Steffen Klassert says:
====================
pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2018-10-01
1) Make xfrmi_get_link_net() static to silence a sparse warning.
From Wei Yongjun.
2) Remove a unused esph pointer definition in esp_input().
From Haishuang Yan.
3) Allow the NIC driver to quietly refuse xfrm offload
in case it does not support it, the SA is created
without offload in this case.
From Shannon Nelson.
Please pull or let me know if there are problems.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
(the parameters in question are mark and flow_flags)
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
(the parameters in question are mark and flow_flags)
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fixes the following sparse warning:
net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c:745:12: warning:
symbol 'xfrmi_get_link_net' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: f203b76d78 ("xfrm: Add virtual xfrm interfaces")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c:692:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
Fixes: 44e2b838c2 ("xfrm: Return detailed errors from xfrmi_newlink")
CC: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com>
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Currently all failure modes of xfrm interface creation return EEXIST.
This change improves the granularity of errnos provided by also
returning ENODEV or EINVAL if failures happen in looking up the
underlying interface, or a required parameter is not provided.
This change has been tested against the Android Kernel Networking Tests,
with additional xfrmi_newlink tests here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/tests/+/715755
Signed-off-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
In order to remove performance impact of having the extra u32 in every
single flowi, this change removes the flowi_xfrm struct, prefering to
take the if_id as a method parameter where needed.
In the inbound direction, if_id is only needed during the
__xfrm_check_policy() function, and the if_id can be determined at that
point based on the skb. As such, xfrmi_decode_session() is only called
with the skb in __xfrm_check_policy().
In the outbound direction, the only place where if_id is needed is the
xfrm_lookup() call in xfrmi_xmit2(). With this change, the if_id is
directly passed into the xfrm_lookup_with_ifid() call. All existing
callers can still call xfrm_lookup(), which uses a default if_id of 0.
This change does not change any behavior of XFRMIs except for improving
overall system performance via flowi size reduction.
This change has been tested against the Android Kernel Networking Tests:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/tests/+/master/net/test
Signed-off-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This patch adds support for virtual xfrm interfaces.
Packets that are routed through such an interface
are guaranteed to be IPsec transformed or dropped.
It is a generic virtual interface that ensures IPsec
transformation, no need to know what happens behind
the interface. This means that we can tunnel IPv4 and
IPv6 through the same interface and support all xfrm
modes (tunnel, transport and beet) on it.
Co-developed-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com>
Tested-by: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>
Reviewed-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>
