cpuidle: Correct some typos in comments

Fixed some confusing typos that were currently identified with codespell,
the details are as follows:

 -in the code comments:
  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c:142: registeration ==> registration
  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c:51: accidently ==> accidentally
  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:409: dependant ==> dependent
  drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:264: occuring ==> occurring
  drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:299: occuring ==> occurring

Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240927081018.8608-1-shenlichuan@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Shen Lichuan 2024-09-27 16:10:18 +08:00 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 38f83090f5
commit ee702fdaf1
4 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ out_kfree_drv:
* *
* Initializes arm cpuidle driver for all CPUs, if any CPU fails * Initializes arm cpuidle driver for all CPUs, if any CPU fails
* to register cpuidle driver then rollback to cancel all CPUs * to register cpuidle driver then rollback to cancel all CPUs
* registeration. * registration.
*/ */
static int __init arm_idle_init(void) static int __init arm_idle_init(void)
{ {

View File

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int qcom_cpu_spc(struct spm_driver_data *drv)
ret = cpu_suspend(0, qcom_pm_collapse); ret = cpu_suspend(0, qcom_pm_collapse);
/* /*
* ARM common code executes WFI without calling into our driver and * ARM common code executes WFI without calling into our driver and
* if the SPM mode is not reset, then we may accidently power down the * if the SPM mode is not reset, then we may accidentally power down the
* cpu when we intended only to gate the cpu clock. * cpu when we intended only to gate the cpu clock.
* Ensure the state is set to standby before returning. * Ensure the state is set to standby before returning.
*/ */

View File

@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
* Min polling interval of 10usec is a guess. It is assuming that * Min polling interval of 10usec is a guess. It is assuming that
* for most users, the time for a single ping-pong workload like * for most users, the time for a single ping-pong workload like
* perf bench pipe would generally complete within 10usec but * perf bench pipe would generally complete within 10usec but
* this is hardware dependant. Actual time can be estimated with * this is hardware dependent. Actual time can be estimated with
* *
* perf bench sched pipe -l 10000 * perf bench sched pipe -l 10000
* *

View File

@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static void __cpuidle_unregister_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
* @drv: a pointer to a valid struct cpuidle_driver * @drv: a pointer to a valid struct cpuidle_driver
* *
* Register the driver under a lock to prevent concurrent attempts to * Register the driver under a lock to prevent concurrent attempts to
* [un]register the driver from occuring at the same time. * [un]register the driver from occurring at the same time.
* *
* Returns 0 on success, a negative error code (returned by * Returns 0 on success, a negative error code (returned by
* __cpuidle_register_driver()) otherwise. * __cpuidle_register_driver()) otherwise.
@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_driver);
* @drv: a pointer to a valid struct cpuidle_driver * @drv: a pointer to a valid struct cpuidle_driver
* *
* Unregisters the cpuidle driver under a lock to prevent concurrent attempts * Unregisters the cpuidle driver under a lock to prevent concurrent attempts
* to [un]register the driver from occuring at the same time. @drv has to * to [un]register the driver from occurring at the same time. @drv has to
* match the currently registered driver. * match the currently registered driver.
*/ */
void cpuidle_unregister_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv) void cpuidle_unregister_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)