btrfs: qgroup: Remove the unnecesaary spin lock for qgroup_rescan_running

After the previous patch, qgroup_rescan_running is protected by
btrfs_fs_info::qgroup_rescan_lock, thus no need for the extra spinlock.

Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Qu Wenruo 2020-02-07 13:38:21 +08:00 committed by David Sterba
parent d61acbbf54
commit daf475c915

View File

@ -3238,7 +3238,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
}
mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
if (init_flags) {
if (fs_info->qgroup_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN) {
@ -3253,7 +3252,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
}
if (ret) {
spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
return ret;
}
@ -3264,8 +3262,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
sizeof(fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress));
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress.objectid = progress_objectid;
init_completion(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
btrfs_init_work(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_work,
@ -3342,9 +3338,7 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
running = fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running;
spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
if (!running)