The openat2 test suite fails on ARM64 because the definition of
O_LARGEFILE is different on ARM64. Fix the problem by defining
the correct O_LARGEFILE definition on ARM64.
"openat2 unexpectedly returned # 3['.../tools/testing/selftests/openat2']
with 208000 (!= 208000)
not ok 102 openat2 with incompatible flags (O_PATH | O_LARGEFILE) fails
with -22 (Invalid argument)"
Fixed change log to improve formatting and clarity:
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Now that we reject conflicting RESOLVE_ flags, add a selftest to avoid
regressions.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027235044.5240-3-cyphar@cyphar.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Test all of the various openat2(2) flags. A small stress-test of a
symlink-rename attack is included to show that the protections against
".."-based attacks are sufficient.
The main things these self-tests are enforcing are:
* The struct+usize ABI for openat2(2) and copy_struct_from_user() to
ensure that upgrades will be handled gracefully (in addition,
ensuring that misaligned structures are also handled correctly).
* The -EINVAL checks for openat2(2) are all correctly handled to avoid
userspace passing unknown or conflicting flag sets (most
importantly, ensuring that invalid flag combinations are checked).
* All of the RESOLVE_* semantics (including errno values) are
correctly handled with various combinations of paths and flags.
* RESOLVE_IN_ROOT correctly protects against the symlink rename(2)
attack that has been responsible for several CVEs (and likely will
be responsible for several more).
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
