commit b6069a9570 (filter: add MOD operation) added generic
support for modulus operation in BPF.
This patch brings JIT support for x86_64
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: George Bakos <gbakos@alpinista.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit ffe06c17af (filter: add XOR operation) added generic support
for XOR operation.
This patch implements the XOR instruction in x86 jit.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Now the helper function from filter.c for negative offsets is exported,
it can be used it in the jit to handle negative offsets.
First modify the asm load helper functions to handle:
- know positive offsets
- know negative offsets
- any offset
then the compiler can be modified to explicitly use these helper
when appropriate.
This fixes the case of a negative X register and allows to lift
the restriction that bpf programs with negative offsets can't
be jited.
Signed-of-by: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When K >= 0xFFFF0000, AND needs the two least significant bytes of K as
its operand, but EMIT2() gives it the least significant byte of K and
0x2. EMIT() should be used here to replace EMIT2().
Signed-off-by: Feiran Zhuang <zhuangfeiran@ict.ac.cn>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Matt Evans spotted that x86 bpf_jit was incorrectly handling negative
constant offsets in BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH instruction.
We need to abort JIT compilation like we do in common_load so that
filter uses the interpreter code and can call __load_pointer()
Reference: http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2011/07/19/11
Thanks to Indan Zupancic to bring back this issue.
Reported-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Reported-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Several problems fixed in this patch :
1) Target of the conditional jump in case a divide by 0 is performed
by a bpf is wrong.
2) Must 'generate' the full function prologue/epilogue at pass=0,
or else we can stop too early in pass=1 if the proglen doesnt change.
(if the increase of prologue/epilogue equals decrease of all
instructions length because some jumps are converted to near jumps)
3) Change the wrong length detection at the end of code generation to
issue a more explicit message, no need for a full stack trace.
Reported-by: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
x86 jump instruction size is 2 or 5 bytes (near/long jump), not 2 or 6
bytes.
In case a conditional jump is followed by a long jump, conditional jump
target is one byte past the start of target instruction.
Signed-off-by: Markus Kötter <nepenthesdev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
