Make acpi_bus_get_parent() more straightforward and remove an
unnecessary local variable ret from it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Since acpi_bus_get_device() returns int and not acpi_status, change
acpi_match_device() so that it doesn't apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the
return value of acpi_bus_get_device().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Currently, the ACPI namespace scanning code creates platform device
objects for ACPI device nodes whose IDs match the contents of the
acpi_platform_device_ids[] table. However, this adds a superfluous
special case into acpi_bus_device_attach() and makes it more
difficult to follow than it has to be. It also will make it more
difficult to implement removal code for those platform device objects
in the future.
For the above reasons, introduce a struct acpi_scan_handler object
for creating platform devices and move the code related to that from
acpi_bus_device_attach() to the .attach() callback of that object.
Also move the acpi_platform_device_ids[] table to acpi_platform.c.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Make the ACPI PCI IRQ link driver use struct acpi_scan_handler
for representing the object used to set up ACPI interrupt links and
to remove data structures used for this purpose before unregistering
the corresponding ACPI device nodes.
This simplifies the code slightly and reduces the kernel's memory
footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver
object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory
which is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler for representing objects that
will do configuration tasks depending on ACPI device nodes'
hardware IDs (HIDs).
Currently, those tasks are done either directly by the ACPI namespace
scanning code or by ACPI device drivers designed specifically for
this purpose. None of the above is desirable, however, because
doing that directly in the namespace scanning code makes that code
overly complicated and difficult to follow and doing that in
"special" device drivers leads to a great deal of confusion about
their role and to confusing interactions with the driver core (for
example, sysfs directories are created for those drivers, but they
are completely unnecessary and only increase the kernel's memory
footprint in vain).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Make acpi_bus_scan_fixed() use device_attach() directly to attach
drivers, if any, to the fixed devices in analogy with how
acpi_bus_scan() works, which allows the last argument of
acpi_add_single_object() to be dropped and the manipulation of the
flags.match_driver bit to be moved to acpi_init_device_object()
and acpi_device_add_finalize().
After these changes all of the functions for the initialization
and registration of struct acpi_device objects work in the same
way for all of them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will
not be run in parallel for the same scope of the ACPI namespace,
which may lead to a great deal of confusion, so introduce a new mutex
to prevent that from happening.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used
by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver
through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device
object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver
.remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Since acpi_bus_trim() cannot fail, change its definition to a void
function, so that its callers don't check the return value in vain
and update the callers.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The acpiphp driver is confusing because it contains partial support for PCI
host bridge hotplug as well as support for hotplug of PCI devices.
This patch moves the host bridge hot-add support to pci_root.c and adds
hot-remove support in pci_root.c.
How to test it: if sci_emu patch is applied, find out root bus number to
ACPI root name mapping from dmesg or /sys. To remove root bus:
echo "\_SB.PCIB 3" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify
To add back root bus:
echo "\_SB.PCIB 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on
new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop
in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for
diagnostics purposes.
For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power
resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use
attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power
resource.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Make it possible to retrieve the current power state of a device with
ACPI power management from user space via sysfs by adding two new
attributes, power_state and real_power_state, to the sysfs directory
associated with the struct acpi_device object representing the
device's ACPI node.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ACPI core adds sysfs device files after the given devices have been
registered with device_register(), which is not appropriate, because
it may lead to race conditions with user space tools using those
files.
Fix the problem by delaying the KOBJ_ADD uevent for ACPI devices
until after all of the devices' sysfs files have been created.
This also fixes a use-after-free in acpi_device_unregister().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Intel Lynxpoint LPSS peripheral drivers depend on LPSS clock tree being
created in order to function properly. The clock tree is exposed as a
platform driver that binds to a device named 'clk-lpt'.
To support this we modify the acpi_create_platform_device() to take one
additional parameter called flags. This is passed from
acpi_platform_device_ids[] array when acpi_create_platform_device() is
called.
We then introduce a new flag ACPI_PLATFORM_CLK which is used to tell
acpi_create_platform_device() to create the platform clocks as well.
Finally we set the ACPI_PLATFORM_CLK flags for all the Lynxpoint LPSS
devices and make sure that when this flag is set we create the
corresponding clock tree platform device.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Core System Resources Table (CSRT) is a proprietary ACPI table that
contains resources for certain devices that are not found in the DSDT
table. Typically a shared DMA controller might be found here.
This patch adds support for this table. We go through all entries in the
table and make platform devices of them. The resources from the table are
passed with the platform device.
There is one special resource in the table and it is the DMA request line
base and number of request lines. This information might be needed by the
DMA controller driver as it needs to map the ACPI DMA request line number
to the actual request line understood by the hardware. This range is passed
as IORESOURCE_DMA resource.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.
For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest
system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be
"on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power
resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to
signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from
sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes
of their wakeup power resources.
Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the
deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given
device can wake up the system from.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory
allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some
cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power
resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example.
Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code
so that power resource initialization errors are treated more
seriously.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two
different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power
resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason
why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce
a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data
returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the
namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power
states power resources.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The local variables in acpi_bus_get_power_flags() need not be
initialized upfront, so change the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To reduce indentation level and improve code readability, move the
initialization code related to device power states from
acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to a new routine,
acpi_bus_init_power_state().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.
Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.
Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of
devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for
power resources used for wakeup).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only
thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources
that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be
achieved in a different way.
Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add
acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all
registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones
that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the
namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as
soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI
device nodes using them for power management).
For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation
of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device
hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects
actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it
doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks
in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether
or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all).
Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are
initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that
also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them
with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine,
acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent
power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code
in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and
registering objects that represent power resources.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Simplify the code preparing struct acpi_device objects for
registration by removing useless code, moving different pieces of
code into the functions they belong to and making a couple of int
functions always returning 0 void.
This also fixes a possible memory leak in ACPI device registration
error code path by making acpi_device_register() detach data from
device->handle if device_register() fails and prepares the scanning
code for special-casing ACPI power resources (next patch).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device
to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI
core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then
it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required
by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on.
Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices
depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they
should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0
state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices
the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices
depend on what power resources.
For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a
new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used
internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code
from kernel subsystems using ACPI.
For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be
resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into
D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in
the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage
such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new
functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and
get the device pointer again later.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make acpi_bus_trim() work in analogy with acpi_bus_scan() and carry
out two passes such that ACPI drivers will be detached from device
nodes being removed in the first pass and the device nodes themselves
will be removed in the second pass.
For this purpose split the driver unregistration out of
acpi_bus_remove() into a new routine, acpi_bus_device_detach(), that
will be executed by acpi_bus_trim() in the additional first pass as
a post-order callback.
This is necessary, because some ACPI drivers' .remove() routines
unregister struct device objects associated with the ACPI device
nodes being removed and that needs to happen while the ACPI
device nodes are still around (for example, in case they need to be
used for power management or similar things at that time).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really
straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using
acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order
callback.
Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot
actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be
NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(),
so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove()
and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under
start->handle as a post-order callback. The, run it directly for
start->handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument
of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim()
to always behave as though it were 1.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister(), type, which is
not used by that function.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Since device_attach() returns 1 on success (a driver has been bound
to the device), the check against its return value in
acpi_bus_device_attach() should modified to take that into accout.
Make it so.
[rjw: Subject and changelog.]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 805d410 (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
to power resources as soon as they were created. As a result,
ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
objects before they are ready to use.
To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER. This fix has been verified to work on
HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
At one point acpi_device_set_id() checks if acpi_device_hid(device)
returns NULL, but that never happens, so system bus devices with an
empty list of PNP IDs are given the dummy HID ("device") instead of
the "system bus HID" ("LNXSYBUS"). Fix the code to use the right
check.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Drop the .bind() and .unbind() that have no more users from
struct acpi_device_ops and remove all of the code referring to
them from drivers/acpi/scan.c.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).
For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is
no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START
add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be
replaced with a single flag. Do that calling the flag match_driver.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more,
so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).
Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.
For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it. Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().
Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.
This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
If acpi_bus_check_add() is called for a handle already having an
existing struct acpi_device object attached, it is not necessary to
check the type and status of the device correspondig to it, so
change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not
used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining
members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't
make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same
time. Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type,
enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC,
ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to
both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and
acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set,
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass
information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning
code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways. It turns out that that
is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing
the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly
possible.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The current ACPI namespace scanning code suggests that acpi_bus_add()
and acpi_bus_start() share some code. In fact, however, they are
completely different code paths (except for the initial checks), so
refactor the code to make that distinction visibly clear.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys
initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the
ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge
driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run
before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects
to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in
the ACPI namespace.
The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the
situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug,
in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present.
The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev
objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and
these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other
ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope. For example, devices
created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be
added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges. For this
purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those
bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are
registered.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Split the ACPI namespace scanning for devices into two passes, such
that struct acpi_device objects are registerd in the first pass
without probing ACPI drivers and the drivers are probed against them
directly in the second pass.
There are two main reasons for doing that.
First, the ACPI PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine,
acpi_pci_root_add(), causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for
all PCI devices under the given root bridge. Usually, there are
corresponding ACPI device nodes in the ACPI namespace for some of
those devices and therefore there should be "companion" struct
acpi_device objects to attach those struct pci_dev objects to. These
struct acpi_device objects should exist when the corresponding
struct pci_dev objects are created, but that is only guaranteed
during boot and not during hotplug. This leads to a number of
functional differences between the boot and the hotplug cases which
are not strictly necessary and make the code more complicated.
For example, this forces the ACPI PCI root bridge driver to defer the
registration of the just created struct pci_dev objects and to use a
special .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), to make
sure that all of the "companion" struct acpi_device objects will be
present at PCI devices registration time during hotplug.
If those differences can be eliminated, we will be able to
consolidate the boot and hotplug code paths for the enumeration and
registration of PCI devices and to reduce the complexity of that
code quite a bit.
The second reason is that, in general, it should be possible to
resolve conflicts of resources assigned by the BIOS to different
devices represented by ACPI namespace nodes before any drivers bind
to them and before they are attached to "companion" objects
representing physical devices (such as struct pci_dev). However, for
this purpose we first need to enumerate all ACPI device nodes in the
given namespace scope.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
* acpi-general:
pnpacpi: fix incorrect TEST_ALPHA() test
ACPI / video: ignore BIOS initial backlight value for HP Folio 13-2000
ACPI : do not use Lid and Sleep button for S5 wakeup
All devices behind Haswell LPSS (Low Power Subsystem) should be represented
as platform devices so add them to the acpi_platform_device_ids list.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled.
But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off.
A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability for S5.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-general: (38 commits)
ACPI / thermal: _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx dependency fix
ACPI: drop unnecessary local variable from acpi_system_write_wakeup_device()
ACPI: Fix logging when no pci_irq is allocated
ACPI: Update Dock hotplug error messages
ACPI: Update Container hotplug error messages
ACPI: Update Memory hotplug error messages
ACPI: Update CPU hotplug error messages
ACPI: Add acpi_handle_<level>() interfaces
ACPI: remove use of __devexit
ACPI / PM: Add Sony Vaio VPCEB1S1E to nonvs blacklist.
ACPI / battery: Correct battery capacity values on Thinkpads
Revert "ACPI / x86: Add quirk for "CheckPoint P-20-00" to not use bridge _CRS_ info"
ACPI: create _SUN sysfs file
ACPI / memhotplug: bind the memory device when the driver is being loaded
ACPI / memhotplug: don't allow to eject the memory device if it is being used
ACPI / memhotplug: free memory device if acpi_memory_enable_device() failed
ACPI / memhotplug: fix memory leak when memory device is unbound from acpi_memhotplug
ACPI / memhotplug: deal with eject request in hotplug queue
ACPI / memory-hotplug: add memory offline code to acpi_memory_device_remove()
ACPI / memory-hotplug: call acpi_bus_trim() to remove memory device
...
Conflicts:
include/linux/acpi.h (two additions at the end of the same file)
* acpica: (26 commits)
ACPICA: Update version to 20121018
ACPICA: AcpiGetObjectInfo: Add support for ACPI 5 _SUB method
ACPICA: Update for 64-bit generation of recent error message changes
ACPICA: Fix externalize name to complete migration to ACPI_MOVE_NAME
ACPICA: Add starting offset parameter to common dump buffer routine
ACPICA: Deploy ACPI_MOVE_NAME across ACPICA source base
ACPICA: Update support for ACPI 5 MPST table
ACPICA: Enhance error reporting for invalid opcodes and bad ACPI_NAMEs
ACPICA: Add ACPI_MOVE_NAME macro to optimize 4-byte ACPI_NAME copies
ACPICA: AcpiExec: Improve algorithm for tracking memory leaks
ACPICA: Add debug print message for mutex objects that are force-released
ACPICA: Resource Mgr: Small fix for buffer size calculation
ACPICA: Remove extra spaces after periods in the Intel license
ACPICA: Remove extra spaces after periods within comments
ACPICA: Update local C library module comments for ASCII table
ACPICA: Fix for predefined name loop during ACPICA initialization
ACPICA: Fix some typos in comments
ACPICA: ACPICA core: Cleanup empty lines at file start and end
ACPICA: Audit/update for ACPICA return macros and debug depth counter
ACPICA: Fix unmerged acmacros.h divergences.
...
Add the generic ACPI SDHCI device ID to acpi_platform_device_ids[]
to make the ACPI core create a platform device object for the ACPI
device node of that ID.
[rjw: Added the changelog.]
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently we have valid flag to represent if this ACPI device power
state is valid. A device power state is valid does not necessarily
mean we, as OSPM, has a mean to put the device into that power state,
e.g. D3 cold is always a valid power state for any ACPI device, but if
there is no _PS3 or _PRx for this device, we can't really put that
device into D3 cold power state. The same is true for D0 power state.
So here comes the os_accessible flag, which is only set if the device
has provided us the required means to put it into that power state,
e.g. if we have _PS3 or _PRx, we can put the device into D3 cold state
and thus, D3 cold power state's os_accessible flag will be set in this
case.
And a new wrapper inline function is added to be used to check if
firmware has provided us a way to power off the device during runtime.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To avoid adding an ACPI handle pointer to struct device on
architectures that don't use ACPI, or generally when CONFIG_ACPI is
not set, in which cases that pointer is useless, define struct
acpi_dev_node that will contain the handle pointer if CONFIG_ACPI is
set and will be empty otherwise and use it to represent the ACPI
device node field in struct device.
In addition to that define macros for reading and setting the ACPI
handle of a device that don't generate code when CONFIG_ACPI is
unset. Modify the ACPI subsystem to use those macros instead of
referring to the given device's ACPI handle directly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
_SUN method provides the slot unique-ID in the ACPI namespace. And The value
is written in Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification as
follows:
"The _SUN value is required to be unique among the slots ofthe same type.
It is also recommended that this number match the slot number printed on
the physical slot whenever possible."
So if we can know the value, we can identify the physical position of the
slot in the system.
The patch creates "sun" file in sysfs for identifying physical position
of the slot.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are conflicts in the "acpi_device_id*" definitions between the
Linux and the ACPICA. The definitions of acpi_device_id* in ACPICA
have been changed to the "acpi_pnp_device_id*". This patch changes
the corresponding "acpica_device_id*" definitiions in the Linux.
This patch will not affect the generated vmlinx binary.
This will decrease 298 lines of 20120913 divergence.diff.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With ACPI 5 it is now possible to enumerate traditional SoC
peripherals, like serial bus controllers and slave devices behind
them. These devices are typically based on IP-blocks used in many
existing SoC platforms and platform drivers for them may already
be present in the kernel tree.
To make driver "porting" more straightforward, add ACPI support to
the platform bus type. Instead of writing ACPI "glue" drivers for
the existing platform drivers, register the platform bus type with
ACPI to create platform device objects for the drivers and bind the
corresponding ACPI handles to those platform devices.
This should allow us to reuse the existing platform drivers for the
devices in question with the minimum amount of modifications.
This changeset is based on Mika Westerberg's and Mathias Nyman's
work.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Introduce function acpi_match_device() allowing callers to match
struct device objects with populated acpi_handle fields against
arrays of ACPI device IDs. Also introduce function
acpi_driver_match_device() using acpi_match_device() internally and
allowing callers to match a struct device object against an array of
ACPI device IDs provided by a device driver.
Additionally, introduce macro ACPI_PTR() that may be used by device
drivers to escape pointers to data structures whose definitions
depend on CONFIG_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Exported acpi_os_hotplug_execute() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
so that they can be called from modules for hot-remove operations.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI devices are glued with physical devices through _ADR object, ACPI
enumerated devices are identified with _UID object. Currently we can
observe _HID/_CID through sysfs interfaces (hid/modalias), but there's
no way for us to check _ADR/_UID from user space. This patch closes
this gap for ACPI developers and users.
[rjw: Modified the subject and changelog slightly.]
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The _UID object is optional, but is required when the device has no
other way to report a persistent unique device ID.
This patch is required for ACPI 5.0 ACPI enumerated IP cores.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Removed lockable in struct acpi_device_flags since it is no
longer used by any code. acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() cannot
use this flag because acpi_bus_trim() frees up its acpi_device
object. Furthermore, the dock driver calls _LCK method without
using this lockable flag.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
During hot-remove, acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() calls ACPI _LCK
method when device->flags.lockable is set. However, this device
pointer is stale since the target acpi_device object has been
already kfree'd by acpi_bus_trim().
The flags.lockable indicates whether or not this ACPI object
implements _LCK method. Fix the stable pointer access by replacing
it with acpi_get_handle() to check if _LCK is implemented.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add support to export the device description obtained from the ACPI _STR
method, if one exists for a device, to user-space via a sysfs interface.
This new interface provides a standard and platform neutral way for users
to obtain the description text stored in the ACPI _STR method. If no
_STR method exists for the device, no sysfs 'description' file will be
created. The 'description' file will be located in the /sys/devices/
directory using the device's path.
/sys/device/<bus>/<bridge path>/<device path>.../firmware_node/description
Example:
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00.07.0/0000:0e:00.0/firmware_node/description
It can also be located using the ACPI device path, for example:
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:00/PNP0A08:00/device:13/device:15/description
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:00/ACPI0004:01/ACPI0007:02/description
Execute the 'cat' command on the 'description' file to obtain the
description string for that device.
This patch also includes documentation describing how the new sysfs
interface works
Changes from v1-v2 based on comments by Len Brown and Fengguang Wu
* Removed output "No Description" and leaving a NULL attribute if the
_STR method failed to evaluate.
* In acpi_device_remove_files() removed the redundent check of
dev->pnp.str_obj before calling free. This check triggered a message
from smatch.
Signed-off-by: Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
A USB port's position and connectability can't be identified on some boards
via USB hub registers. ACPI _UPC and _PLD can help to resolve this issue
and so it is necessary to bind USB with ACPI. This patch is to allow ACPI
binding with USB-3.0 hub.
Current ACPI only can bind one struct-device to one ACPI device node.
This can not work with USB-3.0 hub, because the USB-3.0 hub has two logical
devices. Each works for USB-2.0 and USB-3.0 devices. In the Linux USB subsystem,
those two logical hubs are treated as two seperate devices that have two struct
devices. But in the ACPI DSDT, these two logical hubs share one ACPI device
node. So there is a requirement to bind multi struct-devices to one ACPI
device node. This patch is to resolve such problem.
Following is the ACPI device nodes' description under xhci hcd.
Device (XHC)
Device (RHUB)
Device (HSP1)
Device (HSP2)
Device (HSP3)
Device (HSP4)
Device (SSP1)
Device (SSP2)
Device (SSP3)
Device (SSP4)
Topology in the Linux
device XHC
USB-2.0 logical hub USB-3.0 logical hub
HSP1 SSP1
HSP2 SSP2
HSP3 SSP3
HSP4 SSP4
This patch also modifies the output of /proc/acpi/wakeup. One ACPI node
can be associated with multiple devices:
XHC S4 *enabled pci:0000:00:14.0
RHUB S0 disabled usb:usb1
disabled usb:usb2
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Pull ACPI & power management update from Len Brown:
"Re-write of the turbostat tool.
lower overhead was necessary for measuring very large system when
they are very idle.
IVB support in intel_idle
It's what I run on my IVB, others should be able to also:-)
ACPICA core update
We have found some bugs due to divergence between Linux and the
upstream ACPICA base. Most of these patches are to reduce that
divergence to reduce the risk of future bugs.
Some cpuidle updates, mostly for non-Intel
More will be coming, as they depend on this part.
Some thermal management changes needed by non-ACPI systems.
Some _OST (OS Status Indication) updates for hot ACPI hot-plug."
* 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux: (51 commits)
Thermal: Documentation update
Thermal: Add Hysteresis attributes
Thermal: Make Thermal trip points writeable
ACPI/AC: prevent OOPS on some boxes due to missing check power_supply_register() return value check
tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue
tools/power: turbostat v2 - re-write for efficiency
ACPICA: Update to version 20120711
ACPICA: AcpiSrc: Fix some translation issues for Linux conversion
ACPICA: Update header files copyrights to 2012
ACPICA: Add new ACPI table load/unload external interfaces
ACPICA: Split file: tbxface.c -> tbxfload.c
ACPICA: Add PCC address space to space ID decode function
ACPICA: Fix some comment fields
ACPICA: Table manager: deploy new firmware error/warning interfaces
ACPICA: Add new interfaces for BIOS(firmware) errors and warnings
ACPICA: Split exception code utilities to a new file, utexcep.c
ACPI: acpi_pad: tune round_robin_time
ACPICA: Update to version 20120620
ACPICA: Add support for implicit notify on multiple devices
ACPICA: Update comments; no functional change
...
Since the ACPI bus type's PM callbacks only execute the driver ones
without doing anything else, they can be dropped, because the driver
callbacks will be executed by the PM core directly if bus type
(or other subsystem) callbacks are not present.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Since all ACPI drivers in the tree should have been switched
to power management handling based on struct dev_pm_ops,
modify the ACPI bus type driver so that is doesn't execute
legacy driver power management callbacks from the functions
pointed to by the members of the acpi_bus_pm structure.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Modify acpi_bus_type so that it executes PM callbacks provided
by drivers through their struct dev_pm_ops objects, if present,
while still allowing the legacy ACPI PM callbacks to take precedence.
This will make it possible to convert ACPI drivers one by one to
handling PM through struct dev_pm_ops instead of the legacy way.
The code added by this change is temporary and will be removed
when all of the drivers in question have been switched over to
the PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Make the acpi_bus_type bus type define its PM callbacks through
a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks
in struct bus_type.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
None of the drivers implementing the ACPI device suspend callback
uses the pm_message_t argument of it, so this argument may be dropped
entirely from that callback. This will simplify switching the ACPI
bus type to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Changed acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() to support _OST. This function is
also changed to global so that it can be called from hotplug notify
handlers to perform hot-remove operation.
Changed acpi_eject_store(), which is the sysfs eject handler. It checks
eject_pending to see if the request was originated from ACPI eject
notification. If not, it calls _OST(0x103,84,) per Figure 6-37 in ACPI
5.0 spec.
Added eject_pending bit to acpi_device_flags. This bit is set when the
kernel has received an ACPI eject notification, but does not initiate
its hot-remove operation by itself.
Added struct acpi_eject_event. This structure is used to pass extended
information to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which has a single argument
to support asynchronous call
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
When the system is woken up by the ACPI fixed power button, currently there
is no way of userspace becoming aware that the power button was pressed.
OLPC would like to know this, so that we can respond appropriately.
For example, if the system was woken up by a network packet, we know
we can go back to sleep very quickly. But if the user explicitly woke the
system with the power button, we're going to want to stay awake for a
while.
The wakeup count mechanism seems like a good fit for communicating this.
Mark the fixed power button as wakeup-enabled, and increment its wakeup
counter when the system is woken with the power button. (The wakeup counter
is also incremented when the power button is pressed during system
operation; this is already handled by an existing acpi-button codepath).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Commit 1cc0c998fd ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a
bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of
acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work
as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument.
First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to
__acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold
state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which
doesn't exist.
Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method
to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in
__acpi_bus_set_power(). Also make sure that the explicit_set flag
for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify
acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for
ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist.
Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the
target state, the function will request a transition to
ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3. However,
ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML
method is defined for the given device, which is rare. This causes
problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put
into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work
now. In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned
off as a result.
To fix this issue restore the old behavior of
acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to
ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or
PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument.
This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not
be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state,
but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to
restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a
better solution in the future.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228
Reported-by: rocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com>
Reported-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Peter <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Before this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 incorrectly referenced D3hot
in some places, but D3cold in other places.
After this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
and all references to D3hot use ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT.
ACPI's _PR3 method is used to enter both D3hot and D3cold states.
What distinguishes D3hot from D3cold is the presence _PR3
(Power Resources for D3hot) If these resources are all ON,
then the state is D3hot. If _PR3 is not present,
or all _PR0 resources for the devices are OFF,
then the state is D3cold.
This patch applies after Linux-3.4-rc1.
A future syntax cleanup may remove ACPI_STATE_D3
to emphasize that it always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/sleep.c
This was a text conflict between
a2ef5c4fd4
(ACPI: Move module parameter gts and bfs to sleep.c)
which added #include <linux/module.h>
and
b24e509885
(ACPI, PCI: Move acpi_dev_run_wake() to ACPI core)
which added #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
The resolution was to take them both.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
If a device has _PR3, it means the device supports D3_COLD.
Add the ability to validate and enter D3_COLD state in ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Use kstrdup rather than duplicating its implementation
The semantic patch that makes this output is available
in scripts/coccinelle/api/kstrdup.cocci.
More information about semantic patching is available at
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
There is at least one BIOS with a DSDT containing a power resource
object with a _PR0 entry pointing back to that power resource. In
consequence, while registering that power resource
acpi_bus_get_power_flags() sees that it depends on itself and tries
to register it again, which leads to an infinitely deep recurrence.
This problem was introduced by commit bf325f9538
(ACPI / PM: Register power resource devices as soon as they are
needed).
To fix this problem use the observation that power resources cannot
be power manageable and prevent acpi_bus_get_power_flags() from
being called for power resource objects.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31872
Reported-and-tested-by: Pascal Dormeau <pdormeau@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it
really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
threads for the same device.
Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is
only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is
present for the given device. That information is only used by
acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call
acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped
if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags().
Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0,
so it really should be void.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Before evaluating _PRW for devices that are reported as inactive or
not present by their _STA control methods we should check if those
methods are actually present (otherwise the evaulation of _PRW will
obviously fail and a scary message will be printed unnecessarily).
Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Reported-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Depending on the organization of the ACPI namespace, power resource
device objects may generally be scanned after the "regular" device
objects that they are referred from through _PRn. This, in turn, may
cause acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to attempt to access them through
acpi_bus_init_power() before they are registered (and initialized by
acpi_power_driver). [This is not a theoretical issue, it actually
happens for one PnP device on my testbed HP nx6325.]
To fix this problem, make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() attempt to
register power resource devices as soon as they have been found in
the _PRn output for any other devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI device driver used for handling power resources,
acpi_power_driver, creates a struct acpi_power_resource object for
each ACPI device representing a power resource. These objects are
then used when setting and reading the power states of devices using
the corresponding power resources. Unfortunately, acpi_power_driver
is registered after acpi_scan_init() that may add devices using the
power resources before acpi_power_driver has a chance to create
struct acpi_power_resource objects for them (specifically, the power
resources may be referred to during the scanning process through
acpi_bus_get_power() before they have been initialized).
As the first step towards fixing this issue, move the registration
of acpi_power_driver into acpi_scan_init() so that power resource
devices can be initialized by it as soon as they have been found in
the namespace.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Add function acpi_bus_init_power() for getting the initial power
state of an ACPI device and reference counting its power resources
as appropriate.
Make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() use the new function instead of
acpi_bus_get_power() that updates device->power.state without
reference counting the device's power resources.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This feature provides an automatic device notification for wake devices
when a wakeup GPE occurs and there is no corresponding GPE method or
handler. Rather than ignoring such a GPE, an implicit AML Notify
operation is performed on the parent device object.
This feature is not part of the ACPI specification and is provided for
Windows compatibility only.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
