mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-04 01:24:12 +08:00
drm/i915: more struct_mutex locking
When auditing the locking in i915_gem.c (for a prospective change which I then abandoned), I noticed two places where struct_mutex is not held across GEM object manipulations that would usually require it. Since one is in initial setup and the other in driver unload, I'm guessing the mutex is not required for either; but post a patch in case it is. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2377fe0b6
commit
ecbec53b1d
@ -2182,9 +2182,8 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
|
||||
/* Flush any outstanding unpin_work. */
|
||||
flush_workqueue(dev_priv->wq);
|
||||
|
||||
i915_gem_free_all_phys_object(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||
i915_gem_free_all_phys_object(dev);
|
||||
i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||
if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev) && i915_powersave)
|
||||
|
@ -1416,6 +1416,8 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
|
||||
goto out_free;
|
||||
overlay->reg_bo = reg_bo;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev)) {
|
||||
ret = i915_gem_attach_phys_object(dev, reg_bo,
|
||||
I915_GEM_PHYS_OVERLAY_REGS,
|
||||
@ -1440,6 +1442,8 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* init all values */
|
||||
overlay->color_key = 0x0101fe;
|
||||
overlay->brightness = -19;
|
||||
@ -1464,6 +1468,7 @@ out_unpin_bo:
|
||||
i915_gem_object_unpin(reg_bo);
|
||||
out_free_bo:
|
||||
drm_gem_object_unreference(®_bo->base);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||
out_free:
|
||||
kfree(overlay);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user