The RISC-V BPF uses a5 for BPF return values, which are zero-extended,
whereas the RISC-V ABI uses a0 which is sign-extended. In other words,
a5 and a0 can differ, and are used in different context.
The BPF trampoline are used for both BPF programs, and regular kernel
functions.
Make sure that the RISC-V BPF trampoline saves, and restores both a0
and a5.
Fixes: 49b5e77ae3 ("riscv, bpf: Add bpf trampoline support for RV64")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004120706.52848-3-bjorn@kernel.org
The RISC-V architecture does not expose sub-registers, and hold all
32-bit values in a sign-extended format [1] [2]:
| The compiler and calling convention maintain an invariant that all
| 32-bit values are held in a sign-extended format in 64-bit
| registers. Even 32-bit unsigned integers extend bit 31 into bits
| 63 through 32. Consequently, conversion between unsigned and
| signed 32-bit integers is a no-op, as is conversion from a signed
| 32-bit integer to a signed 64-bit integer.
While BPF, on the other hand, exposes sub-registers, and use
zero-extension (similar to arm64/x86).
This has led to some subtle bugs, where a BPF JITted program has not
sign-extended the a0 register (return value in RISC-V land), passed
the return value up the kernel, e.g.:
| int from_bpf(void);
|
| long foo(void)
| {
| return from_bpf();
| }
Here, a0 would be 0xffff_ffff, instead of the expected
0xffff_ffff_ffff_ffff.
Internally, the RISC-V JIT uses a5 as a dedicated register for BPF
return values.
Keep a5 zero-extended, but explicitly sign-extend a0 (which is used
outside BPF land). Now that a0 (RISC-V ABI) and a5 (BPF ABI) differs,
a0 is only moved to a5 for non-BPF native calls (BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).
Fixes: 2353ecc6f9 ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/riscv-isa-release-056b6ff-2023-10-02/unpriv-isa-asciidoc.pdf # [2]
Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf # [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004120706.52848-2-bjorn@kernel.org
Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc() for memory management of JIT binaries in
RISCV BPF JIT. The bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc creates a pair of RW and RX
buffers. The JIT writes the program into the RW buffer. When the JIT is
done, the program is copied to the final RX buffer with
bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize.
Implement bpf_arch_text_copy() and bpf_arch_text_invalidate() for RISCV
JIT as these functions are required by bpf_jit_binary_pack allocator.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831131229.497941-5-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Add support unconditional bswap instruction. Since riscv is always
little-endian, just treat the unconditional scenario the same as
big-endian conversion.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824095001.3408573-7-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For LDX_B/H/W, when zext has been inserted by verifier, it'll return 1,
and no exception handling will continue. Also, when the offset is 12-bit
value, the redundant zext inserted by the verifier is not removed. Fix
both scenarios by moving down the removal of redundant zext.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824095001.3408573-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit 6724a76cff ("riscv: ftrace: Reduce the detour code size to
half") optimizes the detour code size of kernel functions to half with
T0 register and the upcoming DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS of riscv
is based on this optimization, we need to adapt riscv bpf trampoline
based on this. One thing to do is to reduce detour code size of bpf
programs, and the second is to deal with the return address after the
execution of bpf trampoline. Meanwhile, we need to construct the frame
of parent function, otherwise we will miss one layer when unwinding.
The related tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230721100627.2630326-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
excerpt from an incorrect image:
| ...
| 3b8: 00c50663 beq a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
| 3bc: 0020e317 auipc t1,0x20e
| 3c0: 49630067 jalr zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
| ...
| 20e84c: 8796 c.mv a5,t0
| 20e84e: 6422 c.ldsp s0,8(sp) # Epilogue start
| 20e850: 6141 c.addi16sp sp,16
| 20e852: 853e c.mv a0,a5 # Incorrect jump target
| 20e854: 8082 c.jr ra
The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
final pass.
Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
to track what registers that are touched.
Fixes: 2353ecc6f9 ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230710074131.19596-1-bjorn@kernel.org
bpf_jit_comp64.c uses patch_text(), so add <asm/patch.h> to it
to prevent the build error:
../arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c: In function 'bpf_arch_text_poke':
../arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:691:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'patch_text'; did you mean 'path_get'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
691 | ret = patch_text(ip, new_insns, ninsns);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
Fixes: 596f2e6f9c ("riscv, bpf: Add bpf_arch_text_poke support for RV64")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202302271000.Aj4nMXbZ-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230227072016.14618-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
This patch adds kernel function call support for RV64. Since the offset
from RV64 kernel and module functions to bpf programs is almost within
the range of s32, the current infrastructure of RV64 is already
sufficient for kfunc, so let's turn it on.
Suggested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221140656.3480496-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF trampoline is the critical infrastructure of the BPF subsystem, acting
as a mediator between kernel functions and BPF programs. Numerous important
features, such as using BPF program for zero overhead kernel introspection,
rely on this key component. We can't wait to support bpf trampoline on RV64.
The related tests have passed, as well as the test_verifier with no new
failure ceses.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230215135205.1411105-5-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Implement bpf_arch_text_poke for RV64. For call scenario, to make BPF
trampoline compatible with the kernel and BPF context, we follow the
framework of RV64 ftrace to reserve 4 nops for BPF programs as function
entry, and use auipc+jalr instructions for function call. However, since
auipc+jalr call instruction is non-atomic operation, we need to use
stop-machine to make sure instructions patching in atomic context. Also,
we use auipc+jalr pair and need to patch in stop-machine context for
jump scenario.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230215135205.1411105-4-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
The current emit_call function is not suitable for kernel function call as
it store return value to bpf R0 register. We can separate it out for common
use. Meanwhile, simplify judgment logic, that is, fixed function address
can use jal or auipc+jalr, while the unfixed can use only auipc+jalr.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230215135205.1411105-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
For BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC instruction, verifier will refill imm with
correct addresses of bpf_calls and then run last pass of JIT.
Since the emit_imm of RV64 is variable-length, which will emit
appropriate length instructions accorroding to the imm, it may
broke ctx->offset, and lead to unpredictable problem, such as
inaccurate jump. So let's fix it with fixed-length instructions.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Suggested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221206091410.1584784-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Add support for riscv jit to provide bpf_line_info. We need to
consider the prologue offset in ctx->offset, but unlike x86 and
arm64, ctx->offset of riscv does not provide an extra slot for
the prologue, so here we just calculate the len of prologue and
add it to ctx->offset at the end. Both RV64 and RV32 have been
tested.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220530092815.1112406-3-pulehui@huawei.com
This patch implement more BPF atomic operations for RV64. The newly
added operations are shown below:
atomic[64]_[fetch_]add
atomic[64]_[fetch_]and
atomic[64]_[fetch_]or
atomic[64]_xchg
atomic[64]_cmpxchg
Since riscv specification does not provide AMO instruction for CAS
operation, we use lr/sc instruction for cmpxchg operation, and AMO
instructions for the rest ops.
Tests "test_bpf.ko" and "test_progs -t atomic" have passed, as well
as "test_verifier" with no new failure cases.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220410101246.232875-1-pulehui@huawei.com
* Support for the DA9063 as used on the HiFive Unmatched.
* Support for relative extables, which puts us in line with other
architectures and save some space in vmlinux.
* A handful of kexec fixes/improvements, including the ability to run
crash kernels from PCI-addressable memory on the HiFive Unmatched.
* Support for the SBI SRST extension, which allows systems that do not
have an explicit driver in Linux to reboot.
* A handful of fixes and cleanups, including to the defconfigs and
device trees.
---
This time I do expect to have a part 2, as there's still some smaller
patches on the list. I was hoping to get through more of that over the
weekend, but I got distracted with the ABI issues. Figured it's better
to send this sooner rather than waiting.
Included are my merge resolutions against a master from this morning, if
that helps any:
diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
index 289621da4a2a,9c46dd3ff4a2..000000000000
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
@@@ -27,7 -27,14 +27,15 @@@ enum sbi_ext_id
SBI_EXT_IPI = 0x735049,
SBI_EXT_RFENCE = 0x52464E43,
SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534D,
+ SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
+
+ /* Experimentals extensions must lie within this range */
+ SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START = 0x08000000,
+ SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END = 0x08FFFFFF,
+
+ /* Vendor extensions must lie within this range */
+ SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START = 0x09000000,
+ SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END = 0x09FFFFFF,
};
enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
index e03a4c94cf3f..6bfa1f24d3de 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
@@ -188,14 +188,6 @@ vdd_ldo11: ldo11 {
regulator-always-on;
};
};
-
- rtc {
- compatible = "dlg,da9063-rtc";
- };
-
- wdt {
- compatible = "dlg,da9063-watchdog";
- };
};
};
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=uqtf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.17-mw0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux
Pull RISC-V updates from Palmer Dabbelt:
- Support for the DA9063 as used on the HiFive Unmatched.
- Support for relative extables, which puts us in line with other
architectures and save some space in vmlinux.
- A handful of kexec fixes/improvements, including the ability to run
crash kernels from PCI-addressable memory on the HiFive Unmatched.
- Support for the SBI SRST extension, which allows systems that do not
have an explicit driver in Linux to reboot.
- A handful of fixes and cleanups, including to the defconfigs and
device trees.
* tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.17-mw0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux: (52 commits)
RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available
riscv: mm: fix wrong phys_ram_base value for RV64
RISC-V: Use common riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask() for both SMP=y and SMP=n
riscv: head: remove useless __PAGE_ALIGNED_BSS and .balign
riscv: errata: alternative: mark vendor_patch_func __initdata
riscv: head: make secondary_start_common() static
riscv: remove cpu_stop()
riscv: try to allocate crashkern region from 32bit addressible memory
riscv: use hart id instead of cpu id on machine_kexec
riscv: Don't use va_pa_offset on kdump
riscv: dts: sifive: fu540-c000: Fix PLIC node
riscv: dts: sifive: fu540-c000: Drop bogus soc node compatible values
riscv: dts: sifive: Group tuples in register properties
riscv: dts: sifive: Group tuples in interrupt properties
riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: Group tuples in interrupt properties
riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: Fix clock controller node
riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: Fix reference clock node
riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: Fix PLIC node
riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: Drop empty chosen node
riscv: dts: canaan: Group tuples in interrupt properties
...
This is a riscv port of commit d6e2cc5647 ("arm64: extable: add `type`
and `data` fields").
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
The return values of fixup_exception() and riscv_bpf_fixup_exception()
represent a boolean condition rather than an error code, so it's better
to return `bool` rather than `int`.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This is to group riscv related extable related functions signature
into one file.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36 ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order
to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is
reasonable.
After commit 874be05f52 ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.
On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
On some archs:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable.
The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the
mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh.
For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as
suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes,
it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases
in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the
JIT.
Here are the test results on x86_64:
# uname -m
x86_64
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# ./test_progs -t tailcalls
#142 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-11-01
We've added 181 non-merge commits during the last 28 day(s) which contain
a total of 280 files changed, 11791 insertions(+), 5879 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix bpf verifier propagation of 64-bit bounds, from Alexei.
2) Parallelize bpf test_progs, from Yucong and Andrii.
3) Deprecate various libbpf apis including af_xdp, from Andrii, Hengqi, Magnus.
4) Improve bpf selftests on s390, from Ilya.
5) bloomfilter bpf map type, from Joanne.
6) Big improvements to JIT tests especially on Mips, from Johan.
7) Support kernel module function calls from bpf, from Kumar.
8) Support typeless and weak ksym in light skeleton, from Kumar.
9) Disallow unprivileged bpf by default, from Pawan.
10) BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG support, from Yonghong.
11) Various bpftool cleanups, from Quentin.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (181 commits)
libbpf: Deprecate AF_XDP support
kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
selftests/bpf: Add a testcase for 64-bit bounds propagation issue.
bpf: Fix propagation of signed bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit.
bpf: Fix propagation of bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit and var_off.
selftests/bpf: Fix also no-alu32 strobemeta selftest
bpf: Add missing map_delete_elem method to bloom filter map
selftests/bpf: Add bloom map success test for userspace calls
bpf: Add alignment padding for "map_extra" + consolidate holes
bpf: Bloom filter map naming fixups
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for struct_ops prog
bpf: Add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose
bpf: Factor out helpers for ctx access checking
bpf: Factor out a helper to prepare trampoline for struct_ops prog
selftests, bpf: Fix broken riscv build
riscv, libbpf: Add RISC-V (RV64) support to bpf_tracing.h
tools, build: Add RISC-V to HOSTARCH parsing
riscv, bpf: Increase the maximum number of iterations
selftests, bpf: Add one test for sockmap with strparser
selftests, bpf: Fix test_txmsg_ingress_parser error
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211102013123.9005-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Now that BPF programs can be up to 1M instructions, it is not uncommon
that a program requires more than the current 16 iterations to
converge.
Bump it to 32, which is enough for selftests/bpf, and test_bpf.ko.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028161057.520552-2-bjorn@kernel.org
The bpf_jit_binary_free() function requires a non-NULL argument. When
the RISC-V BPF JIT fails to converge in NR_JIT_ITERATIONS steps,
jit_data->header will be NULL, which triggers a NULL
dereference. Avoid this by checking the argument, prior calling the
function.
Fixes: ca6cb5447c ("riscv, bpf: Factor common RISC-V JIT code")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211028125115.514587-1-bjorn@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
When a tracing BPF program attempts to read memory without using the
bpf_probe_read() helper, the verifier marks the load instruction with
the BPF_PROBE_MEM flag. Since the riscv JIT does not currently recognize
this flag it falls back to the interpreter.
Add support for BPF_PROBE_MEM, by appending an exception table to the
BPF program. If the load instruction causes a data abort, the fixup
infrastructure finds the exception table and fixes up the fault, by
clearing the destination register and jumping over the faulting
instruction.
A more generic solution would add a "handler" field to the table entry,
like on x86 and s390. The same issue in ARM64 is fixed in 8008342853
("bpf, arm64: Add BPF exception tables").
Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027111822.3801679-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com
Expose the maximum amount of useable memory from the riscv JIT.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211014142554.53120-2-lmb@cloudflare.com
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.
This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.
The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.
Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We allocate Non-executable pages, then call bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()
to enable executable permission after mapping them read-only. This is
to prepare for STRICT_MODULE_RWX in following patch.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
We will drop the executable permissions of the code pages from the
mapping at allocation time soon. Move bpf_jit_alloc_exec() and
bpf_jit_free_exec() to bpf_jit_core.c so that they can be shared by
both RV64I and RV32I.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.
In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.
This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.
All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
This patch uses the RVC support and encodings from bpf_jit.h to optimize
the rv64 jit.
The optimizations work by replacing emit(rv_X(...)) with a call to a
helper function emit_X, which will emit a compressed version of the
instruction when possible, and when RVC is enabled.
The JIT continues to pass all tests in lib/test_bpf.c, and introduces
no new failures to test_verifier; both with and without RVC being enabled.
Most changes are straightforward replacements of emit(rv_X(...), ctx)
with emit_X(..., ctx), with the following exceptions bearing mention;
* Change emit_imm to sign-extend the value in "lower", since the
checks for RVC (and the instructions themselves) treat the value as
signed. Otherwise, small negative immediates will not be recognized as
encodable using an RVC instruction. For example, without this change,
emit_imm(rd, -1, ctx) would cause lower to become 4095, which is not a
6b int even though a "c.li rd, -1" instruction suffices.
* For {BPF_MOV,BPF_ADD} BPF_X, drop using addiw,addw in the 32-bit
cases since the values are zero-extended into the upper 32 bits in
the following instructions anyways, and the addition commutes with
zero-extension. (BPF_SUB BPF_X must still use subw since subtraction
does not commute with zero-extension.)
This patch avoids optimizing branches and jumps to use RVC instructions
since surrounding code often makes assumptions about the sizes of
emitted instructions. Optimizing these will require changing these
functions (e.g., emit_branch) to dynamically compute jump offsets.
The following are examples of the JITed code for the verifier selftest
"direct packet read test#3 for CGROUP_SKB OK", without and with RVC
enabled, respectively. The former uses 178 bytes, and the latter uses 112,
for a ~37% reduction in code size for this example.
Without RVC:
0: 02000813 addi a6,zero,32
4: fd010113 addi sp,sp,-48
8: 02813423 sd s0,40(sp)
c: 02913023 sd s1,32(sp)
10: 01213c23 sd s2,24(sp)
14: 01313823 sd s3,16(sp)
18: 01413423 sd s4,8(sp)
1c: 03010413 addi s0,sp,48
20: 03056683 lwu a3,48(a0)
24: 02069693 slli a3,a3,0x20
28: 0206d693 srli a3,a3,0x20
2c: 03456703 lwu a4,52(a0)
30: 02071713 slli a4,a4,0x20
34: 02075713 srli a4,a4,0x20
38: 03856483 lwu s1,56(a0)
3c: 02049493 slli s1,s1,0x20
40: 0204d493 srli s1,s1,0x20
44: 03c56903 lwu s2,60(a0)
48: 02091913 slli s2,s2,0x20
4c: 02095913 srli s2,s2,0x20
50: 04056983 lwu s3,64(a0)
54: 02099993 slli s3,s3,0x20
58: 0209d993 srli s3,s3,0x20
5c: 09056a03 lwu s4,144(a0)
60: 020a1a13 slli s4,s4,0x20
64: 020a5a13 srli s4,s4,0x20
68: 00900313 addi t1,zero,9
6c: 006a7463 bgeu s4,t1,0x74
70: 00000a13 addi s4,zero,0
74: 02d52823 sw a3,48(a0)
78: 02e52a23 sw a4,52(a0)
7c: 02952c23 sw s1,56(a0)
80: 03252e23 sw s2,60(a0)
84: 05352023 sw s3,64(a0)
88: 00000793 addi a5,zero,0
8c: 02813403 ld s0,40(sp)
90: 02013483 ld s1,32(sp)
94: 01813903 ld s2,24(sp)
98: 01013983 ld s3,16(sp)
9c: 00813a03 ld s4,8(sp)
a0: 03010113 addi sp,sp,48
a4: 00078513 addi a0,a5,0
a8: 00008067 jalr zero,0(ra)
With RVC:
0: 02000813 addi a6,zero,32
4: 7179 c.addi16sp sp,-48
6: f422 c.sdsp s0,40(sp)
8: f026 c.sdsp s1,32(sp)
a: ec4a c.sdsp s2,24(sp)
c: e84e c.sdsp s3,16(sp)
e: e452 c.sdsp s4,8(sp)
10: 1800 c.addi4spn s0,sp,48
12: 03056683 lwu a3,48(a0)
16: 1682 c.slli a3,0x20
18: 9281 c.srli a3,0x20
1a: 03456703 lwu a4,52(a0)
1e: 1702 c.slli a4,0x20
20: 9301 c.srli a4,0x20
22: 03856483 lwu s1,56(a0)
26: 1482 c.slli s1,0x20
28: 9081 c.srli s1,0x20
2a: 03c56903 lwu s2,60(a0)
2e: 1902 c.slli s2,0x20
30: 02095913 srli s2,s2,0x20
34: 04056983 lwu s3,64(a0)
38: 1982 c.slli s3,0x20
3a: 0209d993 srli s3,s3,0x20
3e: 09056a03 lwu s4,144(a0)
42: 1a02 c.slli s4,0x20
44: 020a5a13 srli s4,s4,0x20
48: 4325 c.li t1,9
4a: 006a7363 bgeu s4,t1,0x50
4e: 4a01 c.li s4,0
50: d914 c.sw a3,48(a0)
52: d958 c.sw a4,52(a0)
54: dd04 c.sw s1,56(a0)
56: 03252e23 sw s2,60(a0)
5a: 05352023 sw s3,64(a0)
5e: 4781 c.li a5,0
60: 7422 c.ldsp s0,40(sp)
62: 7482 c.ldsp s1,32(sp)
64: 6962 c.ldsp s2,24(sp)
66: 69c2 c.ldsp s3,16(sp)
68: 6a22 c.ldsp s4,8(sp)
6a: 6145 c.addi16sp sp,48
6c: 853e c.mv a0,a5
6e: 8082 c.jr ra
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200721025241.8077-4-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch adds functions for encoding and emitting compressed riscv
(RVC) instructions to the BPF JIT.
Some regular riscv instructions can be compressed into an RVC instruction
if the instruction fields meet some requirements. For example, "add rd,
rs1, rs2" can be compressed into "c.add rd, rs2" when rd == rs1.
To make using RVC encodings simpler, this patch also adds helper
functions that selectively emit either a regular instruction or a
compressed instruction if possible.
For example, emit_add will produce a "c.add" if possible and regular
"add" otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200721025241.8077-3-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch makes the necessary changes to struct rv_jit_context and to
bpf_int_jit_compile to support compressed riscv (RVC) instructions in
the BPF JIT.
It changes the JIT image to be u16 instead of u32, since RVC instructions
are 2 bytes as opposed to 4.
It also changes ctx->offset and ctx->ninsns to refer to 2-byte
instructions rather than 4-byte ones. The riscv PC is required to be
16-bit aligned with or without RVC, so this is sufficient to refer to
any valid riscv offset.
The code for computing jump offsets in bytes is updated accordingly,
and factored into a new "ninsns_rvoff" function to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200721025241.8077-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch optimizes BPF_JSET BPF_K by using a RISC-V andi instruction
when the BPF immediate fits in 12 bits, instead of first loading the
immediate to a temporary register.
Examples of generated code with and without this optimization:
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) without optimization:
20: li t1,2
24: and t1,a0,t1
28: bnez t1,0x30
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) with optimization:
20: andi t1,a0,2
24: bnez t1,0x2c
BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) without optimization:
20: li t1,2
24: mv t2,a0
28: slli t2,t2,0x20
2c: srli t2,t2,0x20
30: slli t1,t1,0x20
34: srli t1,t1,0x20
38: and t1,t2,t1
3c: bnez t1,0x44
BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) with optimization:
20: andi t1,a0,2
24: bnez t1,0x2c
In these examples, because the upper 32 bits of the sign-extended
immediate are 0, BPF_JMP BPF_JSET and BPF_JMP32 BPF_JSET are equivalent
and therefore the JIT produces identical code for them.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200506000320.28965-5-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch adds an optimization to BPF_JMP (32- and 64-bit) BPF_K for
when the BPF immediate is zero.
When the immediate is zero, the code can directly use the RISC-V zero
register instead of loading a zero immediate to a temporary register
first.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200506000320.28965-4-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch adds two optimizations for BPF_ALU BPF_END BPF_FROM_LE in
the RV64 BPF JIT.
First, it enables the verifier zero-extension optimization to avoid zero
extension when imm == 32. Second, it avoids generating code for imm ==
64, since it is equivalent to a no-op.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200506000320.28965-3-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
Commit 66d0d5a854 ("riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
added support for the verifier zero-extension optimization on RV64 and
commit 46dd3d7d28 ("bpf, riscv: Enable zext optimization for more
RV64G ALU ops") enabled it for more instruction cases.
However, BPF_LSH BPF_X and BPF_{LSH,RSH,ARSH} BPF_K are still missing
the optimization.
This patch enables the zero-extension optimization for these remaining
cases.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200506000320.28965-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch fixes issues with stackframe unwinding and alignment in the
current stack layout for BPF programs on RV32.
In the current layout, RV32 fp points to the JIT scratch registers, rather
than to the callee-saved registers. This breaks stackframe unwinding,
which expects fp to point just above the saved ra and fp registers.
This patch fixes the issue by moving the callee-saved registers to be
stored on the top of the stack, pointed to by fp. This satisfies the
assumptions of stackframe unwinding.
This patch also fixes an issue with the old layout that the stack was
not aligned to 16 bytes.
Stacktrace from JITed code using the old stack layout:
[ 12.196249 ] [<c0402200>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0x96
Stacktrace using the new stack layout:
[ 13.062888 ] [<c0402200>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0x96
[ 13.063028 ] [<c04023c6>] show_stack+0x28/0x32
[ 13.063253 ] [<a403e778>] bpf_prog_82b916b2dfa00464+0x80/0x908
[ 13.063417 ] [<c09270b2>] bpf_test_run+0x124/0x39a
[ 13.063553 ] [<c09276c0>] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x234/0x448
[ 13.063704 ] [<c048510e>] __do_sys_bpf+0x766/0x13b4
[ 13.063840 ] [<c0485d82>] sys_bpf+0xc/0x14
[ 13.063961 ] [<c04010f0>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2
The new code is also simpler to understand and includes an ASCII diagram
of the stack layout.
Tested on riscv32 QEMU virt machine.
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200430005127.2205-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch fixes an off by one error in the RV32 JIT handling for BPF
tail call. Currently, the code decrements TCC before checking if it
is less than zero. This limits the maximum number of tail calls to 32
instead of 33 as in other JITs. The fix is to instead check the old
value of TCC before decrementing.
Fixes: 5f316b65e9 ("riscv, bpf: Add RV32G eBPF JIT")
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200421002804.5118-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
The existing code in emit_call on RV64 checks that the PC-relative offset
to the function fits in 32 bits before calling emit_jump_and_link to emit
an auipc+jalr pair. However, this check is incorrect because offsets in
the range [2^31 - 2^11, 2^31 - 1] cannot be encoded using auipc+jalr on
RV64 (see discussion [1]). The RISC-V spec has recently been updated
to reflect this fact [2, 3].
This patch fixes the problem by moving the check on the offset into
emit_jump_and_link and modifying it to the correct range of encodable
offsets, which is [-2^31 - 2^11, 2^31 - 2^11). This also enforces the
check on the offset to other uses of emit_jump_and_link (e.g., BPF_JA)
as well.
Currently, this bug is unlikely to be triggered, because the memory
region from which JITed images are allocated is close enough to kernel
text for the offsets to not become too large; and because the bounds on
BPF program size are small enough. This patch prevents this problem from
becoming an issue if either of these change.
[1]: https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/bwWFhBnnZFQ
[2]: b1e42e09ac
[3]: 4c1b2066eb
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200406221604.18547-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This is an eBPF JIT for RV32G, adapted from the JIT for RV64G and
the 32-bit ARM JIT.
There are two main changes required for this to work compared to
the RV64 JIT.
First, eBPF registers are 64-bit, while RV32G registers are 32-bit.
BPF registers either map directly to 2 RISC-V registers, or reside
in stack scratch space and are saved and restored when used.
Second, many 64-bit ALU operations do not trivially map to 32-bit
operations. Operations that move bits between high and low words,
such as ADD, LSH, MUL, and others must emulate the 64-bit behavior
in terms of 32-bit instructions.
This patch also makes related changes to bpf_jit.h, such
as adding RISC-V instructions required by the RV32 JIT.
Supported features:
The RV32 JIT supports the same features and instructions as the
RV64 JIT, with the following exceptions:
- ALU64 DIV/MOD: Requires loops to implement on 32-bit hardware.
- BPF_XADD | BPF_DW: There's no 8-byte atomic instruction in RV32.
These features are also unsupported on other BPF JITs for 32-bit
architectures.
Testing:
- lib/test_bpf.c
test_bpf: Summary: 378 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [349/366 JIT'ed]
test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED
The tests that are not JITed are all due to use of 64-bit div/mod
or 64-bit xadd.
- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
Summary: 1415 PASSED, 122 SKIPPED, 43 FAILED
Tested both with and without BPF JIT hardening.
This is the same set of tests that pass using the BPF interpreter
with the JIT disabled.
Verification and synthesis:
We developed the RV32 JIT using our automated verification tool,
Serval. We have used Serval in the past to verify patches to the
RV64 JIT. We also used Serval to superoptimize the resulting code
through program synthesis.
You can find the tool and a guide to the approach and results here:
https://github.com/uw-unsat/serval-bpf/tree/rv32-jit-v5
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200305050207.4159-3-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
This patch factors out code that can be used by both the RV64 and RV32
BPF JITs to a common bpf_jit.h and bpf_jit_core.c.
Move struct definitions and macro-like functions to header. Rename
rv_sb_insn/rv_uj_insn to rv_b_insn/rv_j_insn to match the RISC-V
specification.
Move reusable functions emit_body() and bpf_int_jit_compile() to
bpf_jit_core.c with minor simplifications. Rename emit_insn() and
build_{prologue,epilogue}() to be prefixed with "bpf_jit_" as they are
no longer static.
Rename bpf_jit_comp.c to bpf_jit_comp64.c to be more explicit.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200305050207.4159-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-12-27
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 127 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 110 files changed, 6901 insertions(+), 2721 deletions(-).
There are three merge conflicts. Conflicts and resolution looks as follows:
1) Merge conflict in net/bpf/test_run.c:
There was a tree-wide cleanup c593642c8b ("treewide: Use sizeof_field() macro")
which gets in the way with b590cb5f80 ("bpf: Switch to offsetofend in
BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"):
<<<<<<< HEAD
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority) +
sizeof_field(struct __sk_buff, priority),
=======
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, priority),
>>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16
There are a few occasions that look similar to this. Always take the chunk with
offsetofend(). Note that there is one where the fields differ in here:
<<<<<<< HEAD
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp) +
sizeof_field(struct __sk_buff, tstamp),
=======
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs),
>>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16
Just take the one with offsetofend() /and/ gso_segs. Latter is correct due to
850a88cc40 ("bpf: Expose __sk_buff wire_len/gso_segs to BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN").
2) Merge conflict in arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:
(I'm keeping Bjorn in Cc here for a double-check in case I got it wrong.)
<<<<<<< HEAD
if (is_13b_check(off, insn))
return -1;
emit(rv_blt(tcc, RV_REG_ZERO, off >> 1), ctx);
=======
emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
>>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16
Result should look like:
emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, tcc, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
3) Merge conflict in arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:
<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
#define VMALLOC_SIZE (KERN_VIRT_SIZE >> 1)
#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET - 1)
#define VMALLOC_START (PAGE_OFFSET - VMALLOC_SIZE)
#define BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE (SZ_128M)
#define BPF_JIT_REGION_START (PAGE_OFFSET - BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE)
#define BPF_JIT_REGION_END (VMALLOC_END)
/*
* Roughly size the vmemmap space to be large enough to fit enough
* struct pages to map half the virtual address space. Then
* position vmemmap directly below the VMALLOC region.
*/
#define VMEMMAP_SHIFT \
(CONFIG_VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - 1 + STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT)
#define VMEMMAP_SIZE BIT(VMEMMAP_SHIFT)
#define VMEMMAP_END (VMALLOC_START - 1)
#define VMEMMAP_START (VMALLOC_START - VMEMMAP_SIZE)
#define vmemmap ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START)
>>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16
Only take the BPF_* defines from there and move them higher up in the
same file. Remove the rest from the chunk. The VMALLOC_* etc defines
got moved via 01f52e16b8 ("riscv: define vmemmap before pfn_to_page
calls"). Result:
[...]
#define __S101 PAGE_READ_EXEC
#define __S110 PAGE_SHARED_EXEC
#define __S111 PAGE_SHARED_EXEC
#define VMALLOC_SIZE (KERN_VIRT_SIZE >> 1)
#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET - 1)
#define VMALLOC_START (PAGE_OFFSET - VMALLOC_SIZE)
#define BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE (SZ_128M)
#define BPF_JIT_REGION_START (PAGE_OFFSET - BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE)
#define BPF_JIT_REGION_END (VMALLOC_END)
/*
* Roughly size the vmemmap space to be large enough to fit enough
* struct pages to map half the virtual address space. Then
* position vmemmap directly below the VMALLOC region.
*/
#define VMEMMAP_SHIFT \
(CONFIG_VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - 1 + STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT)
#define VMEMMAP_SIZE BIT(VMEMMAP_SHIFT)
#define VMEMMAP_END (VMALLOC_START - 1)
#define VMEMMAP_START (VMALLOC_START - VMEMMAP_SIZE)
[...]
Let me know if there are any other issues.
Anyway, the main changes are:
1) Extend bpftool to produce a struct (aka "skeleton") tailored and specific
to a provided BPF object file. This provides an alternative, simplified API
compared to standard libbpf interaction. Also, add libbpf extern variable
resolution for .kconfig section to import Kconfig data, from Andrii Nakryiko.
2) Add BPF dispatcher for XDP which is a mechanism to avoid indirect calls by
generating a branch funnel as discussed back in bpfconf'19 at LSF/MM. Also,
add various BPF riscv JIT improvements, from Björn Töpel.
3) Extend bpftool to allow matching BPF programs and maps by name,
from Paul Chaignon.
4) Support for replacing cgroup BPF programs attached with BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI
flag for allowing updates without service interruption, from Andrey Ignatov.
5) Cleanup and simplification of ring access functions for AF_XDP with a
bonus of 0-5% performance improvement, from Magnus Karlsson.
6) Enable BPF JITs for x86-64 and arm64 by default. Also, final version of
audit support for BPF, from Daniel Borkmann and latter with Jiri Olsa.
7) Move and extend test_select_reuseport into BPF program tests under
BPF selftests, from Jakub Sitnicki.
8) Various BPF sample improvements for xdpsock for customizing parameters
to set up and benchmark AF_XDP, from Jay Jayatheerthan.
9) Improve libbpf to provide a ulimit hint on permission denied errors.
Also change XDP sample programs to attach in driver mode by default,
from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.
10) Extend BPF test infrastructure to allow changing skb mark from tc BPF
programs, from Nikita V. Shirokov.
11) Optimize prologue code sequence in BPF arm32 JIT, from Russell King.
12) Fix xdp_redirect_cpu BPF sample to manually attach to tracepoints after
libbpf conversion, from Jesper Dangaard Brouer.
13) Minor misc improvements from various others.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
