mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
UBIFS: add brief documentation
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Artem Bityutskiy
parent
9527056630
commit
e56a99d5a4
164
Documentation/filesystems/ubifs.txt
Normal file
164
Documentation/filesystems/ubifs.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
|
||||
Introduction
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
UBIFS file-system stands for UBI File System. UBI stands for "Unsorted
|
||||
Block Images". UBIFS is a flash file system, which means it is designed
|
||||
to work with flash devices. It is important to understand, that UBIFS
|
||||
is completely different to any traditional file-system in Linux, like
|
||||
Ext2, XFS, JFS, etc. UBIFS represents a separate class of file-systems
|
||||
which work with MTD devices, not block devices. The other Linux
|
||||
file-system of this class is JFFS2.
|
||||
|
||||
To make it more clear, here is a small comparison of MTD devices and
|
||||
block devices.
|
||||
|
||||
1 MTD devices represent flash devices and they consist of eraseblocks of
|
||||
rather large size, typically about 128KiB. Block devices consist of
|
||||
small blocks, typically 512 bytes.
|
||||
2 MTD devices support 3 main operations - read from some offset within an
|
||||
eraseblock, write to some offset within an eraseblock, and erase a whole
|
||||
eraseblock. Block devices support 2 main operations - read a whole
|
||||
block and write a whole block.
|
||||
3 The whole eraseblock has to be erased before it becomes possible to
|
||||
re-write its contents. Blocks may be just re-written.
|
||||
4 Eraseblocks become worn out after some number of erase cycles -
|
||||
typically 100K-1G for SLC NAND and NOR flashes, and 1K-10K for MLC
|
||||
NAND flashes. Blocks do not have the wear-out property.
|
||||
5 Eraseblocks may become bad (only on NAND flashes) and software should
|
||||
deal with this. Blocks on hard drives typically do not become bad,
|
||||
because hardware has mechanisms to substitute bad blocks, at least in
|
||||
modern LBA disks.
|
||||
|
||||
It should be quite obvious why UBIFS is very different to traditional
|
||||
file-systems.
|
||||
|
||||
UBIFS works on top of UBI. UBI is a separate software layer which may be
|
||||
found in drivers/mtd/ubi. UBI is basically a volume management and
|
||||
wear-leveling layer. It provides so called UBI volumes which is a higher
|
||||
level abstraction than a MTD device. The programming model of UBI devices
|
||||
is very similar to MTD devices - they still consist of large eraseblocks,
|
||||
they have read/write/erase operations, but UBI devices are devoid of
|
||||
limitations like wear and bad blocks (items 4 and 5 in the above list).
|
||||
|
||||
In a sense, UBIFS is a next generation of JFFS2 file-system, but it is
|
||||
very different and incompatible to JFFS2. The following are the main
|
||||
differences.
|
||||
|
||||
* JFFS2 works on top of MTD devices, UBIFS depends on UBI and works on
|
||||
top of UBI volumes.
|
||||
* JFFS2 does not have on-media index and has to build it while mounting,
|
||||
which requires full media scan. UBIFS maintains the FS indexing
|
||||
information on the flash media and does not require full media scan,
|
||||
so it mounts many times faster than JFFS2.
|
||||
* JFFS2 is a write-through file-system, while UBIFS supports write-back,
|
||||
which makes UBIFS much faster on writes.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly to JFFS2, UBIFS supports on-the-flight compression which makes
|
||||
it possible to fit quite a lot of data to the flash.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly to JFFS2, UBIFS is tolerant of unclean reboots and power-cuts.
|
||||
It does not need stuff like ckfs.ext2. UBIFS automatically replays its
|
||||
journal and recovers from crashes, ensuring that the on-flash data
|
||||
structures are consistent.
|
||||
|
||||
UBIFS scales logarithmically (most of the data structures it uses are
|
||||
trees), so the mount time and memory consumption do not linearly depend
|
||||
on the flash size, like in case of JFFS2. This is because UBIFS
|
||||
maintains the FS index on the flash media. However, UBIFS depends on
|
||||
UBI, which scales linearly. So overall UBI/UBIFS stack scales linearly.
|
||||
Nevertheless, UBI/UBIFS scales considerably better than JFFS2.
|
||||
|
||||
The authors of UBIFS believe, that it is possible to develop UBI2 which
|
||||
would scale logarithmically as well. UBI2 would support the same API as UBI,
|
||||
but it would be binary incompatible to UBI. So UBIFS would not need to be
|
||||
changed to use UBI2
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Mount options
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
(*) == default.
|
||||
|
||||
norm_unmount (*) commit on unmount; the journal is committed
|
||||
when the file-system is unmounted so that the
|
||||
next mount does not have to replay the journal
|
||||
and it becomes very fast;
|
||||
fast_unmount do not commit on unmount; this option makes
|
||||
unmount faster, but the next mount slower
|
||||
because of the need to replay the journal.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Quick usage instructions
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
The UBI volume to mount is specified using "ubiX_Y" or "ubiX:NAME" syntax,
|
||||
where "X" is UBI device number, "Y" is UBI volume number, and "NAME" is
|
||||
UBI volume name.
|
||||
|
||||
Mount volume 0 on UBI device 0 to /mnt/ubifs:
|
||||
$ mount -t ubifs ubi0_0 /mnt/ubifs
|
||||
|
||||
Mount "rootfs" volume of UBI device 0 to /mnt/ubifs ("rootfs" is volume
|
||||
name):
|
||||
$ mount -t ubifs ubi0:rootfs /mnt/ubifs
|
||||
|
||||
The following is an example of the kernel boot arguments to attach mtd0
|
||||
to UBI and mount volume "rootfs":
|
||||
ubi.mtd=0 root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Module Parameters for Debugging
|
||||
===============================
|
||||
|
||||
When UBIFS has been compiled with debugging enabled, there are 3 module
|
||||
parameters that are available to control aspects of testing and debugging.
|
||||
The parameters are unsigned integers where each bit controls an option.
|
||||
The parameters are:
|
||||
|
||||
debug_msgs Selects which debug messages to display, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
Message Type Flag value
|
||||
|
||||
General messages 1
|
||||
Journal messages 2
|
||||
Mount messages 4
|
||||
Commit messages 8
|
||||
LEB search messages 16
|
||||
Budgeting messages 32
|
||||
Garbage collection messages 64
|
||||
Tree Node Cache (TNC) messages 128
|
||||
LEB properties (lprops) messages 256
|
||||
Input/output messages 512
|
||||
Log messages 1024
|
||||
Scan messages 2048
|
||||
Recovery messages 4096
|
||||
|
||||
debug_chks Selects extra checks that UBIFS can do while running:
|
||||
|
||||
Check Flag value
|
||||
|
||||
General checks 1
|
||||
Check Tree Node Cache (TNC) 2
|
||||
Check indexing tree size 4
|
||||
Check orphan area 8
|
||||
Check old indexing tree 16
|
||||
Check LEB properties (lprops) 32
|
||||
Check leaf nodes and inodes 64
|
||||
|
||||
debug_tsts Selects a mode of testing, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
Test mode Flag value
|
||||
|
||||
Force in-the-gaps method 2
|
||||
Failure mode for recovery testing 4
|
||||
|
||||
For example, set debug_msgs to 5 to display General messages and Mount
|
||||
messages.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
UBIFS documentation and FAQ/HOWTO at the MTD web site:
|
||||
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html
|
||||
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubifs.html
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user