Fix warnings of the form...
WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 4983 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/dax/dax12.0'
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x63/0x86
__warn+0xcb/0xf0
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5a/0x80
? kernfs_path_from_node+0x4f/0x60
sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.2+0x97/0xb0
sysfs_create_link+0x25/0x40
device_add+0x266/0x630
devm_create_dax_dev+0x2cf/0x340 [dax]
dax_pmem_probe+0x1f5/0x26e [dax_pmem]
nvdimm_bus_probe+0x71/0x120
...by reusing the namespace id for the device-dax instance name.
Now that we have decided that there will never by more than one
device-dax instance per libnvdimm-namespace parent device [1], we can
directly reuse the namepace ids. There are some possible follow-on
cleanups, but those are saved for a later patch to simplify the -stable
backport.
[1]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-December/008266.html
Fixes: 98a29c39dc ("libnvdimm, namespace: allow creation of multiple pmem...")
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: Dariusz Dokupil <dariusz.dokupil@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
We want dax capable drivers to be able to publish a set of dax
operations [1]. However, we do not want to further abuse block_devices
to advertise these operations. Instead we will attach these operations
to a dax device and add a lookup mechanism to go from block device path
to a dax device. A dax capable driver like pmem or brd is responsible
for registering a dax device, alongside a block device, and then a dax
capable filesystem is responsible for retrieving the dax device by path
name if it wants to call dax_operations.
For now, we refactor the dax pseudo-fs to be a generic facility, rather
than an implementation detail, of the device-dax use case. Where a "dax
device" is just an inode + dax infrastructure, and "Device DAX" is a
mapping service layered on top of that base 'struct dax_device'.
"Filesystem DAX" is then a mapping service that layers a filesystem on
top of that same base device. Filesystem DAX is associated with a
block_device for now, but perhaps directly to a dax device in the
future, or for new pmem-only filesystems.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/19/880
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
