mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-27 06:04:23 +08:00
ring-buffer: Check if absolute timestamp goes backwards
The check_buffer() which checks the timestamps of the ring buffer sub-buffer page, when enabled, only checks if the adding of deltas of the events from the last absolute timestamp or the timestamp of the sub-buffer page adds up to the current event. What it does not check is if the absolute timestamp causes the time of the events to go backwards, as that can cause issues elsewhere. Test for the timestamp going backwards too. This also fixes a slight issue where if the warning triggers at boot up (because of the resetting of the tsc), it will disable all further checks, even those that are after boot Have it continue checking if the warning was ignored during boot up. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231219074732.18b092d4@gandalf.local.home Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d40dbb617a
commit
f50345b49b
@ -3309,6 +3309,23 @@ static void dump_buffer_page(struct buffer_data_page *bpage,
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, checking);
|
||||
static atomic_t ts_dump;
|
||||
|
||||
#define buffer_warn_return(fmt, ...) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
/* If another report is happening, ignore this one */ \
|
||||
if (atomic_inc_return(&ts_dump) != 1) { \
|
||||
atomic_dec(&ts_dump); \
|
||||
goto out; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled); \
|
||||
pr_warn(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
|
||||
dump_buffer_page(bpage, info, tail); \
|
||||
atomic_dec(&ts_dump); \
|
||||
/* There's some cases in boot up that this can happen */ \
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)) \
|
||||
/* Do not re-enable checking */ \
|
||||
return; \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if the current event time stamp matches the deltas on
|
||||
* the buffer page.
|
||||
@ -3362,7 +3379,12 @@ static void check_buffer(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
|
||||
|
||||
case RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP:
|
||||
delta = rb_event_time_stamp(event);
|
||||
ts = rb_fix_abs_ts(delta, ts);
|
||||
delta = rb_fix_abs_ts(delta, ts);
|
||||
if (delta < ts) {
|
||||
buffer_warn_return("[CPU: %d]ABSOLUTE TIME WENT BACKWARDS: last ts: %lld absolute ts: %lld\n",
|
||||
cpu_buffer->cpu, ts, delta);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ts = delta;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING:
|
||||
@ -3379,23 +3401,11 @@ static void check_buffer(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((full && ts > info->ts) ||
|
||||
(!full && ts + info->delta != info->ts)) {
|
||||
/* If another report is happening, ignore this one */
|
||||
if (atomic_inc_return(&ts_dump) != 1) {
|
||||
atomic_dec(&ts_dump);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled);
|
||||
/* There's some cases in boot up that this can happen */
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING);
|
||||
pr_warn("[CPU: %d]TIME DOES NOT MATCH expected:%lld actual:%lld delta:%lld before:%lld after:%lld%s context:%s\n",
|
||||
cpu_buffer->cpu,
|
||||
ts + info->delta, info->ts, info->delta,
|
||||
info->before, info->after,
|
||||
full ? " (full)" : "", show_interrupt_level());
|
||||
dump_buffer_page(bpage, info, tail);
|
||||
atomic_dec(&ts_dump);
|
||||
/* Do not re-enable checking */
|
||||
return;
|
||||
buffer_warn_return("[CPU: %d]TIME DOES NOT MATCH expected:%lld actual:%lld delta:%lld before:%lld after:%lld%s context:%s\n",
|
||||
cpu_buffer->cpu,
|
||||
ts + info->delta, info->ts, info->delta,
|
||||
info->before, info->after,
|
||||
full ? " (full)" : "", show_interrupt_level());
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
atomic_dec(this_cpu_ptr(&checking));
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user