When cross-compiling the bpf sample map_perf_test for aarch64, I find that
__NR_getpgrp is undefined. This causes build errors. This syscall is deprecated
and requires defining __ARCH_WANT_SYSCALL_DEPRECATED. To avoid having to define
that, just use a different syscall (getppid) for the array map stress test.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Create a new case to test the LRU lookup performance.
At the beginning, the LRU map is fully loaded (i.e. the number of keys
is equal to map->max_entries). The lookup is done through key 0
to num_map_entries and then repeats from 0 again.
This patch also creates an anonymous struct to properly
name the test params in stress_lru_hmap_alloc() in map_perf_test_kern.c.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch makes the needed changes to allow each process of
the INNER_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC test to provide its numa node id
when creating the lru map.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch adds a map-in-map LRU example.
If we know only a subset of cores will use the
LRU, we can allocate a common LRU list per targeting core
and store it into an array-of-hashs.
It allows using the common LRU map with map-update performance
comparable to the BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU map but without wasting memory
on the unused cores that we know they will never access the LRU map.
BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU:
> map_perf_test 32 8 10000000 10000000 | awk '{sum += $3}END{print sum}'
9234314 (9.23M/s)
map-in-map LRU:
> map_perf_test 512 8 1260000 80000000 | awk '{sum += $3}END{print sum}'
9962743 (9.96M/s)
Notes that the max_entries for the map-in-map LRU test is 1260000 which
is the max_entries for each inner LRU map. 8 processes have been
started, so 8 * 1260000 = 10080000 (~10M) which is close to what is
used in the BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU test.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
One more LRU test will be added later in this patch series.
In this patch, we first move all existing LRU map tests into
a single syscall (connect) first so that the future new
LRU test can be added without hunting another syscall.
One of the map name is also changed from percpu_lru_hash_map
to nocommon_lru_hash_map to avoid the confusion with percpu_hash_map.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
$ map_perf_test 128
speed of HASH bpf_map_lookup_elem() in lookups per second
w/o JIT w/JIT
before 46M 58M
after 42M 74M
perf report
before:
54.23% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __htab_map_lookup_elem
14.24% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lookup_elem_raw
8.84% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] htab_map_lookup_elem
5.93% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_map_lookup_elem
2.30% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2
1.49% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler
after:
60.03% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __htab_map_lookup_elem
18.07% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lookup_elem_raw
2.91% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2
1.94% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _einittext
1.90% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __audit_syscall_exit
1.72% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler
Notice that bpf_map_lookup_elem() and htab_map_lookup_elem() are trivial
functions, yet they take sizeable amount of cpu time.
htab_map_gen_lookup() removes bpf_map_lookup_elem() and converts
htab_map_lookup_elem() into three BPF insns which causing cpu time
for bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2() slightly increase.
$ map_perf_test 256
speed of ARRAY bpf_map_lookup_elem() in lookups per second
w/o JIT w/JIT
before 97M 174M
after 64M 280M
before:
37.33% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] array_map_lookup_elem
13.95% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_map_lookup_elem
6.54% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2
4.57% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler
after:
32.86% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bpf_prog_da4fc6a3f41761a2
6.54% map_perf_test [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kprobe_ftrace_handler
array_map_gen_lookup() removes calls to array_map_lookup_elem()
and bpf_map_lookup_elem() and replaces them with 7 bpf insns.
The performance without JIT is slower, since executing extra insns
in the interpreter is slower than running native C code,
but with JIT the performance gains are obvious,
since native C->x86 code is replaced with fewer bpf->x86 instructions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Extend the map_perf_test_{user,kern}.c infrastructure to stress test
lpm-trie lookups. We hook into the kprobe on sys_gettid() and measure
the latency depending on trie size and lookup count.
On my Intel Haswell i7-6400U, a single gettid() syscall with an empty
bpf program takes roughly 6.5us on my system. Lookups in empty tries
take ~1.8us on first try, ~0.9us on retries. Lookups in tries with 8192
entries take ~7.1us (on the first _and_ any subsequent try).
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch has some unit tests and a test_lru_dist.
The test_lru_dist reads in the numeric keys from a file.
The files used here are generated by a modified fio-genzipf tool
originated from the fio test suit. The sample data file can be
found here: https://github.com/iamkafai/bpf-lru
The zipf.* data files have 100k numeric keys and the key is also
ranged from 1 to 100k.
The test_lru_dist outputs the number of unique keys (nr_unique).
F.e. The following means, 61239 of them is unique out of 100k keys.
nr_misses means it cannot be found in the LRU map, so nr_misses
must be >= nr_unique. test_lru_dist also simulates a perfect LRU
map as a comparison:
[root@arch-fb-vm1 ~]# ~/devshare/fb-kernel/linux/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist \
/root/zipf.100k.a1_01.out 4000 1
...
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x0):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000) nr_misses:31603(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000 nr_misses:34328(/100000)
....
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x2):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000) nr_misses:31710(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:23093(/100000 nr_misses:34328(/100000)
[root@arch-fb-vm1 ~]# ~/devshare/fb-kernel/linux/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist \
/root/zipf.100k.a0_01.out 40000 1
...
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x0):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000) nr_misses:67054(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000 nr_misses:66993(/100000)
...
test_parallel_lru_dist (map_type:9 map_flags:0x2):
task:0 BPF LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000) nr_misses:67068(/100000)
task:0 Perfect LRU: nr_unique:61239(/100000 nr_misses:66993(/100000)
LRU map has also been added to map_perf_test:
/* Global LRU */
[root@kerneltest003.31.prn1 ~]# for i in 1 4 8; do echo -n "$i cpus: "; \
./map_perf_test 16 $i | awk '{r += $3}END{print r " updates"}'; done
1 cpus: 2934082 updates
4 cpus: 7391434 updates
8 cpus: 6500576 updates
/* Percpu LRU */
[root@kerneltest003.31.prn1 ~]# for i in 1 4 8; do echo -n "$i cpus: "; \
./map_perf_test 32 $i | awk '{r += $3}END{print r " updates"}'; done
1 cpus: 2896553 updates
4 cpus: 9766395 updates
8 cpus: 17460553 updates
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
performance tests for hash map and per-cpu hash map
with and without pre-allocation
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
