mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 12:14:10 +08:00
[PATCH] remove BK documentation
There's no longer a reason to document the obsolete BK usage. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Adrian Bunk
Linus Torvalds
parent
d769a66970
commit
dfc1e14854
@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ Following translations are available on the WWW:
|
||||
|
||||
00-INDEX
|
||||
- this file.
|
||||
BK-usage/
|
||||
- directory with info on BitKeeper.
|
||||
BUG-HUNTING
|
||||
- brute force method of doing binary search of patches to find bug.
|
||||
Changes
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
|
||||
bk-kernel-howto.txt: Description of kernel workflow under BitKeeper
|
||||
|
||||
bk-make-sum: Create summary of changesets in one repository and not
|
||||
another, typically in preparation to be sent to an upstream maintainer.
|
||||
Typical usage:
|
||||
cd my-updated-repo
|
||||
bk-make-sum ~/repo/original-repo
|
||||
mv /tmp/linus.txt ../original-repo.txt
|
||||
|
||||
bksend: Create readable text output containing summary of changes, GNU
|
||||
patch of the changes, and BK metadata of changes (as needed for proper
|
||||
importing into BitKeeper by an upstream maintainer). This output is
|
||||
suitable for emailing BitKeeper changes. The recipient of this output
|
||||
may pipe it directly to 'bk receive'.
|
||||
|
||||
bz64wrap: helper script. Uncompressed input is piped to this script,
|
||||
which compresses its input, and then outputs the uu-/base64-encoded
|
||||
version of the compressed input.
|
||||
|
||||
cpcset: Copy changeset between unrelated repositories.
|
||||
Attempts to preserve changeset user, user address, description, in
|
||||
addition to the changeset (the patch) itself.
|
||||
Typical usage:
|
||||
cd my-updated-repo
|
||||
bk changes # looking for a changeset...
|
||||
cpcset 1.1511 . ../another-repo
|
||||
|
||||
csets-to-patches: Produces a delta of two BK repositories, in the form
|
||||
of individual files, each containing a single cset as a GNU patch.
|
||||
Output is several files, each with the filename "/tmp/rev-$REV.patch"
|
||||
Typical usage:
|
||||
cd my-updated-repo
|
||||
bk changes -L ~/repo/original-repo 2>&1 | \
|
||||
perl csets-to-patches
|
||||
|
||||
cset-to-linus: Produces a delta of two BK repositories, in the form of
|
||||
changeset descriptions, with 'diffstat' output created for each
|
||||
individual changset.
|
||||
Typical usage:
|
||||
cd my-updated-repo
|
||||
bk changes -L ~/repo/original-repo 2>&1 | \
|
||||
perl cset-to-linus > summary.txt
|
||||
|
||||
gcapatch: Generates patch containing changes in local repository.
|
||||
Typical usage:
|
||||
cd my-updated-repo
|
||||
gcapatch > foo.patch
|
||||
|
||||
unbz64wrap: Reverse an encoded, compressed data stream created by
|
||||
bz64wrap into an uncompressed, typically text/plain output.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,283 +0,0 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Doing the BK Thing, Penguin-Style
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This set of notes is intended mainly for kernel developers, occasional
|
||||
or full-time, but sysadmins and power users may find parts of it useful
|
||||
as well. It assumes at least a basic familiarity with CVS, both at a
|
||||
user level (use on the cmd line) and at a higher level (client-server model).
|
||||
Due to the author's background, an operation may be described in terms
|
||||
of CVS, or in terms of how that operation differs from CVS.
|
||||
|
||||
This is -not- intended to be BitKeeper documentation. Always run
|
||||
"bk help <command>" or in X "bk helptool <command>" for reference
|
||||
documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
BitKeeper Concepts
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
In the true nature of the Internet itself, BitKeeper is a distributed
|
||||
system. When applied to revision control, this means doing away with
|
||||
client-server, and changing to a parent-child model... essentially
|
||||
peer-to-peer. On the developer's end, this also represents a
|
||||
fundamental disruption in the standard workflow of changes, commits,
|
||||
and merges. You will need to take a few minutes to think about
|
||||
how to best work under BitKeeper, and re-optimize things a bit.
|
||||
In some sense it is a bit radical, because it might described as
|
||||
tossing changes out into a maelstrom and having them magically
|
||||
land at the right destination... but I'm getting ahead of myself.
|
||||
|
||||
Let's start with this progression:
|
||||
Each BitKeeper source tree on disk is a repository unto itself.
|
||||
Each repository has a parent (except the root/original, of course).
|
||||
Each repository contains a set of a changesets ("csets").
|
||||
Each cset is one or more changed files, bundled together.
|
||||
|
||||
Each tree is a repository, so all changes are checked into the local
|
||||
tree. When a change is checked in, all modified files are grouped
|
||||
into a logical unit, the changeset. Internally, BK links these
|
||||
changesets in a tree, representing various converging and diverging
|
||||
lines of development. These changesets are the bread and butter of
|
||||
the BK system.
|
||||
|
||||
After the concept of changesets, the next thing you need to get used
|
||||
to is having multiple copies of source trees lying around. This -really-
|
||||
takes some getting used to, for some people. Separate source trees
|
||||
are the means in BitKeeper by which you delineate parallel lines
|
||||
of development, both minor and major. What would be branches in
|
||||
CVS become separate source trees, or "clones" in BitKeeper [heh,
|
||||
or Star Wars] terminology.
|
||||
|
||||
Clones and changesets are the tools from which most of the power of
|
||||
BitKeeper is derived. As mentioned earlier, each clone has a parent,
|
||||
the tree used as the source when the new clone was created. In a
|
||||
CVS-like setup, the parent would be a remote server on the Internet,
|
||||
and the child is your local clone of that tree.
|
||||
|
||||
Once you have established a common baseline between two source trees --
|
||||
a common parent -- then you can merge changesets between those two
|
||||
trees with ease. Merging changes into a tree is called a "pull", and
|
||||
is analagous to 'cvs update'. A pull downloads all the changesets in
|
||||
the remote tree you do not have, and merges them. Sending changes in
|
||||
one tree to another tree is called a "push". Push sends all changes
|
||||
in the local tree the remote does not yet have, and merges them.
|
||||
|
||||
From these concepts come some initial command examples:
|
||||
|
||||
1) bk clone -q http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 linus-2.5
|
||||
Download a 2.5 stock kernel tree, naming it "linus-2.5" in the local dir.
|
||||
The "-q" disables listing every single file as it is downloaded.
|
||||
|
||||
2) bk clone -ql linus-2.5 alpha-2.5
|
||||
Create a separate source tree for the Alpha AXP architecture.
|
||||
The "-l" uses hard links instead of copying data, since both trees are
|
||||
on the local disk. You can also replace the above with "bk lclone -q ..."
|
||||
|
||||
You only clone a tree -once-. After cloning the tree lives a long time
|
||||
on disk, being updating by pushes and pulls.
|
||||
|
||||
3) cd alpha-2.5 ; bk pull http://gkernel.bkbits.net/alpha-2.5
|
||||
Download changes in "alpha-2.5" repository which are not present
|
||||
in the local repository, and merge them into the source tree.
|
||||
|
||||
4) bk -r co -q
|
||||
Because every tree is a repository, files must be checked out before
|
||||
they will be in their standard places in the source tree.
|
||||
|
||||
5) bk vi fs/inode.c # example change...
|
||||
bk citool # checkin, using X tool
|
||||
bk push bk://gkernel@bkbits.net/alpha-2.5 # upload change
|
||||
Typical example of a BK sequence that would replace the analagous CVS
|
||||
situation,
|
||||
vi fs/inode.c
|
||||
cvs commit
|
||||
|
||||
As this is just supposed to be a quick BK intro, for more in-depth
|
||||
tutorials, live working demos, and docs, see http://www.bitkeeper.com/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
BK and Kernel Development Workflow
|
||||
----------------------------------
|
||||
Currently the latest 2.5 tree is available via "bk clone $URL"
|
||||
and "bk pull $URL" at http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
|
||||
This should change in a few weeks to a kernel.org URL.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
A big part of using BitKeeper is organizing the various trees you have
|
||||
on your local disk, and organizing the flow of changes among those
|
||||
trees, and remote trees. If one were to graph the relationships between
|
||||
a desired BK setup, you are likely to see a few-many-few graph, like
|
||||
this:
|
||||
|
||||
linux-2.5
|
||||
|
|
||||
merge-to-linus-2.5
|
||||
/ | |
|
||||
/ | |
|
||||
vm-hacks bugfixes filesys personal-hacks
|
||||
\ | | /
|
||||
\ | | /
|
||||
\ | | /
|
||||
testing-and-validation
|
||||
|
||||
Since a "bk push" sends all changes not in the target tree, and
|
||||
since a "bk pull" receives all changes not in the source tree, you want
|
||||
to make sure you are only pushing specific changes to the desired tree,
|
||||
not all changes from "peer parent" trees. For example, pushing a change
|
||||
from the testing-and-validation tree would probably be a bad idea,
|
||||
because it will push all changes from vm-hacks, bugfixes, filesys, and
|
||||
personal-hacks trees into the target tree.
|
||||
|
||||
One would typically work on only one "theme" at a time, either
|
||||
vm-hacks or bugfixes or filesys, keeping those changes isolated in
|
||||
their own tree during development, and only merge the isolated with
|
||||
other changes when going upstream (to Linus or other maintainers) or
|
||||
downstream (to your "union" trees, like testing-and-validation above).
|
||||
|
||||
It should be noted that some of this separation is not just recommended
|
||||
practice, it's actually [for now] -enforced- by BitKeeper. BitKeeper
|
||||
requires that changesets maintain a certain order, which is the reason
|
||||
that "bk push" sends all local changesets the remote doesn't have. This
|
||||
separation may look like a lot of wasted disk space at first, but it
|
||||
helps when two unrelated changes may "pollute" the same area of code, or
|
||||
don't follow the same pace of development, or any other of the standard
|
||||
reasons why one creates a development branch.
|
||||
|
||||
Small development branches (clones) will appear and disappear:
|
||||
|
||||
-------- A --------- B --------- C --------- D -------
|
||||
\ /
|
||||
-----short-term devel branch-----
|
||||
|
||||
While long-term branches will parallel a tree (or trees), with period
|
||||
merge points. In this first example, we pull from a tree (pulls,
|
||||
"\") periodically, such as what occurs when tracking changes in a
|
||||
vendor tree, never pushing changes back up the line:
|
||||
|
||||
-------- A --------- B --------- C --------- D -------
|
||||
\ \ \
|
||||
----long-term devel branch-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
And then a more common case in Linux kernel development, a long term
|
||||
branch with periodic merges back into the tree (pushes, "/"):
|
||||
|
||||
-------- A --------- B --------- C --------- D -------
|
||||
\ \ / \
|
||||
----long-term devel branch-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Submitting Changes to Linus
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
There's a bit of an art, or style, of submitting changes to Linus.
|
||||
Since Linus's tree is now (you might say) fully integrated into the
|
||||
distributed BitKeeper system, there are several prerequisites to
|
||||
properly submitting a BitKeeper change. All these prereq's are just
|
||||
general cleanliness of BK usage, so as people become experts at BK, feel
|
||||
free to optimize this process further (assuming Linus agrees, of
|
||||
course).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
0) Make sure your tree was originally cloned from the linux-2.5 tree
|
||||
created by Linus. If your tree does not have this as its ancestor, it
|
||||
is impossible to reliably exchange changesets.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1) Pay attention to your commit text. The commit message that
|
||||
accompanies each changeset you submit will live on forever in history,
|
||||
and is used by Linus to accurately summarize the changes in each
|
||||
pre-patch. Remember that there is no context, so
|
||||
"fix for new scheduler changes"
|
||||
would be too vague, but
|
||||
"fix mips64 arch for new scheduler switch_to(), TIF_xxx semantics"
|
||||
would be much better.
|
||||
|
||||
You can and should use the command "bk comment -C<rev>" to update the
|
||||
commit text, and improve it after the fact. This is very useful for
|
||||
development: poor, quick descriptions during development, which get
|
||||
cleaned up using "bk comment" before issuing the "bk push" to submit the
|
||||
changes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2) Include an Internet-available URL for Linus to pull from, such as
|
||||
|
||||
Pull from: http://gkernel.bkbits.net/net-drivers-2.5
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3) Include a summary and "diffstat -p1" of each changeset that will be
|
||||
downloaded, when Linus issues a "bk pull". The author auto-generates
|
||||
these summaries using "bk changes -L <parent>", to obtain a listing
|
||||
of all the pending-to-send changesets, and their commit messages.
|
||||
|
||||
It is important to show Linus what he will be downloading when he issues
|
||||
a "bk pull", to reduce the time required to sift the changes once they
|
||||
are downloaded to Linus's local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
IMPORTANT NOTE: One of the features of BK is that your repository does
|
||||
not have to be up to date, in order for Linus to receive your changes.
|
||||
It is considered a courtesy to keep your repository fairly recent, to
|
||||
lessen any potential merge work Linus may need to do.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4) Split up your changes. Each maintainer<->Linus situation is likely
|
||||
to be slightly different here, so take this just as general advice. The
|
||||
author splits up changes according to "themes" when merging with Linus.
|
||||
Simultaneous pushes from local development go to special trees which
|
||||
exist solely to house changes "queued" for Linus. Example of the trees:
|
||||
|
||||
net-drivers-2.5 -- on-going net driver maintenance
|
||||
vm-2.5 -- VM-related changes
|
||||
fs-2.5 -- filesystem-related changes
|
||||
|
||||
Linus then has much more freedom for pulling changes. He could (for
|
||||
example) issue a "bk pull" on vm-2.5 and fs-2.5 trees, to merge their
|
||||
changes, but hold off net-drivers-2.5 because of a change that needs
|
||||
more discussion.
|
||||
|
||||
Other maintainers may find that a single linus-pull-from tree is
|
||||
adequate for passing BK changesets to him.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Frequently Answered Questions
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
1) How do I change the e-mail address shown in the changelog?
|
||||
A. When you run "bk citool" or "bk commit", set environment
|
||||
variables BK_USER and BK_HOST to the desired username
|
||||
and host/domain name.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2) How do I use tags / get a diff between two kernel versions?
|
||||
A. Pass the tags Linus uses to 'bk export'.
|
||||
|
||||
ChangeSets are in a forward-progressing order, so it's pretty easy
|
||||
to get a snapshot starting and ending at any two points in time.
|
||||
Linus puts tags on each release and pre-release, so you could use
|
||||
these two examples:
|
||||
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -hdu -rv2.5.4,v2.5.5 | less
|
||||
# creates patch-2.5.5 essentially
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -du -rv2.5.5-pre1,v2.5.5 | less
|
||||
# changes from pre1 to final
|
||||
|
||||
A tag is just an alias for a specific changeset... and since changesets
|
||||
are ordered, a tag is thus a marker for a specific point in time (or
|
||||
specific state of the tree).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3) Is there an easy way to generate One Big Patch versus mainline,
|
||||
for my long-lived kernel branch?
|
||||
A. Yes. This requires BK 3.x, though.
|
||||
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -r`bk repogca bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5`,+
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh -e
|
||||
# DIR=$HOME/BK/axp-2.5
|
||||
# cd $DIR
|
||||
|
||||
LINUS_REPO=$1
|
||||
DIRBASE=`basename $PWD`
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
cat <<EOT
|
||||
Please do a
|
||||
|
||||
bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/$DIRBASE
|
||||
|
||||
This will update the following files:
|
||||
|
||||
EOT
|
||||
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -hdu -r`bk repogca $LINUS_REPO`,+ | diffstat -p1 2>/dev/null
|
||||
|
||||
cat <<EOT
|
||||
|
||||
through these ChangeSets:
|
||||
|
||||
EOT
|
||||
|
||||
bk changes -L -d'$unless(:MERGE:){ChangeSet|:CSETREV:\n}' $LINUS_REPO |
|
||||
bk -R prs -h -d'$unless(:MERGE:){<:P:@:HOST:> (:D: :I:)\n$each(:C:){ (:C:)\n}\n}' -
|
||||
|
||||
} > /tmp/linus.txt
|
||||
|
||||
cat <<EOT
|
||||
Mail text in /tmp/linus.txt; please check and send using your favourite
|
||||
mailer.
|
||||
EOT
|
||||
@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# A script to format BK changeset output in a manner that is easy to read.
|
||||
# Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com> 13/02/2002
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Add diffstat output after Changelog <adilger@turbolabs.com> 21/02/2002
|
||||
|
||||
PROG=bksend
|
||||
|
||||
usage() {
|
||||
echo "usage: $PROG -r<rev>"
|
||||
echo -e "\twhere <rev> is of the form '1.23', '1.23..', '1.23..1.27',"
|
||||
echo -e "\tor '+' to indicate the most recent revision"
|
||||
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case $1 in
|
||||
-r) REV=$2; shift ;;
|
||||
-r*) REV=`echo $1 | sed 's/^-r//'` ;;
|
||||
*) echo "$PROG: no revision given, you probably don't want that";;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
|
||||
[ -z "$REV" ] && usage
|
||||
|
||||
echo "You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:"
|
||||
echo "'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual."
|
||||
|
||||
SEP="\n===================================================================\n\n"
|
||||
echo -e $SEP
|
||||
env PAGER=/bin/cat bk changes -r$REV
|
||||
echo
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -du -h -r$REV | diffstat
|
||||
echo; echo
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -du -h -r$REV
|
||||
echo -e $SEP
|
||||
bk send -wgzip_uu -r$REV -
|
||||
@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
|
||||
# bz64wrap - the sending side of a bzip2 | base64 stream
|
||||
# Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Jan 2002
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/freeware/bin
|
||||
|
||||
# A program to generate base64 encoding on stdout
|
||||
BASE64_ENCODE="uuencode -m /dev/stdout"
|
||||
BASE64_BEGIN=
|
||||
BASE64_END=
|
||||
|
||||
BZIP=NO
|
||||
BASE64=NO
|
||||
|
||||
# Test if we have the bzip program installed
|
||||
bzip2 -c /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 && BZIP=YES
|
||||
|
||||
# Test if uuencode can handle the -m (MIME) encoding option
|
||||
$BASE64_ENCODE < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 && BASE64=YES
|
||||
|
||||
if [ $BASE64 = NO ]; then
|
||||
BASE64_ENCODE=mimencode
|
||||
BASE64_BEGIN="begin-base64 644 -"
|
||||
BASE64_END="===="
|
||||
|
||||
$BASE64_ENCODE < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 && BASE64=YES
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
if [ $BZIP = NO -o $BASE64 = NO ]; then
|
||||
echo "$0: can't use bz64 encoding: bzip2=$BZIP, $BASE64_ENCODE=$BASE64"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Sadly, mimencode does not appear to have good "begin" and "end" markers
|
||||
# like uuencode does, and it is picky about getting the right start/end of
|
||||
# the base64 stream, so we handle this internally.
|
||||
echo "$BASE64_BEGIN"
|
||||
bzip2 -9 | $BASE64_ENCODE
|
||||
echo "$BASE64_END"
|
||||
@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Purpose: Copy changeset patch and description from one
|
||||
# repository to another, unrelated one.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# usage: cpcset [revision] [from-repository] [to-repository]
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
REV=$1
|
||||
FROM=$2
|
||||
TO=$3
|
||||
TMPF=/tmp/cpcset.$$
|
||||
|
||||
rm -f $TMPF*
|
||||
|
||||
CWD_SAVE=`pwd`
|
||||
cd $FROM
|
||||
bk changes -r$REV | \
|
||||
grep -v '^ChangeSet' | \
|
||||
sed -e 's/^ //g' > $TMPF.log
|
||||
|
||||
USERHOST=`bk changes -r$REV | grep '^ChangeSet' | awk '{print $4}'`
|
||||
export BK_USER=`echo $USERHOST | awk '-F@' '{print $1}'`
|
||||
export BK_HOST=`echo $USERHOST | awk '-F@' '{print $2}'`
|
||||
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -hdu -r$REV > $TMPF.patch && \
|
||||
cd $CWD_SAVE && \
|
||||
cd $TO && \
|
||||
bk import -tpatch -CFR -y"`cat $TMPF.log`" $TMPF.patch . && \
|
||||
bk commit -y"`cat $TMPF.log`"
|
||||
|
||||
rm -f $TMPF*
|
||||
|
||||
echo changeset $REV copied.
|
||||
echo ""
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
|
||||
|
||||
use strict;
|
||||
|
||||
my ($lhs, $rev, $tmp, $rhs, $s);
|
||||
my @cset_text = ();
|
||||
my @pipe_text = ();
|
||||
my $have_cset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
while (<>) {
|
||||
next if /^---/;
|
||||
|
||||
if (($lhs, $tmp, $rhs) = (/^(ChangeSet\@)([^,]+)(, .*)$/)) {
|
||||
&cset_rev if ($have_cset);
|
||||
|
||||
$rev = $tmp;
|
||||
$have_cset = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
push(@cset_text, $_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
elsif ($have_cset) {
|
||||
push(@cset_text, $_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
&cset_rev if ($have_cset);
|
||||
exit(0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
sub cset_rev {
|
||||
my $empty_cset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
open PIPE, "bk export -tpatch -hdu -r $rev | diffstat -p1 2>/dev/null |" or die;
|
||||
while ($s = <PIPE>) {
|
||||
$empty_cset = 1 if ($s =~ /0 files changed/);
|
||||
push(@pipe_text, $s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
close(PIPE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (! $empty_cset) {
|
||||
print @cset_text;
|
||||
print @pipe_text;
|
||||
print "\n\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@pipe_text = ();
|
||||
@cset_text = ();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
|
||||
|
||||
use strict;
|
||||
|
||||
my ($lhs, $rev, $tmp, $rhs, $s);
|
||||
my @cset_text = ();
|
||||
my @pipe_text = ();
|
||||
my $have_cset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
while (<>) {
|
||||
next if /^---/;
|
||||
|
||||
if (($lhs, $tmp, $rhs) = (/^(ChangeSet\@)([^,]+)(, .*)$/)) {
|
||||
&cset_rev if ($have_cset);
|
||||
|
||||
$rev = $tmp;
|
||||
$have_cset = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
push(@cset_text, $_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
elsif ($have_cset) {
|
||||
push(@cset_text, $_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
&cset_rev if ($have_cset);
|
||||
exit(0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
sub cset_rev {
|
||||
my $empty_cset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
system("bk export -tpatch -du -r $rev > /tmp/rev-$rev.patch");
|
||||
|
||||
if (! $empty_cset) {
|
||||
print @cset_text;
|
||||
print @pipe_text;
|
||||
print "\n\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@pipe_text = ();
|
||||
@cset_text = ();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Purpose: Generate GNU diff of local changes versus canonical top-of-tree
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Usage: gcapatch > foo.patch
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
bk export -tpatch -hdu -r`bk repogca bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5`,+
|
||||
@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
|
||||
# unbz64wrap - the receiving side of a bzip2 | base64 stream
|
||||
# Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Jan 2002
|
||||
|
||||
# Sadly, mimencode does not appear to have good "begin" and "end" markers
|
||||
# like uuencode does, and it is picky about getting the right start/end of
|
||||
# the base64 stream, so we handle this explicitly here.
|
||||
|
||||
PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/freeware/bin
|
||||
|
||||
if mimencode -u < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
|
||||
SHOW=
|
||||
while read LINE; do
|
||||
case $LINE in
|
||||
begin-base64*) SHOW=YES ;;
|
||||
====) SHOW= ;;
|
||||
*) [ "$SHOW" ] && echo "$LINE" ;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
done | mimencode -u | bunzip2
|
||||
exit $?
|
||||
else
|
||||
cat - | uudecode -o /dev/stdout | bunzip2
|
||||
exit $?
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ the cifs download to your kernel build directory e.g.
|
||||
6) make modules (or "make" if CIFS VFS not to be built as a module)
|
||||
|
||||
For Linux 2.6:
|
||||
1) Download the kernel (e.g. from http://www.kernel.org or from bitkeeper
|
||||
at bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5) and change directory into the top
|
||||
of the kernel directory tree (e.g. /usr/src/linux-2.5.73)
|
||||
1) Download the kernel (e.g. from http://www.kernel.org)
|
||||
and change directory into the top of the kernel directory tree
|
||||
(e.g. /usr/src/linux-2.5.73)
|
||||
2) make menuconfig (or make xconfig)
|
||||
3) select cifs from within the network filesystem choices
|
||||
4) save and exit
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user