This will allow to configure performance counters with hardware signal
indexes instead of user-readable names in an upcoming patch.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This allows to query the number of available domains, including the
number of hardware counter and the number of signals per domain.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Since a new class has been introduced to query signals, we can now
return an error when the userspace wants to monitor unknown signals.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This commit introduces the NVIF_IOCTL_NEW_V0_PERFMON class which will be
used in order to query domains, signals and sources. This separates the
querying and the counting interface.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
PDAEMON signals don't have to be exposed by the perfmon engine.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Tested on a few cards. Probably works quite well for most, given they should
all be GDDR3.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This looks surprisingly similar to scripts on earlier cards as well
but they don't seem to work just yet. That... and I don't have any, which
makes it a tough job to reverse engineer.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some of the bits in there are similar to the bits in the gt215 rammap.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Might need some generalisation to < GT200. For those: use at your own risk!
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In preparation of NV50 reclocking, where there is no version
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 1addc12648
This commit seems to cause crashes in gk104_fifo_intr_runlist() by
returning 0xbad0da00 when register 0x2a00 is read. Since this commit was
intended for GM20B which is not completely supported yet, let's revert
it for the time being.
Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
More analysis shows that this is identical to 0x79 except that it loads
the frequency indirectly from elsewhere in the VBIOS.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Opcode 0x5a is a register write for data looked up from another part of
the VBIOS image. 0x59 is a more complex opcode, but we may as well
recognize it. These occur on a single known instance of Riva TNT2
hardware.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The return type of exec_lookup() is struct nvkm_output *, so it should
return NULL rather than 0.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There is always the possiblity that the ppm->context pointer would get
partially updated and accidentally would equal ctx. This would allow two
contexts to co-exist, which is not acceptable. Moving the test to the
critical section takes care of this problem.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This fixes a crash when multiple PM engine contexts are created.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
After submitting a GO_IDLE bundle, one must wait for GR to effectively
be idle before submitting the next bundle. Failure to do so may result
in undefined behavior in some rare cases.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Kary Jin <karyj@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
When emitting the ICMD bundle, wait on the bottom half (bit 3 of the
GR_STATUS register) instead of upper half (bit 2) to make sure methods
are effectively emitted.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Kicking channels is part of their deactivation process. Maxwell chips
are particularly sensitive to this, and can start fetching the previous
pushbuffer of a recycled channel if this is not done.
While we are at it, improve the channel preemption code to only wait for
bit 20 of 0x002634 to turn to 0, as it is the bit indicating a
preempt is pending.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Increase clock timeout for SYS, FPB and GPC in order to avoid operation
failure at high gpcclk rate.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
nvbios_extend() returns 1 to indicate "extended the array" and 0 to
indicate the array is already big enough. This is used by the core
shadowing code to prevent re-fetching chunks of the image that have
already been shadowed.
The ACPI fetching code may possibly need to extend this further due
to requiring fetches to happen in 4KiB chunks.
Under certain circumstances (that happen if the total image size is
a multiple of 4KiB), the memory allocated to store the shadow will
already be big enough, causing the ACPI code's nvbios_extend() call
to return 0, which is misinterpreted as a failure.
The fix is simple, accept >= 0 as a successful condition here. The
core will have already made sure that we're not re-fetching data we
already have.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
v2 (Ben Skeggs):
- dropped hunk which would cause unnecessary re-fetching
- more descriptive explanation
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jano.vesely@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Uncertain whether the GPC pack change is due to a newer driver version,
or a legitimate difference from GM204. My GM204 has broken vram, so
can't currently try a newer binary driver on it to confirm.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Under certain circumstances the trapped address will contain subc 7,
which GK104 GR doesn't have anymore.
Notice this case to avoid causing additional priv ring faults.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
No idea if "3" is a constant or derived from something else, but the
value is unchanged in the limited traces of gm107/gm204 I have here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Make static a few functions and structures that should be.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
On some of these chipsets, reading NV_PGRAPH_GPC_GPM_PD_PES_TPC_ID_MASK
can trigger a PRI fault and return an error code instead of a TPC mask,
unless PGOB has been disabled first.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Before we moved gk110's implementation of this to pmu, the functions were
identical. This commit just switches GK208 to use the new (more complete)
implementation of the power-up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
If a memory allocation fails when using the DMA allocator,
gk20a_instobj_dtor_dma() will be called on the failed instmem object.
At this time, node->handle might not be NULL despite the call to
dma_alloc_attrs() having failed. node->cpuaddr is the right member to
check for such a failure, so use it instead.
Reported-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
