Currently zpci_dma_init_device()/zpci_dma_exit_device() is called as
part of zpci_enable_device()/zpci_disable_device() and errors for
zpci_dma_exit_device() are always ignored even if we could abort.
Improve upon this by moving zpci_dma_exit_device() out of
zpci_disable_device() and check for errors whenever we have a way to
abort the current operation. Note that for example in
zpci_event_hard_deconfigured() the device is expected to be gone so we
really can't abort and proceed even in case of error.
Similarly move the cc == 3 special case out of zpci_unregister_ioat()
and into the callers allowing to abort when finding an already disabled
devices precludes proceeding with the operation.
While we are at it log IOAT register/unregister errors in the s390
debugfs log,
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
On failure to register a struct zpci_dev with a struct zpci_bus we left
a dangling pointer in zdev->zbus. As zpci_create_device() bails if
zpci_bus_device_register() fails this is of no consequence but still bad
practice.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Now that the zbus can be created without being scanned we can go one
step further and make registering a device to a zbus independent from
scanning it. This way the zbus handling becomes much more natural
in that functions can be registered on the zbus to be scanned later more
closely resembling the handling of both real PCI hardware and other
virtual PCI busses like Hyper-V's virtual PCI bus (see for example
drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c:create_root_hv_pci_bus()).
Having zbus registration separate from scanning allows us to return
fully initialized but still disabled zdevs from zpci_create_device()
which can then be configured just as we would configure a zdev from
standby (minus the SCLP Configure already done by the platform). There
is still the exception that a PCI function with non-zero devfn can be
plugged before its PCI bus, which depends on the function with zero
devfn, is created. In this case the zdev returend from
zpci_create_device() is still missing its bus, hotplug slot, and
resources which need to be created later but at least it doesn't wait in
the enabled state and can otherwise be treated as initialized.
With this we also separate the initial PCI scan using CLP List PCI
Functions into two phases. In the CLP loop's callback we only register
each function with a virtual zbus creating the latter as needed. Then,
after we have built this virtual PCI topology based on our list of
zbusses, we can make use of the common code functionality to scan each
complete zbus as a separate child bus.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
In a later change we will first collect all PCI functions from the CLP
List PCI functions call, then register them to/creating the relevant
zbus. Then only after we've created our virtual bus structure will we
scan all zbusses iterating over the zbus list. Since scanning is
relatively slow a spinlock is a bad fit for protecting the
loop over the devices on the zbus. Furthermore doing the probing on the
bus we need to use pci_lock_rescan_remove() as devices are added to
the PCI subsystem and that is a mutex which can't be locked nested
inside a spinlock section. Note that the contention of this lock should
be very low either way as zbusses are only added/removed concurrently on
hotplug events.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
In the existing code the creation of the PCI bus and the scanning of
function zero all happens in zpci_scan_bus(). This in turn requires
functions to be enabled and their resources to be available before the
PCI bus is even created.
This not only means that functions are enabled long before they are
actually made available to the common PCI subsystem. In case of
functions with non-zero devfn which appeared before the function with
devfn zero they can wait arbitrarily long in this enabled but not
scanned state.
Fix this by separating the creation of the PCI bus from scanning it and
only prepare, that is enable and setup MMIO bus resources, functions
just before they are scanned. As they may be scanned multiple times
track if we already created resources in the zdev.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Pull setting the maximum bus speed and multifunction attribute into
zpci_bus_scan() in preparation for handling bus creation separately
from scanning the bus.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To match zpci_bus_scan_device() and the PCI common code terminology and
to remove some code duplication, we pull the multiple uses of
pci_scan_single_device() into a function. For now this has the side
effect of adding each device to the PCI bus separately and locking and
unlocking the rescan/remove lock for each instead of just once per bus.
This is clearly less efficient but provides a correct intermediate
behavior until a follow on change does both the adding and scanning only
once per bus.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
The zpci_remove_device() function removes the device from the PCI common
code core which is an operation dealing primarily with the zbus and PCI
bus code. With that and to match an upcoming refactoring of the
symmetric scanning part move it to the bus code.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
- New fsl-mc vfio bus driver supporting userspace drivers of objects
within NXP's DPAA2 architecture (Diana Craciun)
- Support for exposing zPCI information on s390 (Matthew Rosato)
- Fixes for "detached" VFs on s390 (Matthew Rosato)
- Fixes for pin-pages and dma-rw accesses (Yan Zhao)
- Cleanups and optimize vconfig regen (Zenghui Yu)
- Fix duplicate irq-bypass token registration (Alex Williamson)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJfkcCjAAoJECObm247sIsi2XIP/j7NL4glPrWU37mesz9dd5nx
SmZhcmxnOqZSQkOCnu+hNFZ9e+tdQjuX+jATOZaYz5l55bLAFmBlBj1Dv8HWaCVI
mTbJ6xXUwdOvNSxbFH6BIUkJg8otR0iEkefVyJLNlF84FsaDknH4yZxx0vdeczjF
wTkkk3+4VmH+4klvPIa9v0eL7yeKeFmgls9nQViVE5kDWUF4us/z/oHlVm9wR+mL
2r3DEjHyz4L2hwVEkhZk7ytR6szdhuhF2l7NoMmaSEXRXjBzJoO6I3P9Y2W4i+su
MFgTfiQ+OpIfVuiR8GzGev+/SrjWGX0Hvb2sYriKOELjhyedkE2kmxacbqMZ/UE+
SRAhFf64C1rzJ4g1IW//Gg+9ObIPqlkqU52VDbOZdCED0AquwSyVmdwIUAK6qF+I
HLOyZXhMI8EZ+w063cS+aKLJIvQTBbfIdMmPZkopVZhwWB3N3BjdvBKA+rPpPoTx
0DpeUo891+zyeEE4aunUmCB8HFnBPgUa+XZqg2juq9MxjScsqgTzA0WEZg7jV4oj
tORQrqoAKJgSk9oVL3EvAnr+IJix3ScRTqYymESORkz/lRCk2hFX48qdeW+qiSP8
W1DHOnivFb1+JzhuZyaRKFWy1mK0EQQWTsE2b2ymPMKJbFhi+pVxaksmeG5x+4Q9
SAp+Qma8Aj3UtBKcj/S+
=LDPo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'vfio-v5.10-rc1' of git://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio
Pull VFIO updates from Alex Williamson:
- New fsl-mc vfio bus driver supporting userspace drivers of objects
within NXP's DPAA2 architecture (Diana Craciun)
- Support for exposing zPCI information on s390 (Matthew Rosato)
- Fixes for "detached" VFs on s390 (Matthew Rosato)
- Fixes for pin-pages and dma-rw accesses (Yan Zhao)
- Cleanups and optimize vconfig regen (Zenghui Yu)
- Fix duplicate irq-bypass token registration (Alex Williamson)
* tag 'vfio-v5.10-rc1' of git://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio: (30 commits)
vfio iommu type1: Fix memory leak in vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages
vfio/pci: Clear token on bypass registration failure
vfio/fsl-mc: fix the return of the uninitialized variable ret
vfio/fsl-mc: Fix the dead code in vfio_fsl_mc_set_irq_trigger
vfio/fsl-mc: Fixed vfio-fsl-mc driver compilation on 32 bit
MAINTAINERS: Add entry for s390 vfio-pci
vfio-pci/zdev: Add zPCI capabilities to VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO
vfio/fsl-mc: Add support for device reset
vfio/fsl-mc: Add read/write support for fsl-mc devices
vfio/fsl-mc: trigger an interrupt via eventfd
vfio/fsl-mc: Add irq infrastructure for fsl-mc devices
vfio/fsl-mc: Added lock support in preparation for interrupt handling
vfio/fsl-mc: Allow userspace to MMAP fsl-mc device MMIO regions
vfio/fsl-mc: Implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl call
vfio/fsl-mc: Implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO ioctl
vfio/fsl-mc: Scan DPRC objects on vfio-fsl-mc driver bind
vfio: Introduce capability definitions for VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO
s390/pci: track whether util_str is valid in the zpci_dev
s390/pci: stash version in the zpci_dev
vfio/fsl-mc: Add VFIO framework skeleton for fsl-mc devices
...
For s390 we can have VFs that are passed-through without the associated
PF. Firmware provides an emulation layer to allow these devices to
operate independently, but is missing emulation of the Memory Space
Enable bit. For these as well as linked VFs, set no_command_memory
which specifies these devices do not implement PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY.
Fixes: abafbc551f ("vfio-pci: Invalidate mmaps and block MMIO access on disabled memory")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
currently we have multiple #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV blocks spread over
different compliation units and headers, all dealing with SR-IOV
specific behavior.
This violates the style guide which discourages conditionally compiled
code blocks and hinders maintainability by speading SR-IOV functionality
over many files.
Let's move all of this into a conditionally compiled pci_iov.c file and
local header and prefix SR-IOV specific functions with zpci_iov_*.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Currently there are four places in which a PCI function is scanned
and made available to drivers:
1. In pci_scan_root_bus() as part of the initial zbus
creation.
2. In zpci_bus_add_devices() when registering
a device in configured state on a zbus that has already been
scanned.
3. When a function is already known to zPCI (in reserved/standby state)
and configuration is triggered through firmware by PEC 0x301.
4. When a device is already known to zPCI (in standby/reserved state)
and configuration is triggered from within Linux using
enable_slot().
The PF/VF linking step and setting of pdev->is_virtfn introduced with
commit e5794cf1a2 ("s390/pci: create links between PFs and VFs") was
only triggered for the second case, which is where VFs created through
sriov_numvfs usually land. However unlike some other platforms but like
POWER VFs can be individually enabled/disabled through
/sys/bus/pci/slots.
Fix this by doing VF setup as part of pcibios_bus_add_device() which is
called in all of the above cases.
Finally to remove the PF/VF links call the common code
pci_iov_remove_virtfn() function to remove linked VFs.
This takes care of the necessary sysfs cleanup.
Fixes: e5794cf1a2 ("s390/pci: create links between PFs and VFs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8: 2f0230b2f2: s390/pci: re-introduce zpci_remove_device()
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8
Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
We were missing the pci_dev_put() for candidate PFs. Furhtermore in
discussion with upstream it turns out that somewhat counterintuitively
some common code, in particular the vfio-pci driver, assumes that
pdev->is_virtfn always implies that pdev->physfn is set, i.e. that VFs
are always linked.
While POWER does seem to set pdev->is_virtfn even for unlinked functions
(see comments in arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c:eeh_debugfs_break_device())
for now just be safe and only set pdev->is_virtfn on linking.
Also make sure that we only search for parent PFs if the zbus is
multifunction and we thus know the devfn values supplied by firmware
come from the RID.
Fixes: e5794cf1a2 ("s390/pci: create links between PFs and VFs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
On s390 PCI Virtual Functions (VFs) are scanned by firmware and are made
available to Linux via the hot-plug interface. As such the common code
path of doing the scan directly using the parent Physical Function (PF)
is not used and fenced off with the no_vf_scan attribute.
Even if the partition created the VFs itself e.g. using the sriov_numvfs
attribute of a PF, the PF/VF links thus need to be established after the
fact. To do this when a VF is plugged we scan through all functions on
the same zbus and test whether they are the parent PF in which case we
establish the necessary links.
With these links established there is now no more need to fence off
pci_iov_remove_virtfn() for pdev->no_vf_scan as the common code now
works fine.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506154139.90609-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
The assignment of the PCI device multifunction attribute
is set during the PCI device probe.
There is no need to set it here.
Let's do it right and remove this assignment.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
We allow multiple functions on a single bus.
We suppress the ZPCI_DEVFN definition and replace its
occurences with zpci->devfn.
We verify the number of device during the registration.
There can never be more domains in use than existing
devices, so we do not need to verify the count of domain
after having verified the count of devices.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
The current PCI implementation do not provide a bus resource.
This leads to a notice being print at boot.
Let's do it more nicely and provide the bus resource.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
The zPCI bus is in charge to handle common zPCI resources for
zPCI devices.
Creating the zPCI bus, the PCI bus, the zPCI devices and the
PCI devices and hotplug slots
done in a specific order:
- PCI hotplug slot creation needs a PCI bus
- PCI bus needs a PCI domain
which is reported by the pci_domain_nr() when setting up the
host bridge
- PCI domain is set from the zPCI with devfn 0
this is necessary to have a reproducible enumeration
Therefore we can not create devices or hotplug slots for any PCI
device associated with a zPCI device before having discovered
the function zero of the bus.
The discovery and initialization of devices can be done at several
points in the code:
- On Events, serialized in a thread context
- On initialization, in the kernel init thread context
- When powering on the hotplug slot, in a user thread context
The removal of devices and their parent bus may also be done on
events or for devices when powering down the slot.
To guarantee the existence of the bus and devices until they are
no more needed we use kref in zPCI bus and introduce a reference
count in the zPCI devices.
In this patch the zPCI bus still only accept a device with
a devfn 0.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
