In the kernel doc for the `follower_lock` member of `struct drm_panel`
there was a typo where it was called `followers_lock`. This resulted
in a warning when making "htmldocs":
./include/drm/drm_panel.h:270: warning:
Function parameter or member 'follower_lock' not described in 'drm_panel'
Fix the typo.
Fixes: de0874165b ("drm/panel: Add a way for other devices to follow panel state")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802142136.0f67b762@canb.auug.org.au
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230802074727.1.I4036706ad5e7f45e80d41b777164258e52079cd8@changeid
These days, it's fairly common to see panels that have touchscreens
attached to them. The panel and the touchscreen can somewhat be
thought of as totally separate devices and, historically, this is how
Linux has treated them. However, treating them as separate isn't
necessarily the best way to model the two devices, it was just that
there was no better way. Specifically, there is little practical
reason to have the touchscreen powered on when the panel is turned
off, but if we model the devices separately we have no way to keep the
two devices' power states in sync with each other.
The issue described above makes it sound as if the problem here is
just about efficiency. We're wasting power keeping the touchscreen
powered up when the screen is off. While that's true, the problem can
go deeper. Specifically, hardware designers see that there's no reason
to have the touchscreen on while the screen is off and then build
hardware assuming that software would never turn the touchscreen on
while the screen is off.
In the very simplest case of hardware designs like this, the
touchscreen and the panel share some power rails. In most cases, this
turns out not to be terrible and is, again, just a little less
efficient. Specifically if we tell Linux that the touchscreen and the
panel are using the same rails then Linux will keep the rails on when
_either_ device is turned on. That ends to work OK-ish, but now if you
turn the panel off not only will the touchscreen remain powered, but
the power rails for the panel itself won't be switched off, burning
extra power.
The above two inefficiencies are _extra_ minor when you consider the
fact that laptops rarely spend much time with the screen off. The main
use case would be when an external screen (and presumably a power
supply) is attached.
Unfortunately, it gets worse from here. On sc7180-trogdor-homestar,
for instance, the display's TCON (timing controller) sometimes crashes
if you don't power cycle it whenever you stop and restart the video
stream (like during a modeset). The touchscreen keeping the power
rails on causes real problems. One proposal in the homestar timeframe
was to move the touchscreen to an always-on rail, dedicating the main
power rail to the panel. That caused _different_ problems as talked
about in commit 557e05fa9f ("HID: i2c-hid: goodix: Stop tying the
reset line to the regulator"). The end result of all of this was to
add an extra regulator to the board, increasing cost.
Recently, Cong Yang posted a patch [1] where things are even worse.
The panel and touch controller on that system seem even more
intimately tied together and really can't be thought of separately.
To address this issue, let's start allowing devices to register
themselves as "panel followers". These devices will get called after a
panel has been powered on and before a panel is powered off. This
makes the panel the primary device in charge of the power state, which
matches how userspace uses it.
The panel follower API should be fairly straightforward to use. The
current code assumes that panel followers are using device tree and
have a "panel" property pointing to the panel to follow. More
flexibility and non-DT implementations could be added as needed.
Right now, panel followers can follow the prepare/unprepare functions.
There could be arguments made that, instead, they should follow
enable/disable. I've chosen prepare/unprepare for now since those
functions are guaranteed to power up/power down the panel and it seems
better to start the process earlier.
A bit of explaining about why this is a roll-your-own API instead of
using something more standard:
1. In standard APIs in Linux, parent devices are automatically powered
on when a child needs power. Applying that here, it would mean that
we'd force the panel on any time someone was listening to the
touchscreen. That, unfortunately, would have broken homestar's need
(if we hadn't changed the hardware, as per above) where the panel
absolutely needs to be able to power cycle itself. While one could
argue that homestar is broken hardware and we shouldn't have the
API do backflips for it, _officially_ the eDP timing guidelines
agree with homestar's needs and the panel power sequencing diagrams
show power going off. It's nice to be able to support this.
2. We could, conceibably, try to add a new flag to device_link causing
the parent to be in charge of power. Then we could at least use
normal pm_runtime APIs. This sounds great, except that we run into
problems with initial probe. As talked about in the later patch
("HID: i2c-hid: Support being a panel follower") the initial power
on of a panel follower might need to do things (like add
sub-devices) that aren't allowed in a runtime_resume function.
The above complexities explain why this API isn't using common
functions. That being said, this patch is very small and
self-contained, so if someone was later able to adapt it to using more
common APIs while solving the above issues then that could happen in
the future.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230519032316.3464732-1-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.3.Icd5f96342d2242051c754364f4bee13ef2b986d4@changeid
In a whole pile of panel drivers, we have code to make the
prepare/unprepare/enable/disable callbacks behave as no-ops if they've
already been called. It's silly to have this code duplicated
everywhere. Add it to the core instead so that we can eventually
delete it from all the drivers. Note: to get some idea of the
duplicated code, try:
git grep 'if.*>prepared' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
git grep 'if.*>enabled' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
NOTE: arguably, the right thing to do here is actually to skip this
patch and simply remove all the extra checks from the individual
drivers. Perhaps the checks were needed at some point in time in the
past but maybe they no longer are? Certainly as we continue
transitioning over to "panel_bridge" then we expect there to be much
less variety in how these calls are made. When we're called as part of
the bridge chain, things should be pretty simple. In fact, there was
some discussion in the past about these checks [1], including a
discussion about whether the checks were needed and whether the calls
ought to be refcounted. At the time, I decided not to mess with it
because it felt too risky.
Looking closer at it now, I'm fairly certain that nothing in the
existing codebase is expecting these calls to be refcounted. The only
real question is whether someone is already doing something to ensure
prepare()/unprepare() match and enabled()/disable() match. I would say
that, even if there is something else ensuring that things match,
there's enough complexity that adding an extra bool and an extra
double-check here is a good idea. Let's add a drm_warn() to let people
know that it's considered a minor error to take advantage of
drm_panel's double-checking but we'll still make things work fine.
We'll also add an entry to the official DRM todo list to remove the
now pointless check from the panels after this patch lands and,
eventually, fixup anyone who is triggering the new warning.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210416153909.v4.27.I502f2a92ddd36c3d28d014dd75e170c2d405a0a5@changeid
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.2.I59b417d4c29151cc2eff053369ec4822b606f375@changeid
Mapping to the drm_bridge flag pre_enable_prev_first,
add a new flag prepare_prev_first to drm_panel to allow
the panel driver to request that the upstream bridge should
be pre_enabled before the panel prepare.
Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221205173328.1395350-6-dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Panels usually call drm_connector_set_panel_orientation(), which is
later than drm/kms driver calling drm_dev_register(). This leads to a
WARN().
The orientation property is known earlier. For example, some panels
parse the property through device tree during probe.
Add an API to return the property from panel to drm/kms driver, so the
drivers are able to call drm_connector_set_orientation_from_panel() before
drm_dev_register().
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
[dianders: removed space before tab]
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220609072722.3488207-2-hsinyi@chromium.org
When DSC is enabled, we need to get the DSC parameters from the panel
driver, so add a dsc parameter in panel to fetch and pass DSC
configuration for DSI panels to DPU encoder, which will enable and
then configure DSC hardware blocks accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/480910/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220406094031.1027376-3-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
We'd like panels to be able to add things to debugfs underneath the
connector's directory. Let's plumb it through. A panel will be able to
put things in a "panel" directory under the connector's
directory. Note that debugfs is not ABI and so it's always possible
that the location that the panel gets for its debugfs could change in
the future.
NOTE: this currently only works if you're using a modern
architecture. Specifically the plumbing relies on _both_
drm_bridge_connector and drm_panel_bridge. If you're not using one or
both of these things then things won't be plumbed through.
As a side effect of this change, drm_bridges can also get callbacks to
put stuff underneath the connector's debugfs directory. At the moment
all bridges in the chain have their debugfs_init() called with the
connector's root directory.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220204161245.v2.2.Ib0bd5346135cbb0b63006b69b61d4c8af6484740@changeid
We were getting a depmod error:
depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: drm_kms_helper -> drm -> drm_kms_helper
It looks like the rule is that drm_kms_helper can call into drm, but
drm can't call into drm_kms_helper. That means we've got to move the
DP AUX backlight support into drm_dp_helper.
NOTE: as part of this, I didn't try to do any renames of the main
registration function. Even though it's in the drm_dp_helper, it still
feels very parallel to drm_panel_of_backlight().
Fixes: 10f7b40e4f ("drm/panel: add basic DP AUX backlight support")
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712075933.v2.1.I23eb4cc5a680341e7b3e791632a635566fa5806a@changeid
Some panels support backlight control over DP AUX channel using
VESA's standard backlight control interface.
Using new DRM eDP backlight helpers, add support to create and
register a backlight for those panels in drm_panel to simplify
the panel drivers.
The panel driver with access to "struct drm_dp_aux" can create and
register a backlight device using following code snippet in its
probe() function:
err = drm_panel_dp_aux_backlight(panel, aux);
if (err)
return err;
Then drm_panel will handle backlight_(enable|disable) calls
similar to the case when drm_panel_of_backlight() is used.
Currently, we are not supporting one feature where the source
device can combine the backlight brightness levels set through
DP AUX and the BL_PWM_DIM eDP connector pin. Since it's not
required for the basic backlight controls, it can be added later.
Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
[dianders: added blank line for warning when applying]
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1624726268-14869-2-git-send-email-rajeevny@codeaurora.org
This adds a helper function for reading the rotation (panel
orientation) from the device tree.
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200813215609.28643-2-digetx@gmail.com
These functions are now empty and no longer
useful so remove the functions and their uses.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>,
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@nxp.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> # Fixed build and a few warnings
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/9e13761020750b1ce2f1fabee23ef6e2a2942882.camel@perches.com
The function "int drm_panel_add(struct drm_panel *panel)"
always returns 0, this return value is meaningless.
Also, there is no need to check return value which calls
"drm_panel_add and", error branch code will never run.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200801120216.8488-1-bernard@vivo.com
Making this IS_REACHABLE() was still wrong, as that just determines
whether the lower-level backlight code would be reachable from the panel
driver. However, with CONFIG_DRM=y and CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=m,
the drm_panel_of_backlight is left out of drm_panel.o but the condition
tells the driver that it is there, leading to multiple link errors such as
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7701.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls043t1le01.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-seiko-43wvf1g.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ronbo-rb070d30.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-rocktech-jh057n00900.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-panasonic-vvx10f034n00.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "drm_panel_of_backlight" [drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-osd-osd101t2587-53ts.ko] undefined!
Change the condition to check for whether the function was actually part
of the drm module. This version of the patch survived a few hundred
randconfig builds, so I have a good feeling this might be the last
one for the export.
Fixes: 4a34a9dcec ("drm/drm_panel: Fix EXPORT of drm_panel_of_backlight() one more time")
Fixes: 907aa265fd ("drm/drm_panel: fix EXPORT of drm_panel_of_backlight")
Fixes: 152dbdeab1 ("drm/panel: add backlight support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200107203231.920256-1-arnd@arndb.de
The initial commit followed by the fix didn't
take into consideration the case:
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL=y
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=m
CONFIG_DRM_I915=y
where symbol devm_of_find_backlight() is not reachable from DRM subsystem.
Quick fix is to avoid drm_panel_of_backlight() from exporting in such case.
Fixes: 907aa265fd ("drm/drm_panel: fix EXPORT of drm_panel_of_backlight")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217140721.42432-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
The panel drivers used drm_panel.drm for two purposes:
1) Argument to drm_mode_duplicate()
2) drm->dev was used in error messages
The first usage is replaced with drm_connector.dev
- drm_connector is already connected to a drm_device
and we have a valid connector
The second usage is replaced with drm_panel.dev
- this makes drivers more consistent in their dev argument
used for dev_err() and friends
With these replacements there are no more uses of drm_panel.drm,
so it is removed from struct drm_panel.
With this change drm_panel_attach() and drm_panel_detach()
no longer have any use as they are empty functions.
v2:
- editorial correction in changelog (Laurent)
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Stefan Mavrodiev <stefan@olimex.com>
Cc: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@nxp.com>
Cc: "Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: Purism Kernel Team <kernel@puri.sm>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207140353.23967-8-sam@ravnborg.org
Today the bridge creates the drm_connector, but that is planned
to be moved to the display drivers.
To facilitate this, update drm_panel_funcs.get_modes() to
take drm_connector as an argument.
All panel drivers implementing get_modes() are updated.
v2:
- drop accidental change (Laurent)
- update docs for get_modes (Laurent)
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Stefan Mavrodiev <stefan@olimex.com>
Cc: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@nxp.com>
Cc: "Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: Purism Kernel Team <kernel@puri.sm>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207140353.23967-6-sam@ravnborg.org
Panels often support backlight as specified in a device tree.
Update the drm_panel infrastructure to support this to
simplify the drivers.
With this the panel driver just needs to add the following to the
probe() function:
err = drm_panel_of_backlight(panel);
if (err)
return err;
Then drm_panel will handle all the rest.
There is one caveat with the backlight support.
If drm_panel_(enable|disable) are called multiple times
in a row then backlight_(enable|disable) will be called multiple times.
The above will happen when a panel drivers unconditionally
calls drm_panel_disable() in their shutdown() function,
whan the panel is already disabled and then shutdown() is called.
Reading the backlight code it seems safe to call
the backlight_(enable|disable) several times.
v3:
- Improve comments, fix grammar (Laurent)
- Do not fail in drm_panel_of_backlight() if no DT support (Laurent)
- Log if backlight_(enable|disable) fails (Laurent)
- Improve drm_panel_of_backlight() docs
- Updated changelog with backlight analysis (triggered by Laurent)
v2:
- Drop test of CONFIG_DRM_PANEL in header-file (Laurent)
- do not enable backlight if ->enable() returns an error
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207140353.23967-3-sam@ravnborg.org
The callbacks in drm_panel_funcs are optional, so do not
return an error just because no callback is assigned.
v2:
- Document what functions in drm_panel_funcs are optional (Laurent)
- Return -EOPNOTSUPP if get_modes() is not assigned (Laurent)
(Sam: -EOPNOTSUPP seems to best error code in this situation)
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207140353.23967-2-sam@ravnborg.org
Add a type field to the drm_panel structure to report the panel type,
using DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_* macros (the values that make sense are LVDS,
eDP, DSI and DPI). This will be used to initialise the corresponding
connector type.
Update all panel drivers accordingly. The panel-simple driver only
specifies the type for the known to be LVDS panels, while all other
panels are left as unknown and will be converted on a case-by-case
basis as they all need to be carefully reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904132804.29680-2-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Instead of requiring all drivers to set the dev and funcs fields of
drm_panel manually after calling drm_panel_init(), pass the data as
arguments to the function. This simplifies the panel drivers, and will
help future refactoring when adding new arguments to drm_panel_init().
The panel drivers have been updated with the following Coccinelle
semantic patch, with manual inspection to verify that no call to
drm_panel_init() with a single argument still exists.
@@
expression panel;
expression device;
identifier ops;
@@
drm_panel_init(&panel
+ , device, &ops
);
...
(
-panel.dev = device;
-panel.funcs = &ops;
|
-panel.funcs = &ops;
-panel.dev = device;
)
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823193245.23876-3-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
There are no errors that can be reported by this function,
so drop the return code.
Fix the only bridge driver that checked the return result.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804201637.1240-14-sam@ravnborg.org
Inline comments provide better space for additional comments.
Comments was slightly edited to follow the normal style,
but no change to actual content.
Used the opportuniy to change the order in drm_panel_funcs
to follow the order they will be used by a panel.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804201637.1240-13-sam@ravnborg.org
Move inline functions from include/drm/drm_panel.h to drm_panel.c.
This is in preparation for follow-up patches that will add extra
logic to the functions.
As they are no longer static inline, EXPORT them.
v2:
- align order of functions in drm_panel.h and drm_panel.c (Laurent)
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804201637.1240-12-sam@ravnborg.org
Fix build warning if drm_panel.h is built with CONFIG_OF=n or
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL=n and included without the prerequisite err.h:
./include/drm/drm_panel.h: In function ‘of_drm_find_panel’:
./include/drm/drm_panel.h:203:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ERR_PTR’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
^~~~~~~
./include/drm/drm_panel.h:203:9: error: returning ‘int’ from a function with return type ‘struct drm_panel *’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes: 5fa8e4a221 ("drm/panel: Make of_drm_find_panel() return an ERR_PTR() instead of NULL")
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190718161507.2047-2-sam@ravnborg.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=dMl4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BackMerge v4.19-rc6 into drm-next
I have some pulls based on rc6, and I prefer to have an explicit backmerge.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 0c08754b59.
commit 0c08754b59
("drm/panel: Add device_link from panel device to DRM device")
creates a circular dependency under these circumstances:
1. The panel depends on dsi-host because it is MIPI-DSI child
device.
2. dsi-host depends on the drm parent device (connector->dev->dev)
this should be allowed.
3. drm parent dev (connector->dev->dev) depends on the panel
after this patch.
This makes the dependency circular and while it appears it
does not affect any in-tree drivers (they do not seem to have
dsi hosts depending on the same parent device) this does not
seem right.
As noted in a response from Andrzej Hajda, the intent is
likely to make the panel dependent on the DRM device
(connector->dev) not its parent. But we have no way of
doing that since the DRM device doesn't contain any
struct device on its own (arguably it should).
Revert this until a proper approach is figured out.
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180927124130.9102-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Right now, the DRM panel logic returns NULL when a panel pointing to
the passed OF node is not present in the list of registered panels.
Most drivers interpret this NULL value as -EPROBE_DEFER, but we are
about to modify the semantic of of_drm_find_panel() and let the
framework return -ENODEV when the device node we're pointing to has
a status property that is not equal to "okay" or "ok".
Let's first patch the of_drm_find_panel() implementation to return
ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER) instead of NULL and patch all callers to replace
the '!panel' check by an 'IS_ERR(panel)' one.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509130042.9435-2-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com
Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to DRM device (consumer)
when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the master
DRM driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in use. The
device_link should make sure the DRM device is unbound before the panel
driver becomes unavailable.
The device_link is removed when drm_panel_detach() is called. The
drm_panel_detach() should be called by the consumer DRM driver, not the
panel driver, otherwise both drivers are racing to delete the same link.
Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b53584fd988d045c13de22d81825395b0ae0aad7.1524727888.git.jsarha@ti.com
For drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() added in the next commit, an empty
version of of_drm_find_panel is needed for !CONFIG_DRM_PANEL.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
The argument is never modified by the function, make it const.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Write more complete kerneldoc comments for the DRM panel API and
integrate the helpers in the DRM DocBook reference.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>drm/panel: Add helper for simple panel connector
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160506140137.GA4641@ulmo.ba.sec
Many panel data sheets, additionally to typical values, list allowed
ranges for timings such as hsync/vsync lengths, porches, and the pixel
clock rate. These can be stored in a struct display_timing, to be used
by an encoder mode_fixup callback to clamp user provided timing values
or to validate workarounds for clock source limitations.
This patch adds a new drm_panel_funcs callback that returns the panel's
available display_timing entries.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Add a convenience wrapper for the struct drm_panel_funcs' .get_modes()
function so that not every driver needs to check that the panel driver
implements the function before calling it.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>
[treding: extract from larger patch, commit message]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Panels often require an initialization sequence that consists of three
steps: a) powering up the panel, b) starting transmission of video data
and c) enabling the panel (e.g. turn on backlight). This is usually
necessary to avoid visual glitches at the beginning of video data
transmission.
Similarly, the shutdown sequence is typically done in three steps as
well: a) disable the panel (e.g. turn off backlight), b) cease video
data transmission and c) power down the panel.
Currently drivers can only implement .enable() and .disable() functions,
which is not enough to implement the above sequences. This commit adds a
second pair of functions, .prepare() and .unprepare() to allow more
fine-grained control over when the above steps are performed.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>
[treding: rewrite changelog, add kerneldoc]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Add a very simple framework to register and lookup panels. Panel drivers
can initialize a DRM panel and register it with the framework, allowing
them to be retrieved and used by display drivers. Currently only support
for DPMS and obtaining panel modes is provided. However it should be
sufficient to enable a large number of panels. The framework should also
be easily extensible to support more sophisticated kinds of panels such
as DSI.
The framework hasn't been tied into the DRM core, even though it should
be easily possible to do so if that's what we want. In the current
implementation, display drivers can simple make use of it to retrieve a
panel, obtain its modes and control its DPMS mode.
Note that this is currently only tested on systems that boot from a
device tree. No glue code has been written yet for systems that use
platform data, but it should be easy to add.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
