mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 21:38:32 +08:00
soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Fix register state machine handling
When the PMIC wrapper state machine has read a register it goes into the "wait for valid clear" (vldclr) state. The state machine stays in this state until the VLDCLR bit is written to. We should write this bit after reading a register because the SCPSYS won't let the system go into suspend as long as the state machine waits for valid clear. Since now we never leave the state machine in vldclr state we no longer have to check for this state on pwrap_read/pwrap_write entry and can remove the corresponding code. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d71c11f3bd
commit
d956b80ac7
@ -443,11 +443,6 @@ static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp,
|
||||
static int pwrap_write(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
u32 val;
|
||||
|
||||
val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA);
|
||||
if (PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR)
|
||||
pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
@ -462,11 +457,6 @@ static int pwrap_write(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
|
||||
static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
u32 val;
|
||||
|
||||
val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA);
|
||||
if (PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR)
|
||||
pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
@ -480,6 +470,8 @@ static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
|
||||
|
||||
*rdata = PWRAP_GET_WACS_RDATA(pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA));
|
||||
|
||||
pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user