with the following
parameters:

  offset = 0 length = 53248 page dirty = 1 subpage dirty bitmap = 0x2000

Since @offset is 0, btrfs_invalidate() will try to invalidate the full
page, and finally call clear_page_extent_mapped() which will detach
subpage structure from the page.

And since the page no longer has subpage structure, the subpage dirty
bitmap will be cleared, preventing the dirty range from being written
back, thus no way to wake up the ordered extent.

[FIX]
Just follow other filesystems, only to invalidate the page if the range
covers the full page.

There are cases like truncate_setsize() which can call
btrfs_invalidatepage() with offset == 0 and length != 0 for the last
page of an inode.

Although the old code will still try to invalidate the full page, we are
still safe to just wait for ordered extent to finish.
So it shouldn't cause extra problems.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
0528476b6a btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()
[BUG]
With current subpage RW support, the following script can hang the fs
with 64K page size.

 # mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev
 # mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt
 # fsstress -w -n 50 -p 1 -s 1607749395 -d $mnt

The kernel will do an infinite loop in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range().

[CAUSE]
In btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() we:

- Truncate page cache range
- Lock extent io tree
- Wait any ordered extents in the range.

We exit the loop until we meet all the following conditions:

- No ordered extent in the lock range
- No page is in the lock range

The latter condition has a pitfall, it only works for sector size ==
PAGE_SIZE case.

While can't handle the following subpage case:

  0       32K     64K     96K     128K
  |       |///////||//////|       ||

lockstart=32K
lockend=96K - 1

In this case, although the range crosses 2 pages,
truncate_pagecache_range() will invalidate no page at all, but only zero
the [32K, 96K) range of the two pages.

Thus filemap_range_has_page(32K, 96K-1) will always return true, thus we
will never meet the loop exit condition.

[FIX]
Fix the problem by doing page alignment for the lock range.

Function filemap_range_has_page() has already handled lend < lstart
case, we only need to round up @lockstart, and round_down @lockend for
truncate_pagecache_range().

This modification should not change any thing for sector size ==
PAGE_SIZE case, as in that case our range is already page aligned.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
3115deb381 btrfs: reflink: make copy_inline_to_page() to be subpage compatible
The modifications are:

- Page copy destination
  For subpage case, one page can contain multiple sectors, thus we can
  no longer expect the memcpy_to_page()/btrfs_decompress() to copy
  data into page offset 0.
  The correct offset is offset_in_page(file_offset) now, which should
  handle both regular sectorsize and subpage cases well.

- Page status update
  Now we need to use subpage helper to handle the page status update.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
2d8ec40ee4 btrfs: make btrfs_page_mkwrite() to be subpage compatible
Only set_page_dirty() and SetPageUptodate() is not subpage compatible.
Convert them to subpage helpers, so that __extent_writepage_io() can
submit page content correctly.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
6c9ac8be45 btrfs: make btrfs_truncate_block() to be subpage compatible
btrfs_truncate_block() itself is already mostly subpage compatible, the
only missing part is the page dirtying code.

Currently if we have a sector that needs to be truncated, we set the
sector aligned range delalloc, then set the full page dirty.

The problem is, current subpage code requires subpage dirty bit to be
set, or __extent_writepage_io() won't submit bio, thus leads to ordered
extent never to finish.

So this patch will make btrfs_truncate_block() to call
btrfs_page_set_dirty() helper to replace set_page_dirty() to fix the
problem.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
c5ef5c6c73 btrfs: make __extent_writepage_io() only submit dirty range for subpage
__extent_writepage_io() function originally just iterates through all
the extent maps of a page, and submits any regular extents.

This is fine for sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, as if a page is dirty, we
need to submit the only sector contained in the page.

But for subpage case, one dirty page can contain several clean sectors
with at least one dirty sector.

If __extent_writepage_io() still submit all regular extent maps, it can
submit data which is already written to disk.
And since such already written data won't have corresponding ordered
extents, it will trigger a BUG_ON() in btrfs_csum_one_bio().

Change the behavior of __extent_writepage_io() by finding the first
dirty byte in the page, and only submit the dirty range other than the
full extent.

Since we're also here, also modify the following calls to be subpage
compatible:

- SetPageError()
- end_page_writeback()

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
d2a9106448 btrfs: make btrfs_set_range_writeback() subpage compatible
Function btrfs_set_range_writeback() currently just sets the page
writeback unconditionally.

Change it to call the subpage helper so that we can handle both cases
well.

Since the subpage helpers needs btrfs_fs_info, also change the parameter
to accept btrfs_inode.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
4750af3bbe btrfs: prevent extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() to unlock page not locked by __process_pages_contig()
In cow_file_range(), after we have succeeded creating an inline extent,
we unlock the page with extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() by passing
locked_page == NULL.

For sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, this is just making the page lock and
unlock harder to grab.

But for incoming subpage case, it can be a big problem.

For incoming subpage case, page locking have two entry points:

- __process_pages_contig()
  In that case, we know exactly the range we want to lock (which only
  requires sector alignment).
  To handle the subpage requirement, we introduce btrfs_subpage::writers
  to page::private, and will update it in __process_pages_contig().

- Other directly lock/unlock_page() call sites
  Those won't touch btrfs_subpage::writers at all.

This means, page locked by __process_pages_contig() can only be unlocked
by __process_pages_contig().
Thankfully we already have the existing infrastructure in the form of
@locked_page in various call sites.

Unfortunately, extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() in cow_file_range() after
creating an inline extent is the exception.
It intentionally call extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with locked_page ==
NULL, to also unlock current page (and clear its dirty/writeback bits).

To co-operate with incoming subpage modifications, and make the page
lock/unlock pair easier to understand, this patch will still call
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with locked_page, and only unlock the
page in __extent_writepage().

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
a33a8e9afc btrfs: update locked page dirty/writeback/error bits in __process_pages_contig
When __process_pages_contig() gets called for
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(), if we hit the locked page, only Private2
bit is updated, but dirty/writeback/error bits are all skipped.

There are several call sites that call extent_clear_unlock_delalloc()
with locked_page and PAGE_CLEAR_DIRTY/PAGE_SET_WRITEBACK/PAGE_END_WRITEBACK

- cow_file_range()
- run_delalloc_nocow()
- cow_file_range_async()
  All for their error handling branches.

For those call sites, since we skip the locked page for
dirty/error/writeback bit update, the locked page will still have its
subpage dirty bit remaining.

Normally it's the call sites which locked the page to handle the locked
page, but it won't hurt if we also do the update.

Especially there are already other call sites doing the same thing by
manually passing NULL as locked_page.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
b945a4637e btrfs: make page Ordered bit to be subpage compatible
This involves the following modification:

- Ordered extent creation
  This is done in process_one_page(), now PAGE_SET_ORDERED will call
  subpage helper to do the work.

- endio functions
  This is done in btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished().

- btrfs_invalidatepage()

- btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents()
  Use the subpage page helper, and add an extra branch to exit if the
  locked page have covered the full range.

Now the usage of page Ordered flag for ordered extent accounting is fully
subpage compatible.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:10 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
6f17400bd9 btrfs: introduce helpers for subpage ordered status
This patch introduces the following functions to handle btrfs subpage
ordered (Private2) status:

- btrfs_subpage_set_ordered()
- btrfs_subpage_clear_ordered()
- btrfs_subpage_test_ordered()
  These helpers can only be called when the range is ensured to be
  inside the page.

- btrfs_page_set_ordered()
- btrfs_page_clear_ordered()
- btrfs_page_test_ordered()
  These helpers can handle both regular sector size and subpage without
  problem.

These functions are here to coordinate btrfs_invalidatepage() with
btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(), to make sure only one of those
functions can finish the ordered extent.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:09 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
1e1de38792 btrfs: make process_one_page() to handle subpage locking
Introduce a new data inodes specific subpage member, writers, to record
how many sectors are under page lock for delalloc writing.

This member acts pretty much the same as readers, except it's only for
delalloc writes.

This is important for delalloc code to trace which page can really be
freed, as we have cases like run_delalloc_nocow() where we may exit
processing nocow range inside a page, but need to exit to do cow half
way.
In that case, we need a way to determine if we can really unlock a full
page.

With the new btrfs_subpage::writers, there is a new requirement:
- Page locked by process_one_page() must be unlocked by
  process_one_page()
  There are still tons of call sites manually lock and unlock a page,
  without updating btrfs_subpage::writers.
  So if we lock a page through process_one_page() then it must be
  unlocked by process_one_page() to keep btrfs_subpage::writers
  consistent.

  This will be handled in next patch.

Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64]
Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64]
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:09 +02:00