Some later changes in cpufreq core require these tables to be sorted
based on ascending order of their frequencies. There was only one
offender. Fix it and add comments over the arrays.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
checking for section mismatches:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x195e0): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c2410_plls_add() to the function .init.text:s3c_plltab_register()
The function s3c2410_plls_add() references
the function __init s3c_plltab_register().
This is often because s3c2410_plls_add lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of s3c_plltab_register is wrong.
This removes the __init annotation from s3c2410_plls_add as well as the
__initdata section annotations from s3c2440_plls_12 and s3c2440_plls_169344,
which in turn are referenced from s3c2410_plls_add.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an
index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful
for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes.
Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the
assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake.
Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its
users are updated accordingly.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch moves mach-s3c2440/pll into mach-s3c24xx/
and removes arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/ directory in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
