Commit 7175e131eb ("fs: dlm: fix invalid derefence of sb_lvbptr")
fixes an issue when the lkb->lkb_lvbptr set to an dangled pointer and an
followed memcpy() would fail. It was fixed by an additional check of
DLM_LKF_VALBLK flag. The mentioned commit forgot to add an additional check
if DLM_LKF_VALBLK is set for the additional amount of LVB data allocated
in a dlm message. This patch is changing the message allocation to check
additionally if DLM_LKF_VALBLK is set otherwise a dangled lkb->lkb_lvbptr
pointer would allocated zero LVB message data which not gets filled with
actual data.
This patch is however only a cleanup to reduce the amount of zero bytes
transmitted over network as receive_lvb() will only evaluates message LVB
data if DLM_LKF_VALBLK is set.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch moves lkb_sbflags handling to atomic bits ops. This should
prepare for a possible manipulating of lkb_sbflags flags at the same
time by concurrent execution.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch moves the rsb hash table handling to atomic flag operations.
The flag operations for DLM_RTF_SHRINK are protected by
ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].lock. However we switch to atomic ops if new possible
flags will be used in a different way and don't assume such lock
dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will move the lkb_flags value to the recently introduced
lkb_iflags value. For lkb_iflags we use atomic bit operations because
some flags like DLM_IFL_CB_PENDING are used while non rsb lock is held
to avoid issues with other flag manipulations which might run at the
same time we switch to atomic bit operations. Snapshot the bit values to
an uint32_t value is only used for debugging/logging use cases and don't
need to be 100% correct.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Currently manipulating lkb_dflags assumes to held the rsb lock assigned
to the lkb. This is held by dlm message processing after certain
time to lookup the right rsb from the received lkb message id. For user
space locks flags, which is currently the only use case for lkb_dflags,
flags are also being set during dlm character device handling without
holding the rsb lock. To minimize the risk that bit operations are
getting corrupted we switch to atomic bit operations. This patch will
also introduce helpers to snapshot atomic bit values in an non atomic
way. There might be still issues with the flag handling e.g. running in
case of manipulating bit ops and snapshot them at the same time, but this
patch minimize them and will start to use atomic bit operations.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch stores lkb distributed flags value in an separate value
instead of sharing internal and distributed flags in lkb->lkb_flags value.
This has the advantage to not mask/write back flag values in
receive_flags() functionality. The dlm debug_fs does not provide the
distributed flags anymore, those can be added in future.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The DLM_IFL_LOCAL_MS flag is an internal non shared flag but used in
m_flags of dlm messages. It is not shared because it is only used for
local messaging. Instead using DLM_IFL_LOCAL_MS in dlm messages we pass a
parameter around to signal local messaging or not. This patch is adding
the local parameter to signal local messaging.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch renames DLM_IFL_STUB_MS to DLM_IFL_LOCAL_MS flag. The
DLM_IFL_STUB_MS flag is somewhat misnamed, it means the dlm message is
used for local message transfer only. It is used by recovery to resolve
lock states if a node got fenced.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch removes code parts which was declared deprecated by
commit 6b0afc0cc3 ("fs: dlm: don't use deprecated timeout features by
default"). This contains the following dlm functionality:
- start a cancel of a dlm request did not complete after certain timeout:
The current way how dlm cancellation works and interfering with other
dlm requests triggered by the user can end in an overlapping and
returning in -EBUSY. The most user don't handle this case and are
unaware that DLM can return such errno in such situation. Due the
timeout the user are mostly unaware when this happens.
- start a netlink warning messages for user space if dlm requests did
not complete after certain timeout:
This feature was never being built in the only known dlm user space side.
As we are to remove the timeout cancellation feature we can directly
remove this feature as well.
There might be the possibility to bring the timeout cancellation feature
back. However the current way of handling the -EBUSY case which is only
a software limitation and not a hardware limitation should be changed.
We minimize the current code base in DLM cancellation feature to not have
to deal with those existing features while solving the DLM cancellation
feature in general.
UAPI define DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN is commented as deprecated and reserved
value. We should avoid at first to give it a new meaning but let
possible users still compile by keeping this define. In far future we
can give this flag a new meaning. The same for the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT lock
request flag.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch removes the ls_remove_wait waitqueue handling. The current
handling tries to wait before a lookup is send out for a identically
resource name which is going to be removed. Hereby the remove message
should be send out before the new lookup message. The reason is that
after a lookup request and response will actually use the specific
remote rsb. A followed remove message would delete the rsb on the remote
side but it's still being used.
To reach a similar behaviour we simple send the remove message out while
the rsb lookup lock is held and the rsb is removed from the toss list.
Other find_rsb() calls would never have the change to get a rsb back to
live while a remove message will be send out (without holding the lock).
This behaviour requires a non-sleepable context which should be provided
now and might be the reason why it was not implemented so in the first
place.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch allows to give the use control about the allocation context
based on a per message basis. Currently all messages forced to be
created under GFP_NOFS context.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will introducde a queue implementation for callbacks by using
the Linux lists. The current callback queue handling is implemented by a
static limit of 6 entries, see DLM_CALLBACKS_SIZE. The sequence number
inside the callback structure was used to see if the entries inside the
static entry is valid or not. We don't need any sequence numbers anymore
with a dynamic datastructure with grows and shrinks during runtime to
offer such functionality.
We assume that every callback will be delivered to the DLM user if once
queued. Therefore the callback flag DLM_CB_SKIP was dropped and the
check for skipping bast was moved before worker handling and not skip
while the callback worker executes. This will reduce unnecessary queues
of the callback worker.
All last callback saves are pointers now and don't need to copied over.
There is a reference counter for callback structures which will care
about to free the callback structures at the right time if they are not
referenced anymore.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
There is no need to use a mutex in those hot path sections. We change it
to spin lock to serve callbacks more faster by not allowing schedule.
The locked sections will not be locked for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds tracepoints for send and recv cases of dlm messages and
dlm rcom messages. In case of send and dlm message we add the dlm rsb
resource name this dlm messages belongs to. This has the advantage to
follow dlm messages on a per lock basis. In case of recv message the
resource name can be extracted by follow the send message sequence
number.
The dlm message DLM_MSG_PURGE doesn't belong to a lock request and will
not set the resource name in a dlm_message trace. The same for all rcom
messages.
There is additional handling required for this debugging functionality
which is tried to be small as possible. Also the midcomms layer gets
aware of lock resource names, for now this is required to make a
connection between sequence number and lock resource names. It is for
debugging purpose only.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch removes the send repeat remove handling. This handling is
there to repeatingly DLM_MSG_REMOVE messages in cases the dlm stack
thinks it was not received at the first time. In cases of message drops
this functionality is necessary, but since the DLM midcomms layer
guarantees there are no messages drops between cluster nodes this
feature became not strict necessary anymore. Due message
delays/processing it could be that two send_repeat_remove() are sent out
while the other should be still on it's way. We remove the repeat remove
handling because we are sure that the message cannot be dropped due
communication errors.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch fixes a possible use after free if tracing for the specific
event is enabled. To avoid the use after free we introduce a out_put
label like all other user lock specific requests and safe in a boolean
to do a put or not which depends on the execution path of
dlm_user_request().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7a3de7324c ("fs: dlm: trace user space callbacks")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The resource name parameter should never be changed by DLM so we declare
it as const. At some point it is handled as a char pointer, a resource
name can be a non printable ascii string as well. This patch change it
to handle it as void pointer as it is offered by DLM API.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds trace callbacks for user locks. Unfortenately user locks
are handled in a different way than kernel locks in some cases. User
locks never call the dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() kernel API and use the next
step internal API of dlm. Adding those traces from user API callers
should make it possible for dlm trace system to see lock handling for
user locks as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch changes the ls_clear_proc_locks to a spinlock because there
is no need to handle it as a mutex as there is no sleepable context when
ls_clear_proc_locks is held. This allows us to call those functionality
in non-sleepable contexts.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Currently we handle in dlm_receive_buffer() everything else than a
DLM_MSG type as DLM_RCOM message. Although a different message than
DLM_MSG should be a DLM_RCOM we should explicit check on DLM_RCOM and
drop a log_error() if we see something unexpected.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
I experience issues when putting a lkbsb on the stack and have sb_lvbptr
field to a dangled pointer while not using DLM_LKF_VALBLK. It will crash
with the following kernel message, the dangled pointer is here
0xdeadbeef as example:
[ 102.749317] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000deadbeef
[ 102.749320] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 102.749323] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 102.749325] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 102.749332] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 102.749336] CPU: 0 PID: 1567 Comm: lock_torture_wr Tainted: G W 5.19.0-rc3+ #1565
[ 102.749343] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.16.0-2.module+el8.7.0+15506+033991b0 04/01/2014
[ 102.749344] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10
[ 102.749353] Code: cc cc cc cc eb 1e 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 48 c1 e9 03 83 e2 07 f3 48 a5 89 d1 f3 a4 c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 <f3> a4 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 83 fa 20 72 7e 40 38 fe
[ 102.749355] RSP: 0018:ffff97a58145fd08 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 102.749358] RAX: ffff901778b77070 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000040
[ 102.749360] RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 00000000deadbeef RDI: ffff901778b77070
[ 102.749362] RBP: ffff97a58145fd10 R08: ffff901760b67a70 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 102.749364] R10: ffff9017008e2cb8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff901760b67a70
[ 102.749366] R13: ffff901760b78f00 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 102.749368] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff901876e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 102.749372] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 102.749374] CR2: 00000000deadbeef CR3: 000000017c49a004 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
[ 102.749376] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 102.749378] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 102.749379] PKRU: 55555554
[ 102.749381] Call Trace:
[ 102.749382] <TASK>
[ 102.749383] ? send_args+0xb2/0xd0
[ 102.749389] send_common+0xb7/0xd0
[ 102.749395] _unlock_lock+0x2c/0x90
[ 102.749400] unlock_lock.isra.56+0x62/0xa0
[ 102.749405] dlm_unlock+0x21e/0x330
[ 102.749411] ? lock_torture_stats+0x80/0x80 [dlm_locktorture]
[ 102.749416] torture_unlock+0x5a/0x90 [dlm_locktorture]
[ 102.749419] ? preempt_count_sub+0xba/0x100
[ 102.749427] lock_torture_writer+0xbd/0x150 [dlm_locktorture]
[ 102.786186] kthread+0x10a/0x130
[ 102.786581] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 102.787156] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 102.787588] </TASK>
[ 102.787855] Modules linked in: dlm_locktorture torture rpcsec_gss_krb5 intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support kvm vmw_vsock_virtio_transport qxl irqbypass vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common drm_ttm_helper crc32_pclmul joydev crc32c_intel ttm vsock virtio_scsi virtio_balloon snd_pcm drm_kms_helper virtio_console snd_timer snd drm soundcore syscopyarea i2c_i801 sysfillrect sysimgblt i2c_smbus pcspkr fb_sys_fops lpc_ich serio_raw
[ 102.792536] CR2: 00000000deadbeef
[ 102.792930] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This patch fixes the issue by checking also on DLM_LKF_VALBLK on exflags
is set when copying the lvbptr array instead of if it's just null which
fixes for me the issue.
I think this patch can fix other dlm users as well, depending how they
handle the init, freeing memory handling of sb_lvbptr and don't set
DLM_LKF_VALBLK for some dlm_lock() calls. It might a there could be a
hidden issue all the time. However with checking on DLM_LKF_VALBLK the
user always need to provide a sb_lvbptr non-null value. There might be
more intelligent handling between per ls lvblen, DLM_LKF_VALBLK and
non-null to report the user the way how DLM API is used is wrong but can
be added for later, this will only fix the current behaviour.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
If the user generates -EINVAL it's probably because they are
using DLM incorrectly. Change the log level to make these
errors more visible.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Avoid hard-coded function names inside message format strings.
(Prevents checkpatch warnings.)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch checks for -EBUSY conditions in dlm_unlock() before
checking for -EINVAL conditions (except for CANCEL and
FORCEUNLOCK calls where a busy condition is expected.)
There are no problems with the current ordering of checks,
but this makes dlm_unlock() consistent with dlm_lock(), and
may avoid future problems if other checks are added.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
During lock arg validation, first check for -EBUSY cases, then for
-EINVAL cases. The -EINVAL checks look at lkb state variables
which are not stable when an lkb is busy and would cause an
-EBUSY result, e.g. lkb->lkb_grmode.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The unhold_lkb() function decrements the lock's kref, and
asserts that the ref count was not the final one. Use the
kref_put release function (which should not be called) to
call the assert, rather than doing the assert based on the
kref_put return value. Using kill_lkb() as the release
function doesn't make sense if we only want to assert.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will disable use of deprecated timeout features if
CONFIG_DLM_DEPRECATED_API is not set. The deprecated features
will be removed in upcoming kernel release v6.2.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Remove the unused timeout parameter from dlm_user_adopt_orphan().
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch removes warning messages that could be logged when
remote requests had been waiting on a reply message for some timeout
period (which could be set through configfs, but was rarely enabled.)
The improved midcomms layer now carefully tracks all messages and
replies, and logs much more useful messages if there is an actual
problem.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds the resource name to dlm tracepoints. The name
usually comes through the lkb_resource, but in some cases a resource
may not yet be associated with an lkb, in which case the name and
namelen parameters are used.
It should be okay to access the lkb_resource and the res_name field at
the time when the tracepoint is invoked. The resource is assigned to a
lkb and it's reference is being held during the tracepoint call. During
this time the resource cannot be freed. Also a lkb will never switch
its assigned resource. The name of a dlm_rsb is assigned at creation
time and should never be changed during runtime as well.
The TP_printk() call uses always a hexadecimal string array
representation for the resource name (which is not necessarily ascii.)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will optimize __put_lkb() by using kref_put_lock(). The
function kref_put_lock() will only take the lock if the reference is
going to be zero, if not the lock will never be held.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will optimize put_rsb() by using kref_put_lock(). The
function kref_put_lock() will only take the lock if the reference is
going to be zero, if not the lock will never be held.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch removes unnecessary error assigns to 0 at places we know that
error is zero because it was checked on non-zero before.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
We always call hold_lkb(lkb) if we increment lkb->lkb_wait_count.
So, we always need to call unhold_lkb(lkb) if we decrement
lkb->lkb_wait_count. This patch will add missing unhold_lkb(lkb) if we
decrement lkb->lkb_wait_count. In case of setting lkb->lkb_wait_count to
zero we need to countdown until reaching zero and call unhold_lkb(lkb).
The waiters list unhold_lkb(lkb) can be removed because it's done for
the last lkb_wait_count decrement iteration as it's done in
_remove_from_waiters().
This issue was discovered by a dlm gfs2 test case which use excessively
dlm_unlock(LKF_CANCEL) feature. Probably the lkb->lkb_wait_count value
never reached above 1 if this feature isn't used and so it was not
discovered before.
The testcase ended in a rsb on the rsb keep data structure with a
refcount of 1 but no lkb was associated with it, which is itself
an invalid behaviour. A side effect of that was a condition in which
the dlm was sending remove messages in a looping behaviour. With this
patch that has not been reproduced.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
In preparation to limit the scope of a list iterator to the list
traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Before, the code implicitly used the head when no element was found
when using &pos->list. Since the new variable is only set if an
element was found, the list_add() is performed within the loop
and only done after the loop if it is done on the list head directly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch unsets ls_remove_len and ls_remove_name if a message
allocation of a remove messages fails. In this case we never send a
remove message out but set the per ls ls_remove_len ls_remove_name
variable for a pending remove. Unset those variable should indicate
possible waiters in wait_pending_remove() that no pending remove is
going on at this moment.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch move the wake_up() call at the point when a remove message
completed. Before it was only when a remove message was going to be
sent. The possible waiter in wait_pending_remove() waits until a remove
is done if the resource name matches with the per ls variable
ls->ls_remove_name. If this is the case we must wait until a pending
remove is done which is indicated if DLM_WAIT_PENDING_COND() returns
false which will always be the case when ls_remove_len and
ls_remove_name are unset to indicate that a remove is not going on
anymore.
Fixes: 21d9ac1a53 ("fs: dlm: use event based wait for pending remove")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will remove the following warning by sparse:
fs/dlm/lock.c:1049:9: warning: context imbalance in 'dlm_master_lookup' - different lock contexts for basic block
I tried to find any issues with the current handling and I did not find
any. However it is hard to follow the lock handling in this area of
dlm_master_lookup() and I suppose that sparse cannot realize that there
are no issues. The variable "toss_list" makes it really hard to follow
the lock handling because if it's set the rsb lock/refcount isn't held
but the ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].lock is held and this is one reason why the rsb
lock/refcount does not need to be held. If it's not set the
ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].lock is not held but the rsb lock/refcount is held. The
indicator of toss_list will be used to store the actual lock state.
Another possibility is that a retry can happen and then it's hard to
follow the specific code part. I did not find any issues but sparse
cannot realize that there are no issues.
To make it more easier to understand for developers and sparse as well,
we remove the toss_list variable which indicates a specific lock state
and move handling in between of this lock state in a separate function.
This function can be called now in case when the initial lock states are
taken which was previously signalled if toss_list was set or not. The
advantage here is that we can release all locks/refcounts in mostly the
same code block as it was taken.
Afterwards sparse had no issues to figure out that there are no problems
with the current lock behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch cleanups a not necessary label found which can be replaced by
a proper else handling to jump over a specific code block.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch changes to use __le types directly in the dlm message
structure which is casted at the right dlm message buffer positions.
The main goal what is reached here is to remove sparse warnings
regarding to host to little byte order conversion or vice versa. Leaving
those sparse issues ignored and always do it in out/in functionality
tends to leave it unknown in which byte order the variable is being
handled.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch changes to use __le types directly in the dlm rcom
structure which is casted at the right dlm message buffer positions.
The main goal what is reached here is to remove sparse warnings
regarding to host to little byte order conversion or vice versa. Leaving
those sparse issues ignored and always do it in out/in functionality
tends to leave it unknown in which byte order the variable is being
handled.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch changes to use __le types directly in the dlm header
structure which is casted at the right dlm message buffer positions.
The main goal what is reached here is to remove sparse warnings
regarding to host to little byte order conversion or vice versa. Leaving
those sparse issues ignored and always do it in out/in functionality
tends to leave it unknown in which byte order the variable is being
handled.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds a additional check if lkb->lkb_wait_count is non zero as
it is done in validate_unlock_args() to check if any operation is in
progress. While on it add a comment taken from validate_unlock_args() to
signal what the check is doing.
There might be no changes because if lkb->lkb_wait_type is non zero
implies that lkb->lkb_wait_count is non zero. However we should add the
check as it does validate_unlock_args().
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch will use an event based waitqueue to wait for a possible clash
with the ls_remove_name field of dlm_ls instead of doing busy waiting.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the following crash by receiving a invalid message:
[ 160.672220] ==================================================================
[ 160.676206] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.679659] Read of size 8 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task kworker/u32:13/319
[ 160.681447]
[ 160.681824] CPU: 10 PID: 319 Comm: kworker/u32:13 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #399
[ 160.683472] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.14.0-1.module+el8.6.0+12648+6ede71a5 04/01/2014
[ 160.685574] Workqueue: dlm_recv process_recv_sockets
[ 160.686721] Call Trace:
[ 160.687310] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
[ 160.688169] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.689116] kasan_report.cold.14+0x116/0x11b
[ 160.690138] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.690832] dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.691502] _receive_unlock_reply+0x103/0x170
[ 160.692241] _receive_message+0x11df/0x1ec0
[ 160.692926] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
[ 160.693700] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
[ 160.694427] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400
[ 160.695058] ? do_purge.isra.51+0x200/0x200
[ 160.695744] ? lock_acquired+0x360/0x5d0
[ 160.696400] ? lock_contended+0x6a0/0x6a0
[ 160.697055] ? lock_release+0x21d/0x5e0
[ 160.697686] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110
[ 160.698352] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110
[ 160.699026] ? ___might_sleep+0x1cc/0x1e0
[ 160.699698] ? dlm_wait_requestqueue+0x94/0x140
[ 160.700451] ? dlm_process_requestqueue+0x240/0x240
[ 160.701249] ? down_write_killable+0x2b0/0x2b0
[ 160.701988] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa2/0x130
[ 160.702690] dlm_receive_buffer+0x1a5/0x210
[ 160.703385] dlm_process_incoming_buffer+0x726/0x9f0
[ 160.704210] receive_from_sock+0x1c0/0x3b0
[ 160.704886] ? dlm_tcp_shutdown+0x30/0x30
[ 160.705561] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400
[ 160.706197] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
[ 160.706941] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
[ 160.707681] process_recv_sockets+0x32/0x40
[ 160.708366] process_one_work+0x55e/0xad0
[ 160.709045] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x110/0x110
[ 160.709820] worker_thread+0x65/0x5e0
[ 160.710423] ? process_one_work+0xad0/0xad0
[ 160.711087] kthread+0x1ed/0x220
[ 160.711628] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80
[ 160.712314] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
The issue is that we received a DLM message for a user lock but the
destination lock is a kernel lock. Note that the address which is trying
to derefence is 00000000deadbeef, which is in a kernel lock
lkb->lkb_astparam, this field should never be derefenced by the DLM
kernel stack. In case of a user lock lkb->lkb_astparam is lkb->lkb_ua
(memory is shared by a union field). The struct lkb_ua will be handled
by the DLM kernel stack but on a kernel lock it will contain invalid
data and ends in most likely crashing the kernel.
It can be reproduced with two cluster nodes.
node 2:
dlm_tool join test
echo "862 fooobaar 1 2 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_locks
echo "862 3 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_waiters
node 1:
dlm_tool join test
python:
foo = DLM(h_cmd=3, o_nextcmd=1, h_nodeid=1, h_lockspace=0x77222027, \
m_type=7, m_flags=0x1, m_remid=0x862, m_result=0xFFFEFFFE)
newFile = open("/sys/kernel/debug/dlm/comms/2/rawmsg", "wb")
newFile.write(bytes(foo))
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds functionality to put a lkb to the waiters state. It can
be useful to combine this feature with the "rawmsg" debugfs
functionality. It will bring the DLM lkb into a state that a message
will be parsed by the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds functionality to add an lkb during runtime. This is a
highly debugging feature only, wrong input can crash the kernel. It is a
early state feature as well. The goal is to provide a user interface for
manipulate dlm state and combine it with the rawmsg feature. It is
debugfs functionality, we don't care about UAPI breakage. Even it's
possible to add lkb's/rsb's which could never be exists in such wat by
using normal DLM operation. The user of this interface always need to
think before using this feature, not every crash which happens can really
occur during normal dlm operation.
Future there should be more functionality to add a more realistic lkb
which reflects normal DLM state inside the kernel. For now this is
enough.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds functionality to add a lkb with a specific id range.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce
tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their
complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback.
The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is
because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the
end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To
work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there
could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the
start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality
if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further
it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks
immediately so we must have such functionality.
I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be
used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the
struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change
it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and
callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash
value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple
lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality,
e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
