The current behavior of 'tracex7' doesn't consist with other bpf samples
tracex{1..6}. Other samples do not require any argument to run with, but
tracex7 should be run with btrfs device argument. (it should be executed
with test_override_return.sh)
Currently, tracex7 doesn't have any description about how to run this
program and raises an unexpected error. And this result might be
confusing since users might not have a hunch about how to run this
program.
// Current behavior
# ./tracex7
sh: 1: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")
// Fixed behavior
# ./tracex7
ERROR: Run with the btrfs device argument!
In order to fix this error, this commit adds logic to report a message
and exit when running this program with a missing argument.
Additionally in test_override_return.sh, there is a problem with
multiple directory(tmpmnt) creation. So in this commit adds a line with
removing the directory with every execution.
Signed-off-by: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210727041056.23455-1-claudiajkang@gmail.com
Currently, the kprobe BPF program attachment method for bpf_load is
quite old. The implementation of bpf_load "directly" controls and
manages(create, delete) the kprobe events of DEBUGFS. On the other hand,
using using the libbpf automatically manages the kprobe event.
(under bpf_link interface)
By calling bpf_program__attach(_kprobe) in libbpf, the corresponding
kprobe is created and the BPF program will be attached to this kprobe.
To remove this, by simply invoking bpf_link__destroy will clean up the
event.
This commit refactors kprobe tracing programs (tracex{1~7}_user.c) with
libbpf using bpf_link interface and bpf_program__attach.
tracex2_kern.c, which tracks system calls (sys_*), has been modified to
append prefix depending on architecture.
Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200516040608.1377876-3-danieltimlee@gmail.com
There are two files in the tree called libbpf.h which is becoming
problematic. Most samples don't actually need the local libbpf.h
they simply include it to get to bpf/bpf.h. Include bpf/bpf.h
directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This adds a basic test for bpf_override_return to verify it works. We
override the main function for mounting a btrfs fs so it'll return
-ENOMEM and then make sure that trying to mount a btrfs fs will fail.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
