mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list (sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list. Then it drops the sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one. I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock inside.) Cc: stable@kernel.org Tested-by: Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu> Tested-by: Paweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@agmk.net> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f25cc71e63
commit
e75bafbff2
@ -863,7 +863,6 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure)
|
||||
struct svc_serv *serv = (struct svc_serv *)closure;
|
||||
struct svc_xprt *xprt;
|
||||
struct list_head *le, *next;
|
||||
LIST_HEAD(to_be_aged);
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("svc_age_temp_xprts\n");
|
||||
|
||||
@ -884,25 +883,15 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure)
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) > 1 ||
|
||||
test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
svc_xprt_get(xprt);
|
||||
list_move(le, &to_be_aged);
|
||||
list_del_init(le);
|
||||
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
|
||||
set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
while (!list_empty(&to_be_aged)) {
|
||||
le = to_be_aged.next;
|
||||
/* fiddling the xpt_list node is safe 'cos we're XPT_DETACHED */
|
||||
list_del_init(le);
|
||||
xprt = list_entry(le, struct svc_xprt, xpt_list);
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("queuing xprt %p for closing\n", xprt);
|
||||
|
||||
/* a thread will dequeue and close it soon */
|
||||
svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt);
|
||||
svc_xprt_put(xprt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
mod_timer(&serv->sv_temptimer, jiffies + svc_conn_age_period * HZ);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user