mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
atm: solos-pci: Fix potential deadlock on &cli_queue_lock
As &card->cli_queue_lock is acquired under softirq context along the
following call chain from solos_bh(), other acquisition of the same
lock inside process context should disable at least bh to avoid double
lock.
<deadlock #1>
console_show()
--> spin_lock(&card->cli_queue_lock)
<interrupt>
--> solos_bh()
--> spin_lock(&card->cli_queue_lock)
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock.
To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_bh()
on the card->cli_queue_lock under process context code consistently
to prevent the possible deadlock scenario.
Fixes: 9c54004ea7
("atm: Driver for Solos PCI ADSL2+ card.")
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ae4cd3cbd
commit
d5dba32b8f
@ -449,9 +449,9 @@ static ssize_t console_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
unsigned int len;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&card->cli_queue_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&card->cli_queue_lock);
|
||||
skb = skb_dequeue(&card->cli_queue[SOLOS_CHAN(atmdev)]);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&card->cli_queue_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&card->cli_queue_lock);
|
||||
if(skb == NULL)
|
||||
return sprintf(buf, "No data.\n");
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user