From e6bc5b3f423825220a3232ddf08399658c918671 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Yang Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:28:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again After the previous cleanup, DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT's definition has no relationship with DEFINE_EVENT. So After we re-define DEFINE_EVENT, it is not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612092844.56107-5-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- include/trace/trace_events.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/trace/trace_events.h b/include/trace/trace_events.h index 43023c3e9d74..1bc3e7bba9a4 100644 --- a/include/trace/trace_events.h +++ b/include/trace/trace_events.h @@ -709,9 +709,6 @@ static inline void ftrace_test_probe_##call(void) \ check_trace_callback_type_##call(trace_event_raw_event_##template); \ } -#undef DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT -#define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(template, name, proto, args, print) - #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE) #undef __entry