mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
sched: Strengthen buddies and mitigate buddy induced latencies
This patch restores the effectiveness of LAST_BUDDY in preventing pgsql+oltp from collapsing due to wakeup preemption. It also switches LAST_BUDDY to exclusively do what it does best, namely mitigate the effects of aggressive wakeup preemption, which improves vmark throughput markedly, and restores mysql+oltp scalability. Since buddies are about scalability, enable them beginning at the point where we begin expanding sched_latency, namely sched_nr_latency. Previously, buddies were cleared aggressively, which seriously reduced their effectiveness. Not clearing aggressively however, produces a small drop in mysql+oltp throughput immediately after peak, indicating that LAST_BUDDY is actually doing some harm. This is right at the point where X on the desktop in competition with another load wants low latency service. Ergo, do not enable until we need to scale. To mitigate latency induced by buddies, or by a task just missing wakeup preemption, check latency at tick time. Last hunk prevents buddies from stymieing BALANCE_NEWIDLE via CACHE_HOT_BUDDY. Supporting performance tests: tip = v2.6.32-rc5-1497-ga525b32 tipx = NO_GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS NEXT_BUDDY granularity knobs = 31 knobs + 31 buddies tip+x = NO_GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS granularity knobs = 31 knobs (Three run averages except where noted.) vmark: ------ tip 108466 messages per second tip+ 125307 messages per second tip+x 125335 messages per second tipx 117781 messages per second 2.6.31.3 122729 messages per second mysql+oltp: ----------- clients 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 .......................................................................................... tip 9949.89 18690.20 34801.24 34460.04 32682.88 30765.97 28305.27 25059.64 19548.08 tip+ 10013.90 18526.84 34900.38 34420.14 33069.83 32083.40 30578.30 28010.71 25605.47 tipx 9698.71 18002.70 34477.56 33420.01 32634.30 31657.27 29932.67 26827.52 21487.18 2.6.31.3 8243.11 18784.20 34404.83 33148.38 31900.32 31161.90 29663.81 25995.94 18058.86 pgsql+oltp: ----------- clients 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 .......................................................................................... tip 13686.37 26609.25 51934.28 51347.81 49479.51 45312.65 36691.91 26851.57 24145.35 tip+ (1x) 13907.85 27135.87 52951.98 52514.04 51742.52 50705.43 49947.97 48374.19 46227.94 tip+x 13906.78 27065.81 52951.19 52542.59 52176.11 51815.94 50838.90 49439.46 46891.00 tipx 13742.46 26769.81 52351.99 51891.73 51320.79 50938.98 50248.65 48908.70 46553.84 2.6.31.3 13815.35 26906.46 52683.34 52061.31 51937.10 51376.80 50474.28 49394.47 47003.25 Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
92f6a5e37a
commit
f685ceacab
@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Buddy candidates are cache hot:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sched_feat(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY) &&
|
||||
if (sched_feat(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY) && this_rq()->nr_running &&
|
||||
(&p->se == cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->next ||
|
||||
&p->se == cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->last))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
@ -822,6 +822,26 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
|
||||
* re-elected due to buddy favours.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, curr);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure that a task that missed wakeup preemption by a
|
||||
* narrow margin doesn't have to wait for a full slice.
|
||||
* This also mitigates buddy induced latencies under load.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (delta_exec < sysctl_sched_min_granularity)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
|
||||
struct sched_entity *se = __pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
|
||||
s64 delta = curr->vruntime - se->vruntime;
|
||||
|
||||
if (delta > ideal_runtime)
|
||||
resched_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)->curr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -861,21 +881,18 @@ wakeup_preempt_entity(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se);
|
||||
static struct sched_entity *pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sched_entity *se = __pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
|
||||
struct sched_entity *buddy;
|
||||
struct sched_entity *left = se;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->next) {
|
||||
buddy = cfs_rq->next;
|
||||
cfs_rq->next = NULL;
|
||||
if (wakeup_preempt_entity(buddy, se) < 1)
|
||||
return buddy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1)
|
||||
se = cfs_rq->next;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->last) {
|
||||
buddy = cfs_rq->last;
|
||||
cfs_rq->last = NULL;
|
||||
if (wakeup_preempt_entity(buddy, se) < 1)
|
||||
return buddy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prefer last buddy, try to return the CPU to a preempted task.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, left) < 1)
|
||||
se = cfs_rq->last;
|
||||
|
||||
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
|
||||
|
||||
return se;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1577,6 +1594,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
|
||||
struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se, *pse = &p->se;
|
||||
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
|
||||
int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
|
||||
int scale = cfs_rq->nr_running >= sched_nr_latency;
|
||||
|
||||
update_curr(cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1591,18 +1609,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
|
||||
if (unlikely(se == pse))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Only set the backward buddy when the current task is still on the
|
||||
* rq. This can happen when a wakeup gets interleaved with schedule on
|
||||
* the ->pre_schedule() or idle_balance() point, either of which can
|
||||
* drop the rq lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also, during early boot the idle thread is in the fair class, for
|
||||
* obvious reasons its a bad idea to schedule back to the idle thread.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sched_feat(LAST_BUDDY) && likely(se->on_rq && curr != rq->idle))
|
||||
set_last_buddy(se);
|
||||
if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) && !(wake_flags & WF_FORK))
|
||||
if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) && scale && !(wake_flags & WF_FORK))
|
||||
set_next_buddy(pse);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1648,8 +1655,22 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!pse);
|
||||
|
||||
if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1)
|
||||
if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1) {
|
||||
resched_task(curr);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Only set the backward buddy when the current task is still
|
||||
* on the rq. This can happen when a wakeup gets interleaved
|
||||
* with schedule on the ->pre_schedule() or idle_balance()
|
||||
* point, either of which can * drop the rq lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also, during early boot the idle thread is in the fair class,
|
||||
* for obvious reasons its a bad idea to schedule back to it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!se->on_rq || curr == rq->idle))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (sched_feat(LAST_BUDDY) && scale && entity_is_task(se))
|
||||
set_last_buddy(se);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user