From ff821d271415f17f1a704600420e92ebb9bfb32c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:05:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: fixup some comment typos and lengths Various typos and/or spelling errors in comments. Fixes a few > 80 char lines as well. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-mq.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 3295859f419d..b600463791ec 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ void blk_mq_add_to_requeue_list(struct request *rq, bool at_head, /* * We abuse this flag that is otherwise used by the I/O scheduler to - * request head insertation from the workqueue. + * request head insertion from the workqueue. */ BUG_ON(rq->rq_flags & RQF_SOFTBARRIER); @@ -1137,7 +1137,8 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list, if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE) { /* * If an I/O scheduler has been configured and we got a - * driver tag for the next request already, free it again. + * driver tag for the next request already, free it + * again. */ if (!list_empty(list)) { nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist); @@ -2299,8 +2300,11 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock); - /* Check to see if we're transitioning to shared (from 1 to 2 queues). */ - if (!list_empty(&set->tag_list) && !(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)) { + /* + * Check to see if we're transitioning to shared (from 1 to 2 queues). + */ + if (!list_empty(&set->tag_list) && + !(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)) { set->flags |= BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED; /* update existing queue */ blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, true); @@ -2532,10 +2536,9 @@ static void blk_mq_queue_reinit(struct request_queue *q) /* * redo blk_mq_init_cpu_queues and blk_mq_init_hw_queues. FIXME: maybe - * we should change hctx numa_node according to new topology (this - * involves free and re-allocate memory, worthy doing?) + * we should change hctx numa_node according to the new topology (this + * involves freeing and re-allocating memory, worth doing?) */ - blk_mq_map_swqueue(q); blk_mq_sysfs_register(q);