In commit 82e896d992 ("docs: net: page_pool: use kdoc to avoid
duplicating the information") I shied away from using the DOC:
comments when moving to kdoc for documenting page_pool API,
because I wasn't sure how familiar people are with it.
Turns out there is already a DOC: comment for the intro, which
is the same in both places, modulo what looks like minor rewording.
Use the version from Documentation/ but keep the contents with
the code.
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807210051.1014580-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
On x86_64, frag_* fields of struct page_pool are scattered across two
cachelines despite the summary size of 24 bytes. All three fields are
used in pretty much the same places, but the last field, ::frag_users,
is pushed out to the next CL, provoking unwanted false-sharing on
hotpath (frags allocation code).
There are some holes and cold members to move around. Move frag_* one
block up, placing them right after &page_pool_params perfectly at the
beginning of CL2. This doesn't do any meaningful to the second block, as
those are some destroy-path cold structures, and doesn't do anything to
::alloc_stats, which still starts at 200-byte offset, 8 bytes after CL3
(still fitting into 1 cacheline).
On my setup, this yields 1-2% of Mpps when using PP frags actively.
When it comes to 32-bit architectures with 32-byte CL: &page_pool_params
plus ::pad is 44 bytes, the block taken care of is 16 bytes within one
CL, so there should be at least no regressions from the actual change.
::pages_state_hold_cnt is not related directly to that triple, but is
paired currently with ::frags_offset and decoupling them would mean
either two 4-byte holes or more invasive layout changes.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804180529.2483231-4-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Currently, touching <net/page_pool/types.h> triggers a rebuild of more
than half of the kernel. That's because it's included in
<linux/skbuff.h>. And each new include to page_pool/types.h adds more
[useless] data for the toolchain to process per each source file from
that pile.
In commit 6a5bcd84e8 ("page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB
recycling"), Matteo included it to be able to call a couple of functions
defined there. Then, in commit 57f05bc2ab ("page_pool: keep pp info as
long as page pool owns the page") one of the calls was removed, so only
one was left. It's the call to page_pool_return_skb_page() in
napi_frag_unref(). The function is external and doesn't have any
dependencies. Having very niche page_pool_types.h included only for that
looks like an overkill.
As %PP_SIGNATURE is not local to page_pool.c (was only in the
early submissions), nothing holds this function there. Teleport
page_pool_return_skb_page() to skbuff.c, just next to the main consumer,
skb_pp_recycle(), and rename it to napi_pp_put_page(), as it doesn't
work with skbs at all and the former name tells nothing. The #if guards
here are only to not compile and have it in the vmlinux when not needed
-- both call sites are already guarded.
Now, touching page_pool_types.h only triggers rebuilding of the drivers
using it and a couple of core networking files.
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> # make skbuff.h less heavy
Suggested-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com> # move to skbuff.c
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804180529.2483231-3-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Split types and pure function declarations from page_pool.h
and add them in page_page/types.h, so that C sources can
include page_pool.h and headers should generally only include
page_pool/types.h as suggested by jakub.
Rename page_pool.h to page_pool/helpers.h to have both in
one place.
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804180529.2483231-2-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com
[Jakub: change microsoft/mana, fix kdoc paths in Documentation]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
