According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, move the SPDX
License Identifier to the very top of the file. I used C++ comment
style not only for the SPDX line but for the entire block because
this seems Linus' preference [1]. I also dropped the parentheses to
follow the examples in that document.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/133
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and fix the wrongly
stated X11 to MIT.
The X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a
couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the
current DT files claim.
[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
[2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
This is used as a base board for reference core modules.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
